Elephants were giants.
Tigers were giants
Sloths were giants.
Lions were giants.
Rhinos were giants.
Bears were giants.
Great apes were giants.
Even gerbils were giants.
Yet humans were less than 5' tall?
I'm not buying it.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (28)
sorted by:
I'm thinking like 12-14' . What comes to mind for you?
I would say we got the entire range, but getting smaller as we progress through history. That would be consistent with the Nephilim genetics getting progressively diluted.
For example, currently the tallest country in the world is the Netherlands at 72.36 inches. Makes you think those Dutch bankers, through the Venetian Black Nobility, brought those genes with them from the Levant.
In between, say two to four centuries ago, you get a lot of art and architecture for what I would guess would be 10-12', about twice as tall as "ordinary" humans. All the Tartarian architecture looks about that size. For example, the Hermitage has statues on the outside with humans and giants of that ratio, and the front doors look about 15' high.
Going back to the original Nephilim, I heard that the translations of the reports and measurement units yield about 36'. I used to discard that out of hand and attribute it to translation errors, thinking that was too tall on principles of physics. Now I'm not so sure. I mean, I think the physical principles still hold, but now I wonder if the force of gravity was the same.
It intrigues me how much "They" want this erased from history and it disturbs me how well They've succeeded.