Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler by Anthony C. Sutton:
‘The contribution made by American capitalism to German war preparations can only be described as phenomenal. It was certainly crucial to German military capabilities... Not only was an influential sector of American business aware of the nature of Naziism, but for its own purposes aided Naziism wherever possible (and profitable) - with full knowledge that the probable outcome would be war involving Europe and the United States.’ Penetrating a cloak of falsehood, deception and duplicity, Professor Antony C. Sutton reveals one of the most remarkable but unreported facts of the Second World War: that key Wall Street banks and American businesses supported Hitler’s rise to power by financing and trading with Nazi Germany. Carefully tracing this closely guarded secret through original documents and eyewitness accounts, Sutton comes to the unsavoury conclusion that the catastrophic Second World War was extremely profitable for a select group of financial insiders. He presents a thoroughly documented account of the role played by J.P. Morgan, T.W. Lamont, the Rockefeller interests, General Electric Company, Standard Oil, National City Bank, Chase and Manhattan banks, Kuhn, Loeb and Company, General Motors, the Ford Motor Company, and scores of others in helping to prepare the bloodiest, most destructive war in history.
This makes no sense. Like the flat earth arguement.
"I'm not going to make an argument, you have to do 75 hours of (research) yourself"
That's flat earth. That's you. You can't even make an argument? Doesn't sound like you know what you're talking about.
"arguments" are for clowns
Books are for people who want serious information.
Due diligence is what YOU lack, not the guy who gave you sauce.
What's with this __________ is Flat Earth" comparison?
Apples compared to oranges are Flat Earth now.
Flat Earthers don't read books either.
I disagree with his actual argument, but his point on argument is correct. This thread is supposed to be a discussion, and if a person cannot make their argument in a few sentences and instead just instructs the person to read several books, that’s just them not able to back up their point.
If you can’t explain something to a 10 year old then you don’t understand it.
"If you can't explain something to a 10 year old then you don't understand it."
That's a platitude and hardly accurate.
There really are no shortcuts and no substitutes for hard work.
A 10 year need lots of subjects to be 'dummied down' to explain it in a way he might understand, but that's hardly a full understanding.
As for esoteric subjects.......occult subjects called 'hidden knowledge' which is what lies behind the cabal, their methods, agendas and understanding...subjects for adults with the devil in the details...that's a different thing altogether.
If you want to discuss esoteric subjects, get a base on the esoteric first.
Q is about doing the hard work and getting it right, not how to explain something to a child.
Books are supposed to have information in them. If you can't convey what that information is then you're saying you have no idea what that is or it's wrong.
Don't get butthurt because you literally cannot discuss the facts.
That's right. Do your own research. I did. Years ago. Didn't ask anyone to lead me by the hand.
Those books? Yeah, have them and more.
You don't want to put the time in doing research and accuse me of not knowing what I am talking about.
You're fucking lazy and retarded.
That's what a flat earther would say. Can't even make an argument.
Not going to argue. Go learn something.