1
xolotltlaloc 1 point ago +1 / -0

to show you "the blue screen production room" lol... allegedly.

1
xolotltlaloc 1 point ago +1 / -0

a former CIA Director / POTUS visiting NASA ?! unheardof!

2
xolotltlaloc 2 points ago +2 / -0

jennyfromtheblock gets it...

is it considered stolen if the germans handed it over?

3
xolotltlaloc 3 points ago +3 / -0

because the argentines stole the design from the germans, like the chinese stole 5th generation fighter jets from the united states.

/getting downvoted for dropping truth bombs

by pkvi
1
xolotltlaloc 1 point ago +1 / -0

countless times when the checks and balances claims to investigate the checks and balances and nothing comes of it -- bcz it was all an act for our sake.

mostly.

Do remember Hillary was put in front of a committee to explain Benghazi and her servers and poof, nada.

All an act.

overly simplified

Oh but not Trump, he's special bcz .. well, definitely not this time even tho the entire system is corrupt and elections are rigged.. but not this time.. Trump slipped thru miraculously.

i wouldn't put it those limited terms but if you insist on zero nuance: sure - why not - JFK did - well, for a while at least ;)

oh no... wait... this is what pkvi believes:

pkvi believes that JFK was purposely "allowed" to be elected - simply so TPTB could murder him in broad daylight - all part of "the act" - well, except for JFK - he wasn't aware of the larger act at play - what a dumbass JFK must have been!

lol! pkvi is like the flat earther of political theories - one zoom lens demonstration and suddenly s/he thinks s/he's Truman Burbank!! :D

Be more consistent.

thoughtfulness is my consistency.

just because i pick blue one day doesn't mean i am a democrat for life. does it?

and just because i have the sense to recognize trump as the superior POTUS to biden, doesn't mean i believe trump is a "good person". right?

note: "superior" is a relative term - you know what "relative" means, aye assume.

here's the thing, captain sparrow... you're not 100% wrong. a lot of it is literally "an act" - scripted w/ fireworks finales!

however....

...there are multiple and opposing power forces at play - even within a family - but certainly within any town, city, nation or planet.

have you ever played "king of the mountain"? that's politics - if you require simplicity.

bottom line: there is no master-puppetmaster ... in fact, quite the opposite: it's fucking chaos at "the top". anarchy - not harmony - is the natural state of politics.

by pkvi
2
xolotltlaloc 2 points ago +2 / -0

"Your favorite president, me!" Who talks like that?!

a showman - appealing to his base

i love that you focus on Trump "acting" like a clown, instead of the fact that the FBI raided the residence of a former POTUS (for the first time in history - this in spite of the Bush's passing through - twice, the Clinton's passing through, etc.)

Your move? Focus on Trump's antics.

Hmm...I can't decide which team is more delusional:

  • The Trumpets, who think Trump was sent by God;

  • The Trump-haters who believe Biden/Harris is the better choice.

1
xolotltlaloc 1 point ago +1 / -0

#photoshop

(badly)

by pkvi
1
xolotltlaloc 1 point ago +1 / -0

Sorry, I don't understand - too many doubles negatives to twist around.

OK... i get it... and no - I would say it's NOT an act.

To me, "an act" implies everyone is in on it.

If NOT everyone is in on it (e.g., elected POTUS is assassinated), then it's a legit competition between two opposing forces -- not an act.


ps. unless you are suggesting that TPTB put JFK in power - but only because they wanted to publicly assassinate a POTUS. like just to be super #alpha

to that notion i say: politics is highly orchestrated. but there are multiple power forces at play. and interests almost never perfectly align. #notacting #imo

by pkvi
1
xolotltlaloc 1 point ago +1 / -0

He was killed, that much is clear.

So... not "an act", safe to say?

by pkvi
2
xolotltlaloc 2 points ago +2 / -0

Him or killing him?

Killing him.

Killing him was definitely an act.

In what way? Do you believe JFK was not actually assassinated on November 22, 1963 ?

by pkvi
1
xolotltlaloc 1 point ago +1 / -0

Both sides are an act.

Do you think JFK was "an act" ?

by pkvi
1
xolotltlaloc 1 point ago +1 / -0

ps. with all due respect to your idealism, pkvi, i believe you often impose unrealistic standards ;)

i say "unrealistic" because ...i know that you know how fucked up / cut throat / undesirable it all is...

...and yet somehow you expect a pure being of love and light to exist in DC, and we should just vote for that one - what?! :/

nope. that's unrealistic, in my opinion.

for most people, their best option is to vote for the one that serves their interests the most.

("the most" being highly subjective and broadly relative - obviously.)

...then there is the chess-game of "most electable" - i.e., the person you like the best has a very low chance of getting elected.

.... and then there is the JFK / deep-state factor - i.e., even if your dark horse does get elected by some miracle, s/he will either "play ball" (i.e., do what s/he is told) or removed / eliminated.

you know that everything i am saying is true.

and yet you seem to refuse to view trump's actions through this filter.

i am not a dedicated trumpet.

but...

what are my alternatives?

mind you, i am not all a huge fan of "not caring" / "not paying attention" / "not voting".

so... given that I will care, pay attention and vote, because i do believe it DOES make a difference (a very small difference, but a measurable difference) ... and given that i am not going to do anything but sit on my ass and "boost" (among friends, family, social network, etc.) one candidate or another - which one?

you're not going to fix the people who think trump is god-sent, but ...

...are you seriously suggesting that a vote for Biden/Harris was/is the better direction?

by pkvi
4
xolotltlaloc 4 points ago +4 / -0

You can't have the "updated" mRNA injection until you get the previous injection(s).

promise?

1
xolotltlaloc 1 point ago +1 / -0

is there less color in nature?

by pkvi
3
xolotltlaloc 3 points ago +3 / -0

hey, pkvi...

absolutely fair question - i have also wondered...

If you were couped from the highest office, would you just put out memos, not name names, throw patriots under the bus, rally for 'next time'? Why is this not the behavior of a loser or fraud in your eyes?!

personally, i believe that government at the level of POTUS is basically "cut throat" (figuratively and also literally). We know "they" kill Presidents (JFK, attempted Regan). We know they kill anyone they want - Ivana Trump, for example. She "fell down some stairs" ? Hmmm... OK so that was sus. but then almost immediately after that story broke, I saw this WTF:

bottom line: nothing to see here - her best friend expected it ;)

next day at the water cooler: ahh yea did you hear? her best friend expected it. oh well... next.

Personally, that felt like that was a warning message for Trump. (I don't know what was happening behind the scene, but... shortly following his place in Florida was raided by FBI.)

MY POINT BEING: It's cut throat. And I believe we are in a agreement on this point.

So.... consider this hypothetical:

... you just won the votes to be elected POTUS (pkvi'24), but clearly stolen from you at 4AM.

The main stream media hates you.

You have been booted from Twitter.

And you receive a letter via trusted messenger (Director of the FBI, for example) stating that if you attempt to disrupt the official results of the election that that there are credible threats your daughter / son / significant family member ... will be kidnapped, and pieces of him/her (finger bits, ear bits, nose, tongue, etc... ) will be mailed to you monthly as "proof of life".

Your move.


ps. His COVID stature has been very inconsistent - firstly pushing ivermectin, publicly removing his mask, and pronouncing COVID "will just disappear" ... to bragging about "operation warp speed" and telling everyone to "get the shots". I wonder what changed his mind? Perhaps a similar hypothetical? Perhaps mixed with a few carrots? (one carrot = USD 1 billion) -- i.e., "You're going to do what we want because if you don't, we'll remind the world that US POTUS' are vulnerable to accidents / assassinations. And also... here's a $ billion or two. Relax bro. You're 70+ chill. We got this... for the last few decades bro, we got this... sit the fuck down and shut the fuck up." - Israel/Mossad/CIA (aka TPTB)

Maybe not exactly, like that, but... I don't think it's an unreasonable scenario.

by xihg
1
xolotltlaloc 1 point ago +1 / -0

same person

1
xolotltlaloc 1 point ago +1 / -0

the colors are available.

there is no shortage of paint.

2
xolotltlaloc 2 points ago +2 / -0

"Color has been disappearing from the world"

Not "color" - just using less variety of paint.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›