6
turtlebam 6 points ago +6 / -0

Keep projecting.... Must be tough for you running away from one shelter to another. Hezbollah keeping you busy huh?

6
turtlebam 6 points ago +6 / -0

How is the weather in Tel-Aviv? Which quarter do you recommend for renting?

6
turtlebam 6 points ago +6 / -0

Thank you for the spell check. Much appreciated. Keifeng though is correct since some use it. It's Chinese and some spill it differently. Your replies are quick. Are you a bot?

3
turtlebam 3 points ago +3 / -0

I made a mistake by not checking a source and I later corrected it. (Reply given to others reading his posts and not to the lowly Jew)

7
turtlebam 7 points ago +7 / -0

Handshake account. Probably same user as vpnsurfer.

Which Jews? You mean Safardic Jews? Flasha Jews? Keifeng Jew? Mizrahi Jews? Oh you mean inbred Khazarian Jews?

For the record Khazarian Jews are unique. Many speculate they are really neanderthals due to the numerous unique genetic defects they have.

I suppose the definition people have for "white" is not simply skin color but rather European ancestry. Thus white skinned Chinese are not considered "white".

Regardless. the ancestry of the Jew is indeed the depths of hell. so.. But it's alright Khazarian Jews lack many cognitive functions. Not just empathy so you are forgiven if you don't understand. Or perhaps you are really a Flasha or Mizrahi Jew and your grandparents were sprayed with DDT when you arrived to Palestine and it damaged your genetics.

4
turtlebam 4 points ago +4 / -0

The above is a handshake account. Probably the same vpnsurfer and his alts. For others wanting to learn more about Vance: https://conspiracies.win/p/199hSYHIlr/know-your-president/c/

3
turtlebam 3 points ago +3 / -0

Thank you this is a good summary.

1
turtlebam 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yep. I think Jews basically support everybody. You can't be in upper politics without being kosher. If one doesn't work or is too much trouble there is always a replacement/

3
turtlebam 3 points ago +5 / -2

Some peasant Jews voted for Harris. They are insignificant. Some of them even marched in NY chanting Free Palestine. The other important crazy Jews, royalty Jews who fund politicians, Chabad Lubavitch type Jews all voted Trump/Vance.

Hopefully most users on this board will stick around and we will all see how will this work out in the next couple of years.

3
turtlebam 3 points ago +3 / -0

I have a feeling the real one they want to put is Vance. Anyways, will find out how it will unfold.

Vance is funded by Thiel: https://x.com/RTSG_Main/status/1813070310788194640

3
turtlebam 3 points ago +3 / -0

Are you a bot? Your last comments all sound bot like.

1
turtlebam 1 point ago +1 / -0

Jews have lost this turf a while ago. You are free to name the Jew here. On the other hand there are only few users here (Limited hangout - echo chamber). But I still think some info leaks from here to the broader spectrum.

3
turtlebam 3 points ago +3 / -0

Thanks for the link. It feels like another version of "Jewish Lighting". (Burning a non profitable business that you can't sell to collect insurance money)

1
turtlebam 1 point ago +1 / -0

I quote you: "the Committee of 300 is among the best known books about the NWO conspiracy and it made many people aware of the organizations and names behind it and what the agenda is..."

Exactly. Did it make anyone aware of who is REALLY behind the agenda? It's the most well known book because it's a planted book by the CIA and you can download it from their website so they can more easily save your IP as well. It gives you unimportant little tids and bits without you understanding the bigger picture. It doesn't focus on the Jews because it was ultimately written by Jews but it gives you a little morsel about the ADL because anyone looking for such a book either already knows about it or will know about it.

Everyone underestimates intelligence agencies. Intelligence agencies use "intelligence" to achieve their goals!

So you think if an intelligence agency wants to subvert that it will popularize a book full of lies or nonsense? The poison in the honey is well known tactic.

The linked article I shared earlier about Mullins and Coleman is short and worth a read IMO.

Below is a long story but it explains how these agencies work:

One talk show host started out as a legit Youtuber criticizing a dictator. Instead of kidnapping him or assassinating him That dictator's government hired him gradually by slowly giving him money though companies which he didn't suspect worked for that dictator's government. Then after he got used to the lifestyle that only that money could afford they started asking for some changes in his content and they even made him more popular!!! Imagine that! And he kept criticizing the dictator all the same while paid by the very same dictator!!

Those changes they asked from him were that he uses the name of "president" instead of derogatory terms, toning down things. Talking about "entertaining" trivial topics. Most of his audience never suspected a thing but the damage was done.

False opposition is a thing and it's very damaging. The elders of the protocols of zion talks about false opposition and it would have been a much better book to be the best known book about the conspiracy. Yet you were told it's a proven "forgery"

3
turtlebam 3 points ago +3 / -0

I am sorry but the committee of 300 is a disinformation book. Eustace Mullins exposed the author. If my memory serves me right the author of the committee of 300 stole from LaRouche's work and then shifted all blame to the British monarchy completely skirting around the Jew. The author also I think completely bankrupted a publisher who published valuable books for Istvan Bakony. It was u/clemaneuverers who thankfully pointed that out for me.

Look up: Eustace Mullins Exposed Dr. John Coleman In 1992

3
turtlebam 3 points ago +3 / -0

Thank you for the valuable addition.

7
turtlebam 7 points ago +7 / -0

Of course. But we still need to reply to their arguments every once in a while because questions like this might be read by someone who is on the fence and it may dissuade them. My reply was mostly for the anonymous reader. This reader might be someone who will stumble on this thread a year from now. This is a limited hangout with few users but you never know.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›