That's your assertion idiot - it's up to you to prove it. I've given you an argument for why it's false (because they'd use that exact method to identify it instead of PCR and culture) and you ignored and deflected accusing me of strawmanning.
Also, I thought you didn't say this and I twisted it out of context. What happened to that deflection?
I'm done with your trolling, you're obviously bad faith because no one using a computer is this dumb.
I never said you can't observe bacteria. Go back and read my comment. Such a bad deflection putting bacteria (germs) along with viruses. Talk about moving goalposts. What happened to the same experiment done with viruses? Where's the link?
Neat, so… viruses. Grown. From other viruses. Because they existed in the first place. And were grown in number.
No, it's more like what I wrote in my very first comment, which once more, you didn't bother to read. Viruses are observable ONLY AFTER the specimen is mixed in a toxic concoction of monkey cancer cells, antibiotics and enzymes, which annihilate the cells causing them to spill their contents, forming exosomes, which you and other lying dumbasses then wrongfully label virions blaming them for the pathology observed.
You're begging the question
Not what that means.
That's exactly what it means, smart guy. You're assuming the thing in question - i.e. the claim you can see viruses in saliva or in other unadulterated form under a microscope.
How pathetic of you to upvote your comments from your burner account. As if anyone cares about that. And why do you care so much what a random guy on a forum thinks or says? Are you that starved for validation, little troll?
Why would I believe you? You're a bold faced liar. As if anyone would burry themselves in a 20+ message thread of ad homs and deflections - "I didn't say that", "you're strawmanning" and when I bring up the exact quote of you saying just that you go "so you admit it?" - you want me to believe someone red through all that circular idiocy and liked your trolling so much as to give you thumbsies? I don't buy it, seeth harder.
All you have to do is read comments before replying to them. It’s not hard for someone who isn’t paid to post lies. That you continue to have trouble with this is extremely telling.
If only you could explain yourself like a grown human being and not respond to my argument with "how many times you beat your wife". You were sperging and being bad faith from the get go. At least own your moronic 3rd grade behavior.
Reminder that viruses and bacteria are real and can be seen with home equipment.
Did you prove this? You're begging the question, you fucking idiot. The images you posted are of "virus cultures" not of unadulterated patient tissue or saliva under a microscope. Buying a microscope from Walmart won't help me reproduce them, unless I know how to prepare the culture, genius.
The reminder is you won't see a virus under a microscope in your spit under any circumstances. That is why nobody does that for virus detection. Then I asked If you have evidence for the opposite, to share it and prove you're correct. That's how an argument is resolved, not through whining and cussing (which is only appropriate AFTER you address the actual argument, you dumbass).
You're seriously sperging and there's no talking to you. It's evident from all your comment history.
Literally gave you instructions on how to prove it to yourself, you incomprehensibly retarded shill.
I'm not buying a microscope, thanks. You have a) either done done the experiment yourself or b) have evidence of someone else doing it. If not, you just assume what the experiment will show based on your theory with no evidence. Why should I reinvent the wheel? Do you mean to tell me there's not a single paper online proving your point?
Great; that’s on you. You made the choice to continue to be objectively wrong. Your statements are hereby dismissed off-hand and you concede the argument.
based on your theory with no evidence
Said the “things that are proven to be real aren’t real because I say so no I don’t have to prove it” shill.
Was it an invisible link? Is it too hard to post a link and nothing else? I really want to look at that evidence you've got. Was the Millie Vanillie virus the evidence?
That's your assertion idiot - it's up to you to prove it. I've given you an argument for why it's false (because they'd use that exact method to identify it instead of PCR and culture) and you ignored and deflected accusing me of strawmanning.
Also, I thought you didn't say this and I twisted it out of context. What happened to that deflection?
I'm done with your trolling, you're obviously bad faith because no one using a computer is this dumb.
Nope, it’s yours. Fuck off, coward. You have nothing.
You sure?
Yep, eat shit.
I never said you can't observe bacteria. Go back and read my comment. Such a bad deflection putting bacteria (germs) along with viruses. Talk about moving goalposts. What happened to the same experiment done with viruses? Where's the link?
No, it's more like what I wrote in my very first comment, which once more, you didn't bother to read. Viruses are observable ONLY AFTER the specimen is mixed in a toxic concoction of monkey cancer cells, antibiotics and enzymes, which annihilate the cells causing them to spill their contents, forming exosomes, which you and other lying dumbasses then wrongfully label virions blaming them for the pathology observed.
That's exactly what it means, smart guy. You're assuming the thing in question - i.e. the claim you can see viruses in saliva or in other unadulterated form under a microscope.
I've seen your recent comments - you're a sad little troll, ain't you? I hope you find peace.
How pathetic of you to upvote your comments from your burner account. As if anyone cares about that. And why do you care so much what a random guy on a forum thinks or says? Are you that starved for validation, little troll?
Oy vey. Sue me, jew.
Why would I believe you? You're a bold faced liar. As if anyone would burry themselves in a 20+ message thread of ad homs and deflections - "I didn't say that", "you're strawmanning" and when I bring up the exact quote of you saying just that you go "so you admit it?" - you want me to believe someone red through all that circular idiocy and liked your trolling so much as to give you thumbsies? I don't buy it, seeth harder.
If only you could explain yourself like a grown human being and not respond to my argument with "how many times you beat your wife". You were sperging and being bad faith from the get go. At least own your moronic 3rd grade behavior.
Did you prove this? You're begging the question, you fucking idiot. The images you posted are of "virus cultures" not of unadulterated patient tissue or saliva under a microscope. Buying a microscope from Walmart won't help me reproduce them, unless I know how to prepare the culture, genius.
The reminder is you won't see a virus under a microscope in your spit under any circumstances. That is why nobody does that for virus detection. Then I asked If you have evidence for the opposite, to share it and prove you're correct. That's how an argument is resolved, not through whining and cussing (which is only appropriate AFTER you address the actual argument, you dumbass).
You're seriously sperging and there's no talking to you. It's evident from all your comment history.
I'm not buying a microscope, thanks. You have a) either done done the experiment yourself or b) have evidence of someone else doing it. If not, you just assume what the experiment will show based on your theory with no evidence. Why should I reinvent the wheel? Do you mean to tell me there's not a single paper online proving your point?
Great; that’s on you. You made the choice to continue to be objectively wrong. Your statements are hereby dismissed off-hand and you concede the argument.
Said the “things that are proven to be real aren’t real because I say so no I don’t have to prove it” shill.
"These are not the robots you're looking for, move along".
"Things have already been proven, chud, don't ask me for evidence or source - trust me, bro"
I don't see any links. Either put up or fuck off.
Was it an invisible link? Is it too hard to post a link and nothing else? I really want to look at that evidence you've got. Was the Millie Vanillie virus the evidence?