Normies don't care about truth. They've been instructed that objective truth, even if it exists, can't be known and all we have is subjective takes on it. The kabbalistic kike Einstein was instrumental to this with "his" theory of relativity which conceived of everything as being relative to everything else with no absolute position to ground them. Thus everything became a matter of perspective. Ironically it rehabilitated the heliocentric model as equally valid to the geocentric one which sure rubs the "muh science and muh progress" crowd wrong.
It's implications spill outside of science and physics. It's a philosophical paradigm. Einstein did to physics what Kant (foremost enlightenment/freemasonic thinker) did to philosophy.
Kant posited that reality is constructed by each individual mind, which interprets it via universal categories (which he grants himself because convenience I guess), and there is no way of knowing what the objective truth (the thing in itself) is.
Einstein's relativity says that there is no privileged vantage point from which space and time are "really" measured. Instead, every point (or observer) can set up coordinates, and the laws of physics will hold consistently in that frame.
Christian cosmology and Logocentrism. God as the absolute uncreated being behind everything that exists, who grounds reality, regularity in nature and abstract universals.
Normies don't care about truth. They've been instructed that objective truth, even if it exists, can't be known and all we have is subjective takes on it. The kabbalistic kike Einstein was instrumental to this with "his" theory of relativity which conceived of everything as being relative to everything else with no absolute position to ground them. Thus everything became a matter of perspective. Ironically it rehabilitated the heliocentric model as equally valid to the geocentric one which sure rubs the "muh science and muh progress" crowd wrong.
The theory of relativity only applies to a narrow range of concepts. Why do you strawman the theory?
https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fimage.slidesharecdn.com%2Frelativity-240525070508-b1a9f83d%2F85%2FEinstein-s-Theory-of-relativity-Special-Relativity-3-638.jpg&f=1&ipt=7f9263c37fc98b56267aaa701faf1b116091cd29672e0ab58dff6834a5d07265
It is a science concept. Not something claiming "theres no objective truth".
It's implications spill outside of science and physics. It's a philosophical paradigm. Einstein did to physics what Kant (foremost enlightenment/freemasonic thinker) did to philosophy.
Kant posited that reality is constructed by each individual mind, which interprets it via universal categories (which he grants himself because convenience I guess), and there is no way of knowing what the objective truth (the thing in itself) is.
Einstein's relativity says that there is no privileged vantage point from which space and time are "really" measured. Instead, every point (or observer) can set up coordinates, and the laws of physics will hold consistently in that frame.
If "T.o.R.(elativity)" is false, is there a better theory? If so, what is the theory called?
Christian cosmology and Logocentrism. God as the absolute uncreated being behind everything that exists, who grounds reality, regularity in nature and abstract universals.