Also remember the Communists do believe in religion and they are a religion. Stalin, Mao and Pol Pot desecrate churches, but they all believe in Canaanite or Phoenician Baal worship.
That's true. There's a reason why Qtards use the phrase "God wins" to recruit. The religious turn off all their critical thinking as soon as they see it and welcome them.
Ok, while the lizard demons are sucking souls at concerts, putting witch shit in everything we breathe and eat, you think Christians are the problem? They believe in a religion, why wouldn't there be good to combat this?
I will send you a link after I finish my second video, because you are willing to look beyond. Where as most are stuck in their ways.
Hopefully within 4 or so days I will have completed my next video. Yggdrasil, GOD, Adam & Eve, Noah's Ark, Whore of Babylon, Osiris dismembered, and David & Goliath will all be covered.
Bible like other religions holds all the secrets of our universes cycles.
While I agree that "religion" is problematic, most fail to realize that what was formed for good reasons has been infiltrated and redefined by the enemy. The body with no soul is not good; be it the church or the NPC. Ask yourself why American Christianity was one of the very first institutions that was corrupted at the turn of the last century? Perhaps there is something of value in it and that is precisely why it had to be neutered first. There is a take on Christianity that is actually very antithetical to the judeo christian mindset your thinking of. The problem is not Christianity, it is those who do not love the truth.
Allow me to clarify. You see the hidden cycles, and even identify God as a cycle. This is advanced and commendable. But, there is still something your missing. How much greek philosophy have you tried to incorporate into your framework? Have you identified the Prima Materia? Stop thinking they have something you don't.
Faith is a journey. There are plenty of confirmations of the core truths. It is made evident through the internal transformation of the individual.
Now faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen. Hebrews 11:1
Sin separates us from God. It interferes with the way things were designed to work. Faith in the divinity and sacrifice of Christ will save folks from the consequences of their sin. It will also transform their hearts and minds.
You see that his faith and his actions were working together, and his faith was made complete by what he did. James 2:22
I know many Christians who are scientists and critical thinkers. We’re taught to trust but verify. We’re called to critically examine the prevailing consensus:
Do not be conformed to this age, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, so that you may discern what is the good, pleasing, and perfect will of God. Romans 12:2
Yes of course it will. We were not part of the cosmos but designed and built from it. Form came out of flow and has imparted within this form the natural ability and desire to do the same. Sin disconnects our understanding of the relationship between the self and others.
Form came out of flow and has imparted within this form
That implies being within momentum (balance) aka the value for the responding evaluation by choice. What choice within balance represents is "free" will of choice (form) responding to "dom"inance of balance (flow).
Sin represents suggested restrictions upon choice; enforced by others using suggested law enforcement. Meanwhile within balance...flow represents the force define the rules for the responding choice of form, and choice not only needs to be unrestricted; but represents the resistance (form) to the velocity of the natural order (flow).
In short...we perceive the need to resist the natural order; while others suggest us to follow orders aka the temptation to ignore need for want.
Sin disconnects our understanding of the relationship between the self and others.
ALL differentiates ONEs from all the other ONEs so that each ONE can grow back towards ALL. Perceived others represent both perceived inspiration (need) and suggested information (want) for ONEs choice within balance.
Choosing perceived inspiration (need over want) causes growth of understanding; while choosing suggested information (want over need) corrupts understanding.
Every ONE represents a ONE within ALL aka the ALL seeing "I". The number within ALL represents ONE. U'NITY, noun [Latin unitas.] - "the state of being one; oneness." Agreement vs disagreement with others represents the choice of want vs not want (imbalance); while ignoring need (balance).
What if religion (to bind anew) represents consent to suggestion (-ism); which causes the conflict of reason (want vs not want); which those who make the suggestions; can then rebrand at will into for example capitalism vs communism or right vs left?
What if this isn't about believers vs not believers; want vs not want; true vs false; good vs bad...but about ignoring perceived balance (need) for suggestions (want) causing conflict (want vs not want) aka suggestion (-ism) for division (reason)?
Being moved from inception towards death...where can life go? What if life represents choice within balance (momentum) instead of outcome oriented suggestions by others?
You have absolutely no idea what the term "communism" means
I have. I studied communism through all schoolyears. And what that "billionaires and companies" trying to build for the population is the implementation of every bad thing you could find in communism.
They are not building StarTrek communism, where replicators and unlimited sources of energy made all that classes/workforce/business thing obsolete and everybody could choose the path they want. Where needs and abilities defined by people themselves.
They are building worst version of communism where you could own nothing, have no rights and all you get is some guaranteed bowl of synthetic food. And needs and abilities of people defined by authorities.
Both are communisms, "from everybody by abilities, to everybody by needs", but the question is who will define abilities and needs.
Looking at the situation with coronahoax I think that there are a lot of weak minded around. And they are so weak minded that they will never understand any reasoning. What you suppose to do with all that brain damaged horde? Religion does not seem to be the worst solution.
As for christianity itself, it is not christianity fault that church use it as a mean of making profit from people.
I'll try to explain. F.e. Orthodox Cristianity stands on very simple base: Humans have body and soul. You need to feed a soul, just like you need to feed a body. If you will not feed your soul, it will die, just like body will die without food. Grace (don't know if that a correct translation of "благодать". Say, spiritual substance with divine properties) is a food for soul. Jesus leave us a simple instructions of how to obtain the grace to properly feed our soul. That's all. You could believe it or not, it's your choice. I see nothing bad in that theory. Since we don't know exactly how all that soul things works, it's up to me, to stick to that theory or not.
However, as everything they touch, authorities distort christianity to some authority praising cult with rithuals, virtue signalling and other stuff. Somehow some critical thinkers buy that shit as christianity and now attack that theory, not the authorities.
Religion also provides the counterweight to the massive weight of propaganda being shoveled onto people. Not particularly religious myself but if it provides a barrier between my family and the utter vile evil that is spreading like wildfire through our country, then I will die defending Christianity. If religion is eradicated, there will be no foundational principles on which morality and ethics are built. I was hardcore anti-religion until I saw the destruction wrought by the alternative.
Same thing could be said about science, only difference is that there exist no evidence that their scientific theories are true, it is all faith based. People saw it on TV, so they assumed it must be true.
Big bang is nothing more then a theory. No proof exist that Einsteins theories holds up, in fact all you are going to find is that he has been disproved, e=mc2 does not even work. 300 years later we still have no proof that Newtons theory of gravity holds up, people were able to explain why things fall even before Newton, any idea that two objects attracts each other is just false. NASA, the Moon landing, ISS and Mars rovers, all fake, can not be confirmed by anyone outside of the governments Freemasons.
I am worried about the implications of recent "trends" in the treatment of scientific topics by science journalists. The new topic seems to be the treatment of "scientific knowledge" by science journalists, especially those writing for popular publications.
It seems that the assumption is that knowledge is self-evident and must be accepted without question. The treatment of the topic of the power of scientific knowledge to alter our lives is especially worrying because it seems to me that, by putting a more positive spin on the value of knowledge, the mainstream media is ignoring the possibility that scientific knowledge can be twisted to serve political or commercial interests.
I am worried about the implications of...the treatment of "scientific knowledge"
Knowledge represents perceived inspiration; not suggested information. Nature offers (balance); those within consent (choice). Everything suggested under the umbrella of scientism represents choice suggests (information); choice consents to submit to suggested choices; while ignoring balance.
The corruption of science (to know aka to perceive) into scientism (submisson to suggested) operates underneath anything suggested. Your choice needs to response to balance (need/want); while resisting suggested conflict (want vs not want). One does not need suggested information; on needs perceived inspiration.
All these groups formed under scientism and any other suggested -isms; represent idol worshipers, an idol represents suggested information over perceived inspiration.
Example....A "cow" represents form (life) within flow (inception towards death), and we can perceive the behavior of form within flow as needed inspiration to respond to by choice; which allows us to grow our understanding of everything perceived. Nature communicates inspiration by moving us.
The word "cow" represents a suggested meaning (idol) for the form within flow; which when consented to by choice (believing and not believing); allows those who suggested the word "cow" to define; redefine; corrupt or withhold at will the meaning of the idol "cow" for all those attached to it. Nature does not brand any information; it moves everything within itself as perceivable inspiration.
All words; all languages represent suggested spell-craft by the few as idolized meaning for the many; as to deceive them to ignore to respond by choice (evaluation) to real meaning of balance (value) within movement.
It seems that the assumption is that knowledge is self-evident and must be accepted without question.
It is the ignorance of the many towards knowledge (perception of inspiration) being self evident; to instead consent to believe that the idol "knowledge" (suggested information) is self evident. It is our consent to the suggested word "knowledge" that gives the parasitic few the power to define its suggested meaning against the many.
the value of knowledge
Perceived knowledge represents value; responding choice represents evaluation. All suggested knowledge represents devaluation of evaluation by choice; by misusing choice to submit to the suggested choices of others.
the mainstream media
As form (life) within flow (inception towards death); flow represents the main stream of all perceivable; while media (Latin medius; middle) represents the middlemen between perceived inspiration and choice of reaction. Those parasitic middlemen represents the suggested information by the few towards the consenting choice of the ignorant many. The choice of want over need.
to serve political or commercial interests.
a) the highest value within ALL existence represents ONEs evaluation thereof. Suggesting a substitute value (money) tricks one to consent to devalue ONEs evaluation of ALL existence. How? By submitting to the will of others for suggested value.
b) representative government aka govern (to control) and ment (from mens; mind) represents ignoring free will of choice for representative choices suggested by others. Each needs to respond as choice to balance and ignoring to do so does not give choice away; it just corrupts understanding of being choice within balance, hence being mind controlled by the will of others.
c) if one would have a choice to evaluate ALL existence (representative government), one needs to evaluate all suggestions (suggested values) that are presented as alternatives. One cannot have a choice without evaluation; hence one needs to be choice in order to be responsible for one's choices. One cannot be responsible for one's choices without choosing to be responsible. One cannot choose to be responsible for one's choices without having a choice.
d) there is NO "government" for any people; there is only a government of one's own choices. All people need to be responsible for their own choices. Each one needs
if one would have a choice to evaluate ALL existence (representative government)
Representative government represents choice of want towards suggestion by choice of other ones, while ignoring to evaluate ALL.
one needs to evaluate all suggestions (suggested values) that are presented as alternatives.
One evaluates suggestions (wants aka temptations) by either resisting to consent to them or falling for them and then get inspired by the consequences thereof (so far the many chose to stay ignorant; while wanting more suggestions).
As form; there's no alternative for flow. Also; ALTERN'ATIVE, adjective - "offering a choice of two things"...there's the two again.
One cannot have a choice without evaluation
You try to evaluate want vs not want; which ignores that you already evaluated need/want (balance); while choosing to ignore need for want. Evaluating the choices of others already represents the devaluation of ones own choice in response to balance.
Example: a suggested pile of poop. Want vs not want; while ignoring need. If one consents to a suggested pile of poop; by either wanting or not wanting it; both sides will reasoning about the suggested poop. That's not evaluation; that's self devaluation.
Choice already represents evaluation in response to the value of balance. Other suggested choices do not represent value; the behavior of other choices in response to balance represents perceived value (inspiration)...if one adapts to it.
One cannot be responsible for one's choices without choosing to be responsible
Choice represents "response" to balance. The status quo of choice represents "responsibility" aka self sustenance as choice within balance; yet balance requires both need (self sustenance) and want (temptation to ignore need).
It's not about choosing responsibility; it's about struggling to resist shirking responsibility through ignorance.
there is only a government of one's own choices.
Yep; hence govern (control) and ment (form mens; mind) by suggestion in exchange for consent by voting for representatives aka choice shirking responsibility onto suggested choice of others.
One cannot be responsible for one's choices without choosing to be responsible
Yep; hence govern (control) and ment (form mens; mind) by suggestion in exchange for consent by voting for representatives aka choice shirking responsibility onto suggested choice of others.
I guess the real question is, what's the point of having a representative government if it's just a rubber stamp for the rest of us to do as we please?
One cannot be responsible for one's choices without choosing to be responsible
Response-ability represents the status quo of choice within balance (both need and want responses). Responsibility as choice within balance requires self discernment first; hence understanding positioning as ONE within ALL.
There's no choice without choosing; just choice without understanding what one chose.
I guess the real question is, what's the point of having a representative government if it's just a rubber stamp for the rest of us to do as we please?
From the perspective of the few it represents a simple management tool to reconfirm submission of will with each vote consented to. It therefore makes the rest of us; who do as pleased, stand out from the chain of command, which the many are following. This way they can utilize the chain of command against those who stick out; which are those who challenge the beast system.
From the perspective of natural law it represents the circumstantial self destruction of others that tempts one to fall for or inspires one to resist to fall for. Same choice within balance; not matter what others are up to.
From our individual perspective we benefit from understanding both the system in place to exploit ignorance, and that ignorance is causing the parasitic response. Both represent inspiration for each of us to adapt to.
Nature operates on real (perceived) inspiration by those attached to it, and it is not limited by suggested words; to operate on suggested information.
One does not need to know; one needs to know what one chooses to believe; one needs to respond to real balance; one needs to respond to real inspiration.
The word "nature" represents a suggested meaning (idol) for the balance within movement; which when consented to by choice (believing and not believing); allows those who suggested the word "nature" to define; redefine; corrupt or withhold at will the meaning of the idol "
Nature operates on real (perceived) inspiration by those attached to it, and it is not limited by suggested words; to operate on suggested information.
a) nature represents energy (internal power); the internal balance of nature represents flow (loss) and form (growth). So nature operates as flow/form; we operate as form within flow aka in response to it. For each ONE of us; ALL perceived represents inspiration (need) and temptation (want) aka balance for choice.
b) a word shaped out of perceived sound represents idolized meaning; which is what suggestions represent. Consenting to a suggestion made by the choice of others represents the choice of want over need aka ignorance of balance.
c) as choice you represent the responsibility to respond to balance (hence need); while all consented to suggestions represents ignorance of need (hence want). Any suggestion towards your choice represents want or not want; and whichever you choose will cause want vs no want (conflict of reason). Reason represents the suggested rebranding of ignorance; which tricks us to indulge in reasoning about consequences of ignorance.
One does not need to know
Knowledge represents perception aka input by flow into form. Each ONE needs to adapt to perceived input form ALL; because ONE represents a response to ALL.
When you use "not need" you imply nothingness defining need aka ignorance of everything (ALL) defining need.
one needs to know what one chooses to believe
Choice as a response to balance does not need to believe anything suggested; it needs to adapt by to everything perceived. To believe implies to submit choice ; therefore to restrict responsibility through ignorance (want to believe over need to response).
Go at your basic needs (breathing; drinking; eating and sheltering)...what does one need to believe about them?
The base for choice represents balance; the base for balance/choice represents energy.
it is the only choice
Balance is caused by flow causing momentum; hence need being enforced nonetheless to sustain momentum; while ones struggle to resist want represents the temporary growth potential within the ongoing loss of potentiality.
In short...temporary access to everything and infinite possibility of growth in it (need) or ignorance because "don't wanna struggle tho" (want).
you have no choice...
...to not respond as choice.
you are a slave to your own thoughts (submitting to suggestions)
Master (balance of flow); slave (choice of form) aka free within dominance. Submission as form to form allows the will of others to define what temptations to choose upon; while those consenting corrupt their understanding of dominating origin for free choice; hence feeling oppressed by others.
The suggested deity concept is here used to make the origin of authority unquestionable; which allows those reacting in the name of the deities (in nomine) to keep making suggestions without being called out for using their will upon others. Calling out a believer is being perceived as an attack upon the unquestionable authority; not upon those suggesting it; which is how the believer can justify staying ignorant through blaming those who oppose beliefs.
you are a slave to your own mind (to a mind you do not own)
A misused tool (ignorance); misdirected by others (suggestion) and restricting the consciousness from delivering inspiration from source.
you are a slave to your own life (your choices)
Yep. One represents what one chooses to shape oneself into; and presets are used to justify shirking responsibility over choice within ongoing balance. Yet perspective change leads to understanding that limited life represents opportunity for growth within unlimited source.
you are a slave to your own destiny (to a destiny you do not own)
Destiny (destination) represents the ignorance of balance (need) for suggested outcomes (want or not want). Ask yourself...does energy (internal/inherent power) have a destination?
you are a slave to your own ego (to an ego you do not own)
A growth of internal memory that tempts to ignore external input...just like the screen in front of us.
If flow (inception towards death); then form (life). If balance; then choice. Implication (if/then) represents balance; reason (want vs not want; true vs false; good vs bad; believing vs not believing etc.) represents imbalance caused by ignorance of balance.
If question for choice (want vs not want); then balance (need/want) came before and want over need (ignorance) was chosen.
need/want (if/then) = need (balance) over want (imbalance)
Need/want represents "for" choice; if/then implies "as" flow/form. The latter represents ones positioning; the former ones response to it.
What matter for balance/imbalance is ones perspective of being the imbalance(form) within the balance (flow) aka the temporary chaos (form) out of ongoing order (flow).
Flow causes momentum (balance); form reacts to balance; while being enclosed within momentum of flow. Only within momentum can temporary form sustain; for it represents a resistance to the velocity of flow.
good/bad (if/then) = good (balance) over bad (imbalance)
Good and bad implies good versus bad; hence not being a balance; but an imbalance caused by choice (want vs not want in ignorance of need). Nature does not define good or bad; we are being tricked by labeling wants (temptations). Label deceive us to ignore momentum; hence "this apple is good" leading to "this apple is bad" after a short while within momentum.
We worship the idols of suggested meaning (good vs bad); while a) reasoning about it against each other; b) while ignoring different perspectives (victim perceives bad; perpetrator perceives good) and c) while at will of those who made the suggestion; and who deliberately contradict whatever we believe; just to keep us reasoning about it.
Truth/false (if/then) = truth (balance) over false (imbalance)
Same here...true vs false represents choices response (want vs not want) upon suggestions from others; while ignoring the need to adapt to balance. Flow/form implies that we are within ongoing movement; which implies energy, and neither is there such a state as false within energy; it also doesn't proclaim any true states; only constant change.
Choice represents response to balance; balance represents momentum of flow and flow represents energies internal loss of potentiality.
Balance (need/want/good/true/false) is the reason
Only need/want are defined by nature; while good vs bad and true vs false represents suggested rebranding of want vs not want; which represents the conflict of reason.
Example: left vs right (politics) represents reason; choosing to take a step to the left; implies coming from a right and vice verse; hence left/right balance. It's out consent to the words "left and right" that allow others to attach meaning to them (politics); which is then used to divide us by reason.
Now make a step to the left; which implies coming from a right; while trying to reason against it...doesn't work; for one can only reason about want vs not want; not over need; unless ignored.
Cause implies there is a force, and force implies momentum. What matter is how momentum of flow is applied to a balance; which is an ongoing process (momentum of flow) that represents the resistance to the flow (balance) of energy; and what matter is balance/imbalance to the process of balance/imbalance.
To remain balanced (momentum of flow) one must give up the resistance to the flow (balance) of energy; which means allowing the energy to flow (balance) as a balance (momentum of flow).
Balance represents the cause of choice; ignoring balance as the effected choice represents being flushed as form by flow towards death aka diminishing effect to resist cause.
What matter is how momentum of flow is applied to a balance; which is an ongoing process (momentum of flow)
Momentum represents the balance for the responding choice within momentum aka the formed matter with the temporary choice to shape self. Momentum to velocity of flow represents resistance, and velocity meeting resistance causes friction; vibration; resonance...form within momentum of flow.
To remain balanced (momentum of flow) one must give up the resistance to the flow (balance) of energy; which means allowing the energy to flow (balance) as a balance (momentum of flow).
Ignoring to resist (want over need) implies being pulled by the flow towards death; hence temptation. One always is within balance; yet has the choice to willingly ignore balancing; which causes diminishing potential for resistance until form to flow transmutation back to base (death).
Choice/choice in ignorance of balance (to bind anew) creates choice/choice in ignorance of balance. The essence of the religion (to bind anew) is not the original bond, but the will to submit to others.
The original bond under natural law represents offer/consent. As form (life) within flow (inception towards death) we each represent choice (consent) within balance (offer). To bind anew implies choice consenting to suggested choices of others aka to submit to the will of others.
In short: original bond represents balance/choice; religion (to bind anew) represents choice
In short: original bond represents balance/choice; religion (to bind anew) represents choice
Just choice implies without balance, yet as choice one represents the response to balance aka being within balance with the choice to either adhere to it or ignore it. Ignorance (imbalance) represents a state within balance.
"free" will of choice represents response to the "dom"inance of balance. Therefore; free-dom implies being free within being dominated. The suggested choices of others deceive us to ignore balance; but it's always there; while our choice of want over need imbalances us.
we are never free to choose what we want over what we need
Choice (free); Balance (dominance)...that's the system of free-dom we respond to, so having choice (need/want) implies being "free" within dominance of balance. Choosing want of need (ignorance) corrupts ones understanding of this system; which is why one can get to the point of feeling imprisoned within oneself (me against the world allegory). It's not that we lose freedom; it's that we corrupt our understanding of what freedom means.
Have a sleight of hand from a videogame called Nier..."Rules do not exist to bind you, but so that you may know your freedoms".
to grow outside its nature...to be within your nature.
Individual self sustenance leads to collective self sustenance. The seed of the tree represents the ecosystem surrounding it that also hosts you. Understanding the in-between represents first gaining self discernment as ONE within ALL; then leads to the understanding of the ONEness of ALL; which allows the growth of potential.
In short...understanding that differentiation (ONEs) represent an expression of sameness (ALL) is where one balances between within/outside for growth. Understanding sameness; still represents being within differentiation.
You realize "science" is an outgrowth of protestant Christianity right? Almost all of the big hitting philosophers and scientists that initiated the scientific revolution of the sixteenth century where protestant Christians who were influenced by something they found in the teachings of Jesus Christ.
You have little scientia about what you're talking about. Do less accusing and more accepting responsibility. Do not attack those who try to enlighten you.
No matter how many times civilization has been wiped out, the Bible still stands, containing stories going back pre-flood, to the time of the old world.
This is quite possible the stupidest thing I've read on this site. Every single piece of the bible can be attributed to some other religion and just about ALL of them were pagan. It's literally a 'soup' of paganism, mixed with a plethora of other misguided religions that the jews cobbled together.
RELIGION, noun [Latin religio, from religo, to bind anew; re and ligo, to bind.]
The original bond under natural law represents offer/consent. As form (life) within flow (inception towards death) we each represent choice (consent) within balance (offer). To bind anew implies choice consenting to suggested choices of others aka to submit to the will of others.
In short: original bond represents balance/choice; religion (to bind anew) represents choice/choice in ignorance of balance.
I see, another person who has realized the truth.
Also remember the Communists do believe in religion and they are a religion. Stalin, Mao and Pol Pot desecrate churches, but they all believe in Canaanite or Phoenician Baal worship.
That's true. There's a reason why Qtards use the phrase "God wins" to recruit. The religious turn off all their critical thinking as soon as they see it and welcome them.
Ok, while the lizard demons are sucking souls at concerts, putting witch shit in everything we breathe and eat, you think Christians are the problem? They believe in a religion, why wouldn't there be good to combat this?
If they are following the bible, baal worship is real? That's our enemy.
Thanks for your reply. Interesting
I will send you a link after I finish my second video, because you are willing to look beyond. Where as most are stuck in their ways.
Hopefully within 4 or so days I will have completed my next video. Yggdrasil, GOD, Adam & Eve, Noah's Ark, Whore of Babylon, Osiris dismembered, and David & Goliath will all be covered.
Bible like other religions holds all the secrets of our universes cycles.
Ok. Sounds good.
What if the ignorance of the many causes the responding parasitic behavior of the few?
What if suggested good vs bad represents want vs not want in ignorance of need?
You, friend, seem to be a conduit for all information. We are all graced with your presence.
Critical thinking adjustment? TRY
While I agree that "religion" is problematic, most fail to realize that what was formed for good reasons has been infiltrated and redefined by the enemy. The body with no soul is not good; be it the church or the NPC. Ask yourself why American Christianity was one of the very first institutions that was corrupted at the turn of the last century? Perhaps there is something of value in it and that is precisely why it had to be neutered first. There is a take on Christianity that is actually very antithetical to the judeo christian mindset your thinking of. The problem is not Christianity, it is those who do not love the truth.
Your heavy use of "they" implies you still have much to learn.
Allow me to clarify. You see the hidden cycles, and even identify God as a cycle. This is advanced and commendable. But, there is still something your missing. How much greek philosophy have you tried to incorporate into your framework? Have you identified the Prima Materia? Stop thinking they have something you don't.
Faith is a journey. There are plenty of confirmations of the core truths. It is made evident through the internal transformation of the individual.
Sin separates us from God. It interferes with the way things were designed to work. Faith in the divinity and sacrifice of Christ will save folks from the consequences of their sin. It will also transform their hearts and minds.
I know many Christians who are scientists and critical thinkers. We’re taught to trust but verify. We’re called to critically examine the prevailing consensus:
What if the sameness of ALL (flow) differentiates itself into ONEs (form)?
What if sin (suggested value) corrupts choice (ONEs evaluation of ALL perceived value)?
Yes of course it will. We were not part of the cosmos but designed and built from it. Form came out of flow and has imparted within this form the natural ability and desire to do the same. Sin disconnects our understanding of the relationship between the self and others.
That implies being within momentum (balance) aka the value for the responding evaluation by choice. What choice within balance represents is "free" will of choice (form) responding to "dom"inance of balance (flow).
Sin represents suggested restrictions upon choice; enforced by others using suggested law enforcement. Meanwhile within balance...flow represents the force define the rules for the responding choice of form, and choice not only needs to be unrestricted; but represents the resistance (form) to the velocity of the natural order (flow).
In short...we perceive the need to resist the natural order; while others suggest us to follow orders aka the temptation to ignore need for want.
ALL differentiates ONEs from all the other ONEs so that each ONE can grow back towards ALL. Perceived others represent both perceived inspiration (need) and suggested information (want) for ONEs choice within balance.
Choosing perceived inspiration (need over want) causes growth of understanding; while choosing suggested information (want over need) corrupts understanding.
Every ONE represents a ONE within ALL aka the ALL seeing "I". The number within ALL represents ONE. U'NITY, noun [Latin unitas.] - "the state of being one; oneness." Agreement vs disagreement with others represents the choice of want vs not want (imbalance); while ignoring need (balance).
Communists believe in religion. It's called Ancient Canaanite religion.
What if religion (to bind anew) represents consent to suggestion (-ism); which causes the conflict of reason (want vs not want); which those who make the suggestions; can then rebrand at will into for example capitalism vs communism or right vs left?
What if this isn't about believers vs not believers; want vs not want; true vs false; good vs bad...but about ignoring perceived balance (need) for suggestions (want) causing conflict (want vs not want) aka suggestion (-ism) for division (reason)?
Being moved from inception towards death...where can life go? What if life represents choice within balance (momentum) instead of outcome oriented suggestions by others?
PROP'AGATE, verb transitive [Latin propago.] - "that which is set or thrust in" aka form (life) set or thrust by flow (inception towards death).
I have. I studied communism through all schoolyears. And what that "billionaires and companies" trying to build for the population is the implementation of every bad thing you could find in communism.
They are not building StarTrek communism, where replicators and unlimited sources of energy made all that classes/workforce/business thing obsolete and everybody could choose the path they want. Where needs and abilities defined by people themselves.
They are building worst version of communism where you could own nothing, have no rights and all you get is some guaranteed bowl of synthetic food. And needs and abilities of people defined by authorities.
Both are communisms, "from everybody by abilities, to everybody by needs", but the question is who will define abilities and needs.
What if both are predefined as value (needed balance) and responding evaluation (ability of choice)?
Since there are a lot of idiots around, I prefer an idiots that believe in Jesus and Love, than in greed, vaccination or government.
If form; then out of flow; hence being choice within balance; while reason (want vs not want) implies conflict.
What if imbalance (versus) is caused by ignorance (choice of want over need) towards being within balance?
Looking at the situation with coronahoax I think that there are a lot of weak minded around. And they are so weak minded that they will never understand any reasoning. What you suppose to do with all that brain damaged horde? Religion does not seem to be the worst solution.
As for christianity itself, it is not christianity fault that church use it as a mean of making profit from people.
I'll try to explain. F.e. Orthodox Cristianity stands on very simple base: Humans have body and soul. You need to feed a soul, just like you need to feed a body. If you will not feed your soul, it will die, just like body will die without food. Grace (don't know if that a correct translation of "благодать". Say, spiritual substance with divine properties) is a food for soul. Jesus leave us a simple instructions of how to obtain the grace to properly feed our soul. That's all. You could believe it or not, it's your choice. I see nothing bad in that theory. Since we don't know exactly how all that soul things works, it's up to me, to stick to that theory or not.
However, as everything they touch, authorities distort christianity to some authority praising cult with rithuals, virtue signalling and other stuff. Somehow some critical thinkers buy that shit as christianity and now attack that theory, not the authorities.
So, God isn't real to you? Guess it's a big club, and you aren't in it.
There is a difference between organized religion and walking with God. I agree with you on organized religion.
You, constantly on the put down, makes you an asshole. Almost like, you think you know everything, dumbass.
Religion also provides the counterweight to the massive weight of propaganda being shoveled onto people. Not particularly religious myself but if it provides a barrier between my family and the utter vile evil that is spreading like wildfire through our country, then I will die defending Christianity. If religion is eradicated, there will be no foundational principles on which morality and ethics are built. I was hardcore anti-religion until I saw the destruction wrought by the alternative.
Same thing could be said about science, only difference is that there exist no evidence that their scientific theories are true, it is all faith based. People saw it on TV, so they assumed it must be true.
Big bang is nothing more then a theory. No proof exist that Einsteins theories holds up, in fact all you are going to find is that he has been disproved, e=mc2 does not even work. 300 years later we still have no proof that Newtons theory of gravity holds up, people were able to explain why things fall even before Newton, any idea that two objects attracts each other is just false. NASA, the Moon landing, ISS and Mars rovers, all fake, can not be confirmed by anyone outside of the governments Freemasons.
SCI'ENCE, noun [Latin scientia, from scio, to know.] + KNOW, verb transitive [Latin nosco, cognosco.] - "to perceive".
What if consent to suggested scientism corrupts understanding of perceived knowledge?
I am worried about the implications of recent "trends" in the treatment of scientific topics by science journalists. The new topic seems to be the treatment of "scientific knowledge" by science journalists, especially those writing for popular publications.
It seems that the assumption is that knowledge is self-evident and must be accepted without question. The treatment of the topic of the power of scientific knowledge to alter our lives is especially worrying because it seems to me that, by putting a more positive spin on the value of knowledge, the mainstream media is ignoring the possibility that scientific knowledge can be twisted to serve political or commercial interests.
Knowledge represents perceived inspiration; not suggested information. Nature offers (balance); those within consent (choice). Everything suggested under the umbrella of scientism represents choice suggests (information); choice consents to submit to suggested choices; while ignoring balance.
The corruption of science (to know aka to perceive) into scientism (submisson to suggested) operates underneath anything suggested. Your choice needs to response to balance (need/want); while resisting suggested conflict (want vs not want). One does not need suggested information; on needs perceived inspiration.
All these groups formed under scientism and any other suggested -isms; represent idol worshipers, an idol represents suggested information over perceived inspiration.
Example....A "cow" represents form (life) within flow (inception towards death), and we can perceive the behavior of form within flow as needed inspiration to respond to by choice; which allows us to grow our understanding of everything perceived. Nature communicates inspiration by moving us.
The word "cow" represents a suggested meaning (idol) for the form within flow; which when consented to by choice (believing and not believing); allows those who suggested the word "cow" to define; redefine; corrupt or withhold at will the meaning of the idol "cow" for all those attached to it. Nature does not brand any information; it moves everything within itself as perceivable inspiration.
All words; all languages represent suggested spell-craft by the few as idolized meaning for the many; as to deceive them to ignore to respond by choice (evaluation) to real meaning of balance (value) within movement.
It is the ignorance of the many towards knowledge (perception of inspiration) being self evident; to instead consent to believe that the idol "knowledge" (suggested information) is self evident. It is our consent to the suggested word "knowledge" that gives the parasitic few the power to define its suggested meaning against the many.
Perceived knowledge represents value; responding choice represents evaluation. All suggested knowledge represents devaluation of evaluation by choice; by misusing choice to submit to the suggested choices of others.
As form (life) within flow (inception towards death); flow represents the main stream of all perceivable; while media (Latin medius; middle) represents the middlemen between perceived inspiration and choice of reaction. Those parasitic middlemen represents the suggested information by the few towards the consenting choice of the ignorant many. The choice of want over need.
a) the highest value within ALL existence represents ONEs evaluation thereof. Suggesting a substitute value (money) tricks one to consent to devalue ONEs evaluation of ALL existence. How? By submitting to the will of others for suggested value.
b) representative government aka govern (to control) and ment (from mens; mind) represents ignoring free will of choice for representative choices suggested by others. Each needs to respond as choice to balance and ignoring to do so does not give choice away; it just corrupts understanding of being choice within balance, hence being mind controlled by the will of others.
c) if one would have a choice to evaluate ALL existence (representative government), one needs to evaluate all suggestions (suggested values) that are presented as alternatives. One cannot have a choice without evaluation; hence one needs to be choice in order to be responsible for one's choices. One cannot be responsible for one's choices without choosing to be responsible. One cannot choose to be responsible for one's choices without having a choice.
d) there is NO "government" for any people; there is only a government of one's own choices. All people need to be responsible for their own choices. Each one needs
I am fucking thrilled that you two Tardbots found each other. It's a match made in sheol.
Lol, they must get paid by the word.
Representative government represents choice of want towards suggestion by choice of other ones, while ignoring to evaluate ALL.
One evaluates suggestions (wants aka temptations) by either resisting to consent to them or falling for them and then get inspired by the consequences thereof (so far the many chose to stay ignorant; while wanting more suggestions).
As form; there's no alternative for flow. Also; ALTERN'ATIVE, adjective - "offering a choice of two things"...there's the two again.
You try to evaluate want vs not want; which ignores that you already evaluated need/want (balance); while choosing to ignore need for want. Evaluating the choices of others already represents the devaluation of ones own choice in response to balance.
Example: a suggested pile of poop. Want vs not want; while ignoring need. If one consents to a suggested pile of poop; by either wanting or not wanting it; both sides will reasoning about the suggested poop. That's not evaluation; that's self devaluation.
Choice already represents evaluation in response to the value of balance. Other suggested choices do not represent value; the behavior of other choices in response to balance represents perceived value (inspiration)...if one adapts to it.
Choice represents "response" to balance. The status quo of choice represents "responsibility" aka self sustenance as choice within balance; yet balance requires both need (self sustenance) and want (temptation to ignore need).
It's not about choosing responsibility; it's about struggling to resist shirking responsibility through ignorance.
Yep; hence govern (control) and ment (form mens; mind) by suggestion in exchange for consent by voting for representatives aka choice shirking responsibility onto suggested choice of others.
One cannot be responsible for one's choices without choosing to be responsible
Yep; hence govern (control) and ment (form mens; mind) by suggestion in exchange for consent by voting for representatives aka choice shirking responsibility onto suggested choice of others.
I guess the real question is, what's the point of having a representative government if it's just a rubber stamp for the rest of us to do as we please?
Response-ability represents the status quo of choice within balance (both need and want responses). Responsibility as choice within balance requires self discernment first; hence understanding positioning as ONE within ALL.
There's no choice without choosing; just choice without understanding what one chose.
From the perspective of the few it represents a simple management tool to reconfirm submission of will with each vote consented to. It therefore makes the rest of us; who do as pleased, stand out from the chain of command, which the many are following. This way they can utilize the chain of command against those who stick out; which are those who challenge the beast system.
From the perspective of natural law it represents the circumstantial self destruction of others that tempts one to fall for or inspires one to resist to fall for. Same choice within balance; not matter what others are up to.
From our individual perspective we benefit from understanding both the system in place to exploit ignorance, and that ignorance is causing the parasitic response. Both represent inspiration for each of us to adapt to.
Nature operates on real (perceived) inspiration by those attached to it, and it is not limited by suggested words; to operate on suggested information.
One does not need to know; one needs to know what one chooses to believe; one needs to respond to real balance; one needs to respond to real inspiration.
The word "nature" represents a suggested meaning (idol) for the balance within movement; which when consented to by choice (believing and not believing); allows those who suggested the word "nature" to define; redefine; corrupt or withhold at will the meaning of the idol "
a) nature represents energy (internal power); the internal balance of nature represents flow (loss) and form (growth). So nature operates as flow/form; we operate as form within flow aka in response to it. For each ONE of us; ALL perceived represents inspiration (need) and temptation (want) aka balance for choice.
b) a word shaped out of perceived sound represents idolized meaning; which is what suggestions represent. Consenting to a suggestion made by the choice of others represents the choice of want over need aka ignorance of balance.
c) as choice you represent the responsibility to respond to balance (hence need); while all consented to suggestions represents ignorance of need (hence want). Any suggestion towards your choice represents want or not want; and whichever you choose will cause want vs no want (conflict of reason). Reason represents the suggested rebranding of ignorance; which tricks us to indulge in reasoning about consequences of ignorance.
Knowledge represents perception aka input by flow into form. Each ONE needs to adapt to perceived input form ALL; because ONE represents a response to ALL.
When you use "not need" you imply nothingness defining need aka ignorance of everything (ALL) defining need.
Choice as a response to balance does not need to believe anything suggested; it needs to adapt by to everything perceived. To believe implies to submit choice ; therefore to restrict responsibility through ignorance (want to believe over need to response).
Go at your basic needs (breathing; drinking; eating and sheltering)...what does one need to believe about them?
a) the basics is not a choice
b) it is the only choice
c) you have no choice
d) you are a slave to your own thoughts (submitting to suggestions)
e) you are a slave to your own mind (to a mind you do not own)
f) you are a slave to your own life (your choices)
g) you are a slave to your own destiny (to a destiny you do not own)
h) you are a slave to your own ego (to an ego you do not own)
The base for choice represents balance; the base for balance/choice represents energy.
Balance is caused by flow causing momentum; hence need being enforced nonetheless to sustain momentum; while ones struggle to resist want represents the temporary growth potential within the ongoing loss of potentiality.
In short...temporary access to everything and infinite possibility of growth in it (need) or ignorance because "don't wanna struggle tho" (want).
...to not respond as choice.
Master (balance of flow); slave (choice of form) aka free within dominance. Submission as form to form allows the will of others to define what temptations to choose upon; while those consenting corrupt their understanding of dominating origin for free choice; hence feeling oppressed by others.
The suggested deity concept is here used to make the origin of authority unquestionable; which allows those reacting in the name of the deities (in nomine) to keep making suggestions without being called out for using their will upon others. Calling out a believer is being perceived as an attack upon the unquestionable authority; not upon those suggesting it; which is how the believer can justify staying ignorant through blaming those who oppose beliefs.
A misused tool (ignorance); misdirected by others (suggestion) and restricting the consciousness from delivering inspiration from source.
Yep. One represents what one chooses to shape oneself into; and presets are used to justify shirking responsibility over choice within ongoing balance. Yet perspective change leads to understanding that limited life represents opportunity for growth within unlimited source.
Destiny (destination) represents the ignorance of balance (need) for suggested outcomes (want or not want). Ask yourself...does energy (internal/inherent power) have a destination?
A growth of internal memory that tempts to ignore external input...just like the screen in front of us.
I do not answer what if questions.
If flow (inception towards death); then form (life). If balance; then choice. Implication (if/then) represents balance; reason (want vs not want; true vs false; good vs bad; believing vs not believing etc.) represents imbalance caused by ignorance of balance.
If question for choice (want vs not want); then balance (need/want) came before and want over need (ignorance) was chosen.
Want is from "to want" (not want); true is from "true" (false); good is from "good" (bad); and balance is from "balance" (imbalance).
To balance:
need/want (if/then) = need (balance) over want (imbalance)
good/bad (if/then) = good (balance) over bad (imbalance)
Truth/false (if/then) = truth (balance) over false (imbalance)
Balance (need/want/good/true/false) is the reason
Need/want represents "for" choice; if/then implies "as" flow/form. The latter represents ones positioning; the former ones response to it.
What matter for balance/imbalance is ones perspective of being the imbalance(form) within the balance (flow) aka the temporary chaos (form) out of ongoing order (flow).
Flow causes momentum (balance); form reacts to balance; while being enclosed within momentum of flow. Only within momentum can temporary form sustain; for it represents a resistance to the velocity of flow.
Good and bad implies good versus bad; hence not being a balance; but an imbalance caused by choice (want vs not want in ignorance of need). Nature does not define good or bad; we are being tricked by labeling wants (temptations). Label deceive us to ignore momentum; hence "this apple is good" leading to "this apple is bad" after a short while within momentum.
We worship the idols of suggested meaning (good vs bad); while a) reasoning about it against each other; b) while ignoring different perspectives (victim perceives bad; perpetrator perceives good) and c) while at will of those who made the suggestion; and who deliberately contradict whatever we believe; just to keep us reasoning about it.
Same here...true vs false represents choices response (want vs not want) upon suggestions from others; while ignoring the need to adapt to balance. Flow/form implies that we are within ongoing movement; which implies energy, and neither is there such a state as false within energy; it also doesn't proclaim any true states; only constant change.
Choice represents response to balance; balance represents momentum of flow and flow represents energies internal loss of potentiality.
Only need/want are defined by nature; while good vs bad and true vs false represents suggested rebranding of want vs not want; which represents the conflict of reason.
Example: left vs right (politics) represents reason; choosing to take a step to the left; implies coming from a right and vice verse; hence left/right balance. It's out consent to the words "left and right" that allow others to attach meaning to them (politics); which is then used to divide us by reason.
Now make a step to the left; which implies coming from a right; while trying to reason against it...doesn't work; for one can only reason about want vs not want; not over need; unless ignored.
(im)balance is the cause
Cause implies there is a force, and force implies momentum. What matter is how momentum of flow is applied to a balance; which is an ongoing process (momentum of flow) that represents the resistance to the flow (balance) of energy; and what matter is balance/imbalance to the process of balance/imbalance.
To remain balanced (momentum of flow) one must give up the resistance to the flow (balance) of energy; which means allowing the energy to flow (balance) as a balance (momentum of flow).
Balance represents the cause of choice; ignoring balance as the effected choice represents being flushed as form by flow towards death aka diminishing effect to resist cause.
Momentum represents the balance for the responding choice within momentum aka the formed matter with the temporary choice to shape self. Momentum to velocity of flow represents resistance, and velocity meeting resistance causes friction; vibration; resonance...form within momentum of flow.
Ignoring to resist (want over need) implies being pulled by the flow towards death; hence temptation. One always is within balance; yet has the choice to willingly ignore balancing; which causes diminishing potential for resistance until form to flow transmutation back to base (death).
Choice/choice in ignorance of balance (to bind anew) creates choice/choice in ignorance of balance. The essence of the religion (to bind anew) is not the original bond, but the will to submit to others.
The original bond under natural law represents offer/consent. As form (life) within flow (inception towards death) we each represent choice (consent) within balance (offer). To bind anew implies choice consenting to suggested choices of others aka to submit to the will of others.
In short: original bond represents balance/choice; religion (to bind anew) represents choice
Just choice implies without balance, yet as choice one represents the response to balance aka being within balance with the choice to either adhere to it or ignore it. Ignorance (imbalance) represents a state within balance.
"free" will of choice represents response to the "dom"inance of balance. Therefore; free-dom implies being free within being dominated. The suggested choices of others deceive us to ignore balance; but it's always there; while our choice of want over need imbalances us.
Therefore, we are free to choose what we want and need, but we are never free to choose what we want over what we need.
As the tree grows, it is only free to grow within its nature; and it is not free to grow outside its nature.
The choices we make are in balance, and the choices we make are within our nature.
If you want to be free, you must be in balance, and you must be within your nature.
Choice (free); Balance (dominance)...that's the system of free-dom we respond to, so having choice (need/want) implies being "free" within dominance of balance. Choosing want of need (ignorance) corrupts ones understanding of this system; which is why one can get to the point of feeling imprisoned within oneself (me against the world allegory). It's not that we lose freedom; it's that we corrupt our understanding of what freedom means.
Have a sleight of hand from a videogame called Nier..."Rules do not exist to bind you, but so that you may know your freedoms".
Individual self sustenance leads to collective self sustenance. The seed of the tree represents the ecosystem surrounding it that also hosts you. Understanding the in-between represents first gaining self discernment as ONE within ALL; then leads to the understanding of the ONEness of ALL; which allows the growth of potential.
In short...understanding that differentiation (ONEs) represent an expression of sameness (ALL) is where one balances between within/outside for growth. Understanding sameness; still represents being within differentiation.
You realize "science" is an outgrowth of protestant Christianity right? Almost all of the big hitting philosophers and scientists that initiated the scientific revolution of the sixteenth century where protestant Christians who were influenced by something they found in the teachings of Jesus Christ.
You have little scientia about what you're talking about. Do less accusing and more accepting responsibility. Do not attack those who try to enlighten you.
No matter how many times civilization has been wiped out, the Bible still stands, containing stories going back pre-flood, to the time of the old world.
This is quite possible the stupidest thing I've read on this site. Every single piece of the bible can be attributed to some other religion and just about ALL of them were pagan. It's literally a 'soup' of paganism, mixed with a plethora of other misguided religions that the jews cobbled together.
The original bond under natural law represents offer/consent. As form (life) within flow (inception towards death) we each represent choice (consent) within balance (offer). To bind anew implies choice consenting to suggested choices of others aka to submit to the will of others.
In short: original bond represents balance/choice; religion (to bind anew) represents choice/choice in ignorance of balance.