This is just how political discourse happens in clown world.
Soon we'll see groups of intimidating young men in matching uniforms defending these judges by brutalizing protestors, and we'll have come full circle.
Doing a little bit of your own basic research makes all the difference.
I had a doctor tell me that the vax was safe. I asked him how he knew that because the safety trials weren't done yet (this was spring 2021). He tells me they are and I leave.
I go home and check and, sure enough, Pfizer says on their website for the vax that trials complete in 2023 (and I think they pushed it back to 2024 now).
If she were able to ask basic questions of her doctor, she could have easily determined they were lying and changed doctors; sometimes blind obedience isn't so great...
Sooo, he's sending Russia billions of dollars of weaponry.
Election's coming up.
Ask your MPPs why they're talking about literally anything other than this.
He brings up a good point: if Covid were actually deadly, the people in charge (who demanded draconian measures for two years), let it spread to their countries completely unchecked and would have let millions die.
The only time travel restrictions or lockdowns made any sense was before the virus spread everywhere; they're somewhat useful for containment, but that's it.
Not only did our "leaders" attack our jobs, families, and rights in the name of fighting the "pandemic", they also completely failed to actually fight it.
They'll get the bomb two weeks aftet California sinks into the sea due to global warming.
The bailouts are, of course, only good for investment firms. Individual home owners can't wait for the money to trickle down and go bankrupt.
Bailouts are really good for anyone who can survive the crash because the government's broke and would have to print more money, causing more inflation, and diluting the relative amount required to pay back.
The inflation will also water down debt, so these big companies can take out huge, low-interest loans to buy property and the relative amount they have to pay back will negligible. They're already seen it drop by around 8% and there's no reason for it to stop.
It's not "taken for weakness", it is weakness.
Gatekeeping is necessary for any functional community. If you let people in because they bitch at you, well, you get what you get.
Not really.
In the 90s, no one cared about race, sex, whatever. Being a racist was also much less of a big deal and people didn't get cancelled for jokes.
In the mid-2010s the progressives realized that black and hispanic areas were shitholes compared to white areas and women didn't want to work like men.
So they decided that we needed racism back, otherwise they wouldn't have anything to bitch about; an unacceptable situation.
Look at the most racist event of the 90s: the Rodney King beating. Some asshole has a go at the cops and they put the boot to him; that's nothing (although it didn't stop the blacks from rioting cause nogs gonna nog).
Today our schools are actually segregating blacks and telling them that they will never succeed because wypepo.
I think we actually got to a post-racist society for a brief instant, but then (((someone))) started stirring the pot again. Racism is their battlecry; they want us to be fighting blacks and spics so we get ourselves dirty wrestling pigs and don't focus on the real threat.
Maybe they're indigenous; they were given an exemption to protest under the act.
Except that one lady...
So our unvaxxed population is actually closer to 30% than to <20% like we've been told? No kidding.
My message to her is the same as to everyone else espousing the "we have too many people" rhetoric:
Kill yourself, bitch
So he wants to move away from globalization to hyperlocalization where technology will enable us to build small, insular communities, largely independent of the outside world?
Oh no...
Right? Article is technically true, but also applies to birds, rocks, bus stations, etc.
The vaxxed should just self-quarantine indefinitely.
Or is it in the sense that the only reason Nazis became a thing is because the American political establishment ground the German people into the dirt after WW1 and Nazism was how they recovered some dignity?
Like, once again, cruel and arrogant American policy is driving people towards Nazism and we're going to die because of it?
Why don't they save everyone's time and just say "Everyone except straight, white, hetero, cis men who aren't fucked in the head".
Yeah, I don't get how all this censorship is immediately over just because they signed the deal.
Like, was there a big switch on the wall at twitter that says "Faggotry On/Off" that they flicked?
Only one way to find out, obviously.
Frankly, I'd settle for rules that are clear and consistently enforced. Elon wants to ban race stats, whatever. So long as all race stats are banned and we all have to speak assuming anything we say about race is conjecture.
The reason twitter, youtube, facebook, etc are so bad is that their rules only apply to people they don't like.
How exactly are they modelling transmission? Something like:
Likelyhood of vaxxed spread: 0% Likelyhood of unvaxxed spread: 100%
I mean, is there even a difference in spread rates between these populations? The case numbers don't suggest it.
Edit: Fun fact, two of the three authors have done work for Public Health.
That's what it looks like to me.
It's just really weird that all his acheivements have furthered the cause of Globohomo.
First he works on the team that gets e-commerce started: more surveillance of transactions and global labour force.
Then Tesla: EV cars that are controlled by the manufacturer.
SpaceX: Starts private space flights and talks about colonizing Mars -> lifeboat for the rich
Neuralink: duh-doy
Twitter: we'll see, private ownership could make it even easier for the government to use twitter, especially with the owner being neck deep in governmenr contracts.
I think he's a true believer; not one of the cabal creating globalist institutions for their own advantage but someone who actually believes that globalism will raise all boats.
Yeah, this is really nothing in the bigger picture.
My city paid to erect a 6 foot fence around the local skate park for an entire summer so kids couldn't play on it. They also put gates on the basketball courts in the park but not those at the school.
One day I saw a couple of kids open the fence (wasn't locked) so they could skateboard. Some asshole called the cops on them; they sent 3 officers to deal with it.
I made sure to point it out to my kids so that they know exactly what the government thinks of us.
We simulated a spectrum of patterns of mixing between vaccinated and unvaccinated groups
So they didn't actually study anything. They took some data, ran it through a model based on totally unbiased assumptions, and it turns out everything is in line with what Public Health would like it to be (whom they coincidentally work for).
At this point the question is not "Can I trust this study?" but "Can I trust any study?"
They do disclose it in the study. One of the other authors, Ashleigh Tuite, works or worked for Public Health.
Regardless, it's extremely biased.
If someone even pretends to care about the environment, they should be focused on the oceans, full stop.
Nothing affects global climate, food supply, weather patterns, or ecology more than the oceans, which we are currently dregding for the last few fish and filling with plastic waste.