Thanks to everyone who made a suggestion and especially to u/AnimalsOverHumans for the winning suggestion

I am submitting a link that I think is one of the more important pages for getting a good understanding of the reality of WWII that is often not considered correctly.

This page offers a collection of different essays and articles about the Eastern Front during the war, each essay comes from a different author, at a different time and each clearly has a different bias... however, taken all together, one can balance the biases and find truths that are often glossed over or overlooked. Each article is cited.

(I make no claims of support for the rest of the sites content.)

http://greyfalcon.us/Russia%20In%20World%20War%202.htm

This page archived. Oct 18, 2022 https://archive.ph/fS73n

Hitler's Secret Backers is a book first published in 1933, from an pseudononymous author who used the name of SIDNEY WARBURG. The book has insider knowledge on Wall St. financing Hitler, the background and the reason why and what Wall St expected from Hitler. The principal theory is that this book was created by either France, Russia or other government or faction of government (even USA why not) who knew Wall St was financing Hitler and preparing him for war, and wanted to prevent it. This obviously failed.

One thing to mention is that this book was pulled away from libraries and shops only a few days after it was published. But 3 copies survived, and one of the copies (the original book was published in Dutch!) was translated to German, and from this german translation it was translated into English.

I discovered this book only few days ago, from reading WALL ST AND THE RISE OF HITLER by A C. Sutton. He has an entire chapter on this book. Here you can see some quotes/fragments from this chapter: https://scored.co/c/Conspiracies/p/15JnYrQl1s/roundtable-discussion-hitler-and/c/4OeznJ9xxD6

Wikipedia also has a page on the book. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sydney_Warburg

This is the link where to download the book in pdf. Click GET. http://library.lol/main/9E3D4329ADA5FB24C581ED57D9F59BE4

A reply to someone who asked me if Hitler was a Nationalist of a Jew Puppet.

A nationalist who was financed by Wall Street. Hence, all the absurd decisions he made during the war. Not fucking destroying England when he had the chance, after pushing them back the first time.

You are gullible if you think revolutions happen with miracles. Those guns, uniforms, people are all bought with money. You think a big part of those nazis fighting in Ukraine are really patriots? Some of them surly are... Patriots fighting for a corrupt degenerate cocainoman jew like Zelensky, but most of them, especially the mercenaries are paid, very very well. And apart from this, even assuming they are all Ukrainian patriots, the war isnt fought with sticks and stones, but with high tech weapons, and they cost money.

The war in Ukraine is the perfect demonstration of what I'm saying and what suppresed historical facts say. That revolutions are never genuine. People are always mostly apathetic, especially in modern times. Everything is a rich man's trick. The alt-fake-right, is a jew invention.

Quotes from CHAPTER TEN: The Myth of “Sidney Warburg” (from WALL ST AND THE RISE OF HITLER)

The question posed in this chapter is the accusation that some Wall Street financiers (the Rockefellers and Warburgs specifically have been accused) directly planned and financed Hitler’s takeover in 1933, and that they did this from Wall Street. On this question the so-called myth of “Sidney Warburg” is relevant. Prominent Nazi Franz von Papen has stated in his Memoirs-.3

. . . the most documented account of the National Socialists’ sudden acquisition of funds was contained in a book published in Holland in 1933, by the old established Amsterdam publishing house of Van Holkema & Warendorf, called De Geldbronnen van Het Nationaal-Socialisme (Drie Gesprekken Met Hitler) under the name “Sidney Warburg.”

A book with this title in Dutch by “Sidney Warburg” was indeed published in 1933, but remained on the bookstalls in Holland only for a matter of days. The book was purged.4 One of three surviving original copies was translated into English. The translation was at one time deposited in the British Museum, but is now withdrawn from public circulation and is unavailable for research. Nothing is now known of the original Dutch copy upon which this English translation was based. The Second Dutch copy.... The third Dutch copy found its way to Switzerland and was translated into German. The German translation has survived down to the present day in the Schweizerisches Sozialarchiv in Zurich, Switzerland. A certified copy of the authenticated German translation of this Swiss survivor was purchased by the author in 1971 and translated into English. It is upon this English translation of the German translation that the text in this chapter is based.

Publication of the “Sidney Warburg” book was duly reported in the New York Times (November 24, 1933) under the title “Hoax on Nazis Feared.”

What does the book report? What does the book claim happened in Germany in the early 1930s? And do these events have any resemblance to facts we know to be true from other evidence?

A Synopsis of the Suppressed “Sidney Warburg” Book

The Financial Sources of National Socialism opens with an alleged conversation between “Sidney Warburg” and joint author/translator J. G. Shoup. “Warburg” relates why he was handing Shoup an English language manuscript for translation into Dutch and publication in Holland.

The first section of the book is entitled simply “1929.” It relates that in 1929 Wall Street had enormous credits outstanding in Germany and Austria, and that these claims had, for the most part, been frozen. ... In June 1929, a meeting took place between the members of the Federal Reserve Bank and leading American bankers to decide what to do about France, and particularly to check her call on German reparations. This meeting was attended (according to the “Warburg” book) by the directors of Guaranty Trust Company, the “Presidents” of the Federal Reserve Banks, in addition to five independent bankers, “young Rockefeller,” and Glean from Royal Dutch Shell. Carter and Rockefeller according to the text “dominated the proceedings. The others listened and nodded their heads.

The general concensus at the bankers’ meeting was that the only way to free Germany from French financial clutches was by revolution, either Communist or German Nationalist.

In return for preferred financial support, Hitler would be expected to conduct an “aggressive foreign policy and stir up the idea of revenge against France.” This policy, it was anticipated, would result in a French appeal to the United States and England for assistance in “international questions involving the eventual German aggression.” Hitler was not to know about the purpose of Wall Street’s assistance. It would be left “to his reason and resourcefulness to discover the motives behind the proposal.”

few weeks after Warburg’s return from Europe the Hearst newspapers showed “unusual interest” in the new German Nazi Party and even the New York Times carried regular short reports of Hitler’s speeches. Previously these newspapers had not shown too much interest, but that now changed.6 Also, in December 1929 a long study of the German National Socialist movement appeared “in a monthly publication at Harvard University.”

Part II of the suppressed “Financial Sources of National Socialism” is entitled “1931” and opens with a discussion of French influence on international politics. It avers that Herbert Hoover promised Pierre Laval of France not to resolve the debt question without first consulting the French government and [writes Shoup]: When Wall Street found out about this Hoover lost the respect of this circle at one blow. Even the subsequent elections were affected — many believed that Hoover’s failure to get re-elected can be traced back to the issue.7

In the next Warburg-Hitler meeting, Hitler argued that “the Soviets cannot miss our industrial products yet. We will give credit, and if I am not able to deflate France myself, then the Soviets will help me.” Hitler said he had two plans for takeover in Germany: (a) the revolution plan, and (b), the legal takeover plan. The first plan would be a matter of three months, the second plan a matter of three years. Hitler was quoted as saying, “revolution costs five hundred million marks, legal takeover costs two hundred million marks—what will your bankers decide?” After five days a cable from Guaranty Trust arrived for Warburg and is cited in the book as follows: Suggested amounts are out of the question. We don’t want to and cannot. Explain to man that such a transfer to Europe will shatter financial market. Absolutely unknown on international territory. Expect long report, before decision is made. Stay there. Continue investigation. Persuade man of impossible demands. Don’t forget to include in report own opinion of possibilities for future of man.

Warburg cabled his report back to New York and three days later received a second cablegram reading: Report received. Prepare to deliver ten, maximum fifteen million dollars. Advise man necessity of aggression against foreign danger.

The $15 million was accepted for the legal takeover road, not for the revolutionary plan. The money was transferred from Wall Street to Hitler via Warburg as follows—$5 million to be paid at Mendelsohn & Company, Amsterdam; $5 million at the Rotterdamsche Bankvereinigung in Rotterdam; and $5 million at “Banca Italiana.”

The third section of “Financial Sources of National Socialism” is entitled simply “1933.” The section records “Sidney Warburg’s” third and last meeting with Hitler — on the night the Reichstag was burned.

At this meeting Hitler informed Warburg of Nazi progress towards legal takeover. Since 1931 the Nationalist Socialist party had tripled in size. Massive deposits of weapons had been made near the German border in Belgium, Holland, and Austria — but these weapons required cash payments before delivery. Hitler asked for a minimum of 100 million marks to take care of the final step in the takeover programme. Guaranty Trust wired Warburg offering $7 million at most, to be paid as follows — $2 million to the Renania Joint Stock Company in Düsseldorf (the German branch of Royal Dutch), and $5 million to other banks. Warburg reported this offer to Hitler, who requested the $5 million should be sent to the Banca Italiana in Rome and (although the report does not say so) presumably the other $2 million was paid to Düsseldorf. The book concludes with the following statement from Warburg: I carried out my assignment strictly down to the last detail. Hitler is dictator of the largest European country. The world has now observed him at work for several months. My opinion of him means nothing now. His actions will prove if he is bad, which I believe he is. For the sake of the German people I hope in my heart that I am wrong. The world continues to suffer under a system that has to bow to a Hitler to keep itself on its feet. Poor world, poor humanity.

What would be the motive behind such a book?

The only motive that seems acceptable is that the unknown author had knowledge a war was in preparation and hoped for a public reaction against the Wall Street fanatics and their industrialist friends in Germany—before it was too late. Clearly, whoever wrote the book, his motive almost certainly was to warn against Hitlerian aggression and to point to its Wall Street source, because the technical assistance of American companies controlled by Wall Street was still needed to build Hitler’s war machine. The Standard Oil hydrogenation patents and financing for the oil from coal plants, the bomb sights, and the other necessary technology had not been fully transferred when the “Sidney Warburg” book was written. Consequently, this could have been a book designed to break the back of Hitler’s supporters abroad, to inhibit the planned transfer of U.S. war-making potential, and to eliminate financial and diplomatic support of the Nazi state. If this was the goal, it is regrettable that the book failed to achieve any of these purposes.

Antony C Sutton: Wall Street and the rise of Hitler & communism --- Interview with Doctor Anthony C Sutton on his research about the funding of Nazi party and of Soviet communists by a group of American and European financiers and industrialists. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sah_Xni-gtg

[2 of 6] The Best Enemies Money Can Buy - Dr. Antony Sutton https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h7dLTAL3v5E

Prof. Sutton goes into his impeccable research on how a close-knit group of Western financiers and industrialists (centered around Morgan and Rockefeller in the US, and around Milner and the City financiers, in the UK) created and sustained their three supposed enemies right from the very beginning: Soviet Russia, Nazi Germany, and FDR's Fabian socialism.

Late to the party here, but my 2 cents.

There were 2 types of jews, jews who wanted a "national homeland" (The one they wanted to steal i.e. Palestine), and the other type were happy back in Germany, UK, US, etc... and didn't want to move anywhere.

When Hitler came to power the jews who didn't care for a homeland were against him (thus the boycott, Judia declares war against Germany in 1933 etc...) BUT the jews who wanted a homeland in Palestine (Mainly Russian ashkenazis) were happy about Hitler and antisemitism in general. It meant more colonist and land thieves could be sent to Palestine, thus why we might see many jewish connections supporting Hitler BEFORE the war.

In a way both zionism and national socialism had the similar concept of blood and soil. zionist saw assimilated jews as traitor jews and called them kikes. Hence some national socialists respected zionist more than assimilated jews.

Hitler seems to have made an agreement with the jews in 1933, by continuing to send jews to Palestine and making immigration easy, the jews would be off his back. But the jews double crossed him as soon as they got all the jews who wanted to supported the zionist project out. They turned on him and the war started in 1939.

An indisputable proof that through the war Hitler didn't work for the jews was the fact that he later trained Palestinians defending their homes against the jewish colonist.

Had Hitler not allowed the jews out, especially the rich and zionists. And simply placed those jews inside German cities. Fire bombings would have never happened on German cities.

Edit: Further discussion on this topic Deana Spingola hosted couple of shows: https://www.goyimtv.tv/v/1045122240/Deanna-Spingola-Hosts-Carolyn-Yeager-vs-Jim-Conduit--Adolf-Hitler-Debate--Oct-12--2022

https://www.goyimtv.tv/v/2297539165/Deanna-Spingola---Gerhard-Strauch---Parasitical-Bankers-Targeted-Germany-in-WWII---full-version

Video citing some sources: https://www.joshwhotv.com/video/.QG46ww/on-the-accusation-that-hitler-was-financed-revised-version-cut

Michael Collins Piper: https://www.bitchute.com/video/NadL4YNJ7MEd/

Quotes from WALL ST AND THE RISE OF HITLER

Chapter 3

The multinational giant General Electric has an unparalleled role in twentieth-century history. The General Electric Company electrified the Soviet Union in the 1920s and 1930s, and fulfilled for the Soviets Lenin’s dictum that “Socialism = electrification.”1 The Swope Plan, created by General Electric’s one-time president Gerard Swope, became Franklin D. Roosevelt’s New Deal, by a process deplored by one-time President Herbert Hoover and described in Wall Street and FDR.

In 1936 Senator James A. Reed of Missouri, an early Roosevelt supporter, became aware of Roosevelt’s betrayal of liberal ideas and attacked the Roosevelt New Deal programme as a “tyrannical” measure “leading to despotism, [and] sought by its sponsors under the communistic cry of ‘Social Justice.’ ” Senator Reed further charged on the floor of the Senate that Franklin D. Roosevelt was a “hired man for the economic royalists” in Wall Street and that the Roosevelt family “is one of the largest stockholders in the General Electric Company.”

As we probe into behind-the-scenes German interwar history and the story of Hitler and Naziism, we find both Owen D. Young and Gerard Swope of General Electric tied to the rise of Hitlerism and the suppression of German democracy. That General Electric directors are to be found in each of these three distinct historical categories—i.e., the development of the Soviet Union, the creation of Roosevelt’s New Deal, and the rise of Hitlerism—suggests how elements of Big Business are keenly interested in the socialization of the world, for their own purposes and objectives, rather than the maintenance of the impartial marketplace in a free society.

Walter Rathenau .... Walter Rathenau14 became a director of A.E.G. in 1899 and by the early twentieth century was a director of more than 100 corporations. Rathenau was also author of the “Rathenau Plan,” which bears a remarkable resemblance to the “Swope Plan” — i.e., FDR’s New Deal but written by Swope of G.E. In other words, we have the extraordinary coincidence that the authors of New Deal-like plans in the U.S. and Germany were also prime backers of their implementers: Hitler in Germany and Roosevelt in the U.S.

In January 1930 three G.E. men were elected to the board of A.E.G. — Clark H. Minor, Gerard Swope, and E. H. Baldwin — and International General Electric (I.G.E.) continued its moves to merge the world electrical industry into a giant cartel under Wall Street control.

In February General Electric focused on the remaining German electrical giant, Siemens & Halske, and while able to obtain a large block of debentures issued on behalf of the German firm by Dillon, Read of New York, G. E. was not able to gain participation or directors on the Siemens board. ... Siemens retained its independence from General Electric — and this independence is important for our story. The New York Times reported, "The entire press emphasizes the fact that Siemens, contrary to A.E.G., maintains its independence for the future and points out that no General Electric representative will sit on Siemens board of directors".

There is no evidence that Siemens, without American directors, financed Hitler. On the other hand, we have irrefutable documentary evidence (see document No. 391–395) that both German General Electric and Osram, both with American directors, financed Hitler.

In 1932 the American directors of A.E.G. were prominently connected with American banking and political circles as follows: GERARD SWOPE -- Chairman of International General Electric and president of General Electric Company, director of National City Bank (and other companies), director of A.E.G. and Osram in Germany. Author of FDR’s New Deal and member of numerous Roosevelt organizations.
OWEN D. YOUNG--Chairman of board of General Electric, and deputy chairman, Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Author, with J. P. Morgan, of the Young Plan which superseded the Dawes Plan in 1929. (See Chapter One.)
CLARK H. MINOR--President and director of International General Electric, director of British Thomson Houston, Compania Generale di Electtricita (Italy), and Japan Electric Bond & Share Company (Japan)

In brief, we have hard evidence of unquestioned authenticity (see previous document) to show that German General Electric contributed substantial sums to Hitler’s political fund. There were four American directors of A.E.G. (Baldwin, Swope, Minor, and Clark), which was 30 percent owned by International General Electric.

A.E.G. Avoids the Bombs in World War II

in 1939 the German electrical equipment industry was concentrated into a few major corporations linked in an international cartel and by stock ownership to two major U.S. corporations. This industrial complex was never a prime target for bombing in World War II. The A.E.G. and I.T.T. plants were hit only incidentally in area raids and then but rarely. The electrical equipment plants bombed as targets were not those affiliated with U.S. firms. It was Brown Boveri at Mannheim and Siemensstadt in Berlin — which were not connected with the U.S. — who were bombed.

That the A.E.G. plants in Germany were not bombed in World War II was confirmed by the United States Strategic Bombing Survey16, officered by such academics as John K. Galbraith and such Wall Streeters as George W. Ball and Paul H. Nitze. Their “German Electrical Equipment Industry Report” dated January 1947 concludes: "The industry has never been attacked as a basic target system, but a few plants, i.e. Brown Boveri at Mannheim, Bosch at Stuutgart and Siemenstadt in Berlin, have been subjected to precision raids; many others were hit in area raids."

How the US Supported Hitler's Rise to Power -- Historian Peter Kuznick joins Paul Jay to discuss the role of Ford, GM, and other industrialists in rearming Germany and supporting Hitler’s rise to power -- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MaWz42tmxug

I have posted this documentary already. But now I want to specify something in particular. At minute 27:10 the author describes the attempted coup to overthrow the US government. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fk9O9R7hzn8

But Smedley Butler https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smedley_Butler didn't go along. Here is an excerpt of the speech he gave about the offer he received about directing the coup d'etat. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2pSOekHA8OQ

Butler wrote also a book on the topic, titled "War is a racket"! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_Is_a_Racket

Quotes from WALL ST AND THE RISE OF HITLER

Chapter 2

Farben was Hitler and Hitler was Farben. (Senator Homer T. Bone to Senate Committee on Military Affairs, June 4, 1943.)

German bankers on the Farben Aufsichsrat (the supervisory Board of Directors)1 in the late 1920s included the Hamburg banker Max Warburg, whose brother Paul Warburg was a founder of the Federal Reserve System in the United States. Not coincidentally, Paul Warburg was also on the board of American I. G, Farben’s wholly owned U.S. subsidiary. In addition to Max Warburg and Hermann Schmitz, the guiding hand in the creation of the Farben empire, the early Farben Vorstand included Carl Bosch, Fritz ter Meer, Kurt Oppenheim and George von Schnitzler.2 All except Max Warburg were charged as “war criminals” after World War II.

The full story of I.G. Farben and its worldwide activities before World War II can never be known, as key German records were destroyed in 1945 in anticipation of Allied victory.

In 1939, out of 43 major products manufactured by I.G., 28 were of “primary concern” to the German armed forces.

One of the more prominent of these Farben intelligence workers in N.W. 7 was Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands, who joined Farben in the early 1930s after completion of an 18-month period of service in the black-uniformed S.S

The U.S. War Department also accused I. G. Farben and its American associates of spearheading Nazi psychological and economic warfare programmes through dissemination of propaganda via Farben agents abroad, and of providing foreign exchange for this Nazi propaganda. Farben’s cartel arrangements promoted Nazi economic warfare — the outstanding example being the voluntary Standard Oil of New Jersey restriction on development of synthetic rubber in the United States at the behest of I. G. Farben.

In 1945 Dr. Oskar Loehr, deputy head of the I.G. “Tea Buro,” confirmed that I. G. Farben and Standard Oil of New Jersey operated a “preconceived plan” to suppress development of the synthetic rubber industry in the United States, to the advantage of the German Wehrmacht and to the disadvantage of the United States in World War II.

Quotes from WALL ST AND THE RISE OF HITLER

Chapter 1

Dawes plan adopted in august 1924.

The contribution made by American capitalism to German war preparations before 1940 can only be described as phenomenal. It was certainly crucial to German military capabilities. For instance, in 1934 Germany produced domestically only 300,000 tons of natural petroleum products and less than 300,000 tons of synthetic gasoline; the balance was imported. Yet, ten years later in World War II, after transfer of the Standard Oil of New Jersey hydrogenation patents and technology to I. G. Farben (used to produce synthetic gasoline from coal), Germany produced about 6 1/2 million tons of oil — of which 85 percent (5 1/2 million tons) was synthetic oil using the Standard Oil hydrogenation process. Moreover, the control of synthetic oil output in Germany was held by the I. G. Farben subsidiary, Braunkohle-Benzin A. G., and this Farben cartel itself was created in 1926 with Wall Street financial assistance.

The Treaty of Versailles after World War I imposed a heavy reparations burden on defeated Germany. This financial burden — a real cause of the German discontent that led to acceptance of Hitlerism — was utilized by the international bankers for their own benefit. The opportunity to float profitable loans for German cartels in the United States was presented by the Dawes Plan and later the Young Plan. Both plans were engineered by these central bankers, who manned the committees for their own pecuniary advantages, and although technically the committees were not appointed by the U.S. Government, the plans were in fact approved and sponsored by the Government,

Between 1924 and 1931, under the Dawes Plan and the Young Plan, Germany paid out to the Allies about 36 billion marks in reparations. At the same time Germany borrowed abroad, mainly in the U.S., about 33 billion marks — thus making a net German payment of only three billion marks for reparations.

Does it matter if the Jews financed him?

He started off as a govt stooge then realized the nation-state were correct.

I have heard of right wing ppl making BLM t-shirts etc and profiting off leftists.

Maybe he took the money and used it for his own purposes.

Wonder who’s funding the new Covid ww? Human ants must die every 100years?

I have been told here over and over again that Hitler was a good guy.

So this financing was a positive thing?

Not thread specific but wider scope. Many receipts.

gg

Myron Fagan 1967 https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=KrUXPn7HCjM

What goods did Germany trade during the Weimar Republic, and with whom? https://history.stackexchange.com/questions/2237/what-goods-did-germany-trade-during-the-weimar-republic-and-with-whom

There is no such thing as "The Nazi Party".

• Here is the EPUB version of the book Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler by Anthony C. Sutton https://1lib.education/book/2330599/c36332

• Here is a documentary Everything Is A Rich Mans Trick - JFK To 9 11 - Odysee.com that talks about the same issue, and how the same ppl behind the money interests were also behind the creation of the CIA and the JFK assassination.

If one is just now learning about this, one is long behind the eight ball.

Need to hurry and catch up.

In case one doesn't know this.

The wall street gang, (member banks of the NY FED branch), created a Red Cross franchise in Russia to aid the Bolsheviks in their over throw of the Tzar.

I have an old copypasta on this subject. It can be used as a jumping off point for error correction.

~:~

Many people take joy in saying Wall Street and Jewish bankers “financed Hitler.” There is plenty of documented evidence that Wall Street and Jewish bankers did indeed help finance Hitler at first, partly because it allowed the bankers to get rich (as I will describe below) and partly in order to control Stalin. However, when Germany broke free from the bankers, they declared a world war against Germany. When we look at all the facts, the charge that “Jews financed Hitler” becomes irrelevant. Los Angeles Attorney Ellen Brown discusses this topic in her book Web Of Debt.

When Hitler came to power. Germany was hopelessly broke. The Treaty of Versailles had imposed crushing reparations on the German people, demanding that Germans repay every nation’s costs of the war. These costs totaled three times the value of all the property in Germany. Private currency speculators caused the German mark to plummet, precipitating one of the worst runaway inflations in modern times. A wheelbarrow full of 100 billion-mark banknotes could not buy a loaf of bread. The national treasury was empty. Countless homes and farms were lost to speculators and to private (Jewish controlled) banks. Germans lived in hovels. They were starving. Nothing like this had ever happened before–the total destruction of the national currency, plus the erasure of people’s savings and businesses. On top of this came a global depression. Germany had no choice but to succumb to debt slavery under international (mainly jewish) bankers until 1933, when the National Socialists came to power. At that point, the German government thwarted the international banking cartels by issuing its own money. World jewry responded by declaring a global boycott against Germany.

Hitler began a national credit program by devising a plan of public works that included flood control, repair of public buildings and private residences, and construction of new roads, bridges, canals, and port facilities. All these were paid for with money that no longer came from the private international bankers. The projected cost of these various programs was fixed at one billion units of the national currency. To pay for this. the German government (not the international bankers) issued bills of exchange, called Labor Treasury Certificates. In this way the National Socialists put millions of people to work, and paid them with Treasury Certificates. Under the National Socialists, Germany’s money wasn’t backed by gold (which was owned by the international bankers). It was essentially a receipt for labor and materials delivered to the government. Hitler said, “For every mark issued, we required the equivalent of a mark’s worth of work done, or goods produced.” The government paid workers in Certificates. Workers spent those Certificates on other goods and services, thus creating more jobs for more people. In this way the German people climbed out of the crushing debt imposed on them by the international bankers.

Within two years, the unemployment problem had been solved, and Germany was back on its feet. It had a solid, stable currency, with no debt, and no inflation at a time when millions of people in the United States and other Western countries (controlled by international bankers) were still out of work. Within five years, Germany went from the poorest nation in Europe to the richest. Germany even managed to restore foreign trade, despite the international bankers’ denial of foreign credit to Germany, and despite the global boycott by Jewish-owned industries. Germany succeeded in this by exchanging equipment and commodities directly with other countries, using a barter system that cut the bankers out of the picture. Germany flourished, since barter eliminates national debt and trade deficits. (Venezuela does the same thing today when it trades oil for commodities, plus medical help, and so on. Hence the bankers are trying to squeeze Venezuela.)

Germany’s economic freedom was short-lived, but it left several monuments, including the famous Autobahn, the world’s first extensive superhighway. Hjalmar Schacht, a Rothschild agent who was temporarily head of the German central bank, summed it up thus... An American banker had commented, “Dr. Schacht, you should come to America. We’ve lots of money and that’s real banking.” Schacht replied, “You should come to Berlin. We don’t have money. That’s real banking.” (Schact, the Rothschild agent, actually supported the private international bankers against Germany, and was rewarded by having all charges against him dropped at the Nuremberg trials.) This economic freedom made Hitler extremely popular with the German people. Germany was rescued from English economic theory, which says that all currency must be borrowed against the gold owned by a private and secretive banking cartel — such as the Federal Reserve. or the Central Bank of Europe — rather than issued by the government for the benefit of the people.

Canadian researcher Dr. Henry Makow (who is Jewish himself) says the main reason the bankers arranged for a world war against Germany was Hitler sidestepping the bankers by creating his own money, thereby freeing the German people. Worse, this freedom and prosperity threatened to spread to other nations. Hitler had to be stopped! Makow quotes from the 1938 interrogation of C. G. Rakovsky, one of the founders of Soviet Bolshevism and a Trotsky intimate. Rakovsky was tried in show trials in the USSR under Stalin. According to Rakovsky, Hitler was at first funded by the international bankers, through the bankers’ agent Hjalmar Schacht. The bankers financed Hitler in order to control Stalin, who had usurped power from their agent Trotsky. Then Hitler became an even bigger threat than Stalin when Hitler started printing his own money. (Stalin came to power in 1922, which was eleven years before Hitler came to power.) Rakovsky said: “Hitler took over the privilege of manufacturing money, and not only physical moneys, but also financial ones. He took over the machinery of falsification and put it to work for the benefit of the people. Can you possibly imagine what would have come ff this had infected a number of other states?”

Henry Makow, Hitler Did Not Want War: Economist Henry C. K. Liu writes of Germany’s remarkable transformation: “The Nazis came to power in 1933 when the German economy was in total collapse, with ruinous war-reparation obligations and zero prospects for foreign investment or credit. Through an independent monetary policy of sovereign credit and a full-employment public-works program. The Third Reich was able to turn a bankrupt Germany, stripped of overseas colonies, into the strongest economy in Europe within four years, even before armament spending began.”

Henry C. K. Liu, "Nazism and the German Economic Miracle," Asia Times (May 24, 2005) In Billions for the Bankers, Debts for the People (1984), Sheldon Emry commented: “Germany issued debt-free and interest-free money from 1935 on, which accounts for Germany’s startling rise from the depression to a world power in five years. The German government financed its entire operations from 1935 to 1945 without gold, and without debt. It took the entire Capitalist and Communist world to destroy the German revolution, and bring Europe back under the heel of the Bankers?”

These facts do not appear in any textbooks today, since Jews own most publishing companies. What does appear is the disastrous runaway inflation suffered in 1923 by the Weimar Republic, which governed Germany from 1919 to 1933. Today’s textbooks use this inflation to twist truth into its opposite. They cite the radical devaluation of the German mark as an example of what goes wrong when governments print their own money, rather than borrow it from private cartels. In reality, the Weimar financial crisis began with the impossible reparations payments imposed at the Treaty of Versailles. Hjalmar Schacht–the Rothschild agent who was currency commissioner for the Republic — opposed letting the German government print its own money.

The Treaty of Versailles is a model of ingenious measures for the economic destruction of Germany. Germany could not find any way of holding its head above the water, other than by the inflationary expedient of printing bank notes? Schact echoes the textbook lie that Weimar inflation was caused when the German government printed its own money. However, in his 1967 book The Magic of Money, Schact let the cat out of the bag by revealing that it was the PRIVATELY-OWNED Reichsbank, not the German government, that was pumping new currency into the economy. Thus, the PRIVATE BANK caused the Weimar hyper-inflation. Like the U.S. Federal Reserve, the Reichsbank was overseen by appointed government officials, but was operated for private gain. What drove the wartime inflation into hyperinflation was speculation by foreign investors, who sold the mark short. betting on its decreasing value. In the manipulative device known as the short sale, speculators borrow something they don’t own, sell it, and then "cover" by buying it back at the lower price.

Speculation in the German mark was made possible because the PRIVATELY OWNED Reichsbank (not yet under Nazi control) made massive amounts of currency available for borrowing. This currency, like U.S. currency today, was created with accounting entries on the bank’s books. Then the funny-money was lent at compound interest. When the Reichsbank could not keep up with the voracious demand for marks, other private banks were allowed to create marks out of nothing, and to lend them at interest. The result was runaway debt and inflation. Thus, according to Schacht himself, the German government did not cause the Weimar hyperinflation. On the contrary, the government (under the National Socialists) got hyperinflation under control. The National Socialists put the Reichsbank under strict government regulation, and took prompt corrective measures to eliminate foreign speculation. One of those measures was to eliminate easy access to funny-money loans from private banks. Then Hitler got Germany back on its feet by having the public government issue Treasury Certificates.

Schacht, the Rothschild agent, disapproved of this government fiat money, and wound up getting fired as head of the Reichsbank when he refused to issue it. Nonetheless, he acknowledged in his later memoirs that allowing the government to issue the money it needed did not produce the price inflation predicted by classical economic theory, which says that currency must be borrowed from private cartels. What causes hyper-inflation is uncontrolled speculation. When speculation is coupled with debt (owed to private banking cartels) the result is disaster. On the other hand, when a government issues currency in carefully measured ways, it causes supply and demand to increase together, leaving prices unaffected. Hence there is no inflation, no debt, no unemployment. and no need for income taxes. Naturally this terrifies the bankers. since it eliminates their powers. It also terrifies Jews, since their control of banking allows them to buy the media, the government, and everything else. Therefore, to those who delight in saying “Jews financed Hitler,” I ask that they please look at all the facts.

jewish wallstreet financed Hitler because Henry Ford. This is more fucking retarded than flat earth.

I do not have evidence at hand but if we consider the end purpose (for example the USD becoming the world's reserve currency) this scenario would not be out of bounds. This is almost like content creators pushing their favorite stock, cryptocurrency or precious metals to their followers because they are heavily invested in it. So, if the scenario materializes (said crypto goes up) they will mostly benefit from it as they are invested in that asset. By the same thought process Blackrock maybe pushing for China's dominance over USA because they are heavily invested in it. But let's not digress...In the case of the US institutions you mentioned they would massively benefit if the USD became the world's reserve currency...