Why would God make it look like stars are clearly many millions of light years away? Why would God make it look like c was invariant? And make the CMB look like it’s 13.4 billion light years away? Why would God make the rock layers look like they got deposited slowly over millions of years of slow geologic processes, infrequently punctuated by catastrophic (and relatively rapid) layering events?
It's not that it has deceptive appearance, it's that age narratives are templated onto the data. Peter specifically answers that people deceive themselves by assuming uniformitarianism, that everything continues in the same way it has since creation, willfully forgetting (as you know) evidence of cataclysm that belies uniformitarian math.
(1) On standard math, the stars appear millions of lightyears away because they are, and because (as he said) the heavens were stretched out suddenly, millions of times faster than lightspeed, as BBT agrees. (2) Right now c invariance is by definition but it did not appear invariant before this definition; if it wobbles a little we wouldn't know it because we'd assume our dynamic seconds are a little off from the radioactive second. (3) Same as 1. (4) When polystrate trees appear in multiple layers across "millions of years" of invented geologic time, that's evidence of big catastrophe, not occasional punctuation. The rocks don't look like they were deposited over millions of years, and there is no geologic column anywhere on earth that contains all the eras; they are just mishmashed together into one narrative and given subepochs, rather like your many geologic catastrophes, without any real evidence that one theory is better than another.
Satan did bury stupid arguments in atheist brains to test our faith, yes, but dinosaurs are no threat to the young earth, only lying stories about them are. But lying stories about reptilians go back to the Garden of Eden, don't they?
Look, Graph, if a plant shoots up 3 feet from a seed in a couple days, and later you observe it growing only 1 inch a week, are you going to say the plant is 30-40 weeks old by uniformitarian assumption, or are you going to investigate whether plants have differences in growth spurts? It's the same for every single assumption of old earth. I've debunked the worst the establishment can offer, I offer myself to take on all comers, I'm not surprised by their feints anymore. I'm not trying to "prove" young earth as a whole because I find it better to deal with the specific argument that comes up any given day. The evidence is enough for me on the grand claim, and I'm happy to go into specifics with a willing audience, but I don't want to fall into a time-eating trap, so I seek to stick to a response that is not much more than the time the interlocutor put into it.
Hey Graph, I've explained all of those here except the date of asteroids, which hasn't come up but is a straightforward application of the others. Plus I could pull out my references for literally a hundred other young-earth dating mechanisms. So it's not that simple. Until the late 19th century, all scientific consensus used a cosmic age under a million years, even though the Hindus were conducting initial market tests with random large numbers.
Important to note, alongside the Jews there were the Sumerians who are Israelites and have stayed in the Levant.
(I'm going to take it you mean Samaritans, in which case you can skip the next paragraph written on the assumption you meant what you said.)
According to history, the Sumerians were on their way out by 1800 (priestly language only) to 1700 (population decreased due to saline lands), but history knows no Jews for many centuries afterward; the Bible has Judah born in 1797 and not a tribe (as opposed to a family) until the Exodus of 1539. So you seem to be imagining that Sumerians survived somewhere and were imaginatively recast as Judahites, ignoring the fact that the Judahites have perfectly good songs dating back to the 15th century indicating their presence in Canaan and not Sumer. But Sumerians were overpowered by Akkadians and the last "Sealand" dynasty that purported to continue Sumerian tradition was conquered by Babylon before 1500. There are no records about Sumer continuing, but there are plenty of records from Nebuchadnezzar about conquering Jerusalem and migrating Jews, who were the same people Cyrus populated Jerusalem with again. The nation of Israel from Jeroboam on (as attested by Shishak) was Sumerian, but there's no evidence of Sumer for over 500 years and there is continuity of Jeroboam from evidence of a meticulous judgeship period with the contemporary songs, covenant forms, pottery, graves, etc.
Oh, wait, maybe you mean Samaritans. They are often not regarded as Israelites, but let's take their own testimony in combination with that of Nebuchadnezzar and presume that they were first an offshoot group of Josephites in Samaria and then that they were largely intermarried with Iraqis imported by Assyria to repopulate the land. This gives them the right to keep being called "Israelites" but their disagreements with the Israelites associated with Judah ("Jews") are well-known. Funny thing though, the Persians got no civil war because Jews worked slowly and there was no open belligerence at all, until Hyrcanus in 110. There's evidence there were more Samaritans than Jews for a couple centuries, but there were probably more Iraqis among the Samaritans than natives; and the tension between them and Jews was equal on both sides, it was not a matter of Jews against everyone as you suggest.
So with a few tweaks your narrative works almost passably, because Persia did have imperial interest in subsidizing the Jews, but that doesn't tie to a narrative of illegitimacy for the Jews or Persian invention. An invention would not have the accuracy of depiction of the former periods that the traditional texts have as validated by archaeology.
I'm a straight-stick Christian, sold-out to Jesus, but around here I sometimes speak cagily for people who are listening. Meece meant that what Jesus did (as God) was so alien that it tops anything that can come from outer space. This builds on passages like Is. 28:21, about God's "alien task" NIV or "strange act" KJV. He said that to get people's attention, and so did Meece!
Several of us here have discovered Michael Heiser's research on the Near East interpretation of the divine council (some of which led to the Nephilim, cf. Jesus's teaching on Ps. 82). It explains most of the Scriptures where God deigns to sit at the head of a council of gods (angels), speaking at their level as the Angel of Yahweh. That is exactly how Jesus came to speak at our level, without losing anything of the classic creeds or the common confession of the church.
So when someone wants an alien to save us from ourselves, he can find no better than Jesus! Thank you for your understanding.
Demons, of course.
Angels are frequently associated with stars, as in when the stars sang together at creation (Job 38:7), which was 2 days before Adam (Gen. 1).
Aliens COULD BE older than Adam and Eve. So no mention of aliens in Genesis. Giants/nephelim are a thing completely set apart from ET but related to a kind of breeding in the Bible (fallen angels and women).
Fallen angels are aliens. In the young-earth theory they are 2 days older than man. No need for Genesis 1-11 to use the modern term "alien" when there are plenty of alien things there already.
I truly wish aliens are an ancient beyond ancient race that saves us from ourselves. I can dream.
One of them is, Jesus Christ. David Meece song He Was the Alien: "He was the alien, living on Earth, he's the alien. Some were scared, afraid to speak, the man had powers they had never seen."
We'll have some fun with that sometime. No need today.
hes only got 2000 years out of 300,000
Why do you believe the highpriests who are proclaiming 300,000? What if it's actually 6,018 and God has them all? I have the receipts.
the bible that was just stolen stories
Every time I've tested this claim the Bible has been proven original. Even when it admits summarizing other known records.
I wish I could just believe in the sky daddy like that
Your wish is granted, you can.
And he said, Cursed be Canaan; a servant of servants shall he be unto his brethren. And he said, Blessed be the LORD God of Shem; and Canaan shall be his servant. God shall enlarge Japheth, and he shall dwell in the tents of Shem; and Canaan shall be his servant (Gen. 9:25-27).
For the gifts and calling of God are without repentance. For as ye in times past have not believed God, yet have now obtained mercy through their unbelief: even so have these also now not believed, that through your mercy they also may obtain mercy. For God hath concluded them all in unbelief, that he might have mercy upon all (Rom. 11:29-32).
God that made the world and all things therein, seeing that he is Lord of heaven and earth, dwelleth not in temples made with hands; neither is worshipped with men's hands, as though he needed any thing, seeing he giveth to all life, and breath, and all things; and hath made of one blood all nations of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth, and hath determined the times before appointed, and the bounds of their habitation; that they should seek the Lord, if haply they might feel after him, and find him, though he be not far from every one of us (Acts 17:24-27).
Sounds like there's potential for shifting of status and potential for retention of gifts both.
Board readers should be aware that El Al has reportedly the best security in the world because they routinely reserve the right to take you aside and ask a few probing questions. They don't need any TSA or crazy search procedures because they have people experienced at spotting security risks interviewing potential risks all day every day. The fact that he didn't expect this and calls it a "detainer" shows that he's making much book out of what is ordinary for Israel.
That person made a decent connection of all the issues but didn't specify much about causality. By definition that map was enough for one human to consider at one time. It's much deeper than that. However, future explorations of the subject would rely on spadework such as that.
Not too far for this board, keep going. Who is the final boss?
The Hebrews who wrote the Bible in 500 BC intentionally lied about Adam/Eve being the first 2 humans to bury the Lucifer era before them in history.
I've been demonstrating many historical linkages of the Bible with secular history 2000-500. I don't give Lucifer credit of an era on his own witness; the Bible does tell of his history sufficiently. Science has now decided that the progenitors of all humans today shall be called Y-chromosomal Adam and mitochondrial Eve, so whoever were the first deserve those names.
the Canaanites got enslaved by Babylon
Not known to history.
the Moses story which happened in 800 BC (300 years prior)
1539: https://scored.co/c/Christianity/p/15HbbQEgDL/special-study-1718-apr-2022-phar/c
Close, and it's a pretty good eye-opener. Actual is given as 29.9791666... degrees to the nearest second (.0002777... degrees). Since an ideal second is defined as 10000km/90/60/60 it is 30.864+ m. The pyramid is 230.6~ m at base (7.5- seconds). So it would appear the coordinate given is within the pyramid compound, but so would a lot of other coordinates because it's too specific to be meaningful. (A ten-millionth of an ideal degree would be 1.111... cm, so the overspecified coordinate only refers to a single square centimeter somewhere on the pyramid, which shifts easily with tectonics. Since the pyramid is north-aligned to the nearest degree, treating it as 230.6m north-south yields exactly 20754 ten-millionths of the idealized degree, and the "exact" coordinates are overspecified by 4 orders of magnitude.)
Now let's imagine that (1) the speed of light hasn't changed in the past, (2) the ancients measured it at 647600 ideal earth circumferences per day, to 4 significant figures, (3) they divided this by 6, three times, to get ~2998, and (4) they deliberately constructed their pyramid at 2998/9000 of the way up from the equator to the pole, or 29.98 degrees north, that exact coordinate would also describe the Pyramid if the geo link is correct to the nearest second. That means, if they intended this coincidence, the odds of picking the right latitude among all latitudes would be only 1 in 9000, or even 1 in 5000 or 1 in 1440 if other assumptions are used, and not the apparent 1 in a billion.
To state the math in a more likely fashion, if they noticed that 647600 is close to the very factorable number 648000, it would be more a matter of starting from the salient 30-degree latitude, and going just far enough to the equator (1/1500 of the distance, or 1/1620 if they want to be closer) to match the shortfall of light in earth circumferences (a factor of 1/1620). Now the early Egyptians did not have a lot of these other math terms worked out on papyrus, but we know the later Egyptians were much better at unit fractions than we are, which is why I frame it that way. It would be much more natural to speak of 1/1620 south of 1/3 north of the equator than any other form, and to say that light is also short of a perfect 648000 revolutions by 1/1620. That calculation does flow through to the 9-digit match to one of the hundred millions of square centimeters that happen to be in the pyramid. The shortfall of the measured speed of light from exactly 3*10^8 m/s is about the same ratio (1/1445) for the same reason. Note that a large number of other ways of making the same correspondence could be done, but if you recognize that your part of the earth controls the area around the 30-degree circle that's the one you'd pick.
Since this is Conspiracies, I note that (a) all these calculations also work on a flat earth measuring lightspeed on earth's surface only; (b) they would also work in a lightspeed decay theory IF what was measured was not exactly lightspeed but a radioactivity ratio that does remain constant; there are ways to get that to fit. I'm omitting much data about lightspeed decay of course, not to mention ....
TLDR: (1) Even if lightspeed isn't constant, the agreed number is physically significant. (2) The number does match to the pyramid in the given notation but only about 4 digits are significant. (3) Using math more the way Egyptians would, this coincidence can flow from two testable assumptions: (a) They measured the speed of light as being 20^2 earth revolutions short of being 3^4 * 20^3 per day (647600 circumferences per day), and (b) They deliberately placed the pyramid with an equal-ratio shortfall of 1/(20 * 3^4) from 1/3 of the distance from the equator to the north pole (29.98- degrees north).
Congratulations! Most people who submit math here are easily debunked, but yours checks out, even if not as spectacularly as this presentation makes it sound.
(Add: I apologize, your comment and my reply are totally off-topic. We should probably continue in c/FreeSpeech, c/CommunitiesConflict, or some forum I am not banned from. Unless you can write a neutral post that is not excessively meta.)
you unfairly banned my previous account for a whole year
Would you like to make a commitment to follow the rules, such as avoiding trolling and critical meta posts?
most people in here never chose you as a mod
Would you like to write a neutral community question? Admin selected the mod based on your prior community question, so I'm not sure it would help.
You were afraid that people might report your activity
Is there evidence that facts are being censored due to content and not behavior?
Or you'll just ban everyone whenever you have a conflict
Why would the founder of c/CommunitiesConflict use banning to resolve conflict?
the honest users will always find a place to speak the truth
Was anyone banned for illegitimate reasons? For honesty?
a Christian is always elected by a majority
What? In a secular conspiracist forum? Should she have insisted she would turn down the position until a clear community consensus arose, even though your and others' community questions got such little interest?
You only became a mod because you talked to a site moderator
Was anyone else forbidden from talking to admin? Should we ask admin why they made their selection?
a real Christian would step down until a real majority chooses you
Is anyone but me advocating for more community discussion?
“Woe to the shepherds who are destroying and scattering the sheep of my pasture!” – Jeremiah 23:1-2
“It is an abomination for kings to commit wickedness, for a throne is established by righteousness.” – Proverbs 16:12
“Watch out for false prophets. They come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ferocious wolves.” – Matthew 7:15
Ezekiel 34:10 “This is what the Sovereign Lord says: I am against the shepherds and will hold them accountable for my flock; I will remove them from tending the flock so that the shepherds can no longer feed themselves. I will rescue my flock from their mouths, and it will no longer be food for them.”
Zechariah 10:3 “My anger burns against the shepherds, and I will punish the leaders; for the Lord Almighty will care for his flock, the people of Judah, and make them like a proud horse in battle.”
The Bible Came From Arabia, Kamal Salibi, 1985, 1987 ed.
xv: "As a newcomer to the field of Semitic and Biblical studies, I was guided in the initial stages of my research by two colleagues."
1: "I freely acknowledge that my discovery must remain theoretical until confirmed by archaeological investigation .... Of course, in breaking new ground it is likely that I have committed a number of errors, which hostile critics may seize upon in an effort to discredit my conclusions. I sincerely doubt, however, that such errors are likely to be of such magnitude or substance that they will alter my case."
3: "My argument rests almost entirely upon the assumption that the Hebrew Bible has been consistently mistranslated."
6: "I look forward to the day when archaeologists will excavate some of the sites I mention and hopefully provide further evidence that the true land of the Hebrew Bible is West Arabia, not Palestine."
7: "Nearly all the Biblical place-names I could think of were concentrated in an area approximately 600 kilometres long and 200 kilometres wide .... All the co-ordinates of the places involved, as described in the Hebrew Bible, were also traceable there — a fact of the first importance, as these co-ordinates have never really been identified in the countries hitherto believed to have been the lands of the Bible. Moreover, I could not find such a concentration of Biblical place-names, usually in their original Hebrew form, in any other part of the Near East."
9: "‘Jegar-sahadutha’ (Aramaic ygr shdwt’) ... ‘Galeed’ (Hebrew gl‘d) and ‘Mizpah’ (Hebrew h-msph) .... All three names are still carried today by three little-known villages in the same vicinity on the maritime slopes of Asir, in the region of Rijal Alma‘ (Rigal Alma‘), west of Abha (Abha). Their names are: Far‘at Al Shahda (’I shd’), meaning ‘god is the witness’ or ‘god of the witness’, the Arabic pr‘t or pr‘h denoting a mound or hill, equivalent in meaning to the Aramaic ygr; al-Ja‘d (’l-g‘d), which is an Arabicised metathesis of gl‘d; and al-Madhaf (mdp; cf. msph)."
14: "The battle of Carchemish ... took place near Taif, in the southern Hijaz, where two neighbouring villages, Qarr (qr) and Qamashah (qms), still stand. Thus, I would maintain, the Biblical ‘Carchemish’ is certainly not the Hittite Kargamesa, now Jerablus, on the Euphrates, as is traditionally believed."
23: "In [Beersheba] whose name features prominently in the patriarchal narratives of Genesis, and whose origins must therefore go back at least to the late Bronze Age, archaeological excavation has revealed on the exact site materials dating from no earlier than the late Roman period."
26: "Ideally, the full text of the Hebrew Bible must be so analysed, but this involves work for more than one lifetime."
26: "The fact that the Hebrew Bible relates the history of the ancient Israelites in West Arabia does not mean that Judaism had no base in Palestine in Biblical times. It did .... There are clear Biblical hints regarding the growth of a strong Jewish community in Palestine, starting perhaps in the tenth century B.C. ... The reconstruction of the early Jewish history in Palestine is not possible from these texts, nor indeed from any other records so far available."
51: "Kraeling, p. 80 ...: In late Roman times there was a district Geraritike, evidently so named because it was composed primarily of the old Gerar territory."
53-54: "The site of the Biblical Gerar in Palestine has not yet been satisfactorily identified, and no place there continues to carry anything resembling this name."
54: "Msrym denotes any of several locations in West Arabia, including the village of Misramah ... or that of Masr."
55: "Strabo reports ... Gallus reached a place called the ‘Seven Wells’ .... Philby noted the existence of Shaba‘ah."
60: "There is no Gerar near Gaza, in Palestine. Among several which are found in Asir, however, one (al-Qararah) is the Gerar of Genesis 20 and 26 and 2 Chronicles 14, and another (any of four called Ghurar, al-Jarar, Ghirar or al-Qararah) is that of Genesis 10."
WP: "Tel Haror is generally accepted as the site of ancient Gerar. Nevertheless, some other places in the vicinity, between Gaza and Beersheba, have also been suggested."
63: "In the field of Biblical archaeology and its related discipline, palaeography, there is ample opportunity not only for error, but for perpetuating it almost indefinitely."
64: "It is wrong to draw historical conclusions on the basis of inconclusive archaeological evidence."
68-69: "The ‘Moabite Stone’ (the name itself is a misnomer) was set up in Qarhoh (qrhh) by Mesha, king of Moab (ms‘ mlk m’b) - so the inscription on it says .... The Qarhoh in question is apparently the present-day Jahra (ghr), in the area where the stone was found."
WP: "The Mesha Stele, also known as the Moabite Stone, .... was discovered intact by Frederick Augustus Klein, an Anglican missionary, at the site of ancient Dibon (now Dhiban, Jordan), in August 1868."
69: "Mesha describes himself in the inscription as not only king of Moab, but also as a dybny, i.e., as a native of dybn. Dibyan (dbyn) today is also a village in Wadi Adam, not far from Umm al-Yab. So far, readers of the ‘Moabite Stone’ have assumed that dybn is the present village of Dhiban (dbn), in Transjordan, north of where the stone was found. I would suggest, however, that this Dhiban was called after the old Dibyan of the Hijaz after Mesha and his followers arrived to settle there."
72: "The Amarna place-names only make a collective fit in West Arabia. The interested reader may care to examine a table of thirty such names, identified one by one by location."
76: "By now, I hope the reader is willing to concede that there may be sufficient evidence to justify at least a reassessment of the hitherto universally held belief that the events described in the Hebrew Bible relate mainly to Palestine. My next task is to establish the Arabian setting of the Hebrew Bible as a whole, hoping to convince the reader further .... I intend ... to show how this Tihamah is actually the Tehom mentioned in more than thirty passages of the text of the Hebrew Bible."
WP: "Tihamah is the Red Sea coastal plain of the Arabian Peninsula from the Gulf of Aqaba to the Bab el Mandeb. Tihāmat is the Proto-Semitic language's term for 'sea'. Tiamat was the ancient Mesopotamian god of the sea and of chaos. The word appears in masculine form in the Hebrew Bible as təhōm (Genesis 1:2), meaning 'primordial ocean, abyss'."
76-77: "Hayam (hym) ... denotes porous, sandy soil unable to retain water, that is to say soil which remains ‘thirsty’ .... In Arabic, the name of the West Arabian coastal desert should have been Hayam. Its actual name, Tihamah, is a survival of the Biblical Tehom (thwm)."
77-78: "Tehom makes the best sense, wherever it occurs in the canonical Hebrew Bible, as the old Semitic name for the West Arabian coastlands which are called today Tihamah."
78: "The mistranslation here is that of the Revised Standard Version, hereafter RSV .... 1 He will bless you (ybrkk) with the blessings of heaven above (brkt smym m-'l), blessings of the deep that couches beneath (brkt thwm rbst tht), blessings of the breasts and the womb (brkt sdym w-rhm) (Genesis 49:25b). 2 Blessed by the Lord (or by Yahweh) be his land (mbrkt yhwh ’rsw), with the choicest gifts of heaven above (m-mgd smym m-‘l), and the deep that couches beneath (m-thwm rbst tht) (Deuteronomy 33:13b)."
79: "One finds that they actually involve not ‘blessings’, but definitions of the territory or territorial claim of this tribe: 1 He shall settle you (ybrkk) in the Rakkah of Samayin from above (b-rkt smym m-‘l), in the Rakkah of the Tihamah of Rabidah below (b-rkt thwm rbst tht), in the Rakkah of Thadyayn and Rahm (b-rkt sdym w-rhm). 2 From Barakah shall be his land (m-brkt yhwh ’rsw), from the Miqaddah of Samayin (m-mgd smym); from the ridge (m-tl); and from the Tihamah of Rabidah below (w-m-thwm rbst tht) .... I concede there could be a play on words in each of these two definitions of the territory of the Joseph tribe .... In the two passages just cited, the Hebrew ybrkk (see note 8) can mean both ‘he shall settle you’, and ‘he shall bless you’."
80: "Yet the fact remains that the two ‘blessings’ of the Joseph tribe, in Genesis and Deuteronomy, do cite place-names, and hence yield a sense that is concrete. Whatever figurative sense might have been intended by punning, it must be regarded as being of secondary importance, if any."
86: "The event is reported in the standard translations as follows: The waters coming down from above (m-l-m‘lh) stood and rose up in a heap far off (nd ’hd h-rhq m ’d) at Adam (’dm), the city that is beside Zarethan (srtn), and those flowing down toward the sea of the Arabah (‘l ym ‘rbh), the Salt Sea (ym h-mlh), were wholly cut off; and the people passed over opposite Jericho (yryhw) (RSV)."
87: "Joshua 3:16 must be retranslated as follows: The waters coming down from al-Ma‘lah stood, they rose up in one dam extending from Wadd, at Adam, the city that is beside Raznah, and those flowing down west of Ghurabah, west o f al-Milhah, were wholly cut off; and the people passed over opposite Rakhyah."
92: "Msrym ... is rarely used in the Hebrew Bible to refer to Egypt, as commonly assumed. Where it does not refer to Misramah near Abha (see Chapters 4 and 13), it refers to Masr, in Wadi Bishah, or to Madrum (mdrm), in the Ghamid highlands (see Chapter 14). The Biblical ‘Pharaoh’ (pr‘h), as will be suggested later, was not the ruler of Egypt, but a West Arabian god."
93: "Certainly, a ‘Pharaoh’ tribe, called the Far‘a (pr'), is still to be found in Wadi Bishah today, carrying the name of the ancient god or chiefs of the region."
95: "The Jordan (also h-yrdn) where Naaman of Aram ‘dipped himself seven times’ .... could only have been a stream or pool of water. In this case, the term yrdn derives from the same Semitic root yrd."
98: "In Arabic, whd yields the substantives wahd (whd) and wahdah (whdh, with the feminine suffix), meaning an ‘area of flat, low-lying land; ravine’, while the Biblical yhwdh, from yhd, must have been an ancient Semitic topographical term carrying more or less the same meaning."
100: "Pashhur (pshwr) ... is today clearly the oasis of al-Harshaf (hrsp), in Wadi Habuna, north of Wadi Najran."
108: "Altogether, of the 130 recognised place-names in the Ezra-Nehemiah lists, which I have correlated with those West Arabian villages cited above, the identification of only a few remains uncertain. What is perhaps even more important, however, is that no more than a handful of names have been identified with locations in Palestine (in Simons, only ten) .... The onomastic proof is so overwhelming that it seems hardly to warrant archaeological substantiation."
That's about halfway through so I'll leave it there for now as a quote list without significant analysis. You might guess my first impressions from my selections. However, my first note is that you're moving from an Egyptian apologist to an Arabian apologist (if you use too many sources partial to Islam you might get suspected of Islam; you're on the most skeptical site on the internet, doubt it). My second note is, as before, that Salibi is quite the literalist, upholding the existence of all the Biblical peoples, just putting them in Asir in Arabia; so it's hardly compatible to use him as evidence that Abraham and Moses didn't exist. It appears you've shifted the goalpost from your initial implication, "Did Abraham or Moses ever exist? perhaps they're all made up for the story", or from your rather contradictory acceptance of both positions, "Moses and the tribes (Israelites) were Arabs from Yemen .... [AI:] There is no proof of [Abraham and Moses] existence outside of the Bible." If your purpose is to debunk Judaism (and perhaps Christianity) by saying it was all Arabian, that doesn't debunk any miracle or claim other than geography, which is not relevant except for some Zionists. So I'm still unsure of your endgame. But still skimming the text.
Well, that makes a bit more sense, though you first stated it ambiguously enough that it didn't. So the theory is that "Katie Johnson" was deliberately released to pressure Trump, with the inference that the goods were indeed available to Netanyahu, and the withdrawal of "Johnson" was a tactical acknowledgment that Trump was in submission. And then you imply that the Musk-Bondi releases are another phase of the same.
Not sure how that works as a narrative so I'll talk it out. This was Apr-Nov 2016. The public appearance of Jane Doe was cancelled Nov 2, and the lawsuit withdrawn of her own accord according to lawyer Lisa Bloom Nov 4, right before the election. So clearly Norm Lubow, who admitted arranging the lawsuits, was motivated to fight Trump's election chances, and his team changed tack suddenly. Your theory would then be that Bibi had leverage and needed verification that Trump would remain on track and did not fully verify that until the election was underway, and Lubow worked for him. The alternate theory would be that he didn't have leverage and Lubow worked for the anti-Trump coalition and knew they didn't have it, and their bluff was called. Or, Lubow worked for a third party that did have the goods and was the true blackmailer, not US or Israel; but that seems defeated because there would be no reason for an anti-Trump blackmailer not to use the standard Oct-Nov surprise methods when they were already well front-loaded to do so.
Since this is about Epstein, one potential test is to see what the files reveal about Epstein's 1994 travels, when Doe alleges 4 Manhattan incidents; they might reveal either gaps, or matches, or alibis, or nothing. Matches or alibis might also be countered on the theory that Lubow did have access to Epstein's itinerary, and Trump's, but did not have access to blackmail, and so the accusation might have been tailored to the knowable itinerary without being the truth.
Taking it off Bibi personally, though his office, and his agency the Mossad, are certainly top suspects, if any power could blackmail Trump and hasn't, then it's not impossible, it's just so complicated that it takes careful working out. Say you're Philip Dru, you've got a great blackmail ring and Obama is in office, you know it can't last forever and you have a plandemic lined up as a chaos event for your Great Reset, where plan A is you really do kill 90% of humanity under President Clinton and her husband, thus burying much of the aggregating risk of the blackmail. Say you have a backup plan in your patsy the Donald, you don't care which of the two becomes president because he can serve as plan B, and in that plan you are willing to sacrifice many world leaders, maybe a hundred, who are currently greased skids for plan A but who are expendable because you can "always" raise up an equal army to what you lose. In plan B (which happened), you cause Hillbilly to self-submit, you declare an era of good feelings, you release true rumors of a pedo network so you can milk its nonconviction for a decade, you use all possible means for protecting the ignominy of Trump from being detected even though the blackmail tape and its chain-of-custody evidence exists in your SCIF alone somehow, you engage the movie narrative where people think the Biden years were a necessary tactical exile, and you deliver unstinting power to the American people for 5-8 years to prove your dedication to justice and the rule of law. (Despicable Me glances back at easel with sudden nervous doubt.)
Now that theory and even its last clause is not unthinkable. We might even then argue that "Johnson" was merely the public notification that Trump didn't have the power to prevent plan A, but only the cabal whom I call "Dru" did. So (though it takes great gymnastics for me) I might accept that theory as tenable. The ultimate proof, of what a system is, is what it does, and so time will tell what the Trump system continues to do (though we have 5+ years of evidence). It just seems that the no-blackmail story requires less gymnastics, and is consistent with US military objectives as a separate power to Dru.
In either case, it is my duty to expose the truth alone, and so as always I remain provisional about Trump. If he does well, he will be approved, and, if he does evil, he will be rejected; and the judgment will be made upon his whole course. Meanwhile I engage my duty scrupulously.
Nope, there was nothing about a rape video played on national TV, only the 13-year-old "Katie Johnson" who has not been proven to exist.
Ritual ended Feb-Mar 1946, Trump born 1946-06-14, Abramovic born 1946-11-30: https://scored.co/c/Conspiracies/p/1AR0LXOlPv/the-1946-aliester-crowley-moonch/c
The 12 year old child video was broadly advertised live on all news stations months after trump came into office.
Not credible. Maybe I'll look into it.
Cold turkey on taxes historically gets people in trouble after 4-6 years because of the timeframe on IRS's assessment powers when someone abrogates the right of self-assessment. It is absolutely essential to deal with credible allegations that you earned income as early as possible if you didn't earn income. Common law may well sweep this away in the next 4-6 years making cold turkey more palatable; but under common law we still have the duty to learn enough regime law to swim with sharks.
Yes, Rome passed the Caesar on to both Russia (Csar) and Germany (Kaiser), where it was forcibly taken by America (Czar). For details, search "Chronology" at c/Christianity.
We've been answering it pretty well here. Dark matter and dark energy have no evidence and don't exist but are invented to patch up math errors in BBT. When you correct invalid lightspeed assumptions as needed, as newly shown last month by the lensing of Supernova Ares et al., using a plasma origin model and accretion theory under SED, the mass math works correctly without any epicyclic fudging (and with no uncertainty). Let me know what you want to know specifically.
I did say it has limited use. But learn what nonfalsifiability means. I can put unity at the beginning as a source, or in the middle as a bridge, or at the end as a resolution, and it would be rationalized wherever I put it. It's useful to put unity at the end, but it's also useful to put it anywhere else. See what I mean? It's not about typing monkeys. "Just approach it with an open mind."
It's especially difficult when dealing with someone who loves one version of it and doesn't care about another. Anyway, the one God is the source of them all, so you'll get to see him in everything soon enough.
You may be right because the Bible invokes a big difference between light and stars. In the plasma universe origin hypothesis, the light begins everywhere at once and coalesces into plasma strands that eventually accrete into stars; even if there were not lightspeed decay, it seems this would account for the microwave background. But then by the same token, ultraviolet radiation would have redshifted into visible light as well. When you're getting to the range of 10 billion lightyears, you've had a chain of several assumptions to come to that conclusion and I'm not an expert on the whole series; but I do know that the experts are arguing about them, and no single news article is interested in giving the whole chain of inferences but only in quoting the scientists who assume them. For the flat-earthers, there is no evidence of 10 billion lightyears, and this opinion can be joined on many other assumptions too, as is demonstrated in the range of opinions in the "consensus" literature.
Oh, I respect it enough to read it open-mindedly, but not enough to agree that it has right of appeal to authority. I'm pretty big on there being a conspiracy to cover up stochastic electrodynamics, so I hope that level of respect is understandable. But I am free to speak boldly due to the knowledge that truth will never deceive me and I have nothing to fear from myriads of contrary "experts": either my claims get backed up by the evidence, or I learn something new and admit it. So sometimes I am "very bold".