Here's my question - why does everyone claim Antartica is secretive? We've always been allowed to visit and roam freely...... Nothing stopping us except for the cold weather and difficult logistics, but it's never been off limits. Why do so many of us think it has been?
Yes - and HRC was named after Sir Edmund Hillary. Point still the same - why can't he get the county name correct? If he can't do that before pressing send on his twitter, I have many more doubts about his high tech team.
You can go anywhere you wish after you get dropped off. Many backpack/hike across the open land. My point is that it's never been off limits - which is CLEARLY NOT what I remember. History has changed again (the Mandela Effect)
He had me until the ballot drop in Lananshire county PA. I live in PA and there is no such county. Think if he had this cracker jack team assembled then he could at least have the the ballots dropped in a real PA county.
I believe we are only limited by our means of travel. Since there are no roads to drive on, you would need to either secure some form of ground or air transport. Many people go hiking and backpacking every year, and then post their travel photos. Pretty sure you can get dropped off and freely walk south until you freeze to death. South pole much much colder than north pole due to land being below freezing vs ocean which can’t get below 0c underneath the ice. South pole has never even reached 0c (at least since measurements have been recorded).
If you've known as many people as I have who've caught it - you would recognize it's a real virus (or something I can't see) that has unique symptoms that don't match the flu. A third of the people who work for me have had it, at this point I can listen to someone's early symptoms and have at least a 75% accuracy at calling whether it's covid or not. By the way - I've known many who've had it, and 100% of them are just fine.
Already saw your disinfo on being able to see for infinite amounts of distance through our water vapor atmosphere. Grow up man. If you are gonna argue with the flat earthers you will need to do much better. While I don't agree with them, they know their shit and will chew you up and spit you out with false proofs like this.
Not exactly true. If we lived in a vacuum you would be able to see these great distances. The fact that our atmosphere is full of stuff (oxygen, CO2, nitrogen, lots of water vapor, smog) makes visibility beyond X miles not possible. Sorry I don't know the X, but I've seen it before. And of course it varies based on local conditions for air clarity. That being said - I could believe in undisclosed land masses before I can believe in a flat earth.
Antarctica has never been offlimits for humans. Spend a few minutes online and book a trip!
To me this is a Mandela Effect. I clearly remember it being off limits, but now - it never has been off limits. Anyone can go whenever they want.
Point 7 not true anymore, and never was. To me, this is a Mandela Effect. Antarctica was closed off unless you had 'permission' to go. Now, anyone can go there for vacation, and they ALWAYS have been allowed to. There's a thriving cottage industry in Argentina taking people down during the summer. Any of us can head down there and hop a boat to Antarctica. To me - this is mindblowing. Not that we're allowed to go now, but that we've always been allowed to go there. It's never been closed.
What I find somewhat mindblowing is that we've always been allowed to visit Antarctica for vacation. To me, this is a clear Mandela Effect as it was always a no-go zone unless it was with 'permission'. Now, anyone can hop a boat down to Antarctica - and they ALWAYS have been allowed to do so. There's a pretty thriving cottage industry down in Argentina taking folks to Antarctica. And it's always been there....... Weird to me.
I went down this rabbit hole 20 years ago and came to the conclusion that some oil we pump is abiotic, but most of what we’ve been pumping is organic. Meaning it’s both a fossil fuel and naturally occurring (deep inside crust/mantle) hydrocarbon. The qualities and characteristics of the crude are different.
I qenuinely questioned it based on the sheer infowarfare. Early on I recognized we got punked by chinese leaked videos. It wasnt much of a leap that NY killed a bunch of people with unnecessary vents and sending sick into nursing homes (a good flu coupled with unnecessary venting will kill the elderly very efficiently). I dont think my questioning of a real novel virus was misplaced considering what I was witnessing. As time went on so did my knowledge and experience, we grow and change positions.
I would assume the oldest religion is atheism. My guess is prior to having religion (which is a manmade creation - not to mean it's not accurate or true) people had no religion of any kind. Just hunger that would be satisfied by eating and thirst that was quenched with water.
Why would it matter what the world's oldest religion is? I would assume the oldest religion is riddled with issues that were improved upon by subsequent religions. Kind of like the world's oldest 'fire starter' (stones and rocks) is no comparison to my bic lighter.
OK - since OP got 300k by simply subtracting the three year average of total deaths from 2020 total deaths - AND the excess death calculation from the CDC is 300k deaths - your point is?
Difference is OP's method can be validated by my 11 year old daughter vs excess death calculations which have a large amount of inputs that we can't easily get our hands on to properly calculate the expected deaths.
And in the end, you get the SAME answer!
I'm not sure you will find any 'consensus' here.
I can only offer my view.
The reaction to the virus does not match what honest efforts to control a virus, like this, would look like. The reaction is also way out of proportion to the lethality of the virus. So of course I assume there is an alternative goal from the controllers.
I'm sure there are folks here who don't think the virus is real. I was in that camp for quite some time questioning if the 'tests' were just throwing back positives based on any old coronavirus being present. Over time, through experience, I've learned that people who test positive for this virus, and are sick, have unique symptoms that don't match typical coronaviruses or flus. Namely the body aches being different than previously experienced, the loss of taste and smell (usually preceded by a bad taste), and a bit of extended lethargy comparative to past infections.
On the most part, the folks I know who've had it will say it wasn't a very big deal - they've had much more intense flus and coronaviruses in the past even if they didn't last quite as long as covid. That being said - I also know several people who have lost an elderly relative.
So in summary - I think the virus is real - I think the response is fake.
Wish I could give you two thumbs up! I did this same analysis back in August and again in November when folks were posting that deaths were similar to prior years. What they were doing was taking the full year of 2017-2018-2019 and comparing to the first 7 (or 10) months of 2020.
I pulled the same data you are using from the CDC site and saw that deaths were way up in a year to date comparison. No algorithms of excess vs non-excess, covid vs non-covid, just pure number of deaths year over year. Very stable 2017-2019, then we have this 300k uptick in 2020.
Why people keep posting that deaths are 'normal' in the US is beyond me. Most folks won't take the effort that you (or I) did and actually CHECK. It's not that hard. Took me about 30 minutes tops to find the data, format it appropriately, and compare.
You, OP, are a true researcher. Keep it up and you will get vaccinated against BS of many kinds being posted to drive various narratives.
You done good son. I enjoyed r/conspiracy for years.