The government is not supposed to appoint the leader! The electorate must decide and the government should not defy the will of the people.
How can that be real?
AKA Deep State agents
This is Clark Kent if I've ever seen him!
u/pkvi got this one right in a couple of posts.
During the 2020 election, I decided to give the Bernie Sanders subreddit a visit. It was the wee hours of the morning and there were over 400 members online at that moment.
I then took a look at Joe Biden's. He was the Democratic nominee. There were only six users online. I came back in a couple of hours and that number had doubled to twelve.
That's when I understood the magnitude of the fakery.
They could have said this knowing that they were being filmed, i.e. faked.
The reason I say this is because four years ago there was an eerily similar Twitter revelation:
UNDERCOVER VIDEO: Twitter Engineers To “Ban a Way of Talking” Through “Shadow Banning,” Algorithms to Censor Opposing Political Opinions https://www.projectveritas.com/news/undercover-video-twitter-engineers-to-ban-a-way-of-talking-through-shadow-banning-algorithms-to-censor-opposing-political-opinions/
HIDDEN CAMERA: Twitter Engineers To “Ban a Way of Talking” Through “Shadow Banning” https://www.projectveritas.com/video/hidden-camera-twitter-engineers-to-ban-a-way-of-talking-through-shadow-banning/
I believe that it is actually the U.S. Deep State that is behind all the censorship. These "leaks" are just a smokescreen to give people the false impression that it is ideological individuals making these decisions, as the government doing this would violate the U.S. Constitution.
I just did a web search on this topic and relevant results fill the entire front page of the search. It is not being suppressed in any way; they want you to see it.
Of course two hot air balloons can see each other with a telescope. But, eventually, they can't because the distance is too far and this too many particles are in the way, so you can't see it.
But surely you could bring a light so powerful, or a laser that could penetrate far enough to debunk the curvature of the earth. Or how about a radio signal known to travel a far distance through the air?
In my view, the burden of proof is on you, as the round earth has been sufficiently demonstrated to be true.
I'm curious about your point of view on this. Could you please elaborate?
Could be, but I think race is largely irrelevant.
They could have said this knowing that they were being filmed, i.e. faked.
The reason I say this is because four years ago there was an eerily similar Twitter revelation:
UNDERCOVER VIDEO: Twitter Engineers To “Ban a Way of Talking” Through “Shadow Banning,” Algorithms to Censor Opposing Political Opinions https://www.projectveritas.com/news/undercover-video-twitter-engineers-to-ban-a-way-of-talking-through-shadow-banning-algorithms-to-censor-opposing-political-opinions/
HIDDEN CAMERA: Twitter Engineers To “Ban a Way of Talking” Through “Shadow Banning” https://www.projectveritas.com/video/hidden-camera-twitter-engineers-to-ban-a-way-of-talking-through-shadow-banning/
I believe that it is actually the U.S. Deep State that is behind all the censorship. These "leaks" are just a smokescreen to give people the false impression that it is ideological individuals making these decisions, as the government doing this would violate the U.S. Constitution.
I just did a web search on this topic and relevant results fill the entire front page of the search. It is not being suppressed in any way; they want you to see it.
Jeremy Irons Rudolf Steiner
This channel is blocked because it "Contains Incitement to Hatred". Anyone have a mirror?
Nobody is "replacing" ethnic groups.
What is happening is mass labour imports to drive down the wages of working families.
In the United States, they can also use it as a new voting block. The Republican Party will be depicted as hating the new arrivals so that they vote Democratic.
So you have no explanation as to how two hot air balloons can't see each other with a telescope on a flat earth. I guess you're wrong about that.
I don't think many people think that at all.
It doesn't matter; they are military-style.
#pfs? Are you talking about perfect forward secrecy?
Wasn't the bubonic plague caused by bacteria spread by fleas biting infected animals?
Then why has nobody ever been able to do this? If this is "all over the Internet," show me one such report of being able to shine a laser between two places in the sky that are far apart.
I do not think it is real, but simply a manufactured problem to usher in new laws banning unapproved discourse.
They age-restricted this to reduce the number of people who can see it. Is there a mirror?
I didn't ask for all that nonsense. What I said was:
So two hot air balloons and a laser is all you [yes, you]need to demonstrate this.
Just send two up. If the earth is flat, you can show that by having one shine a laser at the other one. This experiment is cheap and repeatable.
If you cannot do that one simple thing, then the world is not flat.
You are smart. People should to be notified of censorship that is affecting the public perception of a topic under discussion. It is also important to have original sources listed in a clear way that is accessible as possible: as a hyperlink, for example. There are many reasons for this which I have explored elsewhere on this forum.
For people out there who haven't heard of "TLAV" (The Last American Vagabond), the last thing in the world you should be concerned about is what some random user account has to say about your level of intelligence. We are all here to learn, and as far as I'm concerned, the more new people the better!
Archive to get around paywall:
After Buffalo Shooting Video Spreads, Social Platforms Face Questions https://archive.ph/7C6dw