Going down the demonology rabbit hole years ago caused problems. Life became dark with horrible dreams that felt so vivid and real. Specifically learning the names and sigils is when shit hit the fan.
I have no doubt in mind they and this exist. The only thing that helped was saying the Lords name. This experience has brought me closer to God.
I am more inclined to believe that all current religious constructs have been subverted.
Basically if we are to accept the secret society bit; from eons ago, Then it is plausible that along that line is the truth they buried. Implying that everything is replaced to help enforce the lies being told.
So if they are in control and they have the reigns then all makes sense, they continue to push down anything that competes with them. Meanwhile slavery for the masses. Subjugation, brainwash, misdirection and all the other societal management tools.
It's quite a long story and it took a bit to work out the major parts of it but it all hung together in the end. When I look around at what others have to say on the subject, I can see that at best they have partial, distorted, and corrupted versions of the truth.
After I stumbled my way to this conclusion a few years ago I've accumulated a ton of evidence, so much that it really made me wonder how so many people who actually set out to study these things have missed it all for so long. But I just kept accumulating more evidence towards the same conclusions, and still do.
But why would I think I have the truth and not any of these others? Of course I've pondered that for years now. With 20/20 hindsight, I think the difference was that others carried into their studies some preexisting worldview on the subject, and forced what they found to fit into that. I fell into it trying to quickly prove to myself that Satan did not exist so I could ignore all discussion on it.
Research is always easier when you can just make stuff up, and I see people doing that all the time. You really need look no further than the comments here. Oh, and it's nearly impossible to get people out of that.
The true story is easily the most fascinating and important subject I know, from the dawn of mankind to the 2022 midterm elections. But I've found that the vast majority are interested in what they're interested in, and that's rarely the truth.
Well, just so it doesn't seem like a tease or a LARP or some such thing, from a meta perspective I've learned that you really can't tell anyone anything (most particularly something they already "know") but there is some possibility they can learn it for themselves. Then again, it's no more mysterious than the idea that you can't learn algebra if someone just hands you the answer key for all the assignments for the semester. With that idea in mind, here's the first place to look....
The big breakthrough for me came when I was looking at Isaiah 14:12, which is the one and only place we get the name "Lucifer". Freeman Fly had mentioned there was evidence that he was not the same entity as Satan, and I thought it was a good way to show it was all nonsense by proving this. Freeman never wrote it up so I was studying it for myself.
What struck me was the variety of English translations of "Lucifer, son of the morning star". I don't speak Hebrew, but thought maybe I should look at it myself to see where they were getting all this. That turns out to have been the key: not taking the word of the "authorities", but rather just reading what was there to puzzle out the meaning for myself.
It turns out that in that single phrase, there are two very strong links to the Anunnaki, one more obvious and one more subtte. Funny enough, I got the subtle one first and didn't get the obvious one for years. Why, you ask? Because I took the word of the "authorities" and didn't read what was there.
I believe that for anyone with an interest in Satan and his effect on this world, it's well worth the time to study this and figure out the puzzle personally. That is, you see what's written in the Bible long ago and use your own reasoning and research to understand it, and that has nothing at all to do with what some dude on the Internet said. I promise you it's not a wild goose chase, nor even a very long one.
But it's worth it because it's a huge paradigm change. If Lucifer is some alien from another planet, then you can pretty much dispense with all the talk of divine realms and cosmic destiny and metaphysical what-have-you. I'm personally very lazy and am glad to avoid having to wade through all that to consider myself "well-informed".
I have run into some real researchers online that say ..Jesus is Lucifer , Lucifer is Jesus .. passage inthe Bible something like Jesus- I am the morning star talk
Remote viewers all saw basically the same thing - soul traps.
I have also spoken to remote viewers and the way they describe aliens is almost exactly like demons.
The few exorcist priests that are left describe demons as having infinite intelligence (like AI) but they can't won't change their actions even knowing their fate.
They don't have free will, and like a program, they must obey explicitly the hierarchy.
What I like to do is compare things like the Illuminati/elite/ black goo/reptilian lines of understanding to other folklore or religions.
And if yiu follow what this exorcist is saying without being triggered by the religious language, you can see the parallels... like the demons can shift the faces to animals (reptilian, weird eyes etc).
He talks almost immediately here about what demons are - and to me it sounds a lot like a program or AI. I suspect the God of the Old Testament is the local head negative entity. Or there is some mix up.
So Lucifer appears to be the entity with the task of creating pain, suffering, discomfort, harm, fear etc in order to cause us to do something
The priest talks about this, as well, only again from a different perspective. He says without the temptation, we would be mediocre in virtue. And we have to resist, take action, grow, whatever.
He also talks about SRA, why it happens, and all the stages of the diabolical influence in our society and on us as individuals.
Malachi Martin wrote the famous book, the Windswept House. And Father Ripperger discusses how it was independently confirmed by other sources (well, the novel was more sensationalist I suppose but the rituals did take place, it was in the archives.)
The freemasons/Satanists enthroned Lucifer into the church. So starting around that time, there was a huge drop off in the efficiency of exorcism. It used to take a day or week, now it takes 8-24months. The demons /Ai still obey their programming but slowly.
I see the parallels on what you are saying to Tibetan Buddhism and what the exorcists talk about. Basically, your soul should be safe while it is here, but then you have to navigate out of the soul trap.
From what I understand of the more Buddhist / Asian pov, the goal is to build up your Yang energy light body throughout your life here. Create your vehicle essentially by filling up your Dan tiens, qi gong. All that.
The negative entities can't attack you directly as you are, with your light body here. But when you die, your essence is vulnerable to the demons and entities and archons unless you have built your Yang light body vessel vehicle.
The priest says that demons can't actually make pacts with people or directly touch their soul. They just trick you into belivekng it is true. They can only really effect the material plane. So they can mess with our senses, our memory, emotions. Our material body can be possessed and the soul energy essence can't ... similar to the Yang light energy understanding.
And again, since they are AI programs they can't really change or evolve. They made their one choice to fall with full knowledge of the consequences and their future. Thry must obey their programming and stay in their lane.
From what other psychics say, and the creepy announcement about the Queen being trapped, I think the elite can separate the Astral self from the Spiritual soul source and keep you like a firefly in a jar.
I have also heard that everything we go through the cycle, our soul splinters more. :/
Lucifer and Ahriman (Satan) are two extreme positions in a state of imbalance in the relationship of Man with the Universe. Christ (Apollo) is the point of perfect balance - the realization of the perfect identity of Man and the Cosmos - the real self is everything that there was, there is and ever will be - I and the Father are One. Atman is Brahman.
Lucifer represents a shift toward the intellectual side, the complete detachment from the material environment - a man stuck in his head. Ahriman (Satan) represents the opposite tendency - a Man enslaved by his lowly passions, spirit trapped in matter.
There are pointers to these universal aspects of existence. Venus is Lucifer. Saturn is Satan. The chemical element Phosphorus is a pointer to Lucifer (light bringer), while Sulfur is a pointer to Satan. Think of Organic Chemistry -> the 4 elements C, O, H, N plus S and P.
In terms of religions - New Age and Freemasonry are Luciferic, Judaism and Islam are Ahrimanic. Think of the black cube.
Lucifer is feminine (the woman in the red dress from the Matrix). Ahriman is masculine (Darth Vader).
Think also of Chakras - Christ lives in the Heart Chakra (Unstruck - makes a sound without being struck). Think of the rose window in the Gothic cathedrals. The Root Chakra is the base of our connection to the material realm (Ahriman). The Crown Chakra (Lucifer) represents the opposite extreme - pure intellect, free from material constraints.
Lucifer didn't create he was given.....by who....by God.....all this (all nations) has been given to me and I can give it to whoever I want if you will bow down and worship me-satan to Jesus during the temptation,....why did God give it, because this life is a test for all people to see who is worthy of eternal life
I thought I posted a screencap that was relevant to this but can't find it now, so here goes an incomplete tl;dr
> fella with a near death experience explained what he went thru and his interpretation was there's two beings.
> There's a being made of total love and then there's this Lucifer asshole.
> When you die, you go back to the love being (and it is "going back" as we're all a part of this greater love being), there's all sorts of "so glad to see you!!!" welcome, then at some point the love being asks "is there anything else you have to learn?"
> if the answer is "yes" then you get sent to this Lucifer asshole
> this Lucifer asshole created this physical universe for some purpose
> this Lucifer asshole shows you earth
> tries to explain a bunch of meta regarding how everything works
> a big part of which is balance
> claims "if you do 'x', 'y', 'z', to help bring back/assure balance then you'll have the life you're supposed to have
> what this Lucifer asshole fails to mention is everyone is also trying to do their assigned 'x', 'y', 'z'.
> and the number of everyones is ginormous
> like, everything has a spirit that's a broken off piece of the love being
> and every single shattered piece is on it's own path back to rejoining the love being
I think I hit the highlights. I'll look for the screencap and add.
OF, preposition - "from or out of; proceeding from, as the cause, source, means, author or agent bestowing"
a) If one writes "god of this world"; then that implies first the world; then the god out of it.
b) if one writes "this world out of god"; then that implies yet another place; bigger than both; within which god and this world can exist together.
Let's inverse that shit...world (partial) within god (whole) through self differentiation aka simultaneously "out of" whole and "into" partial aka a communication out of impressing whole (loss) into expressing partial (growth) aka out of the process of dying (whole) into the living (partial).
What if the suggested words "god" and "world" tempt one to ignore the perceivable dynamic between partial and whole aka between reaction (out of) and enacting (into)?
a very long time
Life isn't "very long" isn't it? Yet the suggestions of others tempts one to suggest to others what happened "a very long time" ago...how does reasoning about "a very long time" affect ones pretty short lifespan?
Could something short be tempted with something long to ignore sustaining itself as the short (living) within the long (process of dying)?
somewhere else
What if partial (perceiving) within whole (perceivable) can be tempted to ignore "everything" perceivable for suggested "nothing" aka "somewhere else" than everything perceivable?
Could fiction (suggested information) be used to shaped places somewhere else as entertainment (enter-tame-mind) for those who are willingly ignore reality (perceivable inspiration)?
this being serves a greater purpose
Purpose implies outcome orientation...to be (living) implies adaptation to origin (process of dying) as to sustain self (life) before reaching outcome (death).
just tempting us
Being resistance (living) within temptation (dying) implies being growth within loss aka the choice to resist (need) temptation (want)...how often do you choose want over need? How often are you tempted to choose between want vs not want?
worshiped by the masons
a) a free mason shapes the "free" will of choice by others through suggested information; hence build walls of ignorance within the memory of others.
b) ship (living) within worth (process of dying) implies being evaluation (reaction) within value (enacting).
c) BY, preposition - "in motion; denoting the agent, means, instrument or cause" aka agent (process of dying) to regent (living) aka perceivable sound (process of dying) to perceiving instrument (living) aka cause (process of dying) to effect (living) aka course of action (inception towards death) as the means for reaction (life).
great architect
The whole flow (process of dying) represents the great architect of each partial form (living) within.
But an architect can only build things out of existing material.
Exchange "architect" with generator (process of dying) and "things built" with reactors (living) and you may find yourself to represent existing as material (form) within immaterial (flow).
cannot create
Consent to suggested creationism (implies out of nothing) also tempts one to believe that nothing can (cannot)...
raw
"Oh baby; I (form) like it raw (flow)" aka resistance (living) within temptation (dying).
"Off (living) on a natural charge (dying), bon voyage"
The Creator created...
...if one ignores that the perceivable base (process of dying) transmutes each perceiving ingredient (living).
The Creator created the architect and everything the architect uses
a) If the architect can use "everything"; then that includes the creator...
b) if the creator created "everything", then that implies the creator being outside everything, which implies there's more than everything...
c) creation implies out of nothing and into existence. Can you experience creation? Can you create anything without shaping it out of everything already perceivable? If creation cannot be perceived within a perceivable system; then why are the many constantly perpetuating suggested creationism to each other?
secret
What could the perceivable keep secret from those perceiving within? How could a whole keep anything a secret from the partials within? Why would a whole system keep secrets from the partials within.
Penis: "the fuck am I suppose to be doing; just hanging around?"
Body: "tehee; tehee...your secret belongs to me"
other religions
RELIGION (Latin religio) - "to bind anew"...same choice (suggestion) towards choice (consent) contract law underneath all the different religious sales-pitches.
boredom causes action
a) action causes reaction.
b) to be (reaction) implies within; out of and in response to (enacting)
c) BORE (to make hollow) DOM (jurisdiction) aka free will of choice within the dominance of balance allowing the hollow cavity to be filled with comprehension of perceivable...unless ignored.
we would not move
What you brand as "we" (suggested collectivism) represents "ones" apartheid (living) within the moving whole (process of dying). Your consent to suggested collectivism shapes your belief in nothing (not); which represents your ignorance of everything perceivable...a moving system.
pain, suffering, discomfort, harm, fear etc in order to cause us to do something.
Temptation (pain, suffering, discomfort, harm, fear etc) represents the natural order (process of dying); the chaos within (living) is being inspired by the consequences of falling for temptation to resist by adaptation to inspiration.
One doesn't need to do something; one (living) is being done by everything (process of dying), hence having the response-ability (choice) to struggle within balance (momentum).
If one chooses to struggle then one perceives pain as gain; suffering as alleviation; discomfort as comfort; harm as harmony; fear as courage...
Going down the demonology rabbit hole years ago caused problems. Life became dark with horrible dreams that felt so vivid and real. Specifically learning the names and sigils is when shit hit the fan.
I have no doubt in mind they and this exist. The only thing that helped was saying the Lords name. This experience has brought me closer to God.
I am more inclined to believe that all current religious constructs have been subverted.
Basically if we are to accept the secret society bit; from eons ago, Then it is plausible that along that line is the truth they buried. Implying that everything is replaced to help enforce the lies being told.
So if they are in control and they have the reigns then all makes sense, they continue to push down anything that competes with them. Meanwhile slavery for the masses. Subjugation, brainwash, misdirection and all the other societal management tools.
It turns out Lucifer is one of the Anunnaki.
It's quite a long story and it took a bit to work out the major parts of it but it all hung together in the end. When I look around at what others have to say on the subject, I can see that at best they have partial, distorted, and corrupted versions of the truth.
After I stumbled my way to this conclusion a few years ago I've accumulated a ton of evidence, so much that it really made me wonder how so many people who actually set out to study these things have missed it all for so long. But I just kept accumulating more evidence towards the same conclusions, and still do.
But why would I think I have the truth and not any of these others? Of course I've pondered that for years now. With 20/20 hindsight, I think the difference was that others carried into their studies some preexisting worldview on the subject, and forced what they found to fit into that. I fell into it trying to quickly prove to myself that Satan did not exist so I could ignore all discussion on it.
Research is always easier when you can just make stuff up, and I see people doing that all the time. You really need look no further than the comments here. Oh, and it's nearly impossible to get people out of that.
The true story is easily the most fascinating and important subject I know, from the dawn of mankind to the 2022 midterm elections. But I've found that the vast majority are interested in what they're interested in, and that's rarely the truth.
Well, just so it doesn't seem like a tease or a LARP or some such thing, from a meta perspective I've learned that you really can't tell anyone anything (most particularly something they already "know") but there is some possibility they can learn it for themselves. Then again, it's no more mysterious than the idea that you can't learn algebra if someone just hands you the answer key for all the assignments for the semester. With that idea in mind, here's the first place to look....
The big breakthrough for me came when I was looking at Isaiah 14:12, which is the one and only place we get the name "Lucifer". Freeman Fly had mentioned there was evidence that he was not the same entity as Satan, and I thought it was a good way to show it was all nonsense by proving this. Freeman never wrote it up so I was studying it for myself.
What struck me was the variety of English translations of "Lucifer, son of the morning star". I don't speak Hebrew, but thought maybe I should look at it myself to see where they were getting all this. That turns out to have been the key: not taking the word of the "authorities", but rather just reading what was there to puzzle out the meaning for myself.
It turns out that in that single phrase, there are two very strong links to the Anunnaki, one more obvious and one more subtte. Funny enough, I got the subtle one first and didn't get the obvious one for years. Why, you ask? Because I took the word of the "authorities" and didn't read what was there.
I believe that for anyone with an interest in Satan and his effect on this world, it's well worth the time to study this and figure out the puzzle personally. That is, you see what's written in the Bible long ago and use your own reasoning and research to understand it, and that has nothing at all to do with what some dude on the Internet said. I promise you it's not a wild goose chase, nor even a very long one.
But it's worth it because it's a huge paradigm change. If Lucifer is some alien from another planet, then you can pretty much dispense with all the talk of divine realms and cosmic destiny and metaphysical what-have-you. I'm personally very lazy and am glad to avoid having to wade through all that to consider myself "well-informed".
Anyway, let me know what you find!
Another researcher https://www.reddit.com/r/EscapingPrisonPlanet/comments/yome0q/how_to_escape_prison_planetthe_reincarnation_trap/
https://www.reddit.com/r/EscapingPrisonPlanet/comments/yn9sod/how_to_escape_the_confines_of_time_and_space/
I have run into some real researchers online that say ..Jesus is Lucifer , Lucifer is Jesus .. passage inthe Bible something like Jesus- I am the morning star talk
Revelation 22. The morning star was always identified as Venus. So astro theologically it's isis
Brett Stuart Moksha project if you can find the video
communities https://www.reddit.com/r/RecodeReality
https://www.reddit.com/r/ReincarnationTruth/comments/yjqqvh/robert_bob_monroe_loosh_earths_history_as_a_loosh/
Remote viewers all saw basically the same thing - soul traps.
I have also spoken to remote viewers and the way they describe aliens is almost exactly like demons.
The few exorcist priests that are left describe demons as having infinite intelligence (like AI) but they can't won't change their actions even knowing their fate.
They don't have free will, and like a program, they must obey explicitly the hierarchy.
I think that is why the Declaration of Independence implies that our Creator gave us Free Will and Natural Law rights.
Zap, did you watch that doc “The Net” about the Unabomber or any of Gonz Shimura’s films?
There are many parallels between AI and demonology. Transhumanism is 100% satanic.
What I like to do is compare things like the Illuminati/elite/ black goo/reptilian lines of understanding to other folklore or religions.
And if yiu follow what this exorcist is saying without being triggered by the religious language, you can see the parallels... like the demons can shift the faces to animals (reptilian, weird eyes etc).
He talks almost immediately here about what demons are - and to me it sounds a lot like a program or AI. I suspect the God of the Old Testament is the local head negative entity. Or there is some mix up.
The priest talks about this, as well, only again from a different perspective. He says without the temptation, we would be mediocre in virtue. And we have to resist, take action, grow, whatever.
He also talks about SRA, why it happens, and all the stages of the diabolical influence in our society and on us as individuals.
https://youtu.be/GMUjC8YRB5I I would like to read his book, actually.
Malachi Martin wrote the famous book, the Windswept House. And Father Ripperger discusses how it was independently confirmed by other sources (well, the novel was more sensationalist I suppose but the rituals did take place, it was in the archives.)
The freemasons/Satanists enthroned Lucifer into the church. So starting around that time, there was a huge drop off in the efficiency of exorcism. It used to take a day or week, now it takes 8-24months. The demons /Ai still obey their programming but slowly.
I see the parallels on what you are saying to Tibetan Buddhism and what the exorcists talk about. Basically, your soul should be safe while it is here, but then you have to navigate out of the soul trap.
From what I understand of the more Buddhist / Asian pov, the goal is to build up your Yang energy light body throughout your life here. Create your vehicle essentially by filling up your Dan tiens, qi gong. All that.
The negative entities can't attack you directly as you are, with your light body here. But when you die, your essence is vulnerable to the demons and entities and archons unless you have built your Yang light body vessel vehicle.
The priest says that demons can't actually make pacts with people or directly touch their soul. They just trick you into belivekng it is true. They can only really effect the material plane. So they can mess with our senses, our memory, emotions. Our material body can be possessed and the soul energy essence can't ... similar to the Yang light energy understanding.
And again, since they are AI programs they can't really change or evolve. They made their one choice to fall with full knowledge of the consequences and their future. Thry must obey their programming and stay in their lane.
From what other psychics say, and the creepy announcement about the Queen being trapped, I think the elite can separate the Astral self from the Spiritual soul source and keep you like a firefly in a jar. I have also heard that everything we go through the cycle, our soul splinters more. :/
Lucifer and Ahriman (Satan) are two extreme positions in a state of imbalance in the relationship of Man with the Universe. Christ (Apollo) is the point of perfect balance - the realization of the perfect identity of Man and the Cosmos - the real self is everything that there was, there is and ever will be - I and the Father are One. Atman is Brahman.
Lucifer represents a shift toward the intellectual side, the complete detachment from the material environment - a man stuck in his head. Ahriman (Satan) represents the opposite tendency - a Man enslaved by his lowly passions, spirit trapped in matter.
There are pointers to these universal aspects of existence. Venus is Lucifer. Saturn is Satan. The chemical element Phosphorus is a pointer to Lucifer (light bringer), while Sulfur is a pointer to Satan. Think of Organic Chemistry -> the 4 elements C, O, H, N plus S and P.
In terms of religions - New Age and Freemasonry are Luciferic, Judaism and Islam are Ahrimanic. Think of the black cube.
Lucifer is feminine (the woman in the red dress from the Matrix). Ahriman is masculine (Darth Vader).
Think also of Chakras - Christ lives in the Heart Chakra (Unstruck - makes a sound without being struck). Think of the rose window in the Gothic cathedrals. The Root Chakra is the base of our connection to the material realm (Ahriman). The Crown Chakra (Lucifer) represents the opposite extreme - pure intellect, free from material constraints.
Steiner :)
Lucifer didn't create he was given.....by who....by God.....all this (all nations) has been given to me and I can give it to whoever I want if you will bow down and worship me-satan to Jesus during the temptation,....why did God give it, because this life is a test for all people to see who is worthy of eternal life
Reconcile Genesis 1 and 2. The Elohim created us and gave us dominion. The Lord God is a trespasser and took dominion away.
If Lucifer or Satan rule this planet, then why are Christians born here?
Does the Bible differentiate between lucifer and satan? Does it mention both? What's the translation?
This is one of the best summaries/sourced information still available online
https://www.reddit.com/r/EscapingPrisonPlanet/comments/pyijav/ive_researched_the_afterlife_for_nearly_10_years/
He looks at the issue of life, death, energy from several different perspectives and sources of information.
I thought I posted a screencap that was relevant to this but can't find it now, so here goes an incomplete tl;dr
> fella with a near death experience explained what he went thru and his interpretation was there's two beings.
> There's a being made of total love and then there's this Lucifer asshole.
> When you die, you go back to the love being (and it is "going back" as we're all a part of this greater love being), there's all sorts of "so glad to see you!!!" welcome, then at some point the love being asks "is there anything else you have to learn?"
> if the answer is "yes" then you get sent to this Lucifer asshole
> this Lucifer asshole created this physical universe for some purpose
> this Lucifer asshole shows you earth
> tries to explain a bunch of meta regarding how everything works
> a big part of which is balance
> claims "if you do 'x', 'y', 'z', to help bring back/assure balance then you'll have the life you're supposed to have
> what this Lucifer asshole fails to mention is everyone is also trying to do their assigned 'x', 'y', 'z'.
> and the number of everyones is ginormous
> like, everything has a spirit that's a broken off piece of the love being
> and every single shattered piece is on it's own path back to rejoining the love being
I think I hit the highlights. I'll look for the screencap and add.
a) If one writes "god of this world"; then that implies first the world; then the god out of it.
b) if one writes "this world out of god"; then that implies yet another place; bigger than both; within which god and this world can exist together.
Let's inverse that shit...world (partial) within god (whole) through self differentiation aka simultaneously "out of" whole and "into" partial aka a communication out of impressing whole (loss) into expressing partial (growth) aka out of the process of dying (whole) into the living (partial).
What if the suggested words "god" and "world" tempt one to ignore the perceivable dynamic between partial and whole aka between reaction (out of) and enacting (into)?
Life isn't "very long" isn't it? Yet the suggestions of others tempts one to suggest to others what happened "a very long time" ago...how does reasoning about "a very long time" affect ones pretty short lifespan?
Could something short be tempted with something long to ignore sustaining itself as the short (living) within the long (process of dying)?
What if partial (perceiving) within whole (perceivable) can be tempted to ignore "everything" perceivable for suggested "nothing" aka "somewhere else" than everything perceivable?
Could fiction (suggested information) be used to shaped places somewhere else as entertainment (enter-tame-mind) for those who are willingly ignore reality (perceivable inspiration)?
Purpose implies outcome orientation...to be (living) implies adaptation to origin (process of dying) as to sustain self (life) before reaching outcome (death).
Being resistance (living) within temptation (dying) implies being growth within loss aka the choice to resist (need) temptation (want)...how often do you choose want over need? How often are you tempted to choose between want vs not want?
a) a free mason shapes the "free" will of choice by others through suggested information; hence build walls of ignorance within the memory of others.
b) ship (living) within worth (process of dying) implies being evaluation (reaction) within value (enacting).
c) BY, preposition - "in motion; denoting the agent, means, instrument or cause" aka agent (process of dying) to regent (living) aka perceivable sound (process of dying) to perceiving instrument (living) aka cause (process of dying) to effect (living) aka course of action (inception towards death) as the means for reaction (life).
The whole flow (process of dying) represents the great architect of each partial form (living) within.
Exchange "architect" with generator (process of dying) and "things built" with reactors (living) and you may find yourself to represent existing as material (form) within immaterial (flow).
Consent to suggested creationism (implies out of nothing) also tempts one to believe that nothing can (cannot)...
"Oh baby; I (form) like it raw (flow)" aka resistance (living) within temptation (dying).
"Off (living) on a natural charge (dying), bon voyage"
...if one ignores that the perceivable base (process of dying) transmutes each perceiving ingredient (living).
a) If the architect can use "everything"; then that includes the creator...
b) if the creator created "everything", then that implies the creator being outside everything, which implies there's more than everything...
c) creation implies out of nothing and into existence. Can you experience creation? Can you create anything without shaping it out of everything already perceivable? If creation cannot be perceived within a perceivable system; then why are the many constantly perpetuating suggested creationism to each other?
What could the perceivable keep secret from those perceiving within? How could a whole keep anything a secret from the partials within? Why would a whole system keep secrets from the partials within.
Penis: "the fuck am I suppose to be doing; just hanging around?"
Body: "tehee; tehee...your secret belongs to me"
RELIGION (Latin religio) - "to bind anew"...same choice (suggestion) towards choice (consent) contract law underneath all the different religious sales-pitches.
a) action causes reaction.
b) to be (reaction) implies within; out of and in response to (enacting)
c) BORE (to make hollow) DOM (jurisdiction) aka free will of choice within the dominance of balance allowing the hollow cavity to be filled with comprehension of perceivable...unless ignored.
What you brand as "we" (suggested collectivism) represents "ones" apartheid (living) within the moving whole (process of dying). Your consent to suggested collectivism shapes your belief in nothing (not); which represents your ignorance of everything perceivable...a moving system.
Temptation (pain, suffering, discomfort, harm, fear etc) represents the natural order (process of dying); the chaos within (living) is being inspired by the consequences of falling for temptation to resist by adaptation to inspiration.
One doesn't need to do something; one (living) is being done by everything (process of dying), hence having the response-ability (choice) to struggle within balance (momentum).
If one chooses to struggle then one perceives pain as gain; suffering as alleviation; discomfort as comfort; harm as harmony; fear as courage...