Answer ANY of my (or our) qestions, rebut ANY of my rebuttals, cite ANY sources of his claims, defend ANY of his assertions when questioned. Basically he is like a DEMOCRAT: Make claims and double down instead of supporting.
If this guy can question God's Word, I can certainly question his STRANGE TEACHINGS.
Address the facts, LBF. Do your ideas stand a chance???
It's a meta-ethical and meta-epistemological question. I can give an account from my worldview. I asked you for how you justify it in yours?
Does universal objective truth exist?
How does it exist (in what way/mode)?
Is it knowable by man's limited mind and to what extent?
How does one come to that knowledge and how can one verify it's not a delusion of the mind?
Why ought we choose truth over falsehood?
A gnostic of your caliber should be able to answer those questions easily.
You ignore the answer by asking the question. This is the exact point to Pilot washing his hands and asking 'What is Truth?' The story has pilot asking the Nazirite (gnostic )the moot question. This story shows how the 'orthodox' has no answers, only questions, and doesn't really believe such things exist.
It would take a lifetime to answer those question and then the knowledge isn't transferable is it? A person would have to do the hard work in many subjects which I've done both academically and independently.
You refused to actually visit the material presented and instead attempt to narrate by ignorance. Now you deflect by asking 'What is Truth'? as you wash your hands of 'gnosis'.
I'd rather not give an account from 'my' worldview, that's the problem with the world to begin with. There are knowers and there are believers who the gnostics called 'seekers after smooth things.' Prove them wrong.
Okay then, you are wrong. Objectively wrong. Don't ask me why because questions are the devil!
He wants to know how you justify your beliefs. He is getting at how you support your ideas.
Sin is the problem.