OF, preposition - "from or out of; proceeding from, as the cause, source, means, author or agent bestowing"
a) If one writes "god of this world"; then that implies first the world; then the god out of it.
b) if one writes "this world out of god"; then that implies yet another place; bigger than both; within which god and this world can exist together.
Let's inverse that shit...world (partial) within god (whole) through self differentiation aka simultaneously "out of" whole and "into" partial aka a communication out of impressing whole (loss) into expressing partial (growth) aka out of the process of dying (whole) into the living (partial).
What if the suggested words "god" and "world" tempt one to ignore the perceivable dynamic between partial and whole aka between reaction (out of) and enacting (into)?
a very long time
Life isn't "very long" isn't it? Yet the suggestions of others tempts one to suggest to others what happened "a very long time" ago...how does reasoning about "a very long time" affect ones pretty short lifespan?
Could something short be tempted with something long to ignore sustaining itself as the short (living) within the long (process of dying)?
somewhere else
What if partial (perceiving) within whole (perceivable) can be tempted to ignore "everything" perceivable for suggested "nothing" aka "somewhere else" than everything perceivable?
Could fiction (suggested information) be used to shaped places somewhere else as entertainment (enter-tame-mind) for those who are willingly ignore reality (perceivable inspiration)?
this being serves a greater purpose
Purpose implies outcome orientation...to be (living) implies adaptation to origin (process of dying) as to sustain self (life) before reaching outcome (death).
just tempting us
Being resistance (living) within temptation (dying) implies being growth within loss aka the choice to resist (need) temptation (want)...how often do you choose want over need? How often are you tempted to choose between want vs not want?
worshiped by the masons
a) a free mason shapes the "free" will of choice by others through suggested information; hence build walls of ignorance within the memory of others.
b) ship (living) within worth (process of dying) implies being evaluation (reaction) within value (enacting).
c) BY, preposition - "in motion; denoting the agent, means, instrument or cause" aka agent (process of dying) to regent (living) aka perceivable sound (process of dying) to perceiving instrument (living) aka cause (process of dying) to effect (living) aka course of action (inception towards death) as the means for reaction (life).
great architect
The whole flow (process of dying) represents the great architect of each partial form (living) within.
But an architect can only build things out of existing material.
Exchange "architect" with generator (process of dying) and "things built" with reactors (living) and you may find yourself to represent existing as material (form) within immaterial (flow).
cannot create
Consent to suggested creationism (implies out of nothing) also tempts one to believe that nothing can (cannot)...
raw
"Oh baby; I (form) like it raw (flow)" aka resistance (living) within temptation (dying).
"Off (living) on a natural charge (dying), bon voyage"
The Creator created...
...if one ignores that the perceivable base (process of dying) transmutes each perceiving ingredient (living).
The Creator created the architect and everything the architect uses
a) If the architect can use "everything"; then that includes the creator...
b) if the creator created "everything", then that implies the creator being outside everything, which implies there's more than everything...
c) creation implies out of nothing and into existence. Can you experience creation? Can you create anything without shaping it out of everything already perceivable? If creation cannot be perceived within a perceivable system; then why are the many constantly perpetuating suggested creationism to each other?
secret
What could the perceivable keep secret from those perceiving within? How could a whole keep anything a secret from the partials within? Why would a whole system keep secrets from the partials within.
Penis: "the fuck am I suppose to be doing; just hanging around?"
Body: "tehee; tehee...your secret belongs to me"
other religions
RELIGION (Latin religio) - "to bind anew"...same choice (suggestion) towards choice (consent) contract law underneath all the different religious sales-pitches.
boredom causes action
a) action causes reaction.
b) to be (reaction) implies within; out of and in response to (enacting)
c) BORE (to make hollow) DOM (jurisdiction) aka free will of choice within the dominance of balance allowing the hollow cavity to be filled with comprehension of perceivable...unless ignored.
we would not move
What you brand as "we" (suggested collectivism) represents "ones" apartheid (living) within the moving whole (process of dying). Your consent to suggested collectivism shapes your belief in nothing (not); which represents your ignorance of everything perceivable...a moving system.
pain, suffering, discomfort, harm, fear etc in order to cause us to do something.
Temptation (pain, suffering, discomfort, harm, fear etc) represents the natural order (process of dying); the chaos within (living) is being inspired by the consequences of falling for temptation to resist by adaptation to inspiration.
One doesn't need to do something; one (living) is being done by everything (process of dying), hence having the response-ability (choice) to struggle within balance (momentum).
If one chooses to struggle then one perceives pain as gain; suffering as alleviation; discomfort as comfort; harm as harmony; fear as courage...
a) If one writes "god of this world"; then that implies first the world; then the god out of it.
b) if one writes "this world out of god"; then that implies yet another place; bigger than both; within which god and this world can exist together.
Let's inverse that shit...world (partial) within god (whole) through self differentiation aka simultaneously "out of" whole and "into" partial aka a communication out of impressing whole (loss) into expressing partial (growth) aka out of the process of dying (whole) into the living (partial).
What if the suggested words "god" and "world" tempt one to ignore the perceivable dynamic between partial and whole aka between reaction (out of) and enacting (into)?
Life isn't "very long" isn't it? Yet the suggestions of others tempts one to suggest to others what happened "a very long time" ago...how does reasoning about "a very long time" affect ones pretty short lifespan?
Could something short be tempted with something long to ignore sustaining itself as the short (living) within the long (process of dying)?
What if partial (perceiving) within whole (perceivable) can be tempted to ignore "everything" perceivable for suggested "nothing" aka "somewhere else" than everything perceivable?
Could fiction (suggested information) be used to shaped places somewhere else as entertainment (enter-tame-mind) for those who are willingly ignore reality (perceivable inspiration)?
Purpose implies outcome orientation...to be (living) implies adaptation to origin (process of dying) as to sustain self (life) before reaching outcome (death).
Being resistance (living) within temptation (dying) implies being growth within loss aka the choice to resist (need) temptation (want)...how often do you choose want over need? How often are you tempted to choose between want vs not want?
a) a free mason shapes the "free" will of choice by others through suggested information; hence build walls of ignorance within the memory of others.
b) ship (living) within worth (process of dying) implies being evaluation (reaction) within value (enacting).
c) BY, preposition - "in motion; denoting the agent, means, instrument or cause" aka agent (process of dying) to regent (living) aka perceivable sound (process of dying) to perceiving instrument (living) aka cause (process of dying) to effect (living) aka course of action (inception towards death) as the means for reaction (life).
The whole flow (process of dying) represents the great architect of each partial form (living) within.
Exchange "architect" with generator (process of dying) and "things built" with reactors (living) and you may find yourself to represent existing as material (form) within immaterial (flow).
Consent to suggested creationism (implies out of nothing) also tempts one to believe that nothing can (cannot)...
"Oh baby; I (form) like it raw (flow)" aka resistance (living) within temptation (dying).
"Off (living) on a natural charge (dying), bon voyage"
...if one ignores that the perceivable base (process of dying) transmutes each perceiving ingredient (living).
a) If the architect can use "everything"; then that includes the creator...
b) if the creator created "everything", then that implies the creator being outside everything, which implies there's more than everything...
c) creation implies out of nothing and into existence. Can you experience creation? Can you create anything without shaping it out of everything already perceivable? If creation cannot be perceived within a perceivable system; then why are the many constantly perpetuating suggested creationism to each other?
What could the perceivable keep secret from those perceiving within? How could a whole keep anything a secret from the partials within? Why would a whole system keep secrets from the partials within.
Penis: "the fuck am I suppose to be doing; just hanging around?"
Body: "tehee; tehee...your secret belongs to me"
RELIGION (Latin religio) - "to bind anew"...same choice (suggestion) towards choice (consent) contract law underneath all the different religious sales-pitches.
a) action causes reaction.
b) to be (reaction) implies within; out of and in response to (enacting)
c) BORE (to make hollow) DOM (jurisdiction) aka free will of choice within the dominance of balance allowing the hollow cavity to be filled with comprehension of perceivable...unless ignored.
What you brand as "we" (suggested collectivism) represents "ones" apartheid (living) within the moving whole (process of dying). Your consent to suggested collectivism shapes your belief in nothing (not); which represents your ignorance of everything perceivable...a moving system.
Temptation (pain, suffering, discomfort, harm, fear etc) represents the natural order (process of dying); the chaos within (living) is being inspired by the consequences of falling for temptation to resist by adaptation to inspiration.
One doesn't need to do something; one (living) is being done by everything (process of dying), hence having the response-ability (choice) to struggle within balance (momentum).
If one chooses to struggle then one perceives pain as gain; suffering as alleviation; discomfort as comfort; harm as harmony; fear as courage...