Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

26
There were giants. No one debates that other mammals were enormous during the ice age. Why wouldn't humans have also been?
posted 2 years ago by KiloRomeo 2 years ago by KiloRomeo +28 / -2

Elephants were giants.
Tigers were giants
Sloths were giants.
Lions were giants.
Rhinos were giants.
Bears were giants.
Great apes were giants.
Even gerbils were giants.
Yet humans were less than 5' tall?
I'm not buying it.

28 comments share
28 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (28)
sorted by:
▲ 9 ▼
– ipproductions 9 points 2 years ago +9 / -0

nephilim were real

graham shillcock observes every monument records giants built them but then he simply dismisses that as "metaphorical"...

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Graphenium 3 points 2 years ago +3 / -0

Jim Viera - TedX - Stone Builders, Mounds & the Giants of Ancient America

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=FNo_dzgznNI


Skeletons in the Cupboard - New Zealand aboriginal documentary

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=PBFpGayPATs


Two great videos to get people started on the subject imo.

And yeah, that’s one thing I’ve come to not like about Hancock. He’s so afraid of being “quoted out of context” that he refuses to speak aloud many of the possibilities raised by his otherwise great research. But he had no problem doing 10 seasons of Ancient Aliens...ehh idk, he’s still a net positive for sure

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– Primate98 6 points 2 years ago +6 / -0

Giants are frequently portrayed in ancient and historical artwork. The deniers explain it away by saying, "Those were just more important people, kings and warriors, and their greatness was reflected by the artist drawing them larger than others."

I've always wanted to personally ask a person holding this view, as I did for the vast majority of my life, "Suppose there actually were giants. As an artist, how would you have portrayed them? Would it have been just like in the existing artworks, but with an arrow pointing towards them with a note saying, 'no really guise, these are yuuuge people!!!'?"

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– ScythianIsraelite 3 points 2 years ago +3 / -0

I have come across this over the years and am familiar with Entity Art's recent series on the topic. I definitely do not trust Entity Art because he has written extensively about seeing demons appear in his bedroom, but he does post some interesting information that should be evaluated. For those who want to see some artwork of giants see these links:

  • Ancient Giants – Old World Buildings – Resets and Genocides, Part 1
  • Medieval and Renaissance Giants + Celts / Gauls, Israelites, Romans & Vikings. Resets and Genocides, Part 2

As you can see the Virgin Mary is portrayed as a giant. There are some people that are twice her height, and then she is portrayed as being twice as tall as smaller people. I remember trying to find an explanation on all of this artwork and I found some graduate level art history students and teachers who all said it's hierachy of scale which is what you explained above.

We have the Shroud of Turin, so we know what Jesus' bodily proportions were. He was a regular sized person. If his mother Mary was a giant then wouldn't Jesus have been taller? Or did the giant Mary just give birth to a regular sized person? Does that make any sense to you that Jesus would be half the height of His mother Mary? How would that work with the Crucifixion and Mary standing at the foot of the cross? Or do you think that in the artwork I linked above that Mary is regular sized (like us) and that the people smaller than her are just midgets? Also if being a giant was so common in the past then how come we haven't found more graves with giant bones? How come there are no historical accounts writing about how many Popes and Kings were giants?

Based on what I have seen most all of the real giant remains were discovered in North America. I think they were brought over here during the time of the Phoenician Atlantic Michigan copper trade. That is why these North American giant remains were all uncovered with copper jewelry, headpieces, trinkets, etc. The Phoenicians likely brought these giants to America. Many think the Phoenicians were Israelites, but the mainstream view is that they descend from Canaanite's who worshipped demons and sacrificed their kids to Moloch. As someone else stated in this thread, I think Ham's wife had the recessive genes for nephilim characteristics and that is where grous such as the Sons of Anak in the Bible came from. If the Phoenicians were Canaanite that means they descended from Ham. That is why some giants were living amongst the Phoenicians. That is why the giants were brought to America by them.

There is actual historical evidence regarding giants in North America and South America. I have not seen any written historical evidence for giants existing in medieval Europe and Popes and Kings being giants. Has literally any Christian theologian of Catholic or Protestant sects even mentioned how Mary was a giant? Did God just not reveal that information to anyone? Catholics have Marian apparitions and pray the Rosary. Many children have seen Mary and did not report her as a giant. I did see something one time on St. Christopher being a giant, but maybe this information is suppressed and that is why I am unable to find it now.

I do agree that history is being suppressed. I view Genghis Khan and the Mongols as White Caucasoid Scythian Tartarians. I think the portrayal of Genghis Khan and the Mongols as Mongoloid's is an extensive disinformation campaign by the Communist Chinese, Soviet Union, and post-WWI propagandist historians in Europe and America. I've read books from the 1400's-1600's about how Genghis Khan turned Eastern Scythia into Tartary and the Mongols were only a small part of the Tartarians. Many of them were also even Nestorian heretics. Here are some links if people are interested

  • The Great Tartarian Empire - ROBERT SEPEHR
  • The Archer and the Steppe or The Empires of Scythia by F.R. Grahame
  • Tartary olim Scythia
  • The Tartarian Empire and Nearby Regions – incl Mogols (Mongols), Ottomans & Persians – Resets and Genocides, Part 3
  • Very brief intro to Nestorianism and Mongols

One topic I don't have a thorough explanation for is artistic depictions of the Native Americans as White people. There is a ton of artwork that depicts most all of the South American Natives as White people and the dark skinned people as a smaller minority group. I already know about about the Viracocha and the Chachapoyas, but these seem to be minority groups. I think the blonde haired blue eyed nobility in South America, which I linked to above, were Eastern Scythian's (Israelites in apostasy) who migrated to the New World. That is why there are some Israelite artifacts in the New World which is sometimes pointed out by Steven M. Collins and other Christian Identity historians. It also fulfills the prophecy of Abraham being a father of many nations.

Note: If the entityart.co.uk links above don't load for people try turning off your VPN. I have had problems with this site when my VPN is on. Don't know why.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– KiloRomeo [S] 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

I'm thinking like 12-14' . What comes to mind for you?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Primate98 4 points 2 years ago +4 / -0

I would say we got the entire range, but getting smaller as we progress through history. That would be consistent with the Nephilim genetics getting progressively diluted.

For example, currently the tallest country in the world is the Netherlands at 72.36 inches. Makes you think those Dutch bankers, through the Venetian Black Nobility, brought those genes with them from the Levant.

In between, say two to four centuries ago, you get a lot of art and architecture for what I would guess would be 10-12', about twice as tall as "ordinary" humans. All the Tartarian architecture looks about that size. For example, the Hermitage has statues on the outside with humans and giants of that ratio, and the front doors look about 15' high.

Going back to the original Nephilim, I heard that the translations of the reports and measurement units yield about 36'. I used to discard that out of hand and attribute it to translation errors, thinking that was too tall on principles of physics. Now I'm not so sure. I mean, I think the physical principles still hold, but now I wonder if the force of gravity was the same.

It intrigues me how much "They" want this erased from history and it disturbs me how well They've succeeded.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– deleted 5 points 2 years ago +5 / -0
▲ 3 ▼
– Lasereyes 3 points 2 years ago +3 / -0

White people were giants.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Vlad_The_Impaler 2 points 2 years ago +3 / -1

Scientists today admit that the north and south pole move. Each and every year its movement can be measured.

This likely means that the axis upon which the theoretical globe spins moves.

This means that what we perceive as the very cold frozen regions of north pole and south pole once existed in very different places upon the planet.

This means that the north pole and south pole may have once had much more mild climates and even civilizations which are now buried under ice.

This is worthy of research into theories of pole shifting in history as well as predictions for future polar shifts.

I've even heard of theories that the north and south pole completely flip meaning north on my compass would become the new south. Crazy to imagine.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– IGOexiled 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

Climate shifts due to orientation makes a lot more sense to me than the "once we hit X amount of CO2 the world heats to boiling" idea.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Hutter 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

Wikipedia is literally chirping crickets waiting for people to read that nature could deal with more CO2 than humans could ever produce even if they tried their hardest, it just rained for 2 mil years.

Also crickets chirping on past climate changes, humans are going through 26th climate change from like past 50.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 2 years ago +4 / -2
▲ 2 ▼
– KiloRomeo [S] 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

Link me pls

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– Oldmancountry17 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

We are giants now, 10 mile high meat sacks being drove around by shrunken nazis.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– KiloRomeo [S] 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

Lol

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– MediaMadeMe 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

In Cathedral of San Lorenzo, the inscription on the door reads:

Janus, primus Rex Italiae de progenie gigantum, qui fundavit Genuam temporae Abrahae

Translates to:

Janus, the first king of Italy of the race of giants, who founded Genoa in the time of Abraham

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Burninator 1 point 2 years ago +4 / -3

There was no ice age, it was Noah's flood and yes there were giants before the flood.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– DOI56 6 points 2 years ago +6 / -0

There were giants after the flood as well. One of Ham's wives I think had the genetics so they were around after, the Anakim, etc..

https://biblehub.com/topical/a/anakim.htm

Leading to the most famous giant, Nimrod (aka Osiris)

Goliath may be more well known to some, but the mystery schools are venerating Nimrod/Osiris and awaiting his return as Horus.

Babylonian Judaism is simply the Egyptian mystery schools (Freemasonry, etc) repackaged with Hebrew sheep's clothing.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– praying71 0 points 2 years ago +5 / -5

Because the God has created the world first, the man was created later. Read the Bible.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Plemethrock 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

Buddy, the bible talks about their being giants in the old testament. I don't know what you're on about though.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– praying71 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

Adam could either be a giant or standard size, couldn’t be both.

If you mean Goliath - that was way later after Adam, he was just a big man.

Whatever “giants” the other cases describe - they’re are all Adam’s descendants so they fit a “big man” category.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ -1 ▼
– deleted -1 points 2 years ago +3 / -4
▲ -4 ▼
– Iknowitsu -4 points 2 years ago +1 / -5

Shills

permalink save report block reply
▲ -4 ▼
– KarlMartell -4 points 2 years ago +1 / -5

Great apes were giants.

There's your answer but you are too fucking stupid to realise it.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– KiloRomeo [S] 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

Different species, clearly. Why do you choose to behave so rudely towards others?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Xaviermgk 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

Agent provocateur/husk of a human.

permalink parent save report block reply

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - qpl2q (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy