Oof... Salty loser... Spamming is not cool, mkay
(media.conspiracies.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (111)
sorted by:
He spammed his lies against me across nine forums repeatedly. He gave up when (IMHO) he realized he had no defense against my proof he has no true allegiance to the pope but only to his interpretation of the pope.
Bible-only is great. The Bible indicates only Pharaoh and Herod celebrate birthdays, namely by killing people, but righteous Job cursed his having a birthday. So it's pretty simple from there.
What do you think of Matt. 18:15-17 and getting a second witness when you have an offense against a self-professed brother like this?
If you speak with Bible verses, you have nothing to fear. Rather, you work to expose someone (u/crusaderpepe), who is adamant on promoting the evil Catholic perversion. You have done nothing wrong. Keep fighting using the scripture!
I also used the Bible against him. He promotes himself as a Catholic, but never replies to this:
And he promotes the Catholic pope ("pope" is "father" in Italian).
He also never provided an answer to this quote.
He is not here to promote Christianity, but to pervert it.
Stay strong, my brother in Christ!
Our win is a matter of time, not a matter of chance. Even people in here are starting to wake up to his phony posts and AI-generated "songs"...
May God bless you, my brother! (I do mean that!) You are most needed in the fight ahead!
This user u/crusaderpepe may have his army of bots upvoting him, and downvoting us, but that doesn't matter in the long run.
You are never wrong to quote the Bible. No, u/crusaderpepe is wrong for never replying honestly to the Scripture.
Remember this verse:
Remember that we don't fight against this shill - u/crusaderpepe, but to show the way to all those confused souls that follow him into the ditch.
There is hope in here. You are the living proof of that. And... trust me... you are not alone!
P.S.: You may not know, but I was ready to give up on this sub... And your comment made me hopeful. May God bless you, brother! You may not realize how much of an impact your actions make... They definitely helped me today. And I will remember that!
We can still help one more soul by exposing this Catholic shill. Don't give up!
Glad to hear. I don't get to check c/Conspiracies as much as I'd like but it's more based than any similar forum on the web. Even the crazies here will talk to you reasonably. But be warned, bots and AI are on the uptick, and not just the overt ones as in OP.
The fact that he's stopped posting to c/Christianity means it's been a quiet haven for two full weeks. Anytime.
I would recommend r/conspiracy_commons tho. It still allows truth to be shared there.
I am not familiar with c/Christianity. Is it really about Christianity?
If you think that forum (c/Christianity) is not filled with bots/shills, I'd like to try it out.
I will wait for your reply before I post there.
P.S.: I see your point, just have no knowledge about c/Christianity. If you can help me with your opinion on that, I would greatly appreciate it.
Yes, early in 2021 I was invited to mod c/Christianity and we have set it up as a virtual Bible study and worship service ever since. We are patient with civil criticism of Christianity (including from within) but we also don't tolerate nonsupport of the three classic creeds or the basic truths of the Bible.
Here are the facts:
You DID NOT go to me privately when you misinterpreted my post(s) to go against Christian teaching. Instead you KVETCHED all over c/Conspiracies, and you don't even believe that Christ established a Church to go to, so you are NOT even following Matthew 18:15-17 yourself, you brain-dead HYPOCRITE!
Geez... I sure hope you never called you own dad "father" or else you are clearly breaking the rule of Matthew 23:9... (rolls eyes)
Or, you know, perhaps Jesus was saying that there is only one HEAVENLY Father - God the Father - and wasn't saying that you couldn't literally call your own dad "father". And this is why you need a Church to interpret Scripture - because low IQ MORONS like Neo1 will interpret Scripture in stupid ways.
Ask your confessor whether "Geez" and other immoderate language is venial or mortal, as it depends on circumstances.
Are you like a Jehovah's Witness or something? My understanding of Job's curse was he cursed the day he was born, to say it was the fact he had a birthday is maybe technically correct but framing it that way seems engineered to a certain conclusion, since the only reason he'd be cursing that he had a birthday is because he wished he weren't burn.
I don't even celebrate my own birthday (though others in my life will force me to) but I find it strange that the Bible contains explicit prohibitions around things like wearing mixed fabrics, rules about circumcision, and all kinds of super specific things, but requires reading between the lines to figure out that God condemns birthdays
No cultism, just Hebrew roots Christianity while avoiding legalism. Yes, the Levitical prohibitions are pretty direct and all have didactic reason, and the avoidance of pagan-style days is just a fence that a lot of people put up when they discover the Hebrew structure. That is, you find out Jesus wasn't born on Christmas and you are tempted to throw out everything. But personally I found that the Bible supports the idea that American birthdays are pretty much little idol parties, and so that's been my practice for awhile, and I share it in case others might see the same evidence the same way.
Yes, I have all sorts of engineered canned statements that I throw into the ether to see what sticks. Obviously the one thing that needs emphasis all the time, especially here, is that Jesus died for our sins and rose to give us eternal life. But I like to build on what others say.
If everyone is just going by "bible only" do you think it's a problem if people read the same thing and come away with conflicting interpretations?
Like what?
Well just for starters I know there are schisms about how applicable the laws in old testament are, and there are versus supporting both sides of the argument.
And it really just boils down to whatever sect the reader is, or in your case, whatever your subjective feeling is on which side to pick.
For there must be also heresies among you, that they which are approved may be made manifest among you (1 Cor. 11:9 KJV).
Don't be shy. Share one example already.
I will wait.
The Word and the Spirit always agree. We can have diversity in nonessentials, but if people are contradicting each other they're not in the same Spirit.
I tried to interpret your comment and struggle to decipher your intended meaning.
I don't don't think it gets any easier when the cryptic nonsense was written 2000 years ago by dead authors, who can't take questions.
Start by affirming Truth exists and should be pursued. That means there must be a way to find it reliably despite our faulty sensors. That way is Spirit. It's not enough just to make a factually true statement, it's also necessary not to be using it in a deceptive spirit.
Everyone knows what it's like to speak honestly, they know when someone is speaking in truth and in spirit. Because of this, when we're dealing with truth statements, we can work together pursuing the truth and arrive at the same place because we are pursuing it in the same spirit. That's the resolution of all contradiction.
If there's no Truth to start out with, there's no point in saying or doing anything, because it's the same as not saying or doing. But everyone believes there's a point, so everyone ultimately believes there's a Truth worth working for. When you commit to pursuing Truth, you find it, that's how the universe works. Eventually we find that there's a community of Truth seekers that has greater solidity and history than any other, they have a book they've checked for millennia and found it to have greater communicative value and description of reality than any other, and the independent evidence for this Holy Bible being the book of Truth continues to grow until you see the whole big picture. That's the unity of the good news, everyone comes to the same core message for humanity who looks for it. Remaining disagreements are just about semantics and technicalities. If there's a true binary contradiction between two people, it's because they're not in the same spirit.
How did singular (one) become plural (people) and could that be a problem?
What if a thing can only be different from other things and never the same as?
Can you name two things that are the same without each one being at a different position from one another?
Why is it so easy to suggest "same" while ignoring perceivable differences?
"2024 Global Scripture Access - 7.45 billion known users*"... https://www.wycliffe.net/resources/statistics/
*For statistical agreement...are given as 'up to…' rather than an exact number