How many of you here upvoted what was fake?
(media.conspiracies.win)
Comments (33)
sorted by:
I never heard of this, but Donald Trump is a pathological liar, so it's not like I'd take his word either.
I am as apolitical as possible, believing primarily Frank Zappa's sentiments that politics is the entertainment branch of the Military Industrial Complex, but while DJT was president, it was difficult to catch him in a lie – unlike all the others we've had since JFK.
I don't equate failed campaign promises with lies. I think he was honest about what he wanted to do, but perhaps not honest about what authority he had to actually do it. The swamp made sure it stayed in power.
He could be lying. But it's equally as plausible, because those who are against him are also pathological liars, that both are lying, or he was lied about.
Unfortunately, most politicians are
To be honest; why wouldn't you believe this?
Larry Fink is (Jewish).
Look at the past history of the US Secretary of Treasury going back (10 Years)
Current: Janet Yellen (Jewish). Previous secretaries: Steven Mnuchin (Jewish). Adam Szubin (Jewish). Jack Lew (Jewish)
Why are there so many jews?
Plenty of Jews yes. Blah blah, Zion Don, I'm not disagreeing with an apropos moniker.
But why believe it without evidence?
I don't know what evidence you are expecting - are you not to believe anything unless you hear it directly from the candidate? Then, with respect, what are you doing on a conspiracy website?
The article came from a reputable source (nypost) the same site that broke news of Ashley Biden's diary so I would see no reason not to believe it.
You know, if you take a look the comments on this post, you really do see how much of "Reality" people just make up. And they are not uncomfortable that they don't have anything reliable to back up what they believe. In fact, it's the opposite: they invent "Reality" to makes themselves comfortable.
For anyone trying to figure out how the world actually works, this is a vital point.
I agree, and what makes this way more difficult is objective reality on a whole host of topics is essentially unknowable. Much has to be taken on faith, either religious, or faith in those teaching you.
Since I first learned about it from Mark Passio, I have always been on extreme alert for solipsism as the core, foundational concept the Dark Luciferians wish to implant in everyone's minds:
Solipsism: The Biggest Lie (3/10/2014)
On the flip side, to even begin to consider oneself a moral actor, one must begin by accepting it as an inherent duty to discern objective reality to the best of your abilities.
Lacking that, you just get infinite variations on, "Why wouldn't I drop these bombs? I don't know for sure what's going on down there, but this paycheck is real enough for me."
I upvote fake shit every day
Good point.
It was disinfo? It sounded very plausible, you can't blame people for thinking it was true. They don't call him the Zion Don for nothing.
Oh, the Zion Don moniker fits, but this was disinfo and the people who dislike Trump because of his ties to the Jews fell for it.
I was skeptical of the info to begin with and didn't pay it much attention. It red like hearsay.
l posted that he should employ them both : maximum farce !
Trump would never lie, right? Just like he told the truth when he said he never head of Project 2025.
Imagine being so deep into this cult that you actually believe anything this fucking clown says
Is this project 2025 in the room with you right now?
It's online. Didn't you know that?
https://www.project2025.org/playbook/
Imagine having such a case of TDS that you think every lie about him is true?
The sword cuts both ways, mon ami.
Please explain why you believe that he is telling the truth here.
Why do you assume his opponents are telling the truth?
Are you confusing me with someone else? When did I ever mention his opponents?
So, will you answer my question or not?
Pettifoggery.
Why won't you answer my question?
I asked why you think his opponents, you know, the ones that said he would choose Fink, were telling the truth?
I never mentioned his opponents therefore I cannot answer a question about a statement I never made.
No you fucking liar. This is what you wrote:
This would have been the correct way to ask your question, considering how you now are trying to change its meaning:
English, you retard. Do you speak it?
So, will you answer my question or not?
TallestShill? Is that you with an alt?
VPNguy: When did you stop beating your wife?
Now, answer me. Why do you assume that those who say Fink was going to be Treasury Sec. were telling the truth?