Fucking wow...
(twitter.com)
Comments (48)
sorted by:
...israel seems to be the benefactor of Charlie's death...
Now I really glad I never gave them money
I'm not anti-Jewish, I just see a lot of organizations (including some churches) that are more about extraction of money than actually doing what they claim to be. Sure, they might even go through the motions of doing the work they claim to represent, but ultimately are about putting distance between you and the fruit of your labor
Why not? You’ve been on here a long time, so what’s stopping you from hating the Synagouge of Satan, just as they hate you?
Not what you think.
Nice link. A lot of people misquote the Bible and it looks as if you put things into context. It'll probably take me a bit to digest what you wrote and I might be making a comment regarding it sometime in the future
Thank you, Jalapeno, that's not the response I usually get! I'd been asking the Lord for years what the historical setting of the text was, and he finally showed me.
FTFY
Not every Jew hates me. If every Jew hates you, it might be wise to ask why
In the Book of Revelations, God says jews lie and that they’re Satanists. There’s no qualifier there, it just is. If He felt it important enough to warn us of their behaviors, you should heed His warning.
I would be enlightened if you could share the passage from the book of Revelation that says that. I don't remember reading it
Revelations 2:9 and 3:9 from a non-Scofield Bible (I recommend King James Version).
Nope, he says the ones who lie are not Jews. He's not speaking of the ethnic Jews (identified by Ignatius as I just linked you) who let the Gentiles call themselves Jews even when they weren't circumcised.
We can infer from Jesus's words that he identifies seven enemy works: the apostolate of satan (2:2), the synagoguing of satan (2:9, 3:9), the throne of satan (2:13), the dwelling of satan (2:13), the depths of satan (2:24), the livings of satan (3:1), and the riches of satan (3:17). Don't limit your view of the enemy when Jesus says otherwise!
God means the actual jews from the OT are no more. They’ve been replaced by imposters who say they are jews but are not. These replacements are the Synagogue of Satan, like Netanyahu.
As I said earlier, you’re using non-Scripture to come to Scripture-based conclusions. Be careful.
Because you're not a jew, that's why.
u/-f-b-i- u/Doggos u/C why do you guys gas light us and ban us and pretend that jews don't control both political parties and basically every institution in every White nation?
You guys like to ban me but why not just offer me some alternative theories? If the globalists aren't jews then who are they?
I voted for Trump three times. I don't even believe elections are real but voted just in case or just to piss off a purple hair dyke. Despite being a Trump supporter when it supposedly counts, in the ballot box, you guys ban me because i don't follow every fucking protocol and suck off jews like you guys do. I find it embarassing that any White man such as one of you practically worships these kikes. Every practicing jew is in hell. The jews you supposedly saved in WWII? They are all Christ deniers and all in hell. Netanyahu? A Christ denier who is going to hell. Imagine calling a bunch of wicked, cursed people who hate Jesus Christ your "greatest allies" while also claiming you are "Christians." No. You're just a midwit brainwashed by zionism who was smart enough to hijack this website after January 6th. And you guys should clarify that because lots of us believe this website might just be operated by feds or a honey pot or containment zone.
You have SpamBots like I-Am-Orlando spamming curated jew horse shit on your forum all day and you have so little self respect for yourself that you guys pin that garbage. If i wanted to read curated gay jew fake right wing politics i'd go to brietbart or daily wire and let Ben Shapiro JewSplain my politics to me in a White Nation like a zio-Cuck.
Admins are kikes. Does that answer your questions?
I don't want to stop u/Doggos or anyone from answering but I've noticed that admins encourage others to answer tentatively to take some burden off them.
Yes, many Jews control many institutions, and very many Jews have explicitly rejected Jesus and are currently in hell or hellbound. But the Bible tells us that there are only children of God or children of the devil (1 John 3:10), so the accurate name of the enemy of Orthodox believers is the devil's children, or the satanists, or synonyms of those.
When we list globalist names, I say Name The Jew For Real because there's nothing wrong with identifying globalist Jews and their acts, but it is wrong to act like it's always Jews, or crypto-Jews, or shabbos goyim, or people that must have some Jewish connection (which can usually be found because the Jews work hard to make connections). That's goalpost-moving and question-begging because, instead of accepting the evidence and modifying the hypothesis, one is manhandling the facts to fit the hypothesis.
Did you see my "It's the Germans" satirical comments where I point out all industry and all orgs are controlled by Germans? It's very easy to fake, because it's not elite research but just manipulation of evidence.
Now, you're not banned by admin. I don't know where you're banned, but if it's PDW it's probably because you don't follow the rules there (such as avoiding certain words that do not advance discussion). You get two choices as a sovereign, you either break rules from other sovereigns and accept their consequences, or you deign to keep their rules so as to honor them as your fellows. "Sucking off" is not a rule, but I know "no racism" has been a rule most of the time and I've explained it to you before.
If you want to make an extraordinary claim that you know certain people are in hell or are personal Christ deniers, you need to give evidence. From the first time I realized it was an issue here I asked for evidence and nobody had it. There's no evidence that Netanyahu denies Jesus Christ; he speaks highly of him but he cannot speak to the religious question of how much Messianic work Jesus has done so far.
(I knew a Jewish man who got saved late in life: he testified that he didn't hate or love Jesus as a person, he only knew that Jesus was the name which people invoked when they cursed and attacked the Jews, so in context he concluded it must have meant something bad. When he finally realized what Jesus had done and what life he lived, he became a Christian. So you say Jews hate Christ, but many of them are actually misinformed both by antisemites and by their own people, and they have no animus for Jesus as a person.)
So this may sound like my former advice to you on Christianity, but if you want a right that is in the control of another sovereign, then you need to learn how that sovereign wants his game played in his zone. You seem capable of that. Just reread everything after you've written it once, and trim that which is just extra invective that doesn't actually tie to demonstrable fact. If you want to be on PDW, I will be happy to advocate for you and to suggest (privately or publicly) what you might want to modify to accommodate the PDW rules, and I'd be happy to interface with a mod if they are willing to ensure your content gets a fair hearing from the two of us. I suppose that sounds like I'm offering it as a mentorship, but since I respect you as a fellow sovereign I don't mean it in any other sense than sharing what we each have available to share.
TLDR: If you want access to PDW, or to another forum, you need to get a mod's ear. I'm willing to advocate and interpose to the degree that you and a mod permit. I think if I proposed that to the mod board in general there'd be at least one or two who might be willing to give you a chance.
Which IS FOUND because NOT ONE IN A POSITION OF POWER ACTS AGAINST JEWISH INTERESTS OR CRITICIZES ISRAEL! You subversive fucking retard.
Irrelevant nations don't formally recognize Israel, but do in secret instead.
This is Conspiracies, what's your evidence? Sounds like special pleading.
Blah blah blah my mythical good jews, not all jews, blah blah
Wah wah rules against racism that we only utilize to protect jews. Free reign to slander or mock Muslims, spics, pajeets, and especially Whites. Rule is only enforced to protect jews
It's like the rest of the laws in real life. There's one justice system for jews and a different justice system for goys. White woman stabbed? Who cares release the nigger to recommit crimes. A single hair on a single jews head is harmed? Strip away rights for all goyim, life in prison, full enforcement of the law
Your long paragraphs don't brainwash everyone from seeing the jews obvious double standards. Remember, every single jew is a hypocrite including your make believe good jews.
Even the Google autocorrect tries to capitalize jew but never tries to capitalize White. jews subvert everything with their double standards and hypocrisy and lies.
In Australia White women have been attacked my migrants for years. jews didn't care. Now a jew is attacked and it's world wide news, PM is cornered and forced to implement more gun laws to strip White men of their rights because invader migrant jews welcomed invader migrant Muslims and then punished the Whites who suffer both kikes and goatfuckers.
Neither jews not towel heads belong in Supreme White Nations and you're too much of a gutless fraud to admit that and accept it as truth.
In my forums, we've had unjust persecution most notably of blacks, Catholics, Jews, and Muslims, and I seek to enforce the rules against that evenly.
You are right that uneven enforcement is a significant problem, and you are free to report any cases where you think I may have employed a double standard. Your present comment contains many different slurs so I bypass them all categorically rather than chastise any at the expense of others.
I see no evidence of this. I offered to help you work with no-racism forums because you implied you wanted to, but if you don't want to then it's your choice either way.
Since you ask, "Jew" is an ethnonym, but "white" and "black" are descriptive adjectives. Ethnonyms like Caucasian, Aryan, European, or African are obviously capitalized, but Caucasians don't seem to prefer those words for some reason, nor do Jews prefer olive or brown. As to words that various groups find offensive, I generally use equal treatment as shown objectively by dictionaries: both pejorative use and offensiveness of "jew" has far outranked either pejorative use or offensiveness of "white", and that's just a linguistic fact.
What I've admitted and accepted as true is that every nation has the right to self-determine its citizenship and ethnicity rules. We might say that whites have led the way in mercifulness to prospective citizens, even to the point of self-sacrifice (sometimes unrequited); so whites have not chosen to enforce tight citizenship and ethnicity rules lately. As a Constitutionist I've pointed out that our supreme law treats whites, blacks, and natives very differently, and that is still reflected when amendments are applied. It also seems that we've had the best methodology this year out of 250 years in terms of achieving better citizenship rules, so we might do best to press that advantage (even though we all know much more must be done). If you have a specific implementable proposal that's better than what we're doing right now, I'm all ears (obviously we know what your administration would do, I'm talking about what Trump's administration might reasonably be persuaded to do as a public servant being instructed by us sovereigns who operate via group consensus).
Add: Since you also pinged me in ConPro, you get the comment I drafted there without realizing you'd pinged me from where I was banned:
Racism is judging the innocent with the guilty, which is done when you defame Jews as a group.
Chosen by God involves two things: chosen for salvation means Christian, blood-bought; chosen for group blessings and/or cursings means a member of a group that has a demographic positive or negative tendency. In the second category, Jews, Israelis, Egyptians, Syrians, Arabs, Jordanians are all "chosen" for various blessings and cursings traceable in Scripture.
So, yes, it mischaracterizes.
Let's have the open dialogue, without the illogical insertion of racism such as by charging people with specific Christ-killing who didn't contribute to his death (in any other way than we all did). Calling for open dialogue and poisoning the well at the same time is contradictory.
The [Conspiracies] forum rule is no attack, violence, or abuse. We can also have the meta dialogue about what those rules mean and how much they should be applied, I recall trying to start that dialogue last month but I don't recall you being very interested. If you think racism should be allowed under those rules, that's a different dialogue than discussing immigration.
Rejection of well-poisoning, followed by well-poisoning. If you had stated it objectively as "26 Jewish/Israeli orgs support mass migration" instead of "mass migration invasion is jewish" (with loaded word "invasion", lowercase of ethnonym, presumptive close, and neglect of all other migration orgs in the world), that wouldn't have been well-poisoning.
The Jews didn't say what they'd do in the Protocols, that was Gentiles satirizing what they thought they saw the Jews preparing to do. Another presumptive close.
Having gotten past all the logic problems (which I point out in the fond hope that you actually want to be logical), you get to the core question of what reasonably implementable policy would be better than what Trump is already doing, for which I refer you to my previous comment [above].
c/Porno c/Satanism c/Yahweh
haha this guy is insufferable.
Imagine Jesus Christ walking into town and kike pharisees like this try to argue with Him all day.
I was not always banned from TheDonald, you know?
I have old posts there. They are in some ways similar to my modern posts. I talked about impaling people. And it was fine.
Here i suggested we impale Hillary Clinton for Treason. TheDonald gave me almost 2,000 upvotes! https://scored.co/c/TheDonald/p/141rxb6BEa/shillary-clinton-committed-treas/c
Now if i suggested a jew get impaled, well then that's when i began to get banned. But when it came to jews on TheDonald, i was just presenting evidence and research. Anyone was welcome to counter it or debunk it.
So you can write long paragraphs but it is obvious that jews are protected and jews don't give a shit about protecting anyone else
If i compare a White woman to a pig TheDonald upvotes me. Such as this one: https://scored.co/c/TheDonald/p/140cbbRAmG/oink-oink--liz-cheney/c
If I compare a black woman to Chewbacca then TheDonald has a sense of humor https://scored.co/c/TheDonald/p/140voJsf4O/chewbacca-vs-kim-foxx--the-retur/c
When i suggested that Trump lynch Bill Gates and Anthony Fauci, no one at TheDonald cared. https://scored.co/c/TheDonald/p/140cSHVJSC/rare-shirtless-trump-hangs-biote/c
But not my precious jews!!!!!!!! That was the line I crossed that led to me getting banned.
For you to argue with me on this is silly because I am telling you the chronology of events and the one issue that pressed the mods' buttons and this is from years ago. I was the same old me posting at TheDonald with no bans. High post score. Then i named the jew and it was all over with from there.
Correct, I'm not arguing. But you have seemed to have a blind spot about the difference between naming "a Jew" (for real) and naming "the Jew" (without naming). Do you want me to contact the mods? I was tempted to even without knowing whether you wanted it, just because I'm interested in answers.
I see that in Aug you wrote, "IMPAL_ J_WS .... Trump is one of them. c/TheZOGnald". You were banned for rules 1-3 (here for Trump, high energy, no racism), unbanned, and then banned for rule 1. I'm pretty confident the mods don't want Zognald linked because (like your OP) it's not "just presenting evidence and research". (By my own standards, I might give that a pass as not being full bannable racism if nobody complains, but if my rule was support Trump and be high energy you'd fail both those.)
"Evidence and research" is something like: "[Ivanka] Trump converted to Orthodox Judaism in July 2009 after studying with Elie Weinstock of the Ramaz School". "Ramaz was founded in 1937 and is affiliated with Congregation Kehilath Jeshurun ... and its rabbi, Joseph Lookstein" (past president of RCA and Bar-Ilan).
We've discussed this question before when I was the "offending mod". Maybe it's easier when I'm not? The question is whether you understand how to follow "rules" as one sovereign deigning to accept the protocol of another sovereign's domain?
The only thing missing is a depiction of Charlie at all the Turning Point events...just as when the depiction of the crucified Jesus became common in the 13th century; the same century when jewish civil liberty was rolled out through the Magna Carta... https://www.timesofisrael.com/the-magna-cartas-very-jewish-underpinnings/
"Some people made some art!" Ok and?
Only within natural (perception) can artificial (suggestion) be shaped...the latter tempts one to ignore the former; like how the articulation of words tempts one to ignore perceivable sound.
Some implies a sum of things aka a summation of each natural person into an artificial people.
Aka made up; created out of nothing; artificially contrived as in... https://www.etymonline.com/word/*mag- MAGIC
I'm agnostic about any conspiracy on this, but an interesting pivot is that Kirk began keeping 7th-day Sabbath about 3 years ago but his book in its defense could only be published posthumously. That suggests he believed it conscientiously as a Christian but the evidence that he was more lately breaking from rabbinical Israel means that his legacy on the Sabbath was free to be spun by those who remain. A falsifiable test for whether this actually contributes to conspiracy would be whether the book when published takes significantly different approaches toward the Jewish aspects of Sabbath than Charlie's public statements about it over prior years.
OP is not the issue because there would have been no problem with Sabbath dinner, rejection of antisemitism, or promotion of Jewish orgs on their own face prior to his death. The issue is whether his statements about Judaism, as a whole, are discontinuous with TP policy about Judaism after his death.
Who cares? We need to stay focused on combating the synagogue of satan hiding behind their shield of antisemitism. Stop letting them divide you.
The synagogue of satan is just one psyop and is not what you think.
We can infer from Jesus's words that he identifies seven enemy works: the apostolate of satan (2:2), the synagoguing of satan (2:9, 3:9), the throne of satan (2:13), the dwelling of satan (2:13), the depths of satan (2:24), the livings of satan (3:1), and the riches of satan (3:17). Don't limit your view of the enemy when Jesus says otherwise!
How's that c/Satanism sub doing for ya?
It is exactly what I think is.
He owns c/Satanism if that says anything about his position.
They must be one of these edgy luciferian fags that think lucifer is our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ.