That you're gullible.
Faith is belief in lieu of evidence.
The book you love was written by man.
The stories in it were made up by man.
The money you donate goes to fund a mans extravagant lifestyle.
It's conspiracy 101.
Comments (25)
sorted by:
Do you have evidence for all the beliefs you hold?
I'ma bout to go philosophy 101 on you.
Wrong, it can also be applied when calling out bs assertions made by atheist edgelords who regurgitate r/atheism tier arguments.
You have to try to find out. Why don't you answer my question?
I have evidence that you swallow semen
I'm not surprised a degenerate atheist like yourself has gay stuff on their coomer mind instead of actual arguments.
In Jesus name we rebuke You demon.
Does it work for their other acount? 😅
tips yarmulke
boofs dreidel
I would have to value your opinion to be offended. Instead I will only say Via con Dios.
You are naturally and factually correct, but as faith and belief are the basic tenets of their belief structure, mere information will not change that.
You'd have to do brainwashing de-programming for months and most would just violently resist that.
Yet, I've met true christians, who live by the TRUE teachings of Christ (man or myth, doesn't matter), see bible for what it is (a tool of obedience control) and priests as mere gatekeepers.
But they are the extreme minority among the Christians I know, unfortunately.
Of course, similar could be said of hindus, buddhists, jews, muslisms, etc.
Most people just like to run scripts and obey.
lol, the TC has to be a Jew.
These brainwashed people can call anything as a conspiracy, but what is supposedly an Israeli war God is somehow completely infallible, and if you think otherwise, you have been seduced by the devil.
If you are wondering how did the LGBT agenda spread so far and wide all over the world that it threatens to make switching genders like switching clothes after half a century, this is how they get you to do it.
I'm pretty sure they get you to do it when they convince you there's no universal moral law, everything is relative to the individual and a social construction, therefore anything goes and nothing's permanent or written in stone.
I can assure you 99% of skittles people and degenerate liberals as a whole are atheistic and it's Christianity that opposes this stuff. You're fighting reality and it's an uphill battle.
The Christians you describe are the protestants. There are lots of sects arranging from Rabbis to people like you. Also the NWO is not Atheist regardless of what you think otherwise. There is a religion, there is always a religion, and no matter what the cover narrative is, it is always done with the same goal in mind.
Also I think you know the priests of the Catholic Church and the Vatican have entire harems of boys. They just want to legitimize it under the guise of liberalism and they have always been.
Wrong again. Protestants tend to be the most liberal and pro-zionist of all denominations. I don't belong to a sect but to the Orthodox Church which is the only Church Christ established and has always been opposed to Talmudic judaism (which is a sect denounced by Christ in the face of the pharisees and their "oral tradition"). I wouldn't consider the top NWO people atheists since they are luciferian freemasons and talmudic jews. Materialism and naturalism is pushed on the masses as a psy op for demoralization: "Man is just a more evolved animal, a meatsack computer which evolved by accident, insignificant in the vastness of the space and time void; there is no purpose or meaning to anything ultimately and you're going to die and dissolve into nothingness so what you do with your life doesn't really matter in the grand scale of things. Just follow your desires, be a hedonist coomsoomer and do as thou wilt - there's no good and evil, no final justice so who cares what you do?". All of the proponents of that demonic worldview are either jews or freemasons.
But no, Christianity is putting people down even though what I described is the most depressing and nihilistic outlook anyone could have. This is what THEY want you to think reality is. Compare that to what the Christian teaching about man and the world is. Everything else is irrelevant - "you will know them by their fruits". Atheists hardly even reproduce, that's how depraved and nihilistic this worldview is. Even from an evolutionary standpoint atheism is a loosing strategy.
All implies God; each one within implies a Christian.
Each one is gullible when ignoring perception (reality) for suggestion (fiction).
a) Giving faith/having belief implies ones consent to the suggestion of another...which makes the suggested evident to the one consenting to hold onto it.
b) There's only ones position within all...consenting to a suggestion of another tempts one to ignore ones position for a "lieu" of another, hence a shirking of response-ability.
a) A book binds those who read in-between covers, hence in-between a conflict of reason like love vs hate.
b) Nature does not write/outline...it implies the line (inception towards death) for those within (life).
Nature doesn't store...it processes (inception towards death) products (life). Few tempt many to abuse mind/memory as storage for suggested information, while ignoring that perceivable inspiration cannot be held onto; saved; stored...without destroying self.
All perceivable (value) generates each ones perception (evaluation)...few suggest money to tempt many to devalue themselves, which in return permits few to set a price for that which nature offers towards each ones FREE will of choice.
Current implies a moving foundation; currency tempts those within (life) a moving foundation (inception towards death) to accumulate debt aka a self inflicted burden...
Living within the process of dying implies ones need to stay out of DEBT/DEAD by resisting wanted temptations luring one into it.
God implies mono; our implies poly...two contradicting sides tempting ones (yours) free will of choice to imbalance itself by holding onto either.
Being implies inter (choice) fere (balance) of God. In other words...Energy internally establishes action and reaction in balance with each other aka DOM-inating action (balance) and FREE reactions (choice).
Few suggest "free will" without OF CHOICE as a liberty to tempt ones consent by "free will of choice" to ignore self as FREE within DOM.
All perceivable generates each ones perception by setting apart aka by internal separation aka by differentiation aka by alternation...few suggest pluralism (we) for many to tribute consent together aka con-tribute, which is what one (singular) does when speaking in the name of others (plural) by simply using the word WE.
WE THE PEOPLE implies a suggested fiction...not a perceivable reality.
Species implies specification by separation of whole into partials. Few suggest speciesism to tempt many to consent to classification of each into many, which few then direct back from many into one aka e pluribus unum (out of many; one).