2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

This isn't c/Christianity, maybe you should read my reply again?

I shared my paranoia with you all because this is where I can do that.

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

How do I explain discernment to others that won't accept it? We need a stable meeting place to what the discernment is measured against, in this case the rules, in c/Christianity it's God's commands.

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

Your proposal sounds like just banning whoever you say I should, should I take everyone's requests or how do we set up who can request and who can't, age of account, comment/post score on board, oh how bout we take polls and vote on who should be banned, what could go wrong?

(Heavy sarcasm)

3
Thisisnotanexit 3 points ago +3 / -0

I don't think you're hearing me. How does this community keep it's integrity if I just ban at my will or who people tell me to ban? (Besides the gore posting pedo)
I don't follow that logic.
That's why we have rules, people can follow them or leave but rule 1 seems to be too difficult a task for some so now there's free for all threads.

4
Thisisnotanexit 4 points ago +4 / -0

How does one enforce rules for some but not others? Just call them a shill and ban cause I said so? I wonder if we've seen what that looks like.

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes, I can't explain to you how perfectly timed this was when you posted it, but this is hilarious.

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

Based on ratio, SwampRangers won, so would be nice if you noticed.

3
Thisisnotanexit 3 points ago +3 / -0

A lot of new people started dropping by after the initial requests began and then went to meta, if I remember the chain of events correctly, u/Neo1 started threads in c/Conspiracies and then u/SwampRangers took that to mean genuine interest and took it to c/Meta and then an even greater influx was seen here, which I don't hold him accountable for creating.

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is not a free for all thread and your mocking reply is a violation of rule 1, will be approved upon edit.

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

Using rule 1, shill would be considered a violation due to common vernacular use. I'm also advising the reply to this comment is a rule 1 violation.

I would rather not remove this whole comment because it is critical of me and should be addressed, which I have here: https://communities.win/c/Conspiracies/p/1ARwwpoCZf/mods-were-demanded-because-of-ne/c/4eZDpN1h9KW

And also adding: If I modded in retaliation and not from rules I'd be no better than the bad actors who do that.

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

We reached the thread limit so I started here because it's relevant.

VeilOfReality:

Certainly expressing an opinion is also valid in a thread like this, yeah?

Me:
Sure, what I'm saying tho is that it's mostly infighting and not outfighting, make sense?

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

These were deleted by the user, perhaps another, new leafer turning? They were rightly removed and no retro free for all thread to be enacted.

Edit: I was incorrect in this comment, see update: https://communities.win/c/Conspiracies/p/1ARws4ap4K/files-mentioning-elon-musk-and-i/c/4eZDpRkbXCq

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

Without rule 1 this community would be conpro esque, no offense to them but it's not how I prefer to argue, we all still need to adhere to site wide rules.

And yea, I think the global surveillance state is becoming a prison planet, have I switched timelines again or I have I just been screaming into the void here for years?

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

The whole internet is public and we should act accordingly, free will also exists. For some reason rule 1 is too difficult a task for some people so I'm not sure what else I should do.

Maybe I am a crazy paranoid conspiracy theorist or maybe I'm a time traveler, the world may never know..

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

I can't admit that but if people wanna act foolish that's on them, I won't have the whole board be covered in shit and pigs.

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is not a free for all thread.

3
Thisisnotanexit [M] 3 points ago +3 / -0

Meta message approved for mod transparency.

We're trying a new thing where anarchists get their own threads (free-for-all) and non-anarchists get their own threads, guess we'll see which is more productive.

Bans will be for not following rules in non anarchist threads and bans in free-for-all/anarchy threads will be site wide violations.

3
Thisisnotanexit 3 points ago +3 / -0

Flair is working now but still won't show on mobile so please be making it known and/or letting me know it's a free for all and I'll be tagging NSFW

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

You're welcome to go elsewhere too. I hear there's a new community in town for conspiracies.

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'll mark it NSFW.

I have to make space for people that don't want derogation and those that do so this is the fix for that.

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

u/VeilOfReality

You're both now welcome to start your own free for all threads and rule 1 will be suspended there. I am having a issue with the new flair so let me know it's a free for all and I'll mark it.

https://communities.win/c/Conspiracies/p/1ARwwpmpWw/free-for-all-poststhreads/c

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›