Me commenting on the virus pics of your initial comment:
We've seen them - here are some sciency-looking pictures of sub-cellular particles, derived from culturing decomposing tissue in monkey kidney cancer cells and antibiotics that we'll call virions and claim they are the cause of the observed pathology.
You replaying to my comment:
buy a home microscope
spit on a slide
look at it
NOOOOOOOO NONE OF THAT IS REEEEEEEEEEEAL
You again:
Anyone can see bacteria (and even some viruses) with a microscope bought at Walmart.
Thanks for admitting viruses and bacteria exist and can be viewed by anyone with simple equipment available anywhere.
The only thing that's twisted is your mind from constantly lying and doing mental gymnastics as if you can't be instantly disproven. Case closed.
That's your assertion idiot - it's up to you to prove it. I've given you an argument for why it's false (because they'd use that exact method to identify it instead of PCR and culture) and you ignored and deflected accusing me of strawmanning.
Also, I thought you didn't say this and I twisted it out of context. What happened to that deflection?
I'm done with your trolling, you're obviously bad faith because no one using a computer is this dumb.
Literally gave you instructions on how to prove it to yourself, you incomprehensibly retarded shill.
I'm not buying a microscope, thanks. You have a) either done done the experiment yourself or b) have evidence of someone else doing it. If not, you just assume what the experiment will show based on your theory with no evidence. Why should I reinvent the wheel? Do you mean to tell me there's not a single paper online proving your point?
Me commenting on the virus pics of your initial comment:
You replaying to my comment:
You again:
The only thing that's twisted is your mind from constantly lying and doing mental gymnastics as if you can't be instantly disproven. Case closed.
Thanks for admitting viruses and bacteria are real and visible with equipment you can personally buy.
That's your assertion idiot - it's up to you to prove it. I've given you an argument for why it's false (because they'd use that exact method to identify it instead of PCR and culture) and you ignored and deflected accusing me of strawmanning.
Also, I thought you didn't say this and I twisted it out of context. What happened to that deflection?
I'm done with your trolling, you're obviously bad faith because no one using a computer is this dumb.
Nope, it’s yours. Fuck off, coward. You have nothing.
You sure?
I'm not buying a microscope, thanks. You have a) either done done the experiment yourself or b) have evidence of someone else doing it. If not, you just assume what the experiment will show based on your theory with no evidence. Why should I reinvent the wheel? Do you mean to tell me there's not a single paper online proving your point?