I'm agnostic about any conspiracy on this, but an interesting pivot is that Kirk began keeping 7th-day Sabbath about 3 years ago but his book in its defense could only be published posthumously. That suggests he believed it conscientiously as a Christian but the evidence that he was more lately breaking from rabbinical Israel means that his legacy on the Sabbath was free to be spun by those who remain. A falsifiable test for whether this actually contributes to conspiracy would be whether the book when published takes significantly different approaches toward the Jewish aspects of Sabbath than Charlie's public statements about it over prior years.
OP is not the issue because there would have been no problem with Sabbath dinner, rejection of antisemitism, or promotion of Jewish orgs on their own face prior to his death. The issue is whether his statements about Judaism, as a whole, are discontinuous with TP policy about Judaism after his death.
We can infer from Jesus's words that he identifies seven enemy works: the apostolate of satan (2:2), the synagoguing of satan (2:9, 3:9), the throne of satan (2:13), the dwelling of satan (2:13), the depths of satan (2:24), the livings of satan (3:1), and the riches of satan (3:17). Don't limit your view of the enemy when Jesus says otherwise!
The post you linked to doesn't do you any favors. We know what the Synagogue of Satan is, and we expect kikes and satanists to try to "fine print" their way out of it.
Everyone on Scored whom I've asked about the synagogue of satan (no need for caps) is unable to explain why they're not contradicting Jesus when he says it's not Jews and they say it's Jews.
They try to point to something in history that is nebulous and undocumented, and I have a new framing that has so far shut up everyone who tries the argument: If we Americans have the right to tell Jews they're not true Jews and we know who the true Jews are, then Jews have the right to tell us Americans that we're not true Americans and they know who the true Americans are. Golden Rule.
Ordinary exegesis implies that Jesus is deliberately linking three other works of satan by using the word "satan" again, and three others by referring to direct contradictions in the same way as he refers to the non-Jews; his other patters of seven in this passage suggest this is intentional design. Do you know what the other six works are that I described in the comment above, with the same degree to which you "know" about the synagogue? This is an elite research board, not a stable for one-trick ponies.
I'm agnostic about any conspiracy on this, but an interesting pivot is that Kirk began keeping 7th-day Sabbath about 3 years ago but his book in its defense could only be published posthumously. That suggests he believed it conscientiously as a Christian but the evidence that he was more lately breaking from rabbinical Israel means that his legacy on the Sabbath was free to be spun by those who remain. A falsifiable test for whether this actually contributes to conspiracy would be whether the book when published takes significantly different approaches toward the Jewish aspects of Sabbath than Charlie's public statements about it over prior years.
OP is not the issue because there would have been no problem with Sabbath dinner, rejection of antisemitism, or promotion of Jewish orgs on their own face prior to his death. The issue is whether his statements about Judaism, as a whole, are discontinuous with TP policy about Judaism after his death.
Who cares? We need to stay focused on combating the synagogue of satan hiding behind their shield of antisemitism. Stop letting them divide you.
The synagogue of satan is just one psyop and is not what you think.
We can infer from Jesus's words that he identifies seven enemy works: the apostolate of satan (2:2), the synagoguing of satan (2:9, 3:9), the throne of satan (2:13), the dwelling of satan (2:13), the depths of satan (2:24), the livings of satan (3:1), and the riches of satan (3:17). Don't limit your view of the enemy when Jesus says otherwise!
How's that c/Satanism sub doing for ya?
It is exactly what I think is.
He owns c/Satanism if that says anything about his position.
The post you linked to doesn't do you any favors. We know what the Synagogue of Satan is, and we expect kikes and satanists to try to "fine print" their way out of it.
Everyone on Scored whom I've asked about the synagogue of satan (no need for caps) is unable to explain why they're not contradicting Jesus when he says it's not Jews and they say it's Jews.
They try to point to something in history that is nebulous and undocumented, and I have a new framing that has so far shut up everyone who tries the argument: If we Americans have the right to tell Jews they're not true Jews and we know who the true Jews are, then Jews have the right to tell us Americans that we're not true Americans and they know who the true Americans are. Golden Rule.
Ordinary exegesis implies that Jesus is deliberately linking three other works of satan by using the word "satan" again, and three others by referring to direct contradictions in the same way as he refers to the non-Jews; his other patters of seven in this passage suggest this is intentional design. Do you know what the other six works are that I described in the comment above, with the same degree to which you "know" about the synagogue? This is an elite research board, not a stable for one-trick ponies.