It seems to me they apply soft eugenics/dysgenics through economy, culture and education. That's a common obsession the Royal Society elite has - Bertrand Russel writes about it in the Effects of science on society and The Scientific Outlook, Julian Huxley also fawns over eugenics and transhumanism. Jonas Salk (Survival of the wisest) and Charles Galton Darwin (The next million years) get into the benefits of eugenics too. I've done research on globalist NWO writings by the technocratic elite.
They argue the scientific elite (the new priest class) should take evolution in their own hands and steer humanity towards a better future (better for them of course).
This all ties in with the Georgia Guidestones, Kissinger report and the Club of Rome malthusian depop agenda.
People tend to dismiss the Day tapes because they lack knowledge of those books and reports. It's all out in the open - H.G. Wells wrote a books called The New World Order and The Open Conspiracy: Blueprints for a World Revolution almost a 100 years ago. Not too subtle.
Yes, I checked the book. There's nothing about Hitler in those pages.
You mean if your body stops producing sufficient insulin. That's when blood sugar spikes and you get diabetes.
Agreed. But mass killing has never been an issue for any totalitarian regime. Once they're in power nothing is stopping them. It's not a matter of technology or logistics - you just need bullets. That's why the whole Holocaust narrative makes zero sense.
It's an artefact from studio lightning. Everyone knows you need sunglasses to really see them.
Those are rookie numbers compared to the USSR and China. But at least the weren't Christian nationalists, am I right?
Marcionism detected (along with some weird 20th century new age/theosophy babbling).
Aliens are fake and gray.
No, his memoirs: https://archive.org/details/eyeswideopenmemo0000raph/page/156/mode/2up
It's not there either - the quote is fake and gay. Always check your sources guys.
I meant faith in epistemological sense, not religious. Atheists base their worldview on faith also. The question is how is each worldview grounded and how are beliefs justified in that worldview.
I know you're not an atheist since you mentioned God. My guess was you're gnostic, most likely coming from a protestant background judging by your outlook on organized religion. You have a idiosyncratic system centered around pantheism/monism (God is all of us) and gnosticism which is very prevalent in conspiracy circles. Anyways, I'm not going to debate you on religion here. I'd rather concentrate on our common ground which is conspiracy and geopolitics.
Ok, just a little pin prick there'll be no more aaaahhh, but you may feel a little sick
Christ and His Church is the ultimate truth. I've been a hardcore atheist for the better part of my life and know both sides of the argument inside and out. I can get into a philosophical discussion about truth and knowledge and demonstrate to you all knowledge is faith based. There are no self-evident truths or brute facts that are not interpreted through a worldview and that exist absent of a mind.
For the same reason they pushed the food pyramid or cereals as a healthy breakfast. They want you eating goy slob that will make you dumb, sterile, dependent and ultimately - dead.
Here's Dr. Day (Planned Parenthood pediatrician) talking about it being part of the NWO plan back in 1969 conference.
He then went on to talk about nutrition and exercise, sort of in the same framework. People would have to eat right and exercise right to live as long as before. Most won't.
In connection with nutrition, there was no specific statement that I can recall regarding particular nutrients that would be either inadequate or in excess. In retrospect, I tend to think he meant high salt diets and high fat diets would predispose [people] toward high blood pressure and premature arteriosclerotic heart disease. And that if people who were too dumb or too lazy to exercise as they should then their dietary fats [would] go up and predispose [them] to disease. And he said something [to the effect that] dietary information, [information] about proper diet, would be widely available, but that most people – particularly stupid people, who had no right to continue living anyway – would ignore the advice and just go on and eat whatever was convenient and tasted good.
There were some other unpleasant things said about food. I just can't recall what they were. But I do remember [thinking] about wanting to plant a garden in the backyard to get around whatever these contaminated foods would be. I regret I don't remember the details ... the rest of this ... about hazardous nutrition.
Here are the full tapes: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FyACtDFbFu8
I think you misunderstood me. I meant getting blackpilled only without the positive side (like Christianity) leads to nihilism. If one is well grounded in the ultimate truth and the universal good which is God, they can take all the blackpills you throw at them.
Most likely yes, but at least they are not as fake and gay as the west.
Depends on the context. Black pills only turn one nihilistic. I'm a Christian and we acknowledge the world is fallen. We've been taught to be in the world but not of it. Christianity gives one both the ultimate black and the ultimate white pill.
Btw who's Eric?
I agree. As I said no one in the cabal has any allegiance to any other group outside of it. Most of the prominent jews are not practicing or even cultural jews, and yet they manage to be vastly overrepresented in the most crucial industries and institutions.
The grift is real. This reads like a 40+ single mom looking for a betta cuck to "man up and step up" level of desperate. Zelensky and his CIA/WEF handlers are getting fucked by the Russians.
At least he died for what's right, right? Right??? Idiot left his family and went to fight a fake and gay Blackrock war on the other side of the globe, spreading that good 'ol American democracy. Yet once more I'm convinced lawyers have no critical thought.
Aaand it's gone.
Not the gotcha you think it is.
You're comparing a decentralized system (me, sharing info) with a centralized one (money issued by a central bank).
I can always revert to printing out pamphlets if the internet is heavily censored. We won't be able to revert back to cash once digital money is fully implemented. They are already getting rid of ATMs and closing branches in Australia because people "have adopted digital payments". They are like: "Trust me bro, it's just free market supply and demand and totally not a carefully planned and socially engineered process of digitalization and getting rid of cash."
Do you even know what his experiments are? Here are the postulates: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Koch%27s_Postulates.svg Do you see the second healthy mouse? That's called a control.
The hypothesis is that the suspected pathogen can be cultured and then inoculated on a healthy animal which will lead to the same pathology which according to him proves causation. The limitation of his method is that it can't prove infection happens in vivo and it also doesn't isolate the pathogen from the culture mixture before inoculation, meaning we can't be sure what is causing the observed effect - the suspected pathogen or something else in the sample tissue.
So yeah, Koch is not ideal but it would still be a huge improvement over what we have now in terms of virus isolation.
You either have no clue what you're talking about or you're trolling me. Just take the L and admit you have more research to do.
Lol, this is hilarious but at least you tried and finally gave some arguments. Mind you I didn't appeal to Koch's postulates since Koch pulled germ theory out of his ass and used the postulates to justify it. And Kochs postulates include a control group with sample from a healthy organism - you could have at least researched that (but I'm not surprised you didn't).
There are two claims made by people who support viral theory:
- viruses exist as separate RNA/DNA carrying entities that can live outside the cell (that's presupposed in contagion so any scientist saying "but viruses need host cells to exist" is a dishonest piece of shit or a mindless drone, uncapable of rigorous thought).
- viruses can enter the cell and kill it, as well as replicate using its mechanisms and resources, causing specific pathology we observe in all infected organisms
Your comparison fails on multiple accounts:
-
a fish can be observed as a separate living organism. The problem with viral particles is, they cannot be observed and appear only after the suspected tissue sample has been cultured in a complex cocktail of various organic and pharmaceutical compounds.
-
why would you kill the fish? You're not supposed to destroy the virus when culturing it. It's the opposite - you provide it with an environment where it can thrive.
-
Koch's postulates are not intended to prove existence of the infectious agent, but rather causation of pathology by the suspected agent. The existence of the agent is presupposed because he studied bacteria, which he could isolate and observe under a microscope.
I won't go on because your comparison is obviously not logically sound. I hope you're not serious with this shit because it's embarassing.
AI is retarded. Never forget it's made by humans who program their idiotic worldview and agenda into it. You're not communicated with an artificial intellect but with a human intellect who wrote an algorithm and fed it biased information.
AI is a psy op that's only possible in our retarded time, when people don't know anything about basic epistemology and think the mind is equal to the brain, i.e. deterministic materialism because the Science told them so.
Bill Cooper said the same thing about the NWO being blamed on a particular group like the jews, the masons, the illuminati, the marxists, the bankers, the jesuits etc. Yes, all of them play a role in the cabal but the top level inner circle people don't hold any allegiances except to the NWO, which is satanic at its core even if not stated explicitly.
Jews are obviously very influential though, but I don't think it's a specifically jewish agenda. They just happened to secure the control of money and debt early on and control of money grants you control of everything else.
No thanks. I'll stick to the Church our Lord Jesus Christ established and entrusted to His apostles by sending the Holy Spirit to reside over it at Pentecost.
I don't want to engage with new-agey bs but I have to ask - why is Christ cool and "the god of the OT" (who according to the Bible is also Christ but we'll let that one slide) is bad? Christ quoted the OT quite a bit and wouldn't shut up about being the same God from the OT along with His Father.