All the weird degenerate shit they engage in is occult in origin. Don't look for scientific or pragmatic reasons. They do it for the same reason it's done in pagan rituals - to communicate with demons and to gain their favor in return for power or as symbolic rituals part of various elite secret societies.
So called evolutionary theory is also based in ancient greek and hindu philosophy (Democritus) and is not scientific at all since it does not adhere to the scientific method of evaluation, hypothesis, experiment and conclusion. It's philosophical speculation at best. I can't imagine how anyone could prove it because no one ever witnessed it and no adequate experiments can be conducted. There are also many purely logical internal contradictions that render such a process impossible.
There are indeed. That's not what I meant by it being fake and gay (I don't think it's wag the dog scenario).
It's possible. He did the job and got suicided to prevent loose ends.
Yes, no one engages in an open war today and everything is done through proxy and psy ops (case in point Russia-NATO war). This is fifth-generation warfare. The US will be involved (like in Ukraine) but under the auspice of helping Israel "restore justice and democracy" in the region. Modern warfare is fake and gay, cowardly, deceptive, unmanly and undignified. There are no civilians, women or children - everyone is a target.
I see some new names here regurgitating normie talking points. The pre-election disinfo task force has been dispatched.
Reddit can burn for all I care.
She was a DEI hire obviously. Don't be dense.
That's nothing compared to what Jacinda did to those poor bastards. They deserve it though for being cucks and allowing it to happen.
I didn't accuse you of bigotry - learn to read, dude. You're either trolling or retarded.
Also, yes: antisemitism was ONE of the multiple reasons for the invention of racism: link to woke CRT demented pieces
A couple of hard hitters for you:
Who "invented" racism and do you happen to accept evolutionary theory as true the way Darwin popularized it?
What race are 90% of the jews?
Does antisemitism stem from perceived racial inferiority of jews (like in the case with blacks as less evolved moronic savages) or does it have other causes?
Are jews portrayed as inferior historically and did they struggle to get ahead in the societies they lived and thus influencing their culture, politics and economy?
And last but not least: Wtf are you doing in a conspiracy forum? Are you fighting disinfo on behalf of some woke-ass NGO?
Funny how you're accusing me of bigotry when you've made statements like this:
I didn't do that. I accused you of being a troll because the things you say are over the top ridiculous to the extent it sounds deliberately so. Btw, what's wrong with me saying women shouldn't vote? Do you want to debate me on this one?
Being an asshole is called the deadly sin of wrath.
Calling people out on their bs especially when they twist Scripture and spew heresy is not wrath. It's love of the Truth. You perceiving me as being "mean" because I'm upfront and don't tolerate lies is not a sin, it's a virtue. I mean you're asking for it making retarded statements like "antisemitism led to the invention of racism". Just think about what you said.
Yes, I see people around me experiencing weird ailments recently - early onset dementia (confirmed by doctors), corneal deterioration, heart problems, lungs filled with fluid, hair shedding, etc. A relative stroked out and died shortly after getting it but they blamed it on other causes. What they have in common is the shot (in my country only about 20% took it so no problem with having a control group). The rest have not experienced significant changes to their health. Sure, that's still anecdotal but I'm not the only one seeing this. I don't even bring it up because they refuse to see a possible link.
A statistical proof would be that in my country there is negative excess mortality every single month since early 2022 as opposed to highly vaxxed places.
The biggest one is that evolution is not a scientific theory because it can't be verified using the scientific method (observation, hypothesis, experiment, conclusion). It's a myth that originates in ancient greek and hindu philosophy that got rebooted in the 19c by a bunch of degenerate Royal Society freemasons who had to come up with a justification for the natural superiority of the British Empire and its race (Darwin: "We're just more evolved, brah. Now bend over."). The "theory" also did wonders in promoting naturalism and degrading the dignity of man who's created in God's image and instead promoted the idea we came from mindless bacteria and are just more evolved apes. It then got shoved into the public education system and pop culture by propagandists like T.H. Huxley, Freud, H.G. Wells and Rockefeller. And here we are now, when most people don't even question its veracity and gobble it up as "scientific" and "rational".
Based on what, your anecdotal observation? Not every vaccinated person is affected, that's true. Besides being still here doesn't mean their health is not fucked.
You can easily sell a few BTC on the exchange. Large quantities would take more time to get rid of but yes, it's convertible to fiat money.
Trump, because it's how the script goes.
Then the voters are retarded for not knowing what Labour stands for.
That's interesting. I take it for granted all major technologies in the past 50 years came from the agencies, mostly DARPA.
"There is neither Jew nor Gentile, neither slave nor free, nor is there male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus." - Galatians 3: 28
You shot yourself in the foot with this quote but that's what happens when you quote-mine and do free interpretations of Scripture. The point is that everyone who believes in Christ is part of His Church (aka the new Israel), they are the new "chosen people" who are not tied to ethnicity or anything else. Can you guess if jews practicing Judaism are in Christ or not?
Antisemitism is still wrong and has lead to many of the world's greatest evils, such as WW2 and the invention of racism.
I get it - you're trolling. A blatant misinterpretation of what Christ said and then this? You overdid it with the racism thing. You're less subtle than the ADL.
Retarded monkeyboy downvoting me for a grammar mistake.
So all events in the NT were made up, including Jesus's crucifixion even though Roman historians (Tacitus) confirm this? Not only would it be extremely hard to make it all up and tie all the knots, it would be impossible to present Jesus's genealogy (which Luke and Matthew did) because even the jews have lost their record by then.
And Him prophesizing the destruction of the Temple was also fanfic? Or that the whole world will worship the God of Abraham and venerate Mary? You realize Christ made prophecies too, right?
This is true degeneracy and nihilism. This are the fruits of liberalism.
You mean what religion God was? That's kind of self-refferential.
No, Christ was not practicing judaism as it is known today which is obvious considering jews reject Him and His Church (the new Israel) and go with the rabbinical oral Torah (Talmud) which is not God's revelation.
Biblical Judaism became Christianity as it was prophesized. Christ was the God of Abraham and all the prophets of the OT prophesized His coming. The jews who rejected their messiah broke the covenant, their own tradition and fell outside of the Church. They were no longer God's chosen people and that title went to everyone who followed Jesus. Their heretical sect became what is known today as rabbinical Judaism.
This popular quote should make much more sense now:
Indeed I will make those of the synagogue of Satan, who say they are Jews and are not, but lie—indeed I will make them come and worship before your feet, and to know that I have loved you. - Rev 3:9
And what makes those books more truthful and trustworthy than the Bible? "Because they were written before it" is not very good argument.
And what is your trustworthy source for all that hidden knowledge?
Because their outward projection is the opposite - normies rarely suspect the elite is engaged in secret societies, eyes wide shut parties and occult rituals. They assume they're just being rich and extravagant but nevertheless share the same general culture and worldview as the normies. Sure, pop culture is ramping up the exposure to that occult side recently but still it's perceived as just entertainment or art (like the Olympics ceremony, Hollywood and the music industry).
The problem of getting to a first replicator. Basically, evo proponents argue species evolve through sexual selection but there must have been a time when evolution happened without it. Think about it - they claim the ability to reproduce sexually evolved out of necessity but obviously those species did just fine millions of years without it.
The same goes for other beneficial complex systems that were formed by this blind process like snake venom, but the venomous snakes had to be able to thrive and reproduce before this "upgrade". Terms like "necessity" or "benefit" presuppose purpose and evaluation but evolution is a purely mechanistic process of inputs and outputs - there's no purpose or evaluation present, it is us who rationalize it post-factum. So how come multiple generations of snakes which reproduce successfully decide they need to develop venom sacs and hollow teeth? Such a process would take millions of generations and until it's complete, there wouldn't be any benefits from it and it would only cause useless energy expenditure. And yet every generation continually develops it for the unforeseeable future as if they're working according to plan. And they're developing it without "knowing" the final system would work properly and make them fitter at all, because there's no feedback happening.
But I prefer to take it at the philosophical worldview level - evo theory presupposes naturalism, determinism and materialism is the case (everything in existence being matter in motion, cause and effect and without purpose). But this process adheres to certain universal laws and regularities like the laws of physics and laws of logic which I would argue are immaterial concepts that are properties of a mind. Yet according to the evo materialist worldview minds are identical to brains which didn't exist for a very long time. Therefore laws of logic which govern the evo process didn't exist up until brains capable of conceptual thinking developed - this is a contradiction.