Thank you for pointing out that the Google results have been manipulated. Maybe it is a media blackout after all.

In Russia, the ship goes down with the captain!

I might be on that list.

I am required by law to have one.

Article and video segment:

Wall Street Analyst: COVID-19 Vaccines ‘Greatest Fraud in History’ | Art Moore | Larry Elder https://www.theepochtimes.com/wall-street-analyst-covid-vaccines-greatest-fraud-in-history-art-moore-larry-elder_4409353.html

EDIT: That page seems to be essentially promotional. Here is the interview:

Wall Street analyst: COVID vaccines ‘greatest fraud in history’ https://rumble.com/vxm9rs-wall-street-analyst-covid-vaccines-greatest-fraud-in-history.html

Actually, people are to eat worms, not nothing.

People should always post links when they are available. It saves time, and time is valuable.

It looks like some organization went out and purchased every copy there is.

Is this corroborated anywhere? What/when/where was this event?

Every source I can find shows Galen Winsor as the editor or annotator and Mike Grimmel and Brett Salisbury as contributors. (One site says Salisbury wrote the introduction.)

I think everyone here knows who the time waster is.

We get what it means to delete something. I'm just curious as to what important things may no longer be able to be found.

There have been cases where I've found things suppressed by Google using DuckDuckGo searches, but not for a some time now.

Nobody cares about your guess.

You can only speak for yourself, not others. My guess is that someone cares about my guesses.

so you trust the UN then? Yes or no?

It's not a black or white issue. That organization, being a collective of thousands of people, most certainly does not have my absolute trust. It doesn't matter the degree to which I think the things they publish are credible.

Really, why should such a thing even matter? What is your claim?

Thanks for the tip. I'll keep an eye out for BBC World screenshots.

I'll believe it when it's shown to be true.

Shills vote on stuff. When I see the pattern, the first thing that comes to mind is the thing being voted on is fake.

Doesn't mention anything about who killed those civilians.

My guess it is the ones shelling and shooting at villages. It is reasonable to think the aggressors are responsible for the vast majority of civilian casualties, just as I think the Russians have caused the majority of civilian deaths this year.

They have issued daily updates since March 7, 2022. Search ohchr.org for: ukraine civilian casualty

Ukraine: civilian casualty update 7 March 2022 https://www.ohchr.org/en/news/2022/03/ukraine-civilian-casualty-update-7-march-2022

That's an example of the level of detail in their reporting.

Source is the UN. Wait, now we trust them?

If you have an actual issue with their methodology or honesty, feel free to explain. I would not accept an argument that nobody is in a position to provide an honest count, so therefore any reports are vastly overstated by orders of magnitude. (As if the UN would be trying to support Donetsk and Luhansk in the first place...)

Do not allow yourself to be thought-terminated. Even if the corpses were placed there (which I doubt), that doesn't mean it didn't happen.

Based on what he said, he in only working with a team.

We need more teams!

I did not know about that.

Where?

I haven't noticed that phenomenon. Are you talking about this forum?

I add links to that sort of thing in my spare time. I've spotted some fakes in the process.

Even Nitter reduces the impact that social media can have. Retweets, quotes and comments give the poster a sense of community engagement, letting them know that their messages are having an impact on society.

Could you explain?