4
TheDigger2 4 points ago +4 / -0

It's like the Welfare queen stereotype that the left claims is a myth. Yeah there may be a lot of rural Americans on welfare. But having spent 20 years in retail grocery, I can tell you the welfare queen is very common in cities. They eat steak and lobster and scoff at store brand products. There was a charity food pantry behind the store that gave out food on Wednesdays, and they would literally throw food they didn't like on the ground as they left.

1
TheDigger2 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think it's real... but it's barely any more deadly (if at all) than the flu. That's the conspiracy. It was yet another lab leak (look at how many viruses have originated in Wuhan the last 20 years). The conspiracy is in the "response."

3
TheDigger2 3 points ago +3 / -0

And yet Russia has now allied with the CCP, when they could have allied with the US against globalism. Not because they love the CCP, but because the west is fucking retarded.

1
TheDigger2 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not sure where you've been but you missed the massive reeeeeeeeee over anyone mentioning that Covid came from China, as well as the media campaign suggesting that white supremacists were beating up Asians.

0
TheDigger2 0 points ago +2 / -2

Yes. Better vote Hillary 2024. She will fix everything. A name like Clinton is a name you can trust.

1
TheDigger2 1 point ago +1 / -0

Inbev owns Anheuser Busch and MillerCoors, along with so many other brands, such as the Stella you posted. Just like Pepsi or Coke, they have more than one place where product is made. Through the 80s and 90s, expensive beer was imported. It wasn't actually good, but people paid more because imported implied it was exotic. Then, the Boston Beer Comoany fucked it up for the major brewers. They made actual good beer in the US. The craft brew revolution happened and far less people were willing to pay premium prices for shitty foreign beer just because it was imported. So now, it's more or less irrelevant where the beer is made because you basically have two categories: Mass produced beer (mostly by Inbev), and "everything else."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/InBev

https://www.statista.com/topics/1904/anheuser-busch-inbev-ab-inbev/#topicHeader__wrapper

4
TheDigger2 4 points ago +4 / -0

What they really wanted to do is ban people who don't rape little kids from entering DC, but that would have been too obvious.

2
TheDigger2 2 points ago +2 / -0

The US government is designed to make it difficult to change laws, and difficult to make broad sweeping changes. It's brilliant. What the founders didn't count on is that in the future, everyone in government would be a corrupt globalist fuck that hated their own country. That was basically unfathomable at the time.

3
TheDigger2 3 points ago +3 / -0

US Intel: We know a thing or two because we've seen a thing or two

6
TheDigger2 6 points ago +6 / -0

Posted this here previously... last year took my stepson to urgent care for an abcessed tooth. Wasn't allowed in because coof. He had to argue with them to get antibiotics because they just kept trying to tell him it was covid. Honk!

2
TheDigger2 2 points ago +2 / -0

People that believe this are like drug dealers and prostitutes that believe undercover cops have to tell them they are police

4
TheDigger2 4 points ago +4 / -0

How dare you say that to my face

I'd say it behind your back but my car only has half a tank of gas

3
TheDigger2 3 points ago +3 / -0

Bbbbbbbut I get death threats for being a lying murderous traitor! It's not like the 80s when I could hide it whaaaaaaaaaaaa

4
TheDigger2 4 points ago +4 / -0

Was listening to a local conservative radio show today and some idiot called in and said it proves nothing because the FBI can't comment on such things. The host hung up on him lol. Sure, they can't comment if they had informants there, I accept that. But when asked if any agents committed acts of violence, they couldn't comment. If there were any "legit" (used loosely) agents there to monitor or whatever excuse, that question should still have been answered with "no" if no agents committed violence. Saying no they did not instigate doesn't admit anyone was there. It just confirms on record that they weren't involved in subversion whether present or not.

I realize probably no one here needs that explained, but when I hear people say shit like that it makes me feel like my brain will explode.

1
TheDigger2 1 point ago +1 / -0

Goebbels would be so proud

view more: Next ›