The legal system doesn't protect anyone, it's a tool you can use to create penalties for people breaking the law.
The catch is, someone has to use it. It does not self activate. And, unfortunately, we don't have a body like the police to pro-actively investigate white collar crime like election fraud.
I'd like to point out the reason Trump has a temper tantrum before he left office was that all the court cases where scheduled after Biden was inaugurated.
It was as if someone knew the procedures didn't make sense/ didn't mesh together well and took advantage of that fact
Same happened to Nixon in 1960 when the Chicago Dems pulled the same "how many votes do we need?" stunt after the other results.
They did a preliminary audit before the inauguration, said "yeah something's fucky", then after the inauguration did a deeper audit said "yes, definitely fraud" and his GOP said "meh, what you gonna do".
Fox Corp. privately settled a defamation case with the Venezuelan businessman Majed Khalil last week, according to a letter to the federal judge overseeing the case dated Saturday.
Khalil was ensnared in voting machine conspiracy theories advanced by Trump lawyer Sidney Powell on the Fox Business show “Lou Dobbs Tonight” and on social media, and he sued Fox Corp., Fox News and Dobbs for defamation.
Sydney's defense in court when she was getting the leopard print pant suit sued off of her was that no reasonable person would conclude that her statements were truly statements of fact.
Then you'd have known it was written by an illiterate 12-year-old.
Keep sitting on your hands and waiting for someone from the government to come and save you from the government... the rest of us are preparing for what's coming, like rational and responsible adults.
You're right about me being largely ignorant of what you just wrote about. She was no longer a part of the Trump legal team after she made some of her allegations. So you are saying that despite that, the document is worth reading?
I was unable to find anything other than mainstream debunking when I searched for this, but I eventually came upon this:
Have you got a link to what it is you are talking about, or is what I linked to everything?
EDIT: Be aware that u/ghost_of_aswartz may be acting in bad faith in trying to comingle false claims from years ago with newly released evidence about a network of ballot trafficking mules.
Did you look at the link I posted? Is there any missing information? What I am looking for is the entire collection of documents you said you read at Christmas. My web searches are blocked.
There is a large amount of video evidence from the election showing democrat party member vote counters illegally running batches more than one time, several in fact, and running fake votes (hidden suitcases that were dragged out to be run through the machines after counting was officially stopped is the most notorious one).
So sitting on the internet all day, working for FREE to post corporate propaganda in exchange for fake internet points is "creating"? Wow, what a sad life you lead....
Not a shill, dipshit. Just someone who isn't a member of your little gay cult and can think for myself. Since you are a child, you cannot handle people with a different point of view than yourself so you need to pretend that someone is paying me to have the super-based opinions that I do.
Powell did make those legal arguments. But it’s also easy to see that she truly did believe her statements and did this as a legal manuever, since she was unable to ultimately prove her most extreme claims.
That the cia or some shadowy group directed the election from overseas and basically hacked the voting machines. It’s possible that this happened to some degree but she’s not in a position to prove this in court.
Those claims were the “kraken” and they were unfortunately never substantiated, from what I understand.
And given what we’re seeing from D’Souza, it looks probable that this was disinformation seeded to Powell to muddy the waters and misdirect everyone (unbeknownst to her).
We can already prove they used a mule operation to swing the election. Literally prove.
This was a red herring. All the details were part of that red herring. That doesn't mean that some of those details aren't important or shouldn't be addressed--but they wanted you focused on that instead of mules.
Powell, along with everyone else, was focused on the shiny object the CIA dangled in front of them, rather than the real op.
It's not that I'm saying it isn't a problem. I'm saying they lit two fires, and want you focused on that, while the second fire burns unnoticed, and with far greater damage.
At the end of the day, it's doesn't matter what she believed to be true or what is actually true.
The fact is that she and her Orange Zionist boss completely failed to fight and win. They are either compromised or totally incompetent morons. Either way, they cannot be trusted.
So you’re saying that you knew the claims about foreign hacking into dominion machines was cia seeded disinformation to provide cover for an on the ground mule operation?
Maybe get off your high horse. You probably ate up the same disinfo like they did.
That disinfo would have been unnecessary had Trump and Powell been playing for the other side, as you suggest.
The fact that you are shilling and bootlicking for a billionaire grifter, is not a "moot point". You recently heard that phrase and have been dying to use it, huh?
We do not have a justice system. We have a legal system.
Wouldn't that be the loopholes of the legal system?
We have a "just us" system... it's just us looking out for us
This.
The legal system doesn't protect anyone, it's a tool you can use to create penalties for people breaking the law.
The catch is, someone has to use it. It does not self activate. And, unfortunately, we don't have a body like the police to pro-actively investigate white collar crime like election fraud.
So, basically, nobody pulled the trigger.
There was lots of damning evidence. Machine fraud. Arizona audit. Testimony, under oath, of shenanigans in multiple states. Now the mule video.
There’s always been a plethora of evidence. Just no one to stand up to do the right thing.
I'd like to point out the reason Trump has a temper tantrum before he left office was that all the court cases where scheduled after Biden was inaugurated.
It was as if someone knew the procedures didn't make sense/ didn't mesh together well and took advantage of that fact
Same happened to Nixon in 1960 when the Chicago Dems pulled the same "how many votes do we need?" stunt after the other results.
They did a preliminary audit before the inauguration, said "yeah something's fucky", then after the inauguration did a deeper audit said "yes, definitely fraud" and his GOP said "meh, what you gonna do".
Parties out of power can raise more funds.
nicely highlighted and presented.
i don't think that what she released was "the kraken".
what she released totally damning. and yes... as you / she say... "Nothing was being done by nobody" - shame on all of us.
but my vibe was that she had some very seriously damaging documents about Dominion, and she was forced by very power players to stand down.
She never released - what she termed, "the kraken".
Just my opinion.
The party who came second can do more fundraising than the party in power.
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/rcna78936
TOP
KEK
Any comments?
Sydney's defense in court when she was getting the leopard print pant suit sued off of her was that no reasonable person would conclude that her statements were truly statements of fact.
You rube.
same thing alex and tucker have said. traitors
Then you'd have known it was written by an illiterate 12-year-old.
Keep sitting on your hands and waiting for someone from the government to come and save you from the government... the rest of us are preparing for what's coming, like rational and responsible adults.
"Go", not "got". So angry that you are typing too furiously to proofread your retarded babbling nonsense?
Still no self-awareness with this one.
any day now
You're right about me being largely ignorant of what you just wrote about. She was no longer a part of the Trump legal team after she made some of her allegations. So you are saying that despite that, the document is worth reading?
I was unable to find anything other than mainstream debunking when I searched for this, but I eventually came upon this:
Evidence of Fraud - 2020 Election https://www.sidneypowell.com/election-evidence-2020
Have you got a link to what it is you are talking about, or is what I linked to everything?
EDIT: Be aware that u/ghost_of_aswartz may be acting in bad faith in trying to comingle false claims from years ago with newly released evidence about a network of ballot trafficking mules.
Thanks for clarifying.
Did you look at the link I posted? Is there any missing information? What I am looking for is the entire collection of documents you said you read at Christmas. My web searches are blocked.
There is a large amount of video evidence from the election showing democrat party member vote counters illegally running batches more than one time, several in fact, and running fake votes (hidden suitcases that were dragged out to be run through the machines after counting was officially stopped is the most notorious one).
Yep, they did that after they kicked out all the Republican poll watchers for bullshit reasons.
twO mOAr WeEkS.....
nO oNe cAn sToP WhAtZ cUmInG....
So sitting on the internet all day, working for FREE to post corporate propaganda in exchange for fake internet points is "creating"? Wow, what a sad life you lead....
Notice how the cucks have no rebuttal, just censorship in the form of downvotes.
That means you are over the target.
Naw, it's just pointless to debate obvious shills.
Call me a "shill". It's easier than admitting openly that you've lost the argument.
Cope on...
Not a shill, dipshit. Just someone who isn't a member of your little gay cult and can think for myself. Since you are a child, you cannot handle people with a different point of view than yourself so you need to pretend that someone is paying me to have the super-based opinions that I do.
You are weak.
Yes you do. All you do is sit on your fat incel ass and post on this website. What a fucking loser!
He’s being disingenuous to some degree.
Powell did make those legal arguments. But it’s also easy to see that she truly did believe her statements and did this as a legal manuever, since she was unable to ultimately prove her most extreme claims.
That the cia or some shadowy group directed the election from overseas and basically hacked the voting machines. It’s possible that this happened to some degree but she’s not in a position to prove this in court.
Those claims were the “kraken” and they were unfortunately never substantiated, from what I understand.
And given what we’re seeing from D’Souza, it looks probable that this was disinformation seeded to Powell to muddy the waters and misdirect everyone (unbeknownst to her).
You seem dumb/shilly.
The specifics are irrelevant.
We can already prove they used a mule operation to swing the election. Literally prove.
This was a red herring. All the details were part of that red herring. That doesn't mean that some of those details aren't important or shouldn't be addressed--but they wanted you focused on that instead of mules.
Powell, along with everyone else, was focused on the shiny object the CIA dangled in front of them, rather than the real op.
It's not that I'm saying it isn't a problem. I'm saying they lit two fires, and want you focused on that, while the second fire burns unnoticed, and with far greater damage.
All you do is destroy, never create. You are just filled with hate, shill. You are obviously an FBI agent, sent here to get people riled up.
See? I can type dumb shit just like you do...
At the end of the day, it's doesn't matter what she believed to be true or what is actually true.
The fact is that she and her Orange Zionist boss completely failed to fight and win. They are either compromised or totally incompetent morons. Either way, they cannot be trusted.
So you’re saying that you knew the claims about foreign hacking into dominion machines was cia seeded disinformation to provide cover for an on the ground mule operation?
Maybe get off your high horse. You probably ate up the same disinfo like they did.
That disinfo would have been unnecessary had Trump and Powell been playing for the other side, as you suggest.
Obviously those lies worked. You're still licking the boots of people with zero spine who hate you.
Moot point. Who said the lies didn’t work? In fact, I said the opposite.
And I’m not licking anyone’s boot, unlike you, big brain.
It’s almost like the point went over your head because you’re a low IQ moron who can’t absorb a nuanced argument.
The fact that you are shilling and bootlicking for a billionaire grifter, is not a "moot point". You recently heard that phrase and have been dying to use it, huh?