I don't see it that way. I first saw the statistical anomalies in the 2016 primaries (both parties cheated against Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump. Then, in the 2016 general election the vote count fraud in metropolitan areas (count stalling, unrealistic numbers for Hillary Clinton) was limited and not enough for Hillary to hang on to what she stole during the primary. In 2020, this pattern emerged in nearly every swing state and went for Biden every single time in impossible clumps.

More than just rampant voter fraud, there was centralized election fraud in the swing states.

You are extrapolating. We have to wait and see.

EDIT: Timestamp 4:10 is where they start talking about immortality.

I don't follow. Are you referring to something that was said in this video?

EDIT:

Biden remarks on pace of Covid vaccinations among Americans – watch live https://youtu.be/xlDJ9V0bGXc?t=439

If you're out there unvaccinated, you don't have to die.

Being far ahead of North Korea technologically, we have for decades been able to employ social diversity to accomplish these same feats.

Jamie Farr, Lebanese-American who played a man who wore women's clothing in the Army https://youtu.be/4MiDWoR4vhs?t=155

Brooke Shields, a woman https://youtu.be/b-311lAMR_Q?t=3470

Multi-ethnic Christians https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o5OQcIHKOF0

Open-Mesh https://www.open-mesh.org/projects/open-mesh/wiki

There are actually various groups out there trying to create community (and larger) networks that don't rely upon telecommunications providers.

I would like for someone to write on the talk page of that Wikipedia article that since the cited WHO report does not cite a source, the report itself is a primary one and therefore not usable on Wikipedia.

Then your enemies will own you with off-topic background noise. Moderation is one of the only tools we have currently to defend against an endless flood of racial slurs intended to poison the well. There is nothing wrong with excluding voices that intend to shout down the entire discussion.

I do not believe people should be killed to resist the takeover.

EDIT: The full video is available at:

The Vigano Tapes https://insidethevatican.com/vigano-tapes/the-vigano-tapes/

The indistinct part at 1:07 is "pactum sceleris."

I could only get some of the article in the document source, but it says "White nationalists, neofascists, and other Tucker Carlson viewers can't get enough Hunter Biden content..." I think it's fair to call that an extreme level of bias.

The reason is so they can use enhanced government power against them. Their real target is literally the majority of Americans.

...turn people into...sexless...husks of a human being.

In Chinese there are words for husband and wife (of course). After the Cultural Revolution, the modern way to say either husband or wife is the gender-neutral word that translates to "lover."

I am talking about US (global, actually) adoption of the China Model. They have a one party system and since the (infiltrated) Democratic Party successfully stole the 2020 Presidential Election, they are slated to become the de-facto single party in the United States. They are well on the way to making it quite difficult for their political opposition to successfully get their messaging across online. The censorship will increase, which makes it even easier to cheat the vote count. They are also using other unfair methods to give the single party an advantage.

I was making a sarcastic remark in response to the recent wave of hate speech that has taken over places that discuss conspiracies.

Reasons for doing this include:

1. It drives people away from these places with the idea that they are full of "deplorables," particularly women, people of color and sexual minorities. This has a devastating effect because of how profoundly this limits for all of us to find common ground.

2. It allows these places to be labelled as "extremist forums" and thus be subject (along with all of the participating users) to Internet censorship and scrutiny from law enforcement and anti-terror agencies.

3. It opens the door to dozens of academic research articles being written this year about the hate speech and calls to violence in these places. Their next step is to enact legislation to regulate them(i.e. shut them down). That will extend to all venues that don't have approved moderation (i.e. Ministry of Truth).

Upon administering D-dimer tests, he discovered 62% had blood clots.

At the 7:58 mark in this video there is an exchange where a Johnson & Johnson employee cites "The 60% thing..." as a reason to not get the J & J shot. Does it refer to what I quoted from your comment? https://www.projectveritas.com/news/johnson-and-johnson-children-dont-need-the-f-cking-covid-vaccine-because/

Is this guy not high-profile enough?

Jackie 'O' Henderson's ex-husband Lee is pictured for the first time after he was hospitalised with an extremely rare heart complication as a side effect of his second Pfizer jab https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-9976787/Jackie-O-Hendersons-ex-husband-Lee-pictured-time-hospitalisation.html

I wonder if they'll see to it we'll never see her again.

I like how every comment in threads about Dave Chappelle try to discredit him. It's like they don't like what he is saying or something.

I disagree with you. Twitter is just the medium. Links are better than screenshots, and screenshots can have links in the comments, but screenshots from Twitter that address relevant topics are better than nothing.

The behavior of some people should be irrelevant in determining our sources of information even if those sources choose to use Twitter as a platform.

Those aren't liberals; it's their job. It's bad to deflect blame away from them and persuade people the shills are ideological individuals rather than sockpuppets working together.

Don't you think the comment you are replying to was being sarcastic? Like they would have some big mozzarella cheese spill in Italy...

Have you got that short clip? All the videos I can find of that briefing are long. She uses the word "fundamental/ly" twelve times, by the way.

The following is the Whitehouse.gov text.

Press Briefing by Press Secretary Jen Psaki, October 12, 2021 https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/press-briefings/2021/10/12/press-briefing-by-press-secretary-jen-psaki-october-12-2021/

MS. PSAKI: The President wants to make fundamental change in our economy, and he feels coming out of the pandemic is exactly the time to do that. And if we don’t do it now, if we don’t address the cost of childcare — to go back to Josh’s question earlier — if we don’t address the climate crisis; if we don’t ensure that universal pre-K is a reality now, we’re not going to have the same opportunity to do it for some time.

We need to make sure people don't pay attention to this. How about some fake antisemitism in the comments? Then people won't take the message seriously.

That'll show 'em!