c) if one would have a choice to evaluate ALL existence (representative government), one needs to evaluate all suggestions (suggested values) that are presented as alternatives. One cannot have a choice without evaluation; hence one needs to be choice in order to be responsible for one's choices. One cannot be responsible for one's choices without choosing to be responsible. One cannot choose to be responsible for one's choices without having a choice.
d) there is NO "government" for any people; there is only a government of one's own choices. All people need to be responsible for their own choices. Each one needs
if one would have a choice to evaluate ALL existence (representative government)
Representative government represents choice of want towards suggestion by choice of other ones, while ignoring to evaluate ALL.
one needs to evaluate all suggestions (suggested values) that are presented as alternatives.
One evaluates suggestions (wants aka temptations) by either resisting to consent to them or falling for them and then get inspired by the consequences thereof (so far the many chose to stay ignorant; while wanting more suggestions).
As form; there's no alternative for flow. Also; ALTERN'ATIVE, adjective - "offering a choice of two things"...there's the two again.
One cannot have a choice without evaluation
You try to evaluate want vs not want; which ignores that you already evaluated need/want (balance); while choosing to ignore need for want. Evaluating the choices of others already represents the devaluation of ones own choice in response to balance.
Example: a suggested pile of poop. Want vs not want; while ignoring need. If one consents to a suggested pile of poop; by either wanting or not wanting it; both sides will reasoning about the suggested poop. That's not evaluation; that's self devaluation.
Choice already represents evaluation in response to the value of balance. Other suggested choices do not represent value; the behavior of other choices in response to balance represents perceived value (inspiration)...if one adapts to it.
One cannot be responsible for one's choices without choosing to be responsible
Choice represents "response" to balance. The status quo of choice represents "responsibility" aka self sustenance as choice within balance; yet balance requires both need (self sustenance) and want (temptation to ignore need).
It's not about choosing responsibility; it's about struggling to resist shirking responsibility through ignorance.
there is only a government of one's own choices.
Yep; hence govern (control) and ment (form mens; mind) by suggestion in exchange for consent by voting for representatives aka choice shirking responsibility onto suggested choice of others.
One cannot be responsible for one's choices without choosing to be responsible
Yep; hence govern (control) and ment (form mens; mind) by suggestion in exchange for consent by voting for representatives aka choice shirking responsibility onto suggested choice of others.
I guess the real question is, what's the point of having a representative government if it's just a rubber stamp for the rest of us to do as we please?
One cannot be responsible for one's choices without choosing to be responsible
Response-ability represents the status quo of choice within balance (both need and want responses). Responsibility as choice within balance requires self discernment first; hence understanding positioning as ONE within ALL.
There's no choice without choosing; just choice without understanding what one chose.
I guess the real question is, what's the point of having a representative government if it's just a rubber stamp for the rest of us to do as we please?
From the perspective of the few it represents a simple management tool to reconfirm submission of will with each vote consented to. It therefore makes the rest of us; who do as pleased, stand out from the chain of command, which the many are following. This way they can utilize the chain of command against those who stick out; which are those who challenge the beast system.
From the perspective of natural law it represents the circumstantial self destruction of others that tempts one to fall for or inspires one to resist to fall for. Same choice within balance; not matter what others are up to.
From our individual perspective we benefit from understanding both the system in place to exploit ignorance, and that ignorance is causing the parasitic response. Both represent inspiration for each of us to adapt to.
c) if one would have a choice to evaluate ALL existence (representative government), one needs to evaluate all suggestions (suggested values) that are presented as alternatives. One cannot have a choice without evaluation; hence one needs to be choice in order to be responsible for one's choices. One cannot be responsible for one's choices without choosing to be responsible. One cannot choose to be responsible for one's choices without having a choice.
d) there is NO "government" for any people; there is only a government of one's own choices. All people need to be responsible for their own choices. Each one needs
I am fucking thrilled that you two Tardbots found each other. It's a match made in sheol.
Lol, they must get paid by the word.
Representative government represents choice of want towards suggestion by choice of other ones, while ignoring to evaluate ALL.
One evaluates suggestions (wants aka temptations) by either resisting to consent to them or falling for them and then get inspired by the consequences thereof (so far the many chose to stay ignorant; while wanting more suggestions).
As form; there's no alternative for flow. Also; ALTERN'ATIVE, adjective - "offering a choice of two things"...there's the two again.
You try to evaluate want vs not want; which ignores that you already evaluated need/want (balance); while choosing to ignore need for want. Evaluating the choices of others already represents the devaluation of ones own choice in response to balance.
Example: a suggested pile of poop. Want vs not want; while ignoring need. If one consents to a suggested pile of poop; by either wanting or not wanting it; both sides will reasoning about the suggested poop. That's not evaluation; that's self devaluation.
Choice already represents evaluation in response to the value of balance. Other suggested choices do not represent value; the behavior of other choices in response to balance represents perceived value (inspiration)...if one adapts to it.
Choice represents "response" to balance. The status quo of choice represents "responsibility" aka self sustenance as choice within balance; yet balance requires both need (self sustenance) and want (temptation to ignore need).
It's not about choosing responsibility; it's about struggling to resist shirking responsibility through ignorance.
Yep; hence govern (control) and ment (form mens; mind) by suggestion in exchange for consent by voting for representatives aka choice shirking responsibility onto suggested choice of others.
One cannot be responsible for one's choices without choosing to be responsible
Yep; hence govern (control) and ment (form mens; mind) by suggestion in exchange for consent by voting for representatives aka choice shirking responsibility onto suggested choice of others.
I guess the real question is, what's the point of having a representative government if it's just a rubber stamp for the rest of us to do as we please?
Response-ability represents the status quo of choice within balance (both need and want responses). Responsibility as choice within balance requires self discernment first; hence understanding positioning as ONE within ALL.
There's no choice without choosing; just choice without understanding what one chose.
From the perspective of the few it represents a simple management tool to reconfirm submission of will with each vote consented to. It therefore makes the rest of us; who do as pleased, stand out from the chain of command, which the many are following. This way they can utilize the chain of command against those who stick out; which are those who challenge the beast system.
From the perspective of natural law it represents the circumstantial self destruction of others that tempts one to fall for or inspires one to resist to fall for. Same choice within balance; not matter what others are up to.
From our individual perspective we benefit from understanding both the system in place to exploit ignorance, and that ignorance is causing the parasitic response. Both represent inspiration for each of us to adapt to.