Said the guy who posts antichristian memes. Total lunacy.
The supposed make up looks weird. It only makes the hand look worse and discolored, that's why I said it looks like vitiligo (which it does). I don't get what's funny.
Yes, I meant the bruise.
False dialectic. She's right even if not for the right reason - no sane person should approve of Mr Warp Speed's martial law. They created this chaos to deploy their solution.
In clown world npc libtards are actually taking the correct side while "the right" is completely gone fishing.
Looks like vitiligo. Either that or Satan marking his people.
Beer is extremely harmful to men and testosterone. Marketing a beverage that tanks your T, giving you bitch tits and a gut as a "manly" drink is the pinnacle of inversion. Jews outdid themselves.
He is, even if non-denominational. Some of them are like the muslims and believe depicting God is idolatry. It's a free-for-all all-you-can-eat buffet with them and Scripture.
Luther was big on bashing them. Wdym??
He was influenced by the Talmud, even if not as outright jewed up as Zwingli and Calvin. The whole idea of everyone making their own biblical interpretation and polemicizing against the traditional interpretation which is kept unchanged within the Church is talmudic.
Once you understand this you will understand who stood behind the Reformation and why the main cities it originated from had a very strong jewish presence (Geneva, Prague, Zurich).
iconoclasm bad
Because it runs contrary to the Christian tradition which affirms icons as story telling devices and representation of angles, saints and of God. Iconoclasm is the innovation, not the other way around.
How so? Is idolizing men and dead people any better?
Strawman. We don't idolize or worship the saints, we venerate them. Protestants tend to think of the Bible as God-sent as if it were not a product of the tradition set up by Christ and compiled by the Church fathers you go against.
If a catholic family member dies can you ask them for 400 gorillion things too?
You can ask him for intercession if he were recognized as a saint, yes.
The Church refers to THE WHOLE Body of Christ. ALL
It is the body of Christ but just like His body, it exists historically and physically in our world, it's not just an abstraction. At the last supper, Christ said one has to eat His flesh and drink His blood, to be in communion with His living body, to gain eternal life.
Saved people are a part of the Church.
How do you know who is saved? It's the other way around - those within the Church, which is the Ark of salvation and God's Kingdom on Earth, are saved. The rest drown with the flood.
By the Biblical definition, most self proclaimed catholics are ironically and sadly not part of the Church.
They are not, because Rome seceded from the Orthodox Catholic Church in 1054.
What one is most consistent with the rest of the Bible? Whatever evidence most supports an interpretation? That interpretation is likelist to be true. Humans are irrational and silly and blinded by sin rather than logical so ofc they won't know this.
Every text is subject to interpretation. Interpretation is not "evidence based", it is context dependent. You can use reason and consistently reach to the wrong conclusions if your premises are wrong. This is why protestantism is not a wholistic tradition but a multiplicity of thousands of different takes on just about any verse in the Bible (including the Bible canon itself, which they take for granted yet it is not self-evident which books and translations are authoritative).
Like purgatory?
Correct. Purgatory is Vatican's fiction (although I enjoyed Dante).
Remember "the first shall be last and the last shall be first"?
This is taken out of context obviously.
Note: Also, very VERY fitting that someone defending catholicism also defends censorship. Pea one, Pea two, meet Pod.
I'm Orthodox but it's the same to you I suppose. I'm against suppression of truth. What I'm not against is suppression and eradication of lies and I believe this is consistent with the Christian faith. The difference between truth and lie is life and death, between God and Satan.
God doesn't tolerate untruth and neither should you. If that means burning books and jailing authors of dangerous deceptions, so be it. I stand by my conviction.
How do you know that God is not personal?
Agreed. Christianity is the religion given to us by Christ who is God though.
I'm sure there's a good explanation. He was too preoccupied with dumping on Christianity that he forgot about it.
Prots and their iconoclasm. Really nothing new under the sun.
You idolize a book that was given to you by the Church, its prophets and apostles. Worse - you idolize your own interpretation of scripture following the man-made tradition of talmudic puppets Luther and Calvin. It is pride that has led you to spiritual delusion (prelest).
I'm pretty sure he's not. Assuming everyone who knows about the plan is one of them is not accurate. There are many ways to get that information and it's not as secret as people think because they disclose their plans or get exposed. The Church has been onto them for thousands of years. The tower of Babel, Nephilim, Lucifer and demons, the false jews, the Mark of the Beast, the antichrist - it's all in the Bible.
You should read C.S. Lewis's That Hideous Strength if you haven't. It's describes a demon controlled anti-human technocratic elite that takes over the Earth. Both Lewis and Tolkien knew what we're up against and they knew the people personally.
I know, it sounds like something a gender studies major would say. His ancestors were toppling the patriarchy I guess.
God has nothing to do with Karma. Pajeets believe Karma to be impersonal force of nature that somehow has moral faculty to judge who led a righteous life, which is stupid of course because who decides what's moral in that mess of a religion? They don't have a notion of individual dignity and value of human life and people are treated like cattle basically, because they'll get to reincarnate either way.
If the Christian God is real (and I believe He is), all of the satanic cabal are going to hell in the afterlife and not getting reincarnated to worms on their karmic journey (but maybe depop is actually a good thing according to Karma and they may get promoted - Sadhguru seems to believe that).
Why would they believe in Karma? Where did you get that from?
From all I came to know about them through research, they're illuminists, freemasons, kabbalists and luciferians.
The reason they shut down the plandemic was because people stood against them and it wasn't profitable for them to persist at the time. Nothing to do with karma which only pajeets and new age tavistock and mk ultra victims believe in.
Sure you do. What's the source that reveals the true god?
They use other means for that, mostly pop culture and media. They don't care for consent, they just want people primed and on board with their agenda so that they don't cause problems.
Atheists can't help but bring religion into everything.
Face it: in the cosmic consciousness soup, humans are on the level of a flatworm. There are "some things" out there more powerful, longer lived, more capable than we can even try to understand.
Right because belief in the Christian God is stupid, but belief in the "cosmic consciousness soup" is totally not batshit crazy, degenerate and retarded new age drivel, brought to you by freemasons and jews.
They do this shit with highly processed human food. This is bad but not even in the same category.
Yeah, they don't do it like the used to in the 12c though. Now they use pop culture and movies to disclose their agenda and initiate the peasants. Mostly because nobody reads and modern entertainment captures the senses better.
That's an actor dude. No banker would recite a poem about how they control the world, this is ridiculous.
Sure, because fabian socialist and transhumanist H.G. Wells is to be trusted.
Any good source to learn about Marc Dutroux's case?