Answer ANY of my (or our) qestions, rebut ANY of my rebuttals, cite ANY sources of his claims, defend ANY of his assertions when questioned. Basically he is like a DEMOCRAT: Make claims and double down instead of supporting.
If this guy can question God's Word, I can certainly question his STRANGE TEACHINGS.
Address the facts, LBF. Do your ideas stand a chance???
Then you're agreeing you were guessing and your take was subjective. You might be concerned about incorrect projection also until he does state clearly, or you could take another tactic and research the extensive body of work surrounding the history and theology known as gnosticism. The word gnosis means 'to know' as opposed to to believe which is certainly more subjective. There are many beliefs, there is one gnosis which serves as the 'high place'. Two stand there, one rules over the lower plane of beliefs, leading 'the 99' as false authority by use of this knowledge. The other 'leaves the 99 to find the One, true source (father) and acts in accord....perfect sympathetic vibration with the father...aka 'The Ogdoad'. These were the actual 'church fathers' who were brought to Councils of Rome, murdered, and then co-opted into a corporate state religion that eventually broke into three religions and multitudes of sects due to the resulting con-fusion. With 17.....Q....(see Qumram)....Divine Inspiration.....this is a movement to Take Things Back from those who have profaned the spirit behind his name. This belongs to all who find and know it and one becomes an Elisha/Elijah in upbraiding all materialist/literal error that stands in its stead.
Black magicians pose as gnostics. They are the one who rule orthodox churches at the top. Only a twist of truth can bring a powerful lie and the wolf poses as the shephard not the sheep. Getting this part right IS "Saving Israel for Last' as it saves the future from continuing the same mistake. Take God back by knowing him. Leave belief to the 99. The end will not be for everyone.
It was based on his own words though and I have good reason to believe it is correct (unless he disproves me). It being subjective doesn't mean it's not objectively true.
Okay fine, now go study gnosis from all angles and prove him right or wrong.
How do you study gnosis?
There are limited starting positions when it comes to metaphysics and epistemology and I already know what they are. He only needs to state which one are his and how they relate together in a coherent and logically consistent worldview that can explain and justify fundamental concepts like truth, meaning, laws of logic, morality, knowledge, etc.
Gnosis as a subject is fairly extensive. One might start by researching the community of Qumram, though it exists as principles, it is variously practiced and understood culturally and historically. There are several excellent books on the subject. The 'debate' between gnostic, agnostic and 'the followers of the Lie' was won by murder and deception to create an all-encompassing Roman (catholic means 'universal') religion. The study of gnosis should include spelling and counting as its principles founded both alphabets and numeral systems. The Gnostic Gospels by Elaine Page is a good source for background and history.
For a clue as to how far back and how deep the understanding goes, take a hard look at this link's information as 'proof'.
Remember that this information, like all deep subjects, is not for the pretender or faint-hearted researcher. It can and has been misused, which is exactly the case with the cabal who controls by their twisted use of the secrets it contains. This is 'two on a high place' with one ruling by it, and another finding the chrism/christ by it. Leave the 99 to find the One. Deep dive finds the pearl.
https://kupdf.net/download/jesus-christ-sun-of-god-ancient-cosmology-and-early-christian-symbolism-by-david-r-fideler-ocr_58a100e36454a7335db1eb87_pdf