Oof... Salty loser... Spamming is not cool, mkay
(media.conspiracies.win)
Comments (111)
sorted by:
I hate when people spam...
...proceeds to spam.
Lol I know, right!?
He spammed his lies against me across nine forums repeatedly. He gave up when (IMHO) he realized he had no defense against my proof he has no true allegiance to the pope but only to his interpretation of the pope.
Bible-only is great. The Bible indicates only Pharaoh and Herod celebrate birthdays, namely by killing people, but righteous Job cursed his having a birthday. So it's pretty simple from there.
What do you think of Matt. 18:15-17 and getting a second witness when you have an offense against a self-professed brother like this?
If you speak with Bible verses, you have nothing to fear. Rather, you work to expose someone (u/crusaderpepe), who is adamant on promoting the evil Catholic perversion. You have done nothing wrong. Keep fighting using the scripture!
I also used the Bible against him. He promotes himself as a Catholic, but never replies to this:
And he promotes the Catholic pope ("pope" is "father" in Italian).
He also never provided an answer to this quote.
He is not here to promote Christianity, but to pervert it.
Stay strong, my brother in Christ!
Our win is a matter of time, not a matter of chance. Even people in here are starting to wake up to his phony posts and AI-generated "songs"...
May God bless you, my brother! (I do mean that!) You are most needed in the fight ahead!
This user u/crusaderpepe may have his army of bots upvoting him, and downvoting us, but that doesn't matter in the long run.
You are never wrong to quote the Bible. No, u/crusaderpepe is wrong for never replying honestly to the Scripture.
Remember this verse:
Remember that we don't fight against this shill - u/crusaderpepe, but to show the way to all those confused souls that follow him into the ditch.
There is hope in here. You are the living proof of that. And... trust me... you are not alone!
P.S.: You may not know, but I was ready to give up on this sub... And your comment made me hopeful. May God bless you, brother! You may not realize how much of an impact your actions make... They definitely helped me today. And I will remember that!
We can still help one more soul by exposing this Catholic shill. Don't give up!
Glad to hear. I don't get to check c/Conspiracies as much as I'd like but it's more based than any similar forum on the web. Even the crazies here will talk to you reasonably. But be warned, bots and AI are on the uptick, and not just the overt ones as in OP.
The fact that he's stopped posting to c/Christianity means it's been a quiet haven for two full weeks. Anytime.
I would recommend r/conspiracy_commons tho. It still allows truth to be shared there.
I am not familiar with c/Christianity. Is it really about Christianity?
If you think that forum (c/Christianity) is not filled with bots/shills, I'd like to try it out.
I will wait for your reply before I post there.
P.S.: I see your point, just have no knowledge about c/Christianity. If you can help me with your opinion on that, I would greatly appreciate it.
Yes, early in 2021 I was invited to mod c/Christianity and we have set it up as a virtual Bible study and worship service ever since. We are patient with civil criticism of Christianity (including from within) but we also don't tolerate nonsupport of the three classic creeds or the basic truths of the Bible.
That's all you had to say!!! Did you accept the invitation to be a mod? Actually, I will assume you did, and I am going to join this group right now.
You probably wouldn't believe me, but this has been the only positive comment that I had in this sub today...
I really hope this place is as Christian as you say it is... I am really tired from this sub, and all the spam, and hate here... You wouldn't believe what I saw in my notifications today... It has been exhausting...
But as they say... when God closes a window, he opens a door. I just hope that I can trust someone one time, and to turn out that it isn't a trap...
I just hope you understand... Or just view my last post, and understand that way...
Either way, I will make an account there and commit 100% as I usually do... I really hope this place hold real Christianity to high esteem...
P.S.: Sorry for all the negativity in this comment... You just don't know what I had to deal with recently...
Oh, starting with Pepe I totally understand!
No new account should be needed. If you logged in at conspiracies.win you just use the same credentials at scored.co/c/Christianity (or communities.win/c/Christianity).
Yeah, the invitation came in line with other things God was doing in my life, and, it turned out, dozens of others. You can trust that the admins permit us to regulate behavior according to the creeds. You can't always trust me, because sometimes I give people a lot more slack than some want, but you can trust that I follow God's instructions as I hear them. Besides the admins themselves, there is one other mod (Eastern Orthodox; I'm Hebrew roots Protestant) who is a real stalwart and help. But in terms of amassing Christian content, it looks like the admins' vision has had good foundation, and lots of good history can be title-searched there.
Ok, I sent you a personal message about an error I got in that new sub. Can you please check it out?
I wanted to post this - https://conspiracies.win/p/1994ozzOJJ/this-is-not-meant-for-this-sub-b/
But got that error 304, or 308, or something like that...
I already made an account, but can't post... I don't understand.
Here are the facts:
You DID NOT go to me privately when you misinterpreted my post(s) to go against Christian teaching. Instead you KVETCHED all over c/Conspiracies, and you don't even believe that Christ established a Church to go to, so you are NOT even following Matthew 18:15-17 yourself, you brain-dead HYPOCRITE!
Geez... I sure hope you never called you own dad "father" or else you are clearly breaking the rule of Matthew 23:9... (rolls eyes)
Or, you know, perhaps Jesus was saying that there is only one HEAVENLY Father - God the Father - and wasn't saying that you couldn't literally call your own dad "father". And this is why you need a Church to interpret Scripture - because low IQ MORONS like Neo1 will interpret Scripture in stupid ways.
Ask your confessor whether "Geez" and other immoderate language is venial or mortal, as it depends on circumstances.
Are you like a Jehovah's Witness or something? My understanding of Job's curse was he cursed the day he was born, to say it was the fact he had a birthday is maybe technically correct but framing it that way seems engineered to a certain conclusion, since the only reason he'd be cursing that he had a birthday is because he wished he weren't burn.
I don't even celebrate my own birthday (though others in my life will force me to) but I find it strange that the Bible contains explicit prohibitions around things like wearing mixed fabrics, rules about circumcision, and all kinds of super specific things, but requires reading between the lines to figure out that God condemns birthdays
No cultism, just Hebrew roots Christianity while avoiding legalism. Yes, the Levitical prohibitions are pretty direct and all have didactic reason, and the avoidance of pagan-style days is just a fence that a lot of people put up when they discover the Hebrew structure. That is, you find out Jesus wasn't born on Christmas and you are tempted to throw out everything. But personally I found that the Bible supports the idea that American birthdays are pretty much little idol parties, and so that's been my practice for awhile, and I share it in case others might see the same evidence the same way.
Yes, I have all sorts of engineered canned statements that I throw into the ether to see what sticks. Obviously the one thing that needs emphasis all the time, especially here, is that Jesus died for our sins and rose to give us eternal life. But I like to build on what others say.
If everyone is just going by "bible only" do you think it's a problem if people read the same thing and come away with conflicting interpretations?
Like what?
Well just for starters I know there are schisms about how applicable the laws in old testament are, and there are versus supporting both sides of the argument.
And it really just boils down to whatever sect the reader is, or in your case, whatever your subjective feeling is on which side to pick.
For there must be also heresies among you, that they which are approved may be made manifest among you (1 Cor. 11:9 KJV).
Heresy/haireisthai/hairein - "to choose"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/heresy#etymonline_v_9184
So all doctrines require consent by choice, while choosing implies heresy...
Approval; commendations, sanctions are given by choice, right?
Don't be shy. Share one example already.
I will wait.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_views_on_the_Old_Covenant
There's a whole wikipedia page on the numerous sects that disagree on that issue dude. If you wanna have an honest discussion we can, but dont waste my time with homework assignments or demands for citations on things that are common fucking knowledge, while you avoid addressing the point that in fact there are differing interpretations of scripture and you've offered no objective method for coming to the correct one.
Oh, no... A WIKI PAGE?!?
Wow... And here am I quoting the Bible...
Also, wow... You wasted so much words to play the victim... Jewish, are you? (I mean fake jew, who constantly plays the victim)
I will allow you to form an argument, not a baseless wiki accusation.
I'll wait.
Present yourself better than a 3rd-grader this time, if possible for you. As I said - I will wait.
I'm not gonna entertain this game where you pretend like there are no Christians who disagree on this fundamental question of biblical interpretation. You're a waste of time, and an even bigger waste of space.
Filioque.
Moralism aka good vs bad...
The Word and the Spirit always agree. We can have diversity in nonessentials, but if people are contradicting each other they're not in the same Spirit.
I tried to interpret your comment and struggle to decipher your intended meaning.
I don't don't think it gets any easier when the cryptic nonsense was written 2000 years ago by dead authors, who can't take questions.
Start by affirming Truth exists and should be pursued. That means there must be a way to find it reliably despite our faulty sensors. That way is Spirit. It's not enough just to make a factually true statement, it's also necessary not to be using it in a deceptive spirit.
Everyone knows what it's like to speak honestly, they know when someone is speaking in truth and in spirit. Because of this, when we're dealing with truth statements, we can work together pursuing the truth and arrive at the same place because we are pursuing it in the same spirit. That's the resolution of all contradiction.
If there's no Truth to start out with, there's no point in saying or doing anything, because it's the same as not saying or doing. But everyone believes there's a point, so everyone ultimately believes there's a Truth worth working for. When you commit to pursuing Truth, you find it, that's how the universe works. Eventually we find that there's a community of Truth seekers that has greater solidity and history than any other, they have a book they've checked for millennia and found it to have greater communicative value and description of reality than any other, and the independent evidence for this Holy Bible being the book of Truth continues to grow until you see the whole big picture. That's the unity of the good news, everyone comes to the same core message for humanity who looks for it. Remaining disagreements are just about semantics and technicalities. If there's a true binary contradiction between two people, it's because they're not in the same spirit.
If one doesn't affirm truth, then how could others use lies against one?
If life starts at inception, then is there a point of death at the end of ones life sentence?
If one doesn't affirm truth, one lies to oneself. To fail to make anything firm is to fail to be anything.
Since life is experienced in the present, an end is never something experienced. The All has no inception because all inception is within it, and so the All has no end. So One is free to follow All, and need not end just because one has an inception.
Originally, heresy did mean choice, all choices were heresies (sects, sections). Therefore not to choose is also a heresy. Whenever we speak, and whenever we don't, we will and define and choose. It's still a tenet even if it's not a doctrine.
a) How could a BEING fail to BE anything?
b) Being implies made form (life) by flow (inception towards death)...holding onto form by trying to affirm to one another, destroys form through friction, hence a conflict of reason (affirm vs denial). As long as one holds firm to either side, so long both sides are mutually destroying each other.
One DOES before one can choose to DOESN'T affirm (truth) or deny (lie)...being comes before choice. Affirmation and denial tempts ones choice to select the suggested choices of another aka shirking of response-ability.
Who is calling one a liar if one doesn't affirm truth to another?
Life implies essence...others suggest present/pre-sence to gain ones permission/consent/affirmation to define pre (before) aka the exterior/abstract of ones essence.
Experience aka ex per (expression by) implies an impressing into. Nature operates from impression (inception towards death) through expression (life)...pre-sent (before being send) implies the sleight of hand one ignores.
Few suggest many to express consent TOWARDS suggested in exchange for experience (XP), which inverts reality..."ex per" aka expression by origin.
What about "never" aka nothing ever? Can that be experienced? Why is nothing used as the foundation to deny (de-nihilo) an end of being?
Why did you put a THE before ALL? An adjective before ALL; before everything? Ad-ject (towards throwing) implies an ejection before aka an inception of an adjected ALL by an ejecting THE...
Only a partial (one) within whole (all) has a beginning (inception) and end (death) of being (life).
Partial implies temporal ; whole implies ongoing...separation (momentum) of whole (motion) into partials (matter) establishes beginning and end aka inception and death.
All directs (inception towards death) each one (life) within...which implies a separation of velocity into resistance. To follow implies the path of least resistance aka the temptation to go with the velocity towards death instead of resisting for the sustenance of life by adapting to the origin of inception.
Ones free will of choice struggles with needing to resist wanted temptation...following implies a temptation, hence others utilizing leaders calling followers to give consent/affirmation to suggested progressivism towards outcomes.
Another angle...temptation aka sin/syn - "synchrony" implies simultaneous with others aka following, while resistance implies ones resisting stance apart from others.
Need (inception towards death) generates want (life)...hence ones struggle to rise during fall.
Example...water or wine? Which one represents need? Neither...thirst does. Wanting or not wanting water or wine tempts one to ignore needing to resist thirst.
Because is the suggested inversion of cause (inception towards death) towards being (life) aka just (balance) generating odds (choice).
This requires self discernment, which one ignores when consenting to suggested "because". If one asks nature "why", then nature doesn't answer "because"...it simply moves cause towards being to inspire adaptation.
You may call this Gods' breath of life...which life needs to exhale, hence adapting to the process of dying.
a) Which one made the choice that suggested meaning changes origin (God)?
b) What if origin (all) offers choice (one), while choosing (ones choice) to shirk it onto another (chosen one) implies heresy?
b) Origin of choice implies balance...balance cannot be changed by choices within...choice within balance can only imbalance self...choosing to suggest imbalance tempts other choices to imbalance self.
What if many choose to ignore origin (perceivable balance) for each other (suggested choices), which establishes a chosen few in control over many followers?
ALL to ONE implies sect/seco - "to divide" aka a separation of whole into partials.
Consenting to suggested choices tempts back together aka e pluribus unum (out of many; one) or tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) aka abrahamism (father of multitude) etc.
Few can only remain apart if many are mixed together...which requires ones free will of choice to consent (send together).
What if the origin of not implies suggested nihil-ism (Latin nihilo; nothing) which tempts one to consent to de-nial perceivable for suggested? Thinking that one can "not choose" implies ones choice to consent to "nothing"...
What if even (balance) forces odds (choice) to adapt?
Notice how a child struggles to find the balance to stand up and walk, yet most adults ignore this struggle of choice adapting to balance when walking through their lives...
Only within balance of motion can matter wield choice (will)...define/definite (to affix) implies wanting to hold onto, while ignoring needing to let go.
How could choice be affixed (defined), when choosing implies reaction to balance?
What if few tempt many to ignore perceivable sound for suggested words, hence for DEAF PHONETICIANS (definitions) aka those deaf to phonics (sound)?
Could words like "insane person" be utilized to distract from sound like "in sanus (within sound) + per sonos (by sound)?
If one asks a hundred others to define "insane person"; then what are the odds of anyone bringing up "sound"?
Even implies everything...nothing tempts one at odds with even.
I did, and I determined that the way to find truth is to demonstrate it empirically, not to merely assert it without evidence.
That is the reason I'm now an atheist, and don't believe god is real at all.
Cool.... Time for you to demonstrate spirits are real now.
Thanks for self-identifying. If you don't believe any god is real, why would it be time for me to demonstrate otherwise? It's illogical, and in fact untruthful, to state your belief so boldly and then to challenge me to defeat your belief, unless you yourself already have doubts about your own belief.
If you affirm Truth exists and should be pursued, you've already demonstrated what you need, namely that truth and duty ("should") exist even though they have never been demonstrated empirically. Every atheist believes in one or more axioms that have not been demonstrated empirically, and can only make progress by admitting that. For instance, the statement that only empirically demonstrated propositions matter has never been demonstrated empirically.
There are atheists here I can work with because they do really want to pursue Truth. Rush Limbaugh said so rightly that he would not rest until everyone agreed with him, and that's a deep statement that there really is a truth and it has more power to shape both him and us than we realize. If you're willing not to rest until people agree with you, we can have a dialogue. The head mod of c/Atheist has helpfully pinned a top post prominently featuring my outline indicating a few points we can dialogue on. But here we're off-topic now.
Because you have to demonstrate HOW you know something in order for me to believe you, otherwise you're just making shit up or going alone with shit someone else made up.
How did singular (one) become plural (people) and could that be a problem?
What if a thing can only be different from other things and never the same as?
Can you name two things that are the same without each one being at a different position from one another?
Why is it so easy to suggest "same" while ignoring perceivable differences?
"2024 Global Scripture Access - 7.45 billion known users*"... https://www.wycliffe.net/resources/statistics/
*For statistical agreement...are given as 'up to…' rather than an exact number
Some of us get very tired of crusader's 'song I wrote' spam.
You mean:
Yes, this does grow tiresome...
I am happy more people see this.
Still... Who are those upvoting him? I never see them defending his posts in the comments. Not a single time.
I don't know who are upvoting me, but I do thank them for their support.
Whats worse, him posting every few days, or someone posting 6 threads in a row, of political stuff. Or even worse, bitching about their own personal drama that they cant seem to escape, (hint: thats me).
Im here for the aliens, and the spiritual, and the super natural. But it seems like most of the posts here are political.
(Why are we making fun of people for believing in aliens in a fucking CONSPIRACY forum)
Now, I have no right to say anything, I am fully aware of how exactly shitty I am of a person for my contribution to the community. Which is why I actually try not to make posts, because I just basically bitch like its a personal blog. And I dont respond to 99% of my replies.
In my moment of need, no one was there responding to my posts, or trying to actually give me real help. Just ridiculing and calling me crazy. Mainly reddit. Before that it was mainly people telling me how stupid I am for having the audacity not to believe the same things they do.
https://np.reddit.com/r/NovaScotia/comments/ml2ozx/can_freon_cause_irregular_heartbeat
That faggot meetc/hfx_redditor couldnt delete this one since he lost his mod powers in that sub. He deleted every post I made in r/halifax and even took over a dead sub to delete another post.
After that, I dont care what anyone thinks anymore. I am sorry for that. I should try and share what knowledge I have and I do to the extent I can, but what is the point.
The media has done a good job of demonizing people like us, I got to wonder what people like my old professor Dr Mirabello are doing.
https://www.amazon.ca/Odin-Brotherhood-Mark-Mirabello-PH-D/dp/1906958637
Dude taught a alternative historys and religions class (conspiracy 101) and it was prolly one of my favorite electives I took, next to art. Game design programming is something I genuinely enjoyed, thought I could make a career out of it but turns out im a loser. But I did try to take a variety of electives to help broaden my horizons on everything, which was the original point of college, not just repeating shit you read in a book.
All we do here is fight and throw fingers, and its kinda sad. The normies/randos come by and of course theres usually some kinda anti semitic crap, and because the average person has been brainwashed they instantly think were all bonkers here.
Whatever though, I am such a bitter old man now. Feel like im 60 years old, knocking on deaths door. And most people(in real life) are so ignorant and retarded.
Im tired boss.
You can always choose to block me or just ignore my posts. This will fix your problem. Have a great day, and God bless!
Just so it's public, I am blocking u/Neo1 because he's a a hypocrite and has no desire to engage me in a civil way. I was asking him about what sect he was in to see how I could dialogue with him, but he just spewed stupidity at me. So if you guys want to know why I don't respond to his posts, this is why: You cannot see posts of those you blocked. Have a great day! God bless!