If flow (inception towards death); then form (life). If balance; then choice. Implication (if/then) represents balance; reason (want vs not want; true vs false; good vs bad; believing vs not believing etc.) represents imbalance caused by ignorance of balance.
If question for choice (want vs not want); then balance (need/want) came before and want over need (ignorance) was chosen.
need/want (if/then) = need (balance) over want (imbalance)
Need/want represents "for" choice; if/then implies "as" flow/form. The latter represents ones positioning; the former ones response to it.
What matter for balance/imbalance is ones perspective of being the imbalance(form) within the balance (flow) aka the temporary chaos (form) out of ongoing order (flow).
Flow causes momentum (balance); form reacts to balance; while being enclosed within momentum of flow. Only within momentum can temporary form sustain; for it represents a resistance to the velocity of flow.
good/bad (if/then) = good (balance) over bad (imbalance)
Good and bad implies good versus bad; hence not being a balance; but an imbalance caused by choice (want vs not want in ignorance of need). Nature does not define good or bad; we are being tricked by labeling wants (temptations). Label deceive us to ignore momentum; hence "this apple is good" leading to "this apple is bad" after a short while within momentum.
We worship the idols of suggested meaning (good vs bad); while a) reasoning about it against each other; b) while ignoring different perspectives (victim perceives bad; perpetrator perceives good) and c) while at will of those who made the suggestion; and who deliberately contradict whatever we believe; just to keep us reasoning about it.
Truth/false (if/then) = truth (balance) over false (imbalance)
Same here...true vs false represents choices response (want vs not want) upon suggestions from others; while ignoring the need to adapt to balance. Flow/form implies that we are within ongoing movement; which implies energy, and neither is there such a state as false within energy; it also doesn't proclaim any true states; only constant change.
Choice represents response to balance; balance represents momentum of flow and flow represents energies internal loss of potentiality.
Balance (need/want/good/true/false) is the reason
Only need/want are defined by nature; while good vs bad and true vs false represents suggested rebranding of want vs not want; which represents the conflict of reason.
Example: left vs right (politics) represents reason; choosing to take a step to the left; implies coming from a right and vice verse; hence left/right balance. It's out consent to the words "left and right" that allow others to attach meaning to them (politics); which is then used to divide us by reason.
Now make a step to the left; which implies coming from a right; while trying to reason against it...doesn't work; for one can only reason about want vs not want; not over need; unless ignored.
Cause implies there is a force, and force implies momentum. What matter is how momentum of flow is applied to a balance; which is an ongoing process (momentum of flow) that represents the resistance to the flow (balance) of energy; and what matter is balance/imbalance to the process of balance/imbalance.
To remain balanced (momentum of flow) one must give up the resistance to the flow (balance) of energy; which means allowing the energy to flow (balance) as a balance (momentum of flow).
I do not answer what if questions.
If flow (inception towards death); then form (life). If balance; then choice. Implication (if/then) represents balance; reason (want vs not want; true vs false; good vs bad; believing vs not believing etc.) represents imbalance caused by ignorance of balance.
If question for choice (want vs not want); then balance (need/want) came before and want over need (ignorance) was chosen.
Want is from "to want" (not want); true is from "true" (false); good is from "good" (bad); and balance is from "balance" (imbalance).
To balance:
need/want (if/then) = need (balance) over want (imbalance)
good/bad (if/then) = good (balance) over bad (imbalance)
Truth/false (if/then) = truth (balance) over false (imbalance)
Balance (need/want/good/true/false) is the reason
Need/want represents "for" choice; if/then implies "as" flow/form. The latter represents ones positioning; the former ones response to it.
What matter for balance/imbalance is ones perspective of being the imbalance(form) within the balance (flow) aka the temporary chaos (form) out of ongoing order (flow).
Flow causes momentum (balance); form reacts to balance; while being enclosed within momentum of flow. Only within momentum can temporary form sustain; for it represents a resistance to the velocity of flow.
Good and bad implies good versus bad; hence not being a balance; but an imbalance caused by choice (want vs not want in ignorance of need). Nature does not define good or bad; we are being tricked by labeling wants (temptations). Label deceive us to ignore momentum; hence "this apple is good" leading to "this apple is bad" after a short while within momentum.
We worship the idols of suggested meaning (good vs bad); while a) reasoning about it against each other; b) while ignoring different perspectives (victim perceives bad; perpetrator perceives good) and c) while at will of those who made the suggestion; and who deliberately contradict whatever we believe; just to keep us reasoning about it.
Same here...true vs false represents choices response (want vs not want) upon suggestions from others; while ignoring the need to adapt to balance. Flow/form implies that we are within ongoing movement; which implies energy, and neither is there such a state as false within energy; it also doesn't proclaim any true states; only constant change.
Choice represents response to balance; balance represents momentum of flow and flow represents energies internal loss of potentiality.
Only need/want are defined by nature; while good vs bad and true vs false represents suggested rebranding of want vs not want; which represents the conflict of reason.
Example: left vs right (politics) represents reason; choosing to take a step to the left; implies coming from a right and vice verse; hence left/right balance. It's out consent to the words "left and right" that allow others to attach meaning to them (politics); which is then used to divide us by reason.
Now make a step to the left; which implies coming from a right; while trying to reason against it...doesn't work; for one can only reason about want vs not want; not over need; unless ignored.
(im)balance is the cause
Cause implies there is a force, and force implies momentum. What matter is how momentum of flow is applied to a balance; which is an ongoing process (momentum of flow) that represents the resistance to the flow (balance) of energy; and what matter is balance/imbalance to the process of balance/imbalance.
To remain balanced (momentum of flow) one must give up the resistance to the flow (balance) of energy; which means allowing the energy to flow (balance) as a balance (momentum of flow).