Here are key facts and sources about the alleged “pandemic” that will help you get a grasp on what has happened to the world since January 2020, and help you enlighten any of your friends who might be still trapped in the New Normal fog.
II. Lockdowns
III. PCR Tests
V. Ventilators
VI. Masks
VII. Vaccines
VIII. Deception & Foreknowledge
sources:
PART I: “COVID DEATHS” & MORTALITY
UK Gov't confirms Covid19 harmless to VAST MAJORITY of people
Almost all studies on the infection-fatality ratio (IFR) of Covid have returned results between 0.04% and 0.5%, meaning Covid’s survival rate is at least 99.5%.
A more reasonable statistical measure of mortality is Age-Standardised Mortality Rate (ASMR).
By this measure, 2020 isn’t even the worst year for mortality since 2000, in fact since 1943 only 9 years have been better than 2020.
Similarly, in the US the ASMR for 2020 is only at 2004 levels.
For a detailed breakdown of how Covid affected mortality across Western Europe and the US click here. What increases in mortality we have seen could be attributable to non-Covid causes [facts 7, 9 & 19].
Healthcare officials from Italy, Germany, the UK, US, Northern Ireland and others have all admitted to this practice.
Dr. Ngozi Ezike | How COVID Deaths are Classified.
Removing any distinction between dying of Covid, and dying of something else after testing positive for Covid will naturally lead to over-counting of “Covid deaths”. British pathologist Dr John Lee was warning of this “substantial over-estimate” as early as last spring. Other mainstream sources have reported it, too.
Considering the huge percentage of “asymptomatic” Covid infections [14], the well-known prevalence of serious comorbidities [fact 4] and the potential for false-positive tests [fact 18], this renders the Covid death numbers an extremely unreliable statistic.
These included cancer, heart disease, dementia, Alzheimer’s, kidney failure and diabetes (among others). Over 50% of them had three or more serious pre-existing conditions.
This pattern has held up in all other countries over the course of the “pandemic”. An October 2020 FOIA request to the UK’s ONS revealed less than 10% of the official “Covid death” count at that time had Covid as the sole cause of death.
In almost all cases the median age of a “Covid death” is higher than the national life expectancy.
As such, for most of the world, the “pandemic” has had little-to-no impact on life expectancy. Contrast this with the Spanish flu, which saw a 28% drop in life expectancy in the US in just over a year. source
Chances of dying from coronavirus v normal annual risk
The risk of death “from Covid” follows, almost exactly, your background risk of death in general.
The small increase for some of the older age groups can be accounted for by other factors. [facts 7, 9 & 19]
In the US, hospitals considered “universal DNRs” for any patient who tested positive for Covid, and whistleblowing nurses have admitted the DNR system was abused in New York.
In the UK there was an “unprecdented” rise in “illegal” DNRs for disabled people, GP surgeries sent out letters to non-terminal patients recommending they sign DNR orders, whilst other doctors signed “blanket DNRs” for entire nursing homes.
A study done by Sheffield University found over one-third of all “suspected” Covid patients had a DNR attached to their file within 24 hours of hospital admission.
Blanket use of coerced or illegal DNR orders could account for any increases in mortality in 2020/21. [Facts 2 & 6]
PART II: LOCKDOWNS
“Covid deaths” in Florida (no lockdown) vs California (lockdown)
“Covid deaths” in Sweden (no lockdown) vs UK (lockdown)
Dr David Nabarro, World Health Organization special envoy for Covid-19 described lockdowns as a “global catastrophe” in October 2020:
A UN report from April 2020 warned of 100,000s of children being killed by the economic impact of lockdowns, while tens of millions more face possible poverty and famine.
Unemployment, poverty, suicide, alcoholism, drug use and other social/mental health crises are spiking all over the world. While missed and delayed surgeries and screenings are going to see increased mortality from heart disease, cancer et al. in the near future.
The impact of lockdown would account for the small increases in excess mortality. [Facts 2 & 6]
In March 2020 it was reported that hospitals in Spain and Italy were over-flowing with patients, but this happens every flu season. In 2017 Spanish hospitals were at 200% capacity, and 2015 saw patients sleeping in corridors. A paper JAMA paper from March 2020 found that Italian hospitals “typically run at 85-90% capacity in the winter months”.
In the UK, the NHS is regularly stretched to breaking point over the winter.
As part of their Covid policy, the NHS announced in Spring of 2020 that they would be “re-organizing hospital capacity in new ways to treat Covid and non-Covid patients separately” and that “as result hospitals will experience capacity pressures at lower overall occupancy rates than would previously have been the case.”
This means they removed thousands of beds. During an alleged deadly pandemic, they reduced the maximum occupancy of hospitals. Despite this, the NHS never felt pressure beyond your typical flu season, and at times actually had 4x more empty beds than normal.
In both the UK and US millions were spent on temporary emergency hospitals that were never used.
PART III: PCR TESTS
A Chinese study found the same patient could get two different results from the same test on the same day.
In Germany, tests are known to have reacted to common cold viruses.
A 2006 study found PCR tests for one virus responded to other viruses too.
In 2007, a reliance on PCR tests resulted in an “outbreak” of Whooping Cough that never actually existed.
Some tests in the US even reacted to the negative control sample.
The late President of Tanzania, John Magufuli, submitted samples goat, pawpaw and motor oil for PCR testing, all came back positive for the virus.
As early as February of 2020 experts were admitting the test was unreliable. Dr Wang Cheng, president of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences told Chinese state television “The accuracy of the tests is only 30-50%”.
The Australian government’s own website claimed “There is limited evidence available to assess the accuracy and clinical utility of available COVID-19 tests.”
And a Portuguese court ruled that PCR tests were “unreliable” and should not be used for diagnosis.
You can read detailed breakdowns of the failings of PCR tests here, here and here.
The MIQE PCR guidelines agree (pdf), stating: “[CT] values higher than 40 are suspect because of the implied low efficiency and generally should not be reported.”
Dr. Fauci himself even admitted anything over 35 cycles is almost never culturable.
Dr. Juliet Morrison, virologist at the University of California, Riverside, told the New York Times: "Any test with a cycle threshold above 35 is too sensitive…I’m shocked that people would think that 40 [cycles] could represent a positive…A more reasonable cutoff would be 30 to 35″.
In the same article Dr Michael Mina, of the Harvard School of Public Health, said the limit should be 30, and the author goes on to point out that reducing the CT from 40 to 30 would have reduced “covid cases” in some states by as much as 90%.
The CDC’s own data suggests no sample over 33 cycles could be cultured, and Germany’s Robert Koch Institute says nothing over 30 cycles is likely to be infectious.
Despite this, it is known almost all the labs in the US are running their tests at least 37 cycles and sometimes as high as 45. The NHS “standard operating procedure” for PCR tests (pdf) rules set the limit at 40 cycles.
Based on what we know about the CT values, the majority of PCR test results are at best questionable.
Then, in January 2021, the WHO released another memo, this time warning that “asymptomatic” positive PCR tests should be re-tested because they might be false positives:
They wrote a paper, Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR, which was submitted for publication on January 21st 2020, and then accepted on January 22nd, meaning the paper was allegedly “peer-reviewed” in less than 24 hours, a process that typically takes weeks.
Since then, a consortium of over forty life scientists has petitioned for the withdrawal of the paper, writing a lengthy report detailing 10 major errors in the paper’s methodology.
They have also requested the release of the journal’s peer-review report, to prove the paper really did pass through the peer-review process. The journal has yet to comply.
The Corman-Drosten assays are the root of every Covid PCR test in the world. If the paper is questionable, every PCR test is also questionable.
PART IV: "ASYMPTOMATIC INFECTION"
It is literally impossible to tell the difference between an “asymptomatic case” and a false-positive test result.
A meta-analysis of Covid studies, published by Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) in December 2020, found that asymptomatic carriers had a less than 1% chance of infecting people within their household. Another study, done on influenza in 2009, found:
Given the known flaws of the PCR tests, many “asymptomatic cases” may be false positives. [fact 14]
https://www.technocracy.news/giant-study-disproves-myth-of-asymptomatic-covid-spread/
PART VIII: DECEPTION & FOREKNOWLEDGE
Two EU documents published in 2018, the “2018 State of Vaccine Confidence” and a technical report titled “Designing and implementing an immunisation information system” discussed the plausibility of an EU-wide vaccination monitoring system.
These documents were combined into the 2019 “Vaccination Roadmap”, which (among other things) established a “feasibility study” on vaccine passports to begin in 2019 and finish in 2021.
This report’s final conclusions (pdf) were released to the public in September 2019, just a month before Event 201.
The exercise published its findings and recommendations in November 2019 as a “call to action”. (pdf) One month later, China recorded their first case of “Covid”.
U.S Flu Positivity Rates by Week
It’s not just the US either, globally flu has apparently almost completely disappeared.
Meanwhile, a new disease called “Covid”, which has identical symptoms and a similar mortality rate to influenza, is apparently affecting all the people normally affected by the flu.
Business Insider reported that “billionaires saw their net worth increase by half a trillion dollars” by October 2020.
Clearly that number will be even bigger by now.
Organizations such as the CDC knew full well that Pfizer's therapeutic only decreased chances of severe morbidity (hospitalizations and deaths) yet led people on to think that the therapeutic provided Immunity like other "vaccinations"
Definition changes CDC changed definition of vaccination WHO changed definition of herd immunity Pandemic definition changes in order for numbers to be lower
PART VI: MASKS
One meta-analysis published by the CDC in May 2020 found “no significant reduction in influenza transmission with the use of face masks”.
Another study with over 8000 subjects found masks “did not seem to be effective against laboratory-confirmed viral respiratory infections nor against clinical respiratory infection.”
There are literally too many to quote them all, but you can read them: [1] [2] (pdf) [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] Or read a summary by SPR here.
While some studies have been done claiming to show mask do work for Covid, they are all seriously flawed. One relied on self-reported surveys as data. Another was so badly designed a panel of experts demand it be withdrawn. A third was withdrawn after its predictions proved entirely incorrect.
The WHO commissioned their own meta-analysis in the Lancet, but that study looked only at N95 masks and only in hospitals. [For full run down on the bad data in this study click here.]
Aside from scientific evidence, there’s plenty of real-world evidence that masks do nothing to halt the spread of disease.
For example, North Dakota and South Dakota had near-identical case figures, despite one having a mask-mandate and the other not.
cases per 100k population in North Dakota and South Dakota
In Kansas, counties without mask mandates actually had fewer Covid “cases” than counties with mask mandates. And despite masks being very common in Japan, they had their worst flu outbreak in decades in 2019.
Dr. James Meehan reported in August 2020 he was seeing increases in bacterial pneumonia, fungal infections, facial rashes.
Masks are also known to contain plastic microfibers, which damage the lungs when inhaled and may be potentially carcinogenic.
Childen wearing masks encourages mouth-breathing, which results in facial deformities.
People around the world have passed out due to CO2 poisoning while wearing their masks, and some children in China even suffered sudden cardiac arrest.
The report goes on to warn these masks (and other medical waste) will clog sewage and irrigation systems, which will have knock on effects on public health, irrigation and agriculture.
A study from the University of Swansea found “heavy metals and plastic fibres were released when throw-away masks were submerged in water.” These materials are toxic to both people and wildlife.
PART VII: VACCINES
Scientists have been trying to develop a SARS and MERS vaccine for years with little success. Some of the failed SARS vaccines actually caused hypersensitivity to the SARS virus, meaning that vaccinated mice could potentially get the disease more severely than unvaccinated mice. Another attempt caused liver damage in ferrets.
While traditional vaccines work by exposing the body to a weakened strain of the microorganism responsible for causing the disease, these new Covid vaccines are mRNA vaccines.
mRNA (messenger ribonucleic acid) vaccines theoretically work by injecting viral mRNA into the body, where it replicates inside your cells and encourages your body to recognise, and make antigens for, the “spike proteins” of the virus. They have been the subject of research since the 1990s, but before 2020 no mRNA vaccine was ever approved for use.
The vaccine manufacturers themselves, upon releasing the untested mRNA gene therapies, were quite clear their product’s “efficacy” was based on “reducing the severity of symptoms”.
Pfizer even admit this is true in the leaked supply contract between the pharmaceutical giant, and the government of Albania:
Further, none of the vaccines have been subject to proper trials. Many of them skipped early-stage trials entirely, and the late-stage human trials have either not been peer-reviewed, have not released their data, will not finish until 2023 or were abandoned after “severe adverse effects”.
The EU’s product licensing law does the same, and there are reports of confidential liability clauses in the contracts the EU signed with vaccine manufacturers.
The UK went even further, granting permanent legal indemnity to the government, and any employees thereof, for any harm done when a patient is being treated for Covid19 or “suspected Covid19”.
Again, the leaked Albanian contract suggests that Pfizer, at least, made this indemnity a standard demand of supplying Covid vaccines:
we fucking need some wikis in .win
PART V: VENTILATORS
Writing in The Spectator, Dr Matt Strauss stated:
Despite this, the WHO, CDC, ECDC (pdf) and NHS all “recommended” Covid patients be ventilated instead of using non-invasive methods.
This was not a medical policy designed to best treat the patients, but rather to reduce the hypothetical spread of Covid by preventing patients from exhaling aerosol droplets.
Intubation tubes are a source of potential a infection known as “ventilator-associated pneumonia”, which studies show affects up to 28% of all people put on ventilators, and kills 20-55% of those infected.
Mechanical ventilation is also damaging to the physical structure of the lungs, resulting in “ventilator-induced lung injury”, which can dramatically impact quality of life, and even result in death.
Experts estimate 40-50% of ventilated patients die, regardless of their disease. Around the world, between 66 and 86% of all “Covid patients” put on ventilators died.
According to the “undercover nurse”, ventilators were being used so improperly in New York, they were destroying patients’ lungs.
This policy was negligence at best, and potentially deliberate murder at worst. This misuse of ventilators could account for any increase in mortality in 2020/21. [Facts 2 & 6]
axo... this is my formal request to hire you as my daily organizer / planner.
apparently, you have a method to my perceived madness... only cause you dont seem crazy.
write a book or some shit. most authors aint got shit on you.
Muhaha! My plan is working ! :D
Aaah, this is from OffGuardian. I think they deserve some cryptodonation for their efforts
yes, they are legends.
Thank you Sir. You are a hero.
The other fact, or the 31st fact you all need to know is 70% of the global population had ZERO idea what is going on or outright refuses to admit that this is not a pandemic, but an attempt in full blown cultural and physical Genocide not seen since the Dark Ages and Soviet Russia, and the remaining 30% of the population who knows that this is a GENOCIDE were mostly (80-99%) in WESTERN COUNTRIES.
completely untrue. nations that suffered through actual socialist regimes in LIVING MEMORY were and are at the top of the call out heap.
americans on the other hand are very open to trying this new flavor of governance for the most part. you’ve got this entirely backwards.
And you are talking about: Vietnam, Cambodia, South Korea, Japan, Taiwan, China, Russia.
None of that shit were in anywhere close to any call out heap. All I see is people masked against their will, but with 100% compliance without fail.
These "scientists" are sell outs.
https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/5/4/e006577
confirms cloth masks do nothing and contribute to the spread of disease.
Authors added a note during covid
https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/5/4/e006577.responses#covid-19-shortages-of-masks-and-the-use-of-cloth-masks-as-a-last-resort
Oh we still recommend cloth masks since having some protection is better than none.
Wtf? The study explicitly said the cloth masks contributed to a higher rate of disease. The followup made assumptions about the outcome of the first study to try to discredit it!
This gives mask Nazis all the argument they need, even though it's completely invalid, to keep pushing their idiocy on the country.
It's deliberate.
What they are actually going to do with the masks is to condition you so you want to die.
The goal is to force 20 to 40 percent of any given population to commit suicide or resort to extremes as a form of genocide.
You left out the most important:
1: sars-cov-2 has never been isolated in a human anywhere, ever. 2: they have no way to test for it. PCR is not a test and none of the tests can distinguish between "covid" and the flu. 3: flu deaths were effectively 0 last year, while covid deaths somehow managed to be approximately what flu deaths should have been. 4: hospitals were paid for "positive" covid diagnoses and treatments.
PART III: PCR TESTS
Dear @axolotl_peyotl, As an atheist, I can proudly say, you're doing God's work man! Keep it up!
Yes, that's an honest comment, and not sarcasm. I love what you've done here!
I'm glad this info was useful!!! You rock!!
This is remarkable. Thank you. Saving this
just finished now actually, all the info should be ITT (I did it throughout the day because it takes a long time to reformat with links etc).
Should probably add to this the fundamental violation of any form of liberty-based government that mandates are, plus a section on nation-by-nation protections against this exact kind of intrusion into people's lives.
Thank you 💙❄💙❄💙❄💙❄💙❄💙❄💙❄💙❄💙❄💙❄💙❄💙❄💙
Thanks, Axo
Holy fuck this is great ty 👍👌👊
I think we may need a new sticky or an update for a the vaccine deaths and studies coming out showing the heart damage.
Good call.
Fantastic post. Thank you.
Thanks for the reference links and all. Great work!
Calm, authoritative points are powerful
Watch covid land: https://banned.video/watch?id=615f96b3aa816336dbd21792
very nice, thanks
Savling this
How about a post discussing how virology is fake to begin with
Folks, there is more to this than we know.
Here's an important fact you need to know about COVID.
And here's another.
This is an almost 100% unrelated photo of President Biden on his knees, bowing before the Israeli President as Jews laugh at him.
Not once in 9 posts did you ever mention the benefits of Vitamin and Mineral prevention:
Shame on you
Vitamin C, D & Zinc are those you missed.
I didn't write this.
This is a megathread! The idea is for folks to expand the discussion in the comments. Please, by all means, share any relevant info about treatment!
Also, I personally believe COVID is a hoax and doesn't exist as a tangible virus.
This is a diverse board with diverse opinions, and yours are most certainly welcome!
It says 30 but there's only 8 🧐
look again, they are split up into 30 sections.
Great work!
How about the fact that almost all vaccination in the US has been moved from being done at medical facilities/private practices to being administered by Pharmacy techs who have no training in actual medicine.
I think this is one of the major ways they have undercounted adverse effects because people go in to Walgreen's, get the shot, leave, and then if something happens, they aren't going to go back to the pharmacy for treatment. They are going to the ER or to their doctor for treatment. So the feedback loop is broken from the start.