Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

21
Reddit is fucked (twitter.com)
posted 1 year ago by dukey 1 year ago by dukey +21 / -0
22 comments share
22 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (22)
sorted by:
▲ 13 ▼
– Franky_F4F 13 points 1 year ago +15 / -2

Except anti semetic, you will have no freedom for that.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– OnlyRetardsGetTheJab 6 points 1 year ago +6 / -0

"I will then ban federal money from being used to label domestic speech as mis or dis information."

Notice that the most threatening of the censorship terminology - "hate speech" - was somehow left out of that statement.

Possibly because Jews want "hate speech" laws in place to deal with anyone who mentions Jews in an unflattering manner.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– freedomlogic 4 points 1 year ago +4 / -0

Really strange how jews are the only legally protected race. I dont see any other race with laws designed to specifically protect their feelings.

And why? Because israel is the holy land? How many people in america even still believe in god anymore.

But its funny seeing the guy who was bailed out by the deep state, bitching about the deep state. How the fuck do you lose money on a casino anyway.

I guess when all your doing is spending money on partys and strippers.

https://www.europereloaded.com/rothschild-inc-saved-donald-trump/

In 2005 Trump said “I have to start by saying that I’m a big fan, a very big fan, of the United Nations and all it stands for.” This statement would appear to stand in contrast to the recent campaign announcements in front of an AIPAC crowd in which Trump spoke more truthfully. “The United Nations is not a friend of democracy. It’s not a friend to freedom. It’s not even a friend to the United States of America, where we all know, it has its home. And it surely isn’t a friend to Israel.”

In 1987 Donald Trump purchased his first casino interests when he acquired 93% of the shares in Resorts International. Resorts International has a sordid history which began in the early 1950’s when it evolved from a CIA and Mossad front company which had been established for the purpose of money laundering the profits from drug trafficking, gambling, and other illegal activities.

The socioeconomic engineering benefits of mass population manipulation through means of drug addiction, gambling, and other vices, far outweigh those provided by money laundering alone. It can be assumed that money laundering acted as a secondary advantage in much the same way that the subjugation of the Chinese population through the spread of opium financially benefited the East India Trading Company centuries before.

On October 30, 1978, The Spotlight newspaper reported that the principle investors of Resorts International were Meyer Lansky, Tibor Rosenbaum, William Mellon Hitchcock, David Rockefeller, and one Baron Edmond de Rothschild.

He the good guy tho.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– WeedleTLiar 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Eh, they're fundamentally different.

One is the government being the arbiter of objective facts, and it would be good if they were explicitely blocked from doing them.

Hate speech falls within their discretion because it has to do with whether some speech is threatening to the point of justifying violence.

Jews are pussies so we really don't need to worry about offending them.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– OnlyRetardsGetTheJab 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

has to do with whether some speech is threatening to the point of justifying violence

No it doesn't.
It is, and will continue to be, whatever they want it to be at a given time.

Just like misinformation and disinformation.

Three ambiguous terms chosen specifically because of how easy it is for government to interpret and reinterpret them however they want.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– WeedleTLiar 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

You can disagree with their interpretation (I and do), but they're still two different things.

Would I like to see "hate speech" eliminated from law, or reduced to an immediate and actionable threat of violence? Yes. Do I think threats should be dealt with by authorities before people take matters into their own hands? Also, yes.

Do I think there is ever a reason for thr government to make determinations regarding facts? No, never, no exceptions, which is why I'm fine with the two being dealt with separately.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Axias 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

That 1st Amendment.. It protects me. If it ever fails, I have the 2nd.

-Every American with a gun.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– Dregan_ya 6 points 1 year ago +6 / -0

This soap opera keeps getting better by the day.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– OnlyRetardsGetTheJab 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

The way Trump worded this, Elon would be in trouble for labeling and penalizing 'antisemitic' comments on X.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– deleted 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0
▲ 3 ▼
– OnlyRetardsGetTheJab 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

This is twice now (first RFK and now Trump) that's they've instructed them to retain their records.

The only two explanations for this that I can think of are:

  • They're engaging in some kind of bluff/performance

  • They're giving them a heads-up so they can destroy their records before the show trials begin

edit: Looks like this vid is from Dec 2022. That makes more sense. It's campaign talk. Looks like Elon might be trying to hold him to his words, which is interesting.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Primate98 2 points 1 year ago +3 / -1

Frankly, it's surreal. It's like this was AI-generated, created from prompts given by an awake and aware person for what they would like to see happen.

Personal confession: a video similar to this one was posted on r//conspiracy_commons, and several of the Redditors "debunked" it as from years ago or some such claim, and I believed it.

On a serious note, I think Trump did not have a very good idea of what he was up against in 2015. He severely underestimated Them and ultimately he--and all the rest of us--came out on the losing end. This time around, any sort of "middle-grounding" or negotiation or artful wording or saying without saying is out the window.

Fat lot of fucking good it did any of us last time.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– free-will-of-choice 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

it's surreal

a) Nature WAS perceivable before anyone within can suggest what something IS...like surrealism.

b) Real implies ones response (re) to all (al)...sur (beyond) implies being yonder aka within sight, yet not near aka perceivable in sight, yet ignored for suggested.

AI-generated

Only nature generates...artifice is shaped within what nature generates.

a video similar to this one

a) One implies different from one another.

b) Video/videre - "to see" implies ones perception within all perceivable...not looking at a suggested video.

all the rest

Rest implies "reminder after separation"...ALL implies that which separates into each ONE within, hence "before" not after, and before implies forwards (inception towards death) being (life) aka the internal separation of all into each one.

sort of middle-grounding

The opposite of sort implies differentiation. Few tempt many together aka casting lots aka sorting shares to equalize differences among them, hence making many "similar" to each other.

As for natural differentiation...sides (inception/death) generate middle-ground (life). What do moving sides imply? Balance! What's the center of balance? Choice!

artful wording

Artificial (words) tempts one to ignore natural (sound)...

fucking good

Fucking (coming together) good vs bad (conflict of reason)...choosing a suggested side fucks oneself over. Choice needs to balance, not fight other choices withing imbalance (want vs not want).

In alchemy there's a process where "contrasting elements in proper proportion neutralize each other"...it's called neutral/neuter - "neither of two". If only ONE had the free will of choice to choose neither of two...

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– americanjerky 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

Make Reddit digg again

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– WeedleTLiar 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Did he say he was going to revoke Section 230? Cause that would open every platform to legal liability from anything posted by anyone. Everyone would have to immediately shut down all user content or risk getting sued, or charged, for not blocked the pedo pajeet fast enough.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– wheresthehonor 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LrZezvf-AdQ Trump wants death penalty for antisemitism.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– TurnToGodNow 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

So no government agents prosecuted for violating the first amendment and changes by executive order.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– BGallemore 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

He just said two days ago that he would ban anti-semitism nation-wide. We're about to enter a whole new era.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Axias 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

The one law he's made against anti-semitism was an enlargement of section 6(discrim laws): basically, you lose fed funds if you are an organziation that is overtly anti-semitic.

Number of enforcements this law has had since 2019: ZERO.

1st Amendment rules: which he is PUTTING ON STEROIDS: will easily destroy valid criticism as being marked as anti-semitic.

Facts are not anti-semitic.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– BGallemore 0 points 1 year ago +1 / -1

He made the statement two days ago. The fact that he already put something in place five years ago on banning anti-semitism only supports my claim and my belief. Trump was given the Crown of Jerusalem and then sent the Replica Arc of the Convenant to Israel last week. He kissed the Rebbes grave on October 7th. He is going to usher in the Anti-Christ.

permalink parent save report block reply

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - nxltw (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy