The goal of anti-sugar propaganda among alt communities, is to lower glucose consumption. They already did that with average customer, but there still noticeable amount of people that still get enough glucose for normal brain activity.

Yeah, they did a poor job of it then. High fructose corn syrup is 50% glucose. People eat carbs that get metabolized to glucose and drink sugar in excess. There's little difference between eating doughy foods and eating plain sugar because starch gets metabolized by the enzymes of your saliva almost instantaneously. So the last thing you should worry about is people not getting enough glucose.

If you're going to advocate for any kind of sugar it should be honey or fruit derived sugar which is fructose - this is the sugar our ancestors ate and they did it in moderation. Refined sugar is a industrial era invention.

The goal of anti-sugar propaganda among alt communities, is to lower glucose consumption. They already did that with average customer, but there still noticeable amount of people that still get enough glucose for normal brain activity.

It's not real competition. Do you realize the same corporations run both industries so that they can't loose? It's the same with the "anti-tabbacco propaganda" or the "green energy propaganda" ran by the very corporations that provide the "healthy" alternative. I thought this method of market control is well understood by people here since everyone knows how fake and gay political rivalries are and that Blackrock and Vanguard have majority shares in every industry.

Not to mention the whole "they don't want you eating sugar" makes no sense and you have to drum up ridiculous narratives about how lack of carbs makes weak and your brain not working properly. This is just dietary ignorance because fats and proteins get metabolized into a source of energy and can fully substitute carbs (not the other way around). If your theory were true, people on keto diets would be in a really rough state and borderline retarded and the opposite is observed.

Just write "microplastics is harmful" in google and you will get tons of articles of how microplastics a severe threat to humanity. Change that to "vaccines is harmful" and you will not find any relevant article, in the best case you will find something about "minor side effects".

So because they spin false narratives about vaccines then everything must be false? That's a non sequitur and the red-pilled rookie fallacy - "everything is fake, dude, it's all lies upon lies" (not calling you one btw). Try that with anything you truly believe to be harmful like excessive drinking or smoking. Well the "experts" on google say it's harmful so what now?

The thing they do is they will spin plastics as a climate change and environmental hazard first ("Guys, it's hurting mommy Erf and the polar bears") and the harm it causes to humans, especially in terms of fertility, goes in the background. This is also a common propaganda technique.

PS: Here's the truth about the fat wars and the war on meat and animal products in general: https://x.com/fightwithmemes/status/1868183961714770368/photo/1

And talking about real scams and propaganda, who could forget the infamous food pyramid: https://wearechief.com/blogs/articles/the-corrupt-history-of-the-food-pyramid?srsltid=AfmBOooU7uQu0ukmIp34766wedWc0yXDs-embQCad-IJHpBURthRv_Oy How can you still claim they want to reduce carbs in the diet when they created that unscientific monstrosity and brainwashed people into thinking this is healthy in any way.