Answer ANY of my (or our) qestions, rebut ANY of my rebuttals, cite ANY sources of his claims, defend ANY of his assertions when questioned. Basically he is like a DEMOCRAT: Make claims and double down instead of supporting.
If this guy can question God's Word, I can certainly question his STRANGE TEACHINGS.
Address the facts, LBF. Do your ideas stand a chance???
Great. How do you verify your interpretation is correct is what I'm asking? What grounds truth in your worldview? You?
I don't possess an interpretation. Why ask for my verification of my interpretation anyway? It isn't about me. So how does "I took a look" verify that gnosis is '..a..mess..'? That's your interpretation...but of what?
Interpretation insinuates that you 'know' what an original statement says, and you fail that. You waste the time of, and insult anyone who has done the work. You couldn't defeat whats-his-name in verbal battle, as opposed to discussion, so you call him out, hoping for a rescue from the posse.
There is already another attempt by the cabal to create yet another misguided 'crusade' as distraction from the great awakening. (See Hollywood stars suddenly gaining 'religion') That awakening includes the understanding of who the Babylonian Brotherhood was and is, how they came to the seats of power...(those you trust the most) .and how they are finally to be taken out. But that's only the beginning. Eliminating the Liars and their lies.
One truth....many beliefs.
There is indeed a rule here about banning people who post 'callouts' rather than deal with the issue yourself. You failed to do the work, you don't fool anyone but yourself with that. You should know that the Q team, our literal material savior is largely gnostic as the identifying by the letter Q and number 17 as Divine Inspiration proves. You see, this is a Taking Back of that which was stolen and corrupted. Seeing the eternal with new eyes. The recruitment to Q Team required knowledge of the occult and its organizations ( ie: those who run the churches from the top) in order to know the enemy and his methods. The enemy's method is to take a grain of truth (gnosis) and twist the Hell out of it. Each book of the old testament is testament to this occurring again and again. How to escape. I point at the sun and you look at my finger. I pointed to Things to gno but you ignored. What is one who ignores? Do the work.
You can't do any work or come to any true knowledge about those things if you start from a faulty worldview built on false and unjustified assumptions.
Why would I listen or read what someone has to say about the world, reality or God, if they can't give an account of metaphysical concepts that they presuppose like knowledge, truth, meaning, logic, etc.
If someone argues that Christianity is sun worship I will ask them to justify the claim and most importantly - ask how did they came to know that. If I say that Christianity is true you would ask me the same thing, right? So why would I grant you the opposite claim? You reasserting your position doesn't make it any more convincing or justified. Imagine me saying "Christianity is real because the Bible says so". Would you accept that?
'If you start from a faulty worldview..."
Correct. So all should get to correcting the lies given by study of the original truths that were twisted.
"If someone argues that Christianity is sun worship''.....they'd get into a strawman argument as is usually the case with literalist interpretation.
One can't debate without knowing the opposite viewpoint and can't judge what is unknown. One knows. Another believes.
As for all answers to all questions: There is only One that can be known. MANY are believed.
If one can't work difficult calculus equations, then it doesn't exist as concept, right? And is useless. Whatever it might be that's being discussed. I can't think it, or refuse to look, so it doesn't exist and work can't be done by it, right? Accuracy and clarity, aka understanding being the goal, with knowledge of how to get there.
If its metaphysics you need, then study The Tao of Physics that show a connection to theology. You'll be disappointed that it doesn't match your current take, so I wouldn't bother - If I were you.
You project your own weakness. The links I provided detail the metaphysics as well as their SOURCE. You provide dogma and your words are a tangled mess lacking any substance. You didn't read, think and learn, but judge anyway, and that is what caused the gnostic to call the willfully ignorant 'The Profane' and 'seekers after smooth things'. Put on the big boy pants and do the work.
Alright, let's cut to the chase: Why ought we value truth and knowledge at all?
The source of your bible is Q.