I am worried about the implications of recent "trends" in the treatment of scientific topics by science journalists. The new topic seems to be the treatment of "scientific knowledge" by science journalists, especially those writing for popular publications.
It seems that the assumption is that knowledge is self-evident and must be accepted without question. The treatment of the topic of the power of scientific knowledge to alter our lives is especially worrying because it seems to me that, by putting a more positive spin on the value of knowledge, the mainstream media is ignoring the possibility that scientific knowledge can be twisted to serve political or commercial interests.
I am worried about the implications of...the treatment of "scientific knowledge"
Knowledge represents perceived inspiration; not suggested information. Nature offers (balance); those within consent (choice). Everything suggested under the umbrella of scientism represents choice suggests (information); choice consents to submit to suggested choices; while ignoring balance.
The corruption of science (to know aka to perceive) into scientism (submisson to suggested) operates underneath anything suggested. Your choice needs to response to balance (need/want); while resisting suggested conflict (want vs not want). One does not need suggested information; on needs perceived inspiration.
All these groups formed under scientism and any other suggested -isms; represent idol worshipers, an idol represents suggested information over perceived inspiration.
Example....A "cow" represents form (life) within flow (inception towards death), and we can perceive the behavior of form within flow as needed inspiration to respond to by choice; which allows us to grow our understanding of everything perceived. Nature communicates inspiration by moving us.
The word "cow" represents a suggested meaning (idol) for the form within flow; which when consented to by choice (believing and not believing); allows those who suggested the word "cow" to define; redefine; corrupt or withhold at will the meaning of the idol "cow" for all those attached to it. Nature does not brand any information; it moves everything within itself as perceivable inspiration.
All words; all languages represent suggested spell-craft by the few as idolized meaning for the many; as to deceive them to ignore to respond by choice (evaluation) to real meaning of balance (value) within movement.
It seems that the assumption is that knowledge is self-evident and must be accepted without question.
It is the ignorance of the many towards knowledge (perception of inspiration) being self evident; to instead consent to believe that the idol "knowledge" (suggested information) is self evident. It is our consent to the suggested word "knowledge" that gives the parasitic few the power to define its suggested meaning against the many.
the value of knowledge
Perceived knowledge represents value; responding choice represents evaluation. All suggested knowledge represents devaluation of evaluation by choice; by misusing choice to submit to the suggested choices of others.
the mainstream media
As form (life) within flow (inception towards death); flow represents the main stream of all perceivable; while media (Latin medius; middle) represents the middlemen between perceived inspiration and choice of reaction. Those parasitic middlemen represents the suggested information by the few towards the consenting choice of the ignorant many. The choice of want over need.
to serve political or commercial interests.
a) the highest value within ALL existence represents ONEs evaluation thereof. Suggesting a substitute value (money) tricks one to consent to devalue ONEs evaluation of ALL existence. How? By submitting to the will of others for suggested value.
b) representative government aka govern (to control) and ment (from mens; mind) represents ignoring free will of choice for representative choices suggested by others. Each needs to respond as choice to balance and ignoring to do so does not give choice away; it just corrupts understanding of being choice within balance, hence being mind controlled by the will of others.
c) if one would have a choice to evaluate ALL existence (representative government), one needs to evaluate all suggestions (suggested values) that are presented as alternatives. One cannot have a choice without evaluation; hence one needs to be choice in order to be responsible for one's choices. One cannot be responsible for one's choices without choosing to be responsible. One cannot choose to be responsible for one's choices without having a choice.
d) there is NO "government" for any people; there is only a government of one's own choices. All people need to be responsible for their own choices. Each one needs
if one would have a choice to evaluate ALL existence (representative government)
Representative government represents choice of want towards suggestion by choice of other ones, while ignoring to evaluate ALL.
one needs to evaluate all suggestions (suggested values) that are presented as alternatives.
One evaluates suggestions (wants aka temptations) by either resisting to consent to them or falling for them and then get inspired by the consequences thereof (so far the many chose to stay ignorant; while wanting more suggestions).
As form; there's no alternative for flow. Also; ALTERN'ATIVE, adjective - "offering a choice of two things"...there's the two again.
One cannot have a choice without evaluation
You try to evaluate want vs not want; which ignores that you already evaluated need/want (balance); while choosing to ignore need for want. Evaluating the choices of others already represents the devaluation of ones own choice in response to balance.
Example: a suggested pile of poop. Want vs not want; while ignoring need. If one consents to a suggested pile of poop; by either wanting or not wanting it; both sides will reasoning about the suggested poop. That's not evaluation; that's self devaluation.
Choice already represents evaluation in response to the value of balance. Other suggested choices do not represent value; the behavior of other choices in response to balance represents perceived value (inspiration)...if one adapts to it.
One cannot be responsible for one's choices without choosing to be responsible
Choice represents "response" to balance. The status quo of choice represents "responsibility" aka self sustenance as choice within balance; yet balance requires both need (self sustenance) and want (temptation to ignore need).
It's not about choosing responsibility; it's about struggling to resist shirking responsibility through ignorance.
there is only a government of one's own choices.
Yep; hence govern (control) and ment (form mens; mind) by suggestion in exchange for consent by voting for representatives aka choice shirking responsibility onto suggested choice of others.
One cannot be responsible for one's choices without choosing to be responsible
Yep; hence govern (control) and ment (form mens; mind) by suggestion in exchange for consent by voting for representatives aka choice shirking responsibility onto suggested choice of others.
I guess the real question is, what's the point of having a representative government if it's just a rubber stamp for the rest of us to do as we please?
Nature operates on real (perceived) inspiration by those attached to it, and it is not limited by suggested words; to operate on suggested information.
One does not need to know; one needs to know what one chooses to believe; one needs to respond to real balance; one needs to respond to real inspiration.
The word "nature" represents a suggested meaning (idol) for the balance within movement; which when consented to by choice (believing and not believing); allows those who suggested the word "nature" to define; redefine; corrupt or withhold at will the meaning of the idol "
Nature operates on real (perceived) inspiration by those attached to it, and it is not limited by suggested words; to operate on suggested information.
a) nature represents energy (internal power); the internal balance of nature represents flow (loss) and form (growth). So nature operates as flow/form; we operate as form within flow aka in response to it. For each ONE of us; ALL perceived represents inspiration (need) and temptation (want) aka balance for choice.
b) a word shaped out of perceived sound represents idolized meaning; which is what suggestions represent. Consenting to a suggestion made by the choice of others represents the choice of want over need aka ignorance of balance.
c) as choice you represent the responsibility to respond to balance (hence need); while all consented to suggestions represents ignorance of need (hence want). Any suggestion towards your choice represents want or not want; and whichever you choose will cause want vs no want (conflict of reason). Reason represents the suggested rebranding of ignorance; which tricks us to indulge in reasoning about consequences of ignorance.
One does not need to know
Knowledge represents perception aka input by flow into form. Each ONE needs to adapt to perceived input form ALL; because ONE represents a response to ALL.
When you use "not need" you imply nothingness defining need aka ignorance of everything (ALL) defining need.
one needs to know what one chooses to believe
Choice as a response to balance does not need to believe anything suggested; it needs to adapt by to everything perceived. To believe implies to submit choice ; therefore to restrict responsibility through ignorance (want to believe over need to response).
Go at your basic needs (breathing; drinking; eating and sheltering)...what does one need to believe about them?
I am worried about the implications of recent "trends" in the treatment of scientific topics by science journalists. The new topic seems to be the treatment of "scientific knowledge" by science journalists, especially those writing for popular publications.
It seems that the assumption is that knowledge is self-evident and must be accepted without question. The treatment of the topic of the power of scientific knowledge to alter our lives is especially worrying because it seems to me that, by putting a more positive spin on the value of knowledge, the mainstream media is ignoring the possibility that scientific knowledge can be twisted to serve political or commercial interests.
Knowledge represents perceived inspiration; not suggested information. Nature offers (balance); those within consent (choice). Everything suggested under the umbrella of scientism represents choice suggests (information); choice consents to submit to suggested choices; while ignoring balance.
The corruption of science (to know aka to perceive) into scientism (submisson to suggested) operates underneath anything suggested. Your choice needs to response to balance (need/want); while resisting suggested conflict (want vs not want). One does not need suggested information; on needs perceived inspiration.
All these groups formed under scientism and any other suggested -isms; represent idol worshipers, an idol represents suggested information over perceived inspiration.
Example....A "cow" represents form (life) within flow (inception towards death), and we can perceive the behavior of form within flow as needed inspiration to respond to by choice; which allows us to grow our understanding of everything perceived. Nature communicates inspiration by moving us.
The word "cow" represents a suggested meaning (idol) for the form within flow; which when consented to by choice (believing and not believing); allows those who suggested the word "cow" to define; redefine; corrupt or withhold at will the meaning of the idol "cow" for all those attached to it. Nature does not brand any information; it moves everything within itself as perceivable inspiration.
All words; all languages represent suggested spell-craft by the few as idolized meaning for the many; as to deceive them to ignore to respond by choice (evaluation) to real meaning of balance (value) within movement.
It is the ignorance of the many towards knowledge (perception of inspiration) being self evident; to instead consent to believe that the idol "knowledge" (suggested information) is self evident. It is our consent to the suggested word "knowledge" that gives the parasitic few the power to define its suggested meaning against the many.
Perceived knowledge represents value; responding choice represents evaluation. All suggested knowledge represents devaluation of evaluation by choice; by misusing choice to submit to the suggested choices of others.
As form (life) within flow (inception towards death); flow represents the main stream of all perceivable; while media (Latin medius; middle) represents the middlemen between perceived inspiration and choice of reaction. Those parasitic middlemen represents the suggested information by the few towards the consenting choice of the ignorant many. The choice of want over need.
a) the highest value within ALL existence represents ONEs evaluation thereof. Suggesting a substitute value (money) tricks one to consent to devalue ONEs evaluation of ALL existence. How? By submitting to the will of others for suggested value.
b) representative government aka govern (to control) and ment (from mens; mind) represents ignoring free will of choice for representative choices suggested by others. Each needs to respond as choice to balance and ignoring to do so does not give choice away; it just corrupts understanding of being choice within balance, hence being mind controlled by the will of others.
c) if one would have a choice to evaluate ALL existence (representative government), one needs to evaluate all suggestions (suggested values) that are presented as alternatives. One cannot have a choice without evaluation; hence one needs to be choice in order to be responsible for one's choices. One cannot be responsible for one's choices without choosing to be responsible. One cannot choose to be responsible for one's choices without having a choice.
d) there is NO "government" for any people; there is only a government of one's own choices. All people need to be responsible for their own choices. Each one needs
I am fucking thrilled that you two Tardbots found each other. It's a match made in sheol.
Lol, they must get paid by the word.
Representative government represents choice of want towards suggestion by choice of other ones, while ignoring to evaluate ALL.
One evaluates suggestions (wants aka temptations) by either resisting to consent to them or falling for them and then get inspired by the consequences thereof (so far the many chose to stay ignorant; while wanting more suggestions).
As form; there's no alternative for flow. Also; ALTERN'ATIVE, adjective - "offering a choice of two things"...there's the two again.
You try to evaluate want vs not want; which ignores that you already evaluated need/want (balance); while choosing to ignore need for want. Evaluating the choices of others already represents the devaluation of ones own choice in response to balance.
Example: a suggested pile of poop. Want vs not want; while ignoring need. If one consents to a suggested pile of poop; by either wanting or not wanting it; both sides will reasoning about the suggested poop. That's not evaluation; that's self devaluation.
Choice already represents evaluation in response to the value of balance. Other suggested choices do not represent value; the behavior of other choices in response to balance represents perceived value (inspiration)...if one adapts to it.
Choice represents "response" to balance. The status quo of choice represents "responsibility" aka self sustenance as choice within balance; yet balance requires both need (self sustenance) and want (temptation to ignore need).
It's not about choosing responsibility; it's about struggling to resist shirking responsibility through ignorance.
Yep; hence govern (control) and ment (form mens; mind) by suggestion in exchange for consent by voting for representatives aka choice shirking responsibility onto suggested choice of others.
One cannot be responsible for one's choices without choosing to be responsible
Yep; hence govern (control) and ment (form mens; mind) by suggestion in exchange for consent by voting for representatives aka choice shirking responsibility onto suggested choice of others.
I guess the real question is, what's the point of having a representative government if it's just a rubber stamp for the rest of us to do as we please?
Nature operates on real (perceived) inspiration by those attached to it, and it is not limited by suggested words; to operate on suggested information.
One does not need to know; one needs to know what one chooses to believe; one needs to respond to real balance; one needs to respond to real inspiration.
The word "nature" represents a suggested meaning (idol) for the balance within movement; which when consented to by choice (believing and not believing); allows those who suggested the word "nature" to define; redefine; corrupt or withhold at will the meaning of the idol "
a) nature represents energy (internal power); the internal balance of nature represents flow (loss) and form (growth). So nature operates as flow/form; we operate as form within flow aka in response to it. For each ONE of us; ALL perceived represents inspiration (need) and temptation (want) aka balance for choice.
b) a word shaped out of perceived sound represents idolized meaning; which is what suggestions represent. Consenting to a suggestion made by the choice of others represents the choice of want over need aka ignorance of balance.
c) as choice you represent the responsibility to respond to balance (hence need); while all consented to suggestions represents ignorance of need (hence want). Any suggestion towards your choice represents want or not want; and whichever you choose will cause want vs no want (conflict of reason). Reason represents the suggested rebranding of ignorance; which tricks us to indulge in reasoning about consequences of ignorance.
Knowledge represents perception aka input by flow into form. Each ONE needs to adapt to perceived input form ALL; because ONE represents a response to ALL.
When you use "not need" you imply nothingness defining need aka ignorance of everything (ALL) defining need.
Choice as a response to balance does not need to believe anything suggested; it needs to adapt by to everything perceived. To believe implies to submit choice ; therefore to restrict responsibility through ignorance (want to believe over need to response).
Go at your basic needs (breathing; drinking; eating and sheltering)...what does one need to believe about them?
a) the basics is not a choice
b) it is the only choice
c) you have no choice
d) you are a slave to your own thoughts (submitting to suggestions)
e) you are a slave to your own mind (to a mind you do not own)
f) you are a slave to your own life (your choices)
g) you are a slave to your own destiny (to a destiny you do not own)
h) you are a slave to your own ego (to an ego you do not own)