incongruous moon landing shadows
(media.conspiracies.win)
Comments (54)
sorted by:
of all the redpills, choking down the moon landing fraud was probably the toughest. i read soooo many books about and had so many heroes from the rocket programs of the 50's and 60's before i was out of grade school...
also famously the conspiracy rogan denounced when it was one of his first red pills which got me thinking controlled opposition before the famous recording pause with eddie even happened
What recording pause? Do you mean he stopped making episodes with Eddie in them?
Nah. There were like 1100 episodes with no pause. Didn't matter if ppl had to pee. He would just have Jaime and the guest fill time. Eddie brought up something and caused the first pause ever and when they resumed recording the episode that topic was mysteriously dropped.
Oh wow, that is pretty remarkable. I mean, at this point, everybody kind of knows that Joe Rogan is a sell out piece of shit, but it's interesting to hear something like that, because it indicates that he literally had a black list of topics and Eddie brought one up anyway. Who knows if Eddie bravo is as legit as he has always seemed, but he certainly is more legit than Joe Rogan ever was.
Eddie is def legit. He sounds exactly like my dumber acquaintances who know enough to reject mainstream approved thought but not smart enough to have a concise explanation of why they do it. I didn't realize my ability to break down these subjects was special until I started reaching out to red pill folks. Especially when just going the opposite way as the official narrative is an easy way to get baited by a clever enemy. Most of my time on GA.win was pushing back against red NPCs.
That's a pretty good explanation of the state of things, including the bit about GA, red NPCs is a great word to describe them. I worked with a guy who really believed the Q stuff when it first started, and I literally told him back then, and keep in mind this was long before anybody was talking about Operation Trust, so it was honestly just that obvious, but I was trying to tell him "this seems like the perfect thing to keep people from doing anything, just convincing them that Superman is going to save them at the end", and I swear it was the weirdest thing because this was long before it became a common phenomenon to see peeps like this (this was like Dec 2016, IIRC), and so for me it was like observing a friend joining a cult - he was 100% convinced. The following March or so of 2017 was the last time we ever talked, and I feel like this cult mentality was definitely a factor in that. His whole mindset completely changed.
'sup Eddie :)
joking aside, thanks for explaining "the pause". hadn't known about it.
Remember Joe Rogan Questions Everything? Lol.
all fake after X-15
Same here, im sure for most of us growing up in america, one of our first dreams is becoming a astronaut. Ended up with lazy eye after running into something and it swelled shut for about a month around the age of 8. Really fucked my vision up. Then I turned out to be 6'3 anyway. Growing up in Ohio, you hear alot about the natives who made it up there.
Im still torn, I believe they either made it up there, and we now have bases established there. Or they never made it. Considering we have never publicly went back is a big indicator, but then again there is enough money missing from the pentagons budget it could pay for bases on mars. Whos to say that hacker gary mackinnon didnt really stumble upon legit documents?
There are more than a few odd inconsistencies like shadows, the looks on the first apollo crew's faces when they come back, them getting caught trying to fake being out of low earth orbit. (which you wont find in a google search, but it is in some of the big moon debunking videos).
The explanation for the shadows almost sounds legit. In the picture that they made to tried and recreate it, its funny how they put the rock so much closer to them. And even then you can see the shadow isnt exactly parallel on that one either is it? And then the rocks are supposed to show what exactly? That they were using different lenses?
I do lean towards the moon landing be faked, mainly because they built a huge set in the desert, using bombs to recreate the craters exactly to a 1 to 1 scale. It was a huge undertaking and highly compartmentalized. No one knew why they were creating mock spacesuits or fake moon rocks. Just that they were commissioned to make it.
I also find the videos very weird.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CdootzOBkOU
Why do I have this odd feeling this was the real speed they were moving... I cant quite put my finger on it but it just seems so much more legit than the slowed down version. I think part of the reason these videos throw me off is the moon is so much smaller than earth, shouldnt they be able to jump much higher? Only a few cips where you cant see their feet (Suggesting they may be on trampolines), where they "jump".
1/6th gravity but jumps about as high as he would on earth lol.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NHeOpJh5Q-M
No, they were hanging from threads in those scenes. They used the same method that's applied in theatre productions sometimes.
The small stones at the knees, correct shadows....
The large shadow at the hip, it's dropping onto a hole....
Maybe the hauled a bunch of studio lights and batteries along with them to get better pictures..?
i love how you are dead serious, and your faith is unshakable in the face of any possible evidence!
Easier to waste trillions of dollars in R&D than actually go to the moon.
They sure spend a lot of money on the DUMS.
Yea and I imagine stocking them with shit isnt cheap either, remember all those weird shortages for things like kids medications and food condiments. As well as the millions of cows and chickens that were supposedly killed in freak fires. Coincidences, im sure ^^.
Underage hookers and blow.
honestly, since underage hookers and blow are going to happen anyway, i wish planners would just make a line item for that budget rather than surreptitiously siphoning off funds from legit projects.
Ive seen you link this video before. I always open it up but even the title irks me wrong. Not really reoccurring ice ages. Its one ice age with reoccurring interglacials. Skipping through it I can see something about gods judgement haha. Sorry but god couldnt stop what is coming even if he wanted to.
When you say glass beads I think of the ones that are created during meteorite impacts, like the ones china supposedly discovered.
For some reason your comment made me think about the glass, vitrified forts. Almost like humanity was either under attack, or the earth was getting scorched by something like plasma. It's funny in plato's atlantis, one of the big secrets the egyptian priest share, is that earth is periodically cleansed with either water or fire. If its water the ones in the low lying areas are swept into the sea, and if its fire, the people high in the mountains are burned to death. There are even patches of glass in the middle of the desert, their best guess is meteorites as well, but considering there are no impact craters. The fact that they seem to be localized, meaning no wide swaths of destruction make me lean towards it being the result of some kind of thermonuclear weapon.
Fun fact, did you know mars suffered a nuclear explosion I guess after the oceans dried up and the atmosphere disappeared.
Wasnt cydonia where they took pictures of the face and pyramids that later turned out to be a hill or something they claimed?
I mean, if you believe that kinda stuff.
https://www.hou.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2015/eposter/2660.pdf
This really explains the science behind it if you want to understand it. One of the hypothesis is that it was the result of a thermonuclear weapon, partly because it didnt leave a crater.
I'm with you. I think there's a breakaway civilization and that the tech/physics to get into space is alot simpler than we're led to believe.
imho, one of NASA's roles is to psy-op people into thinking getting off-planet takes vast resources and a huge power expenditure to generate the force required. the actual tech required and physics to understand is probably fairly simple. the kind of thing a couple 21st cenury Wright Brothers could build in their garage.
again imho, i think the Hutchison Effect guy was probably flirting with some of the physics principles involved in modulating whatever it is we call "gravitation". his focus wasn't on generating a propulsion system, though.
Oh, i assure you sir/madame - the embezzlement is quite real.
The rest of it is hollywood ;)
What if we flew all the way there and forgot to take the lens cap off
I'd say that's the most benign of the plausible explanations. On the other end, we could have been stopped from filming by the moons inhabitants.
This all being hypothetical spitballing, if I were nasa, I'd never let it slip that I left a lens cap on.
I'd like to see front mounted cameras myself. In the 60s, I can see the technology being somewhat cumbersome, but now. ol Elon can just slap a gopro on the dash of one of them bad boys and away we go.
Maybe someone has to point it out to them directly, as they haven't thought of it yet....
They still can't do it. Artemis is fake too. Man has never left low earth orbit.
Never heard of your first bulletin.
The second one is supposedly the reason for the artemis missions. DId they send the dummys strapped with radiation sensors yet? I remember hearing the launch was delayed but they must have launched it months ago. They may make it to the moon ok. Beyond though. I still think its strange none of the apollo astronauts didnt end up sterile. Lucky bastards.
And your third point is kinda silly. Breaking earths gravity is the hardest part. Flying from LEO is a fraction of the cost.
Can the moon landing deniers actually explain what they think the lighting setup is here? Two lights pointing in different directions that only cast shadows on one object? The shadows can be easily explained by the ground being sloped.
What convinced me we didnt go is the problem of heat.
Heat needs to be transferred to something. On earth an air conditioner takes the heat from the air inside, moves it outside and transfers it to the air. Newtons laws of thermal dynamics etc. (there is no such thing as "cold". It is a relative term to heat)
The sun sends radiation to the spacemen which is absorbed as heat. There is no way to get rid of the heat efficiently. They are in space, no air to dissipate heat into. They are like a vacuum coffee cup.
Thats a good point. They allegedly landed in a sun settie kind of spot. On the edge of "night".
But they still had to get there and back. And the shadows are at most like OPs pic. Looks like direct sunlight to me.
And look at the big one in the top-left corner. The direction is the opposite.
It’s as if the lights were set up on all sides of the scene.
Is this foto on the official NASA page or the stones are photoshopped?
they faked it to one up russia. that's ALL the moon landing was about. of course we went to space and maybe orbited the moon and all that, but I think they may have seriously fake it to one up russia and "beat them", since the u.s. can't stand russia being equal to them .
That's what I think
Careful. There's a mod that wants to remove your post because he doesn't read complex sentences.
Good post. And I say this rarely, not that you should care. But I like seeing logical posts in here.
Logic - 100% Physics - 100% Countering the propaganda - 100%
Post value - 100%. Keep it up!
ty. just fyi, none of your comment's downvotes are mine.
fake and gay, confirmed.
There is a good paper out there on the parallax issue(s) and lazy reusing of dlp (most likely/presumably) backgrounds during apollo.
Unless you can show that in both photos, the angle of the light, height and angle of the camera, and position and shapes of the stones are the same, this is useless.