It's quite a long story and it took a bit to work out the major parts of it but it all hung together in the end. When I look around at what others have to say on the subject, I can see that at best they have partial, distorted, and corrupted versions of the truth.
After I stumbled my way to this conclusion a few years ago I've accumulated a ton of evidence, so much that it really made me wonder how so many people who actually set out to study these things have missed it all for so long. But I just kept accumulating more evidence towards the same conclusions, and still do.
But why would I think I have the truth and not any of these others? Of course I've pondered that for years now. With 20/20 hindsight, I think the difference was that others carried into their studies some preexisting worldview on the subject, and forced what they found to fit into that. I fell into it trying to quickly prove to myself that Satan did not exist so I could ignore all discussion on it.
Research is always easier when you can just make stuff up, and I see people doing that all the time. You really need look no further than the comments here. Oh, and it's nearly impossible to get people out of that.
The true story is easily the most fascinating and important subject I know, from the dawn of mankind to the 2022 midterm elections. But I've found that the vast majority are interested in what they're interested in, and that's rarely the truth.
Well, just so it doesn't seem like a tease or a LARP or some such thing, from a meta perspective I've learned that you really can't tell anyone anything (most particularly something they already "know") but there is some possibility they can learn it for themselves. Then again, it's no more mysterious than the idea that you can't learn algebra if someone just hands you the answer key for all the assignments for the semester. With that idea in mind, here's the first place to look....
The big breakthrough for me came when I was looking at Isaiah 14:12, which is the one and only place we get the name "Lucifer". Freeman Fly had mentioned there was evidence that he was not the same entity as Satan, and I thought it was a good way to show it was all nonsense by proving this. Freeman never wrote it up so I was studying it for myself.
What struck me was the variety of English translations of "Lucifer, son of the morning star". I don't speak Hebrew, but thought maybe I should look at it myself to see where they were getting all this. That turns out to have been the key: not taking the word of the "authorities", but rather just reading what was there to puzzle out the meaning for myself.
It turns out that in that single phrase, there are two very strong links to the Anunnaki, one more obvious and one more subtte. Funny enough, I got the subtle one first and didn't get the obvious one for years. Why, you ask? Because I took the word of the "authorities" and didn't read what was there.
I believe that for anyone with an interest in Satan and his effect on this world, it's well worth the time to study this and figure out the puzzle personally. That is, you see what's written in the Bible long ago and use your own reasoning and research to understand it, and that has nothing at all to do with what some dude on the Internet said. I promise you it's not a wild goose chase, nor even a very long one.
But it's worth it because it's a huge paradigm change. If Lucifer is some alien from another planet, then you can pretty much dispense with all the talk of divine realms and cosmic destiny and metaphysical what-have-you. I'm personally very lazy and am glad to avoid having to wade through all that to consider myself "well-informed".
It turns out Lucifer is one of the Anunnaki.
It's quite a long story and it took a bit to work out the major parts of it but it all hung together in the end. When I look around at what others have to say on the subject, I can see that at best they have partial, distorted, and corrupted versions of the truth.
After I stumbled my way to this conclusion a few years ago I've accumulated a ton of evidence, so much that it really made me wonder how so many people who actually set out to study these things have missed it all for so long. But I just kept accumulating more evidence towards the same conclusions, and still do.
But why would I think I have the truth and not any of these others? Of course I've pondered that for years now. With 20/20 hindsight, I think the difference was that others carried into their studies some preexisting worldview on the subject, and forced what they found to fit into that. I fell into it trying to quickly prove to myself that Satan did not exist so I could ignore all discussion on it.
Research is always easier when you can just make stuff up, and I see people doing that all the time. You really need look no further than the comments here. Oh, and it's nearly impossible to get people out of that.
The true story is easily the most fascinating and important subject I know, from the dawn of mankind to the 2022 midterm elections. But I've found that the vast majority are interested in what they're interested in, and that's rarely the truth.
Well, just so it doesn't seem like a tease or a LARP or some such thing, from a meta perspective I've learned that you really can't tell anyone anything (most particularly something they already "know") but there is some possibility they can learn it for themselves. Then again, it's no more mysterious than the idea that you can't learn algebra if someone just hands you the answer key for all the assignments for the semester. With that idea in mind, here's the first place to look....
The big breakthrough for me came when I was looking at Isaiah 14:12, which is the one and only place we get the name "Lucifer". Freeman Fly had mentioned there was evidence that he was not the same entity as Satan, and I thought it was a good way to show it was all nonsense by proving this. Freeman never wrote it up so I was studying it for myself.
What struck me was the variety of English translations of "Lucifer, son of the morning star". I don't speak Hebrew, but thought maybe I should look at it myself to see where they were getting all this. That turns out to have been the key: not taking the word of the "authorities", but rather just reading what was there to puzzle out the meaning for myself.
It turns out that in that single phrase, there are two very strong links to the Anunnaki, one more obvious and one more subtte. Funny enough, I got the subtle one first and didn't get the obvious one for years. Why, you ask? Because I took the word of the "authorities" and didn't read what was there.
I believe that for anyone with an interest in Satan and his effect on this world, it's well worth the time to study this and figure out the puzzle personally. That is, you see what's written in the Bible long ago and use your own reasoning and research to understand it, and that has nothing at all to do with what some dude on the Internet said. I promise you it's not a wild goose chase, nor even a very long one.
But it's worth it because it's a huge paradigm change. If Lucifer is some alien from another planet, then you can pretty much dispense with all the talk of divine realms and cosmic destiny and metaphysical what-have-you. I'm personally very lazy and am glad to avoid having to wade through all that to consider myself "well-informed".
Anyway, let me know what you find!