Answer ANY of my (or our) qestions, rebut ANY of my rebuttals, cite ANY sources of his claims, defend ANY of his assertions when questioned. Basically he is like a DEMOCRAT: Make claims and double down instead of supporting.
If this guy can question God's Word, I can certainly question his STRANGE TEACHINGS.
Address the facts, LBF. Do your ideas stand a chance???
Again...singing and speaking imply articulation of natural sound. Only within sound can one utter/utera - "outer, exterior, external", as in...sound impresses; singing and speaking expresses, hence ex-istence.
Being within sound implies instrument aka mind (ment) structured (stru) within (in)...hence INTO EX-istence.
Whole separating into partial aka cause into effect aka all into one implies internal expression.
Word
How about this...verb/verbal/verbum - "word", hence "dealing with words, concerned with words only"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/verbal
Then think about that..."When the agent and object change places, and the agent is considered as the instrument by which the object is affected, the verb is called passive".
If the word/verb implies passive; then sound implies active. Nature activates being (life) by passing (inception towards death).
The word 'word' isn't a verb. Dis-tinction is needed to de-fine the point. Like the word 'life'. If you see life as inception towards death, death is your goal. All movement can be seen as 'movement towards non-movement' in that regard, which is non-sense. Movement isn't a thing, it's a condition or state of a thing. Death would be lack of the condition of life by the same regard. Spirit is reduced when formulated into a letter and then words. Are you aware of how this was done to exhibit the gematria within all alphabets?
https://kupdf.net/download/jesus-christ-sun-of-god-ancient-cosmology-and-early-christian-symbolism-by-david-r-fideler-ocr_58a100e36454a7335db1eb87_pdf
This should become your new point of reference when de-coding words. . You're un-needed to this anon. You do, however, serve a purpose, so as usual, I will not downvote the 'wordy' explanations as they most are always half and materially accurate but dualisticly contrarian in nature, leading to more questions, as there are no 'definitive' answers due to their dualistic nature on the material plane.
Word
The word "verb" implies "word"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/verb