1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ok but how do I verify they are visible? I can't go to open see to do that.

See the edit.

4
SmithW1984 4 points ago +4 / -0

It would have been nice to see the actual pictures of the lighthouses at that distance. It also depends what vessel you're observing them from - if it's a cargo ship deck you're up 20m above sea level.

But here's my defeater: if the Earth was flat why do ships have crows nests up on the mast? Wouldn't people be able to see at the same distance from the deck? Were all shipbuilders in on the conspiracy for the past thousand plus years?

3
SmithW1984 3 points ago +3 / -0

It is. So is evolutionary theory and any origin story of the universe.

7
SmithW1984 7 points ago +7 / -0

I don't think there will be a big reveal. The whole thing simmered off - sure people die more than before but excess deaths are not too high to raise serious concerns in the masses and they will continue to be gaslight the culprit is anything but the stabbies. Those people don't want the truth. If they did they would be aware of it by now because the info is out in the open. At this point it'd be harder even for the government to convince them they were poisoned.

There are other ways to depop beside mass vaccination and it's working like a charm - just look at the fertility indexes and at people getting sicker and more degenerate with each generation.

There will be another cataclysmic event in the next few years. Most likely war and financial collapse.

1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

What you're spouting is your interpretation of history.

Yes and it's based on historical evidence. Read Tragedy and Hope by C. Quigley and see for yourself. This is the best meticulously sourced book on 20th century history and prof. Quigley was an insider to the establishment, not a conspiracy hack.

1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well, I would say your defense of Hitler, who is really a mixed bag, is incompatible with Orthodoxy as I understand it. I get attacking usury and usurers.

As opposed to what? Would you say the same if I came to the defense of the allies? Do you want to bet who's more anti-christian - nazi Germany or the modern "liberal democratic" west ran by those who hate Christ? My defense of Hitler is not endorsement of his regime but acknowledgment of the truth about recent history. I'll stick with the truth and that's as Christian as one can get.

I mentioned the crusades to point how the Vatican went conquering Jerusalem for economic reasons but wouldn't help Byzantium fend off the turks because there was nothing for them to win out of that.

3
SmithW1984 3 points ago +3 / -0

Why do they assume we want to live in a "more liberated society"? Where do they get their telos from and why should anyone care for their marxist bs?

2
SmithW1984 2 points ago +2 / -0

So you don't consider libertarians right-leaning? According to modern political science they are although I'd argue they are classical liberals, based on the origins of their ideas. Anything right from antifa drag queens is portrayed as the right these days.

1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

All wars are bankers wars =/= all wars have economic causation

True. My argument was it became solely bankers wars after the bankers took control of international finance obviously.

I see a Nazi making Marxist arguments and naming the Jew...oh the irony.

You need spectacles then. I'm neither a nazi nor a marxist because I'm Orthodox Christian and my faith is incompatible with any secular humanist ideology.

2
SmithW1984 2 points ago +2 / -0

I second that tier. I'm at Phase 3 also.

5
SmithW1984 5 points ago +5 / -0

Not exactly, that's why I put it in quotes. But of course you chose to nitpick terminology instead of engaging with the actual arguments.

1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

When dealing with people who print money, fines are senseless.

This is the most crucial truth for understanding modern economics.

7
SmithW1984 7 points ago +7 / -0

According to you anyone criticizing the "alt-right" pantheon is a sperg?

I don't need to be one to notice Elon is a zionist DARPA darling, planting chips in human brains. Trump is a zionist and vaxx shill, owned by the bankers who finance his business. Rogan is a gatekeeper of what is acceptable to entertain as a "conspiracy theorist" according to normies. AJ I like the most of the bunch despite his constant fear porn and over-the-top manner but he still can't touch certain topics because of the controllers.

5
SmithW1984 5 points ago +5 / -0

It became painfully obvious during the coof and the controlled opposition figures like Malone.

3
SmithW1984 3 points ago +4 / -1

I've never red it but it seemed sus how widely available the book is. The hard hitters are always hard to find because most publishers (who are jewish) won't touch them with a 10 feet pole.

Try finding a copy of something truly eye-opening like Eustace Mullins, Sutton or Ioan Ratiu. Normies love gifting Mein Kampf because they find it edgy.

1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

I didn't shift at all. Who controls the economy if not the bankers? That was not always the case and at the time of the crusades the economy was in the hands of the state and the church. But yeah, I'd argue the crusades were about conquest and resources and the ideology came second. If that weren't the case explain why the Vatican did jack shit to prevent the Ottomans raping and enslaving half of Europe's Christian population?

As for Napoleon, you guessed it, it was the bankers once again. Napoleon became his own banker and they weren't having it. Sure, there are other factors at play in all those events but we're talking about the origin and the primary movers. Here's the rundown: https://youtu.be/IKuVO4JaqBY?t=2758

2
SmithW1984 2 points ago +2 / -0

Now that's someone using their brain. They have Trump in the office and he's going to shill for Israel and his corporate overlords. That being said, it's still better to have him than any of the democrats. But they will use him as a Trojan horse.

3
SmithW1984 3 points ago +3 / -0

"But, but BTC is anonymous and made me rich so it must be good although no one has a clue why such a technology was allowed to proliferate by the banking elite and where it came from*".

*It was DARPA.

1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's easy to judge mistakes in hindsight. He may have made strategic mistakes, I don't know enough about warfare and I won't repeat some Nat Geo History mantra. The argument was about the reason for the war in the first place and who instigated it. It was the internetional bankers.

1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

Tell that to Bernard Baruch, it's his quote. I picked it up from Eustace Mullins' Secrets of the Federal reserve.

Testifying before the Nye Committee on September 13, 1937, Bernard Baruch stated that "All wars are economic in their origin." So much for religious and political disagreements, which had been specially touted as the cause of wars.

How was Mohamed's war not economical in origin? Did he just convert people to islam without caring to extend his rule, taking land, slaves and spoils? The demonic goatfucker wanted to be rich and powerful. He was no different than the international bankers in that regard.

3
SmithW1984 3 points ago +4 / -1

I thought it's bs given the fake picture, but now that you chimed in I'm thinking there's probably something foul afoot for real.

2
SmithW1984 2 points ago +2 / -0

What's an "alt-right" historian? There's just one history, I don't care for political takes. I base what I say on historical evidence, documents and common sense.

Who am I to blame? Who runs global finance for the last few hundred years?

because of their imperialistic war with China

That was not the reason for the embargo and for them getting shafted by the US. Do you know how many imperialistic wars was Britain involved in at that time?

All wars are of economic origin.

2
SmithW1984 2 points ago +2 / -0

You obviously don't know the history behind the wars. Germany was not the aggressor, this is the jewish allied propaganda we've been spoonfed all of our lives just like the 6 mil, the gas chambers, etc. Hitler defended the interests of his country and yes, sometimes that means going to war. What's your take on the founding fathers and them starting a war with Britain?

The Rothchild/Lord Milner controlled Anglo-American establishment baited Germany into the war. They were trying to get Germany in a major conflict and destroy it for decades before WWI broke because having such a powerful industrial nation rule over central Europe was unacceptable to them. Prof. Carol Quigley writes about the vicious anti-german propaganda from around the Boer war which intensified with WWI. Then the US citizens were brainwashed into believing Germany were the bad guys and the US needed to intervene on the side of the Entente despite the general population being sympathetic towards the Germans and disliking John Bull for obvious reasons.

Again, I'm not saying this as a Hitler fanboy. I just want the truth to be known and acknowledged, especially since the bad guys won and skewed everything in their favor.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›