1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +2 / -1

NT was written by Paul mostly plus 4 apostles and John The Revelator. Mostly versus were removed from the first 4 books and 70% of the Revelations book was altered completely.

What's the source on this and why should we trust it? Maybe it's the case but you'd have to prove it somehow.

Paul must have been quite the writer because he managed to write all the gospels in different styles and from a different perspective. He even went as far as to give two different genealogies of Jesus in Mathew and in Luke. Then there's the problem with the other apostles who were with Christ, evangelized and established churches in different parts of the world as seen in Acts. Was Peter in on the conspiracy too?

The thing is Christianity doesn't rest on the Bible as protestants believe, but the other way around - the Bible is a product of the living apostolic tradition which is traced back to Jesus and to the prophets of the OT. That tradition is kept unchanged by the Church, lives to this day and will continue to live until the end of times as Christ Himself has promised. This means Christians were practicing their religion before the Bible was compiled and we even have surviving evidence attesting to that.

1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why didn't you answered the other part - who's at fault for jews sitting at the top of the world and enslaving it with debt and degeneracy? Who handed them the keys to the world kingdoms? Assume responsibility otherwise you're no better than the perpetual victims themselves.

2
SmithW1984 2 points ago +3 / -1

Christians believe the Bible is God's revelation to man. Not parts of it - the whole thing. The Biblical canon and especially the gospels are crucial to the Christian faith. What are the parts that were altered?

Your views on God are not Christian and are all based on ancient heresies long refuted by the Church fathers.

1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

Abortion is only banned in 13 out of 50 states. You're still losing. https://www.kff.org/womens-health-policy/dashboard/abortion-in-the-u-s-dashboard/

Whatever. It's a matter of principle - does abortion ought to be illegal or not?

Jews. The people who own Trump. c/TheZOGnald

Wrong. Jews were behind this, it was the people who let them do this. Are a few hundred wealthy jews more powerful than the people of the world and if they are now, who let things turn that way? No, people were weakened by their own sin and failed at their duty to protect their community and that's how the jews took over.

2
SmithW1984 2 points ago +3 / -1

Christians, listen up - the Bible is faked and your religion is a psy op.

Dude, that's pretty much what the devil would say. The question is why should anyone lend credence to any of this gnostic nonsense? How do you back up those bold claims and how do you know this is not yet another psy op? If you spent 10 years studying this, not only did you lose your time, but you've also lost your mind.

3
SmithW1984 3 points ago +3 / -0

Nothing will convince the truthers. It's a cult.

1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

Abortion in the USA is mostly the same as it was before. Still available. Also millions of White women are still eating the jew birth control pills.

Who's to blame for that? Trump? You can't expect cultural change to happen overnight. I know that making abortion illegal is a step in the right direction. There is no hope for the US because it has long been a country that idolizes "muh freedums" over universal truth and duties and that applies to both ends of the fake dialectical spectrum. It's a liberal society that serves Mammon (the free market, debt, greed and consumerism). It's inevitable that such a society will debase itself over time with a philosophy like that. Women will eat the jew birth control pills and procure abrotions because the free market meets the engineered demand created by indoctrinating them through culture and education into marxism and sexual liberation.

But who let things devolve into this? It's not single politician's fault - it's the fault of each and everyone of us who was weak, cowardly, deceived and spiritually deficient. What we see today is thanks to the failings of our forefathers. Let our children inherit a better world.

1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

just assembled the biggest pro-Zionist cabinet in history

That would be Bush or Obama.

1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

What about Roe vs Wade? There's no denying the world has gone to shit after WWII - it's all been a downturn since then due to liberalism and secular humanism. The Overton window shifts constantly. That's why every small victory against degeneracy counts. There's a shift in the culture war. Things look better than they did back in pre-coof times. Normies are starting to reject the liberal narratives.

1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

Here's a reddit post on that:

You should buy bitcoin from another person (peer-to-peer) if you want to buy bitcoin without KYC.

You can buy bitcoin directly from someone that owns bitcoin and that is willing to sell you some. You can buy bitcoin from someone that you meet at a Bitcoin meetup that is willing to sell you some bitcoin. You can buy bitcoin from a bitcoin seller that advertises on a classified ad website like Craigslist or Gumtree. Or you can use a peer-to-peer cryptocurrency exchange to easily find someone that is willing to sell you some bitcoin.

Bisq, RoboSats, Hodl Hodl, AgoraDesk, and LocalCoinSwap are some of the peer-to-peer cryptocurrency exchanges that make it easy to find someone to buy bitcoin from (peer-to-peer) without KYC.

Bisq is a decentralized and open source peer-to-peer cryptocurrency exchange that does not perform KYC. Bisq is decentralized, so you have to run the Bisq application on your computer in order to buy or sell bitcoin on Bisq.

RoboSats is a peer-to-peer bitcoin exchange that does not perform KYC. RoboSats has Lightning Network integration so that you can deposit and withdraw bitcoin over the Lightning Network.

Hodl Hodl is a peer-to-peer cryptocurrency exchange that does not perform KYC. Hodl Hodl has Lightning Network integration. AgoraDesk is a peer-to-peer cryptocurrency exchange that does not perform KYC.

LocalCoinSwap is a peer-to-peer cryptocurrency exchange that does not perform KYC.

All five of these peer-to-peer cryptocurrency exchanges that I have listed do not require you to provide them any of your personal information in order to buy or sell bitcoin. Many of the bitcoin sellers on these peer-to-peer cryptocurrency exchanges do not request any of your personal information when you buy bitcoin from them. But some of the bitcoin sellers on these peer-to-peer cryptocurrency exchanges do request your name/ID when you buy bitcoin from them because of certain laws/regulations or to help prevent them from getting scammed by fraudsters paying them with stolen accounts.

Many bitcoin ATMs do not request your KYC info when you buy less than a certain $ amount of bitcoin at a time, but all bitcoin ATMs do have a camera in the front of the machine.

1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +2 / -1

At least learn how BTC's blockchain technology works if you're going to criticize it:

Blockchain does not store any of its information in a central location. Instead, the blockchain is copied and spread across a network of computers. Whenever a new block is added to the blockchain, every computer on the network updates its blockchain to reflect the change.

This means that in order to manipulate the blockchain you have to control every computer on the network. In CBDC, the blockchain will be stored at the central bank's server and every transaction will be logged in along with ID. BTC transactions are anonymous because the only information needed is a wallet hash. There is NO ID REQUIRED. You're barking at the wrong tree, boomer. This is not CBDC, it's pretty much the opposite.

2
SmithW1984 2 points ago +2 / -0

The only thing that is verified is the transaction between two wallets. It's anonymous if your BTC wallet is not somehow linked to your name. Guess what? You don't have to do that.

1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

As if owning cash fiat money is any different? You don't even own the banknotes themselves - only the value they represent. It's the same with BTC - you own the value stored in BTC which is in your digital wallet. The difference is BTC is not issued by the Fed.

1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

u/XxxRDTPRNxxX already explained it - it's anonymous, decentralized and most of all has limited supply which means no monetary policy to manipulate money value and cause inflation-deflation boom busts. The only thing in common between BTC and CBDC is that they both are encryption based digital money. Monopoly money is more like real USD - both of them being fake printed money with an unlimited supply - than BTC is to CBDC.

As for Satoshi Nakamoto, he probably doesn't exist and the blockchain technology comes from the same place as all other groundbreaking tech comes from - DARPA and the military agencies. Just like any tech, it's just a tool that can be used for good or for evil. In this case BTC is the good and CBDC is the evil, and yes this is what they're shooting for and they probably use BTC as a stepping stone. That still doesn't make BTC bad though. It's the same as with the internet.

1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well put. I'm tired of "right-leaning" normies who may have red some Ayn Rand ((real name is Rosenbaum)) pretending that we live in some meritocratic capitalistic society where you just have to invent a better moustrap to get to the top of the chain. The whole market thing is as much of a scam as the fake monopoly money it's running on. TPTB have their hands on both supply and demand, and on capital and monetary policy.

1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

I can hear them seething. I was stupid enough to wait until BTC got to 55K. It's never too late to admit you were a fool and invest into the future of decentralized limited supply money and the only viable alternative to CBDC.

1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

I was a 90's kid and I remember my parents buying into the margarine craze. They still got a grill like that and think pork and beef consumption can lead to heart disease and I'm from an Eastern bloc country. Isn't it funny how the propaganda transcends all borders and cultures? It's almost as if that's the main feature of the global free market. Media and products are what's driving change in culture and behavior. Whoever controls the markets controls everything. This is where libertarian and ancap brains melt.

1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

Exactly. Back in the day McDonald fries were fried in tallow. That makes all the difference between junk food and a healthy snack. Boomers who remember say they tasted much better too. WWII shortages and development of the chemical industry were the reasons why seed and vegetable oils took over animal fats which have always been the staple fat source prior to the 20th century.

Animal fats were always superior and only brainwashed normies could think otherwise. Imagine the level of delusion someone has to be in to believe margarine is better for your health than butter because some Tavistock affiliated institute told them so in a magazine. That's what happens when people are not grounded in tradition and history.

1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

The goal of anti-sugar propaganda among alt communities, is to lower glucose consumption. They already did that with average customer, but there still noticeable amount of people that still get enough glucose for normal brain activity.

Yeah, they did a poor job of it then. High fructose corn syrup is 50% glucose. People eat carbs that get metabolized to glucose and drink sugar in excess. There's little difference between eating doughy foods and eating plain sugar because starch gets metabolized by the enzymes of your saliva almost instantaneously. So the last thing you should worry about is people not getting enough glucose.

If you're going to advocate for any kind of sugar it should be honey or fruit derived sugar which is fructose - this is the sugar our ancestors ate and they did it in moderation. Refined sugar is a industrial era invention.

The goal of anti-sugar propaganda among alt communities, is to lower glucose consumption. They already did that with average customer, but there still noticeable amount of people that still get enough glucose for normal brain activity.

It's not real competition. Do you realize the same corporations run both industries so that they can't loose? It's the same with the "anti-tabbacco propaganda" or the "green energy propaganda" ran by the very corporations that provide the "healthy" alternative. I thought this method of market control is well understood by people here since everyone knows how fake and gay political rivalries are and that Blackrock and Vanguard have majority shares in every industry.

Not to mention the whole "they don't want you eating sugar" makes no sense and you have to drum up ridiculous narratives about how lack of carbs makes weak and your brain not working properly. This is just dietary ignorance because fats and proteins get metabolized into a source of energy and can fully substitute carbs (not the other way around). If your theory were true, people on keto diets would be in a really rough state and borderline retarded and the opposite is observed.

Just write "microplastics is harmful" in google and you will get tons of articles of how microplastics a severe threat to humanity. Change that to "vaccines is harmful" and you will not find any relevant article, in the best case you will find something about "minor side effects".

So because they spin false narratives about vaccines then everything must be false? That's a non sequitur and the red-pilled rookie fallacy - "everything is fake, dude, it's all lies upon lies" (not calling you one btw). Try that with anything you truly believe to be harmful like excessive drinking or smoking. Well the "experts" on google say it's harmful so what now?

The thing they do is they will spin plastics as a climate change and environmental hazard first ("Guys, it's hurting mommy Erf and the polar bears") and the harm it causes to humans, especially in terms of fertility, goes in the background. This is also a common propaganda technique.

PS: Here's the truth about the fat wars and the war on meat and animal products in general: https://x.com/fightwithmemes/status/1868183961714770368/photo/1

And talking about real scams and propaganda, who could forget the infamous food pyramid: https://wearechief.com/blogs/articles/the-corrupt-history-of-the-food-pyramid?srsltid=AfmBOooU7uQu0ukmIp34766wedWc0yXDs-embQCad-IJHpBURthRv_Oy How can you still claim they want to reduce carbs in the diet when they created that unscientific monstrosity and brainwashed people into thinking this is healthy in any way.

1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's not random and it has a few dozen pages of sources and references other serious authors in the field like prof. Quigley and prof Sutton. This is legitimate geopolitical research. What's your standard for trustworthiness? Where do you get your knowledge on geopolitics and history from? Wikipedia and tiktok videos?

Just say you don't know shit and want to remain that way. I know full well there's nothing I can throw at you that will make any difference. You're only going to shit on it because you're a fucking shill who's not arguing in good faith.

1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think the plan has stages and we're going through one right now. The first stage was to prepare the masses through indoctrination and to uproot them from their ancestor's traditions, beliefs and cultural heritage. This was achieved mostly through technology, free-trade, consoomerism, mind-altering drugs, mind control and the advent of social engineering.

In 2020 humanity was deemed ready for the next stage where the world is held hostage to a perpetual state of crisis, there are shortages and chaos in society and people are more susceptible to accept change through fear and brute force.

The last stage will probably be a major disaster that will overshadow anything before it (like WWIII) and will fully reset the paradigm wiping out all the history before it - basically how Brave New World came to be in Huxley's non-fictional novel.

2
SmithW1984 2 points ago +2 / -0

What's the point of adding this heating operation, say, for sunflower oil?

The whole process yields more oil from the seeds and is faster than cold pressing.

It's not seed oils, it is making something else from them with that processing is harmful.

Correct. I'm not sure about the rest, but cold pressed sunflower oil (aka шарлан) is healthy. Olive oil is always cold pressed. Both are great. The reason seed oils get thrashed is because most of the time the highly processed is the one that dominates the market. One has too seek out cold pressed oil specifically and pay extra for it and 99% don't do that.

Yes, like that shit with anti-sugar propaganda and replacing it with fructose or sweeteners. Sugar is most effective source of fuel for human brain, and someone want keep humanity dumb.

It's the other way around. Too much sugar spikes insulin, promotes systematic inflammation and makes people dumb through insulin resistency which is accompanied with brain fog. People in the modern world eat tons more sugar than before and get most of their calories from simple carbs. Our body is not equipped for that and we get sick.

How could you even think there's anti-sugar propaganda when all the junk food made by the megacorporations is mostly sugar? The last time I checked people running the propaganda were the people at the top of the chain who control the markets.

Teflon AKA PTFE is one of the most inert substances in the world. Even fluoridic acid can't do anything with teflon. So teflon is the most harmless thing that could get into our body. :) I would be more concerned about food itself than about possible swallowing of tiny teflon chip.

That's exactly what happens - the coating flakes little by little and you ingest it. And because it's inert it doesn't get metabolized in the body and accumulates like all other plastics.

Modern plastics we have around is much more durable and most are unbelievably inert like PTFE, PP, PE, PETG and other. Modern ABS and PS also much better than polystirol from few decades earlier. Recall that old polystirol cases for computers and home appliances - they become yellow and turn brittle in few years sometime. Now ABS casings will stay like new for decades.

Single use plastic containers and coatings (like the coatings of food boxes, cans, cartons and coffee cups) are not made of high-grade plastics. It gets worse when they are in contact with hot and oily food or drink (never microwave plastic). BPA is still ubiquitous in plastic bottles, container coatings and cash slips which use thermal paper. It's also found in hygiene and cosmetic products. Which brings me to the next point - there are other ways one accumulates toxic compounds beside ingestion including skin contact and breathing.

BPA and phthalates fuck with your endocrine system and leads to infertility. This is where I put my tin foil hat on and say they knew plastics do that and started pushing them from the 60s onward as part of the depop agenda.

So, if microplastics is really a problem, we would see much higher casualities from it in the past, than now.

As mentioned, plastic use ramped up since the 60s but it wasn't ubiqtious until the 80s and 90s (https://journals.openedition.org/factsreports/docannexe/image/5071/img-2-small580.png). This means the first generation that suffer consequences are the millennials. Millennials' fertility is abysmal and it's not just the anti-natal propaganda but legitimate physiological problems.

Now I'm not saying it's just plastics and seed oils to blame for that, but they are a part of the toxic environment this generation (and the ones after it) have been raised in. It's a systematic attack - seed oils, soy, vaccines, lack of exercise, stress, nutrient deficient diet, too much carbs and sugars, toxic chemicals and plastics in the air, soil and water, EMR, etc. No one can fully escape it but you can do as much as it's in your power.

I think all that FUD pushed about sugar, microplastic, seed oils and other stuff that was perfectly fine not long ago is a cover for some really evil shit, like things that inserted/produced in our food supply, say during that deep food processing you mentioned earlier.

It was never fine as I pointed out. Your ancestors didn't eat that shit or handled plastics for thousands of years. No one was exposed to this even 100 years ago. This is an experiment and we're living it. I write this because I think you're reasonable and aware of many things and it may get you to research the topic more thoroughly.

2
SmithW1984 2 points ago +2 / -0

What does this "seed oil" means? Sunflower and olive oil used for millenia in different cuisines, and nobody ever accounted it as harmful.

No, what our ancestors used was cold-pressed sunflower and olive oil but mostly animal fat since you're not greek. What is now being sold as food grade oil is processed under heat which degrades it and it was practically used just for oiling up machines 100 years ago. Canola is especially egregious since it's a gene modified rapeseed oil, which is naturally toxic for consumption. The only contender for worst choice of fat would be syoybean oil and margarine.

Where this modern narrative about "seed oils" come from?

You got it backwards - the false narrative is that seed oils are harmless. The truth is they are highly processed, unnatural, unsuitable for human consumption and promoters of chronic inflammation in the body (due to high Omega 6 content) leading to various diseases.

You should really dig deeper in this. Food and diet is one of the biggest psy ops of our modern world. Pretty much everything sold in the supermarkets, including the produce and meat, is fake and gray now.

because of all that modern frying pan coatings

There's a whole another rabbit hole about what those coatings are made of and the bio-accumulation of plastics like teflon in the organs (yes, in your balls too).

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›