Interesting, when you look at another dissident if the German government who died the same way.
“3D printing pioneer Jstark worked tirelessly towards two simple goals: freedom of expression, and an individual right to keep and bear arms. News broke recently revealing that, shortly after being raided by German police, he died of cardiac arrest”
Noack was also raided, but a year before the heart attack.
He was speaking out but didn’t have damning data yet. After he did have proof is when he died.
Its pretty clear german/austrian spooks are assassinating people via some method of poison that causes heart attacks.
Dude, there’s no difference in that compound besides one proton. In water that’s exactly what graphene oxide would turn into. I’m saying all the graphene oxide claims that people are making have zero published data referencing which lots they tested, much less any sort of lab data supporting it’s presence.
I like and respect the work you do, axo but attacking me for pointing out this is lacking in any sort of substantial evidence ain’t a good look for you.
Dr. Noack was a world expert on graphene hydroxide. He was very clear what he was observing was NOT graphene oxide. It's a very important distinction. Sorry I came off strong, but you clearly didn't research this individual and his theory before commenting.
Yes I did, dude. There is no real distinction in cytosol or in solution. Graphene is a family of compounds with an almost infinite number of conformations and functional group arrangements.
You’re grasping here. He has published ZERO reproducible, traceable, or verifiable proof of graphene oxide (or hydroxide since you’re unclear on IUPAC nomenclature here) derivatives in a specific lot of a specific manufacture. There’s zero evidence of this. The only reason people are claiming he’s a world expert on this subject is because thats what the source is saying. No one fucking knew who this guy was before this claim.
At no point in any of either of those presentations has he presented ANY sort of analysis of a vaccine vial or sample.
Much less any sort of QC analysis of lab samples or methods.
ps. bro... instead of being such a karen, consider taking 30 seconds to do a google search - maybe next time YOU could be the person to post more convincing evidence. cheers.
Interesting, when you look at another dissident if the German government who died the same way.
“3D printing pioneer Jstark worked tirelessly towards two simple goals: freedom of expression, and an individual right to keep and bear arms. News broke recently revealing that, shortly after being raided by German police, he died of cardiac arrest”
Noack was also raided, but a year before the heart attack. He was speaking out but didn’t have damning data yet. After he did have proof is when he died.
Its pretty clear german/austrian spooks are assassinating people via some method of poison that causes heart attacks.
Could be energy weapons too
Unsubstantiated. No data posted to show graphene oxide in specific batches. Or even which manufacturers. I remember this shit from 18 months ago.
hey look a "deboonker" who didn't even read the headline correctly.
graphene hydroxide retard
Show me the nomenclature difference between graphene oxide and graphene hydroxide, please. Show me which phenol group is hydrolyzed at which carbon.
Can you do that, or are you too ignorant to admit you don’t know what you’re talking about?
Dude, there’s no difference in that compound besides one proton. In water that’s exactly what graphene oxide would turn into. I’m saying all the graphene oxide claims that people are making have zero published data referencing which lots they tested, much less any sort of lab data supporting it’s presence.
Edit: more info on GO characterization.
I like and respect the work you do, axo but attacking me for pointing out this is lacking in any sort of substantial evidence ain’t a good look for you.
Dr. Noack was a world expert on graphene hydroxide. He was very clear what he was observing was NOT graphene oxide. It's a very important distinction. Sorry I came off strong, but you clearly didn't research this individual and his theory before commenting.
Yes I did, dude. There is no real distinction in cytosol or in solution. Graphene is a family of compounds with an almost infinite number of conformations and functional group arrangements.
You’re grasping here. He has published ZERO reproducible, traceable, or verifiable proof of graphene oxide (or hydroxide since you’re unclear on IUPAC nomenclature here) derivatives in a specific lot of a specific manufacture. There’s zero evidence of this. The only reason people are claiming he’s a world expert on this subject is because thats what the source is saying. No one fucking knew who this guy was before this claim.
So show me some evidence please.
Dr. Noack already provided the evidence. (Watch the OP video... evidence.)
Then he was arrested.
Then he died of a Heart Attack™
No he didn’t. There is no reference to specific vaccine lots. There is no presentation of chain of custody or sample sizes of lots analyzed.
He is just saying he did. That’s not science. That’s “trust me bro”.
see inclusive comment here
Are you talking about this video as evidence? https://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/german-chemist-dr-andreas-noack-was-arrested-by-an-armed-police-unit-during-youtube-live-stream/
Or this one? https://www.bitchute.com/video/X9oMvf6dbhCi/
At no point in any of either of those presentations has he presented ANY sort of analysis of a vaccine vial or sample. Much less any sort of QC analysis of lab samples or methods.
Was this your proof of his murder? https://www.bitchute.com/video/AUQtKfJDRvcc/
A fucking video of his supposed girlfriend talking? That’s it?
OR. Hear me out on this… He’s LARPing on the internet.
yes
well... no. but that is evidence.
probably would need to get the guy to testify under oath, to be submittable in court - awwww he's dead. how convenient.
by the way, other pieces of evidence that "they" use graphene in the vaccines™ also include:
... i would also include this:
because, let's face it, reuters' track record for fact checking would suggest the claim is right over the target.
also check out:
...and this - use of graphene seems to be an open secret in the scientific community:
... even a patent on the use of "Nano coronavirus recombinant vaccine taking graphene oxide as carrier"
ps. bro... instead of being such a karen, consider taking 30 seconds to do a google search - maybe next time YOU could be the person to post more convincing evidence. cheers.