You have absolutely no idea what the term "communism" means
I have. I studied communism through all schoolyears. And what that "billionaires and companies" trying to build for the population is the implementation of every bad thing you could find in communism.
They are not building StarTrek communism, where replicators and unlimited sources of energy made all that classes/workforce/business thing obsolete and everybody could choose the path they want. Where needs and abilities defined by people themselves.
They are building worst version of communism where you could own nothing, have no rights and all you get is some guaranteed bowl of synthetic food. And needs and abilities of people defined by authorities.
Both are communisms, "from everybody by abilities, to everybody by needs", but the question is who will define abilities and needs.
I have. I studied communism through all schoolyears. And what that "billionaires and companies" trying to build for the population is the implementation of every bad thing you could find in communism.
They are not building StarTrek communism, where replicators and unlimited sources of energy made all that classes/workforce/business thing obsolete and everybody could choose the path they want. Where needs and abilities defined by people themselves.
They are building worst version of communism where you could own nothing, have no rights and all you get is some guaranteed bowl of synthetic food. And needs and abilities of people defined by authorities.
Both are communisms, "from everybody by abilities, to everybody by needs", but the question is who will define abilities and needs.
What if both are predefined as value (needed balance) and responding evaluation (ability of choice)?