Charlie Kirk, possible Mossad/CIA assassination?
(twitter.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (27)
sorted by:
The jews who crucified Jesus, making them antichrists and servants of Satan, were most certainly of the tribes and related to the pharisee Saul, even if most of today's jews have a different origin. Rabbinical judaism originated from the pharisaical tradition after the Temple.
They and their followers (be it khazars or other gentiles) are the true synagogue of Satan regardless of their bloodline just like Christians are the true seed of Abraham and God's chosen people regardless of them being jews or not. This is the core of the Christian teaching - your heart and free choice, and not your blood or circumstances, either saves or condemns you.
"Quite a claim" is not an argument. Jesus rising from the death is quite a claim too. Paul was received into the Church and met with Peter. Cutting him off from the rest of the NT (which is divinely inspired in its entirety) is arbitrary. If you're skeptical of his letters why not be skeptical about everything else?
I didn't know there's a Top 10 list in the NT. Sounds very authoritative.
It doesn't matter. It is possible for a jew, even a pharisee who has prosecuted and killed Christians and hated Christ, to repent and become a saint and pillar of His Church. This proves my point and no further examples are required. I believe God made the same point when He revealed Himself to Paul and converted him (a point Jesus also made on the cross in Luke 23:43).
Agreed on that.