I worry that you ignored my argument and resorted to a regurgitated ad hom instead. If only coming up with snarky, yet unrelated personal remarks proved your point, you may have stood a chance at convincing anybody.
No, you pretend you pretending it's shitposting doesn't make it so.
I asked you a precise question: If we can detect a virus by looking at spit under a microscope, why don't they use that method to isolate and detect viruses, but instead do PCR and culturing? If a person is sick with a respiratory virus they should have billions of virions in their saliva - isn't that the reason for social distancing and masks?
No, you pretend you pretending it's shitposting doesn't make it so.
Neat, don’t care. Anyone can see bacteria (and even some viruses) with a microscope bought at Walmart. You’re clinically insane. Your well poisoning is dismissed off-hand. You have nothing to add here.
but instead do PCR
You mean the thing that THE CREATOR HIMSELF said doesn’t do what they say it does? Gee, I wonder.
[other crap]
I don’t give a shit about any of that. The ZOG lies. It’s what they do. What’s your point, dumbass? “THEY LIED ABOUT [one infinitesimally small aspect of X] THEREFORE [X] ITSELF ISN’T REAL”? That’s not a fucking argument.
None of the shit you wrote addressed anything above. I can't decide whether you're being bad faith or you genuinely are IQ deficient and don't get the simple argument I made.
They use PCR and culturing regardless of how effective that is for detecting the supposed virus. That's not the point and neither does it matter if anyone lied about anything during the pandemic. This has literally nothing to do with the argument.
The question was why would they use such relatively complex, time consuming and expensive methods (culturing, PCR), instead of just getting saliva samples under a microscope and finding out if a person has the virus or not?
I worry that you ignored my argument and resorted to a regurgitated ad hom instead. If only coming up with snarky, yet unrelated personal remarks proved your point, you may have stood a chance at convincing anybody.
I ignored your comment because it’s zero effort shitposting that only paid shills would say. It’s not working.
No, you pretend you pretending it's shitposting doesn't make it so.
I asked you a precise question: If we can detect a virus by looking at spit under a microscope, why don't they use that method to isolate and detect viruses, but instead do PCR and culturing? If a person is sick with a respiratory virus they should have billions of virions in their saliva - isn't that the reason for social distancing and masks?
Neat, don’t care. Anyone can see bacteria (and even some viruses) with a microscope bought at Walmart. You’re clinically insane. Your well poisoning is dismissed off-hand. You have nothing to add here.
You mean the thing that THE CREATOR HIMSELF said doesn’t do what they say it does? Gee, I wonder.
I don’t give a shit about any of that. The ZOG lies. It’s what they do. What’s your point, dumbass? “THEY LIED ABOUT [one infinitesimally small aspect of X] THEREFORE [X] ITSELF ISN’T REAL”? That’s not a fucking argument.
Lol, dude. The master deflector strikes again.
None of the shit you wrote addressed anything above. I can't decide whether you're being bad faith or you genuinely are IQ deficient and don't get the simple argument I made.
They use PCR and culturing regardless of how effective that is for detecting the supposed virus. That's not the point and neither does it matter if anyone lied about anything during the pandemic. This has literally nothing to do with the argument.
The question was why would they use such relatively complex, time consuming and expensive methods (culturing, PCR), instead of just getting saliva samples under a microscope and finding out if a person has the virus or not?