I think you are being the hypocritical one.
You were censored for your attack on the user, your argument was kept intact and now we are continuing debating your argument, which I think is hypocritcal.
To your argument, it's funny to see you adopt the same mindset you are accusing 'all Jews' of having against you. Evil encourages more evil, stop letting them sink you down..
The last sentence is attacking the person, not the argument and this needs to be edited for your comment to be approved.
Argument:
Have Palestinian children caused crimes against jews? Then why did jews in the fake "israel" genocide them?
jew children, nor their disgusting parents have any place in Supreme White Nations. We have a duty to watch over and care for our own children.
Video Title: Hollywood Killed Your Heroes on Purpose -Real Life Fake Wizard
3 simple rules Vlad,
Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.
Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.
Rule 3: No subversion.
Why can't we be frens?
What notes do you have for moderation?
It sure is somethin
From what I gather, two videos were posted and then deleted from the same source, so related.
You can add to this post: https://communities.win/c/Conspiracies/p/1ASZ3cnYAA/deleted-white-house-video/c
I do love me some word play.
Stickied for more visibility, thanks for putting this together.
(Killer jams too)
Coverage includes cattle collars that are remote controlled using frequencies and biometric wearables and implantables using under the skin technology for humans.
Voice to skull is crazy wild! So messed up.
I don't know anyone that has had it or would admit it, I think.
Adding some relevant info in case some people haven't heard about it:
https://communities.win/c/Conspiracies/p/1ARKESver2/voice-to-skull-technology/c
There is some leeway against mod/actions but don't abuse it.. (This is your warning)
Removed for rule 1 violation. Will be approved upon edit.
Please add your quoted rebuttal without attacking the person you are replying to.
Oh, you said that? I thought it was someone else.
Rule 1 is a good strategy and prevents unnecessary infighting and disruption.
Most adults don't go around name calling eachother, mature ones anyway..
I'm not babysitting, I'm encouraging.
Yeah, rule 1 is be respectful, attack the argument not the person. This has always been the rule here.
I understand there are disagreements but I don't understand how inferring someone is a shill helps the disagreement (edit: discussion)
I do appreciate the advice though because I do need to be careful and am not hoping for yes man zombies.
Pretty borderline, I think, I don't think we should play the technicality game but I can if you think we have to.
This is good ongoing research. Be respectful, please.
Can you remove you calling him a shill? That's a rule 1 violation but I'd rather not delete the whole comment for the dialogue yous have going.
Then go there.
It's disruptive to discussion and adds nothing.
Removed for being doubley obnoxious. It's an unnecessary nuisance.
You are combining two different arguments and it's confusing and I don't think you're being consistent or clear..
You are being hypocritical in your stance by saying no Jews are innocent but all Whites are.. I remember God saying that none are worthy, only Jesus Christ and all have fallen short of His glory and He mercifully saves us.
You are accusing my moderation and not looking at the facts that would prove you wrong.. I'm moderating behaviour and not content, please feel free to check the logs.