Answer ANY of my (or our) qestions, rebut ANY of my rebuttals, cite ANY sources of his claims, defend ANY of his assertions when questioned. Basically he is like a DEMOCRAT: Make claims and double down instead of supporting.
If this guy can question God's Word, I can certainly question his STRANGE TEACHINGS.
Address the facts, LBF. Do your ideas stand a chance???
Dont we have a rule here to ban people for calling others out like this? Reminds me of another old user that was doing shit like this along time ago.
This feels all a bit coordinated, like they want all us old forum members to leave.
No one bitches about the one guy fucking treating this sub like his personal blog ranting about shit that makes no fucking sense.
And thats fucking funny coming from me, ive been bitching nonstop about getting poisoned at work for almost 6 years now.
I know I dont want to read pages and pages of fucking chatgpt responses when chatgpt doesnt even know what its talking about part of the time. Especially the more data you feed it.
But were going to call out a member who barely posts here anymore.
Fuck off shills.
Shills get scared when people drop too much truth. I try to ignore them.
You have never rebutted a SINGLE fact for the past week or more!
Ignore yourself, then - your logic DEMANDS it.
Your next failure will prove me Right. Watch as you SUCCESSFULLY
FULFILL
my PREDICTION.
Basically he believes Christian ideas about God are dogma forced by man-made institutions to control people, while his spiritual gnosis is his own and somehow not influenced by various contradictory ideas and that he escapes dogmatism because the beliefs are made up (rather compiled) by him.
Your belief about his belief skews the understanding of his understanding.
I can justify what I said above. I'd say it's an objective assessment and not a subjective belief.
You conjecture without knowing, 'why' he 'believes' the way he does, and then project that onto him. That's subjective.
I'm guessing what his worldview is based on what he writes here. If I've made wrong conclusions I'd be glad to hear him explaining his worldview and how he justifies the knowledge he has.
The "why" here would be his justification and unless he states it clearly I have to guess it. The thing is there are no infinite positions to take and it can be narrowed down to what I said.
That's redundant. All beliefs are subjective by definition, because they are property of the individual mind (that doesn't mean the thing being believed is subjective though). We are limited by our mode of being.
Then you're agreeing you were guessing and your take was subjective. You might be concerned about incorrect projection also until he does state clearly, or you could take another tactic and research the extensive body of work surrounding the history and theology known as gnosticism. The word gnosis means 'to know' as opposed to to believe which is certainly more subjective. There are many beliefs, there is one gnosis which serves as the 'high place'. Two stand there, one rules over the lower plane of beliefs, leading 'the 99' as false authority by use of this knowledge. The other 'leaves the 99 to find the One, true source (father) and acts in accord....perfect sympathetic vibration with the father...aka 'The Ogdoad'. These were the actual 'church fathers' who were brought to Councils of Rome, murdered, and then co-opted into a corporate state religion that eventually broke into three religions and multitudes of sects due to the resulting con-fusion. With 17.....Q....(see Qumram)....Divine Inspiration.....this is a movement to Take Things Back from those who have profaned the spirit behind his name. This belongs to all who find and know it and one becomes an Elisha/Elijah in upbraiding all materialist/literal error that stands in its stead.
Black magicians pose as gnostics. They are the one who rule orthodox churches at the top. Only a twist of truth can bring a powerful lie and the wolf poses as the shephard not the sheep. Getting this part right IS "Saving Israel for Last' as it saves the future from continuing the same mistake. Take God back by knowing him. Leave belief to the 99. The end will not be for everyone.
It was based on his own words though and I have good reason to believe it is correct (unless he disproves me). It being subjective doesn't mean it's not objectively true.
Okay fine, now go study gnosis from all angles and prove him right or wrong.
What if... "In the beginning was sound, and sound was with God, and sound was God."
The spoken word is sound
But only within sound can any word be spoken. Words imply the articulation of natural sound. What are words describing if not all sound offers?
Makes no sense. According to John 1, the Word is Christ, the second person of the Godhead. He is a person, not an attribute or an abstraction..
Aka per sonos...by sound.
Sensing implies responding (perception) to something send (perceivable)...only afterwards can one make something within it. Just like words can only be made after sound sends/sense, hence being of a sound mind.
To be able to accord (come into agreement)...one has to be first TOwarded aka being moved. Sound implies the moving instigator for anything shaped within.
Only withing sound can A-CHORD be played...
Christ implies "anointed one" aka one set apart from one another...any word is shaped by holding letters together.
Sound anoints by flowing through each solid instrument within.
Being person aka per sonos (by sound) implies by seco (to divide).
There can be no second to God...the one and only. Hence second/seco (to divide) implies the division/divination of each Christ (anointed one) within all of God.
Any one within all implies an attribute thereof, and essence (life) during abstract (inception towards death).
The earliest cosmologies state that the universe was 'sang into existence'.
Harmony as Love
Again...singing and speaking imply articulation of natural sound. Only within sound can one utter/utera - "outer, exterior, external", as in...sound impresses; singing and speaking expresses, hence ex-istence.
Being within sound implies instrument aka mind (ment) structured (stru) within (in)...hence INTO EX-istence.
Whole separating into partial aka cause into effect aka all into one implies internal expression.
Word
How about this...verb/verbal/verbum - "word", hence "dealing with words, concerned with words only"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/verbal
Then think about that..."When the agent and object change places, and the agent is considered as the instrument by which the object is affected, the verb is called passive".
If the word/verb implies passive; then sound implies active. Nature activates being (life) by passing (inception towards death).
The word 'word' isn't a verb. Dis-tinction is needed to de-fine the point. Like the word 'life'. If you see life as inception towards death, death is your goal. All movement can be seen as 'movement towards non-movement' in that regard, which is non-sense. Movement isn't a thing, it's a condition or state of a thing. Death would be lack of the condition of life by the same regard. Spirit is reduced when formulated into a letter and then words. Are you aware of how this was done to exhibit the gematria within all alphabets?
https://kupdf.net/download/jesus-christ-sun-of-god-ancient-cosmology-and-early-christian-symbolism-by-david-r-fideler-ocr_58a100e36454a7335db1eb87_pdf
This should become your new point of reference when de-coding words. . You're un-needed to this anon. You do, however, serve a purpose, so as usual, I will not downvote the 'wordy' explanations as they most are always half and materially accurate but dualisticly contrarian in nature, leading to more questions, as there are no 'definitive' answers due to their dualistic nature on the material plane.
Word
The word "verb" implies "word"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/verb
It does, doesn't it. But it isn't one. Did that solve anything?
The word 'imply', implies that there is a deeper connection left unsaid. That's the shortcoming of words.
Word implies verb. Verb implies word. Welcome to dualism as explanation.
There were no words before mouths to express, yet it is said that in the beginning was The Word. Logos as the spirit from which all words as lesser formulai....sephira...are formulated. This breaks its truth into parts to re-member. All would do well to learn how to count and spell, as this was never taught in schools. Learning this would eliminate the guesswork and error.
I would point to that user as a perfect example of the level of consciousness of the vast majority of "conspiracy theorists".
At that level, you keep finding out how "right" you are and feel a compulsion to demonstrate that to others. Of course, there's no end to "evidence" that can be interpreted to prove that correctness, and it is impervious to all counterargument.
While this may strike many as the obvious endpoint of any conspiracy theory or science or reasoning itself, it isn't. As Richard Feynman put it:
The search for the truth is finding out what you're wrong about and correcting yourself, hopefully with an idea that is--in some sense--less wrong.
Light Bringer is (as I am sure all you know) is also a term for Lucifer. (said the person who takes his name from Faust)
Whoever that person is, his bizarre ChatGPT and other nonsensical rantings are almost as bad as mine.
Pretty sure it was decided no 'meta call out posts'. (Just letting you know in case this gets deleted)
If you both seek resolutions there is a community for that: https://communities.win/c/CommunitiesConflict
u/LightBringerFlex
Bring your "light". Bring it on.
If he shows up in this thread, his first words will be, "Hello Agent Smith."